The court rejected a rise in property value from ₹12 crore to ₹52.61 crore because litigation, encroachments and development burdens were ignored. A ₹2.03 crore deficit demand was quashed.

The petitioner said his name was removed from the electoral roll while his appeal was taken up without notice. The court asked the tribunal to restore and hear the appeal.

The court refused to stop an ongoing investigation into missing files, altered land records and allegedly illegal mutations at the Rajganj land office, directing the SIT to move quickly.

The candidate alleged that the OMR sheet emailed after the challenge window was not hers. The court held that she should have checked the sheets published on the NTA website in time.

Restoring a partition suit, the court held that undervaluation required the statutory inquiry the trial judge had skipped. It also ordered a receiver to collect rent and preserve the property.

The court kept an ex parte restraint on Facebook posts in place, finding no fair-comment or public-interest basis in a post it viewed as hearsay and designed to demean.

The father’s Thakur validity certificate remained operative despite a later fraud notice. The court ordered the daughter’s certificate within one week, subject to reopening if the father’s claim falls.

A student’s first examination counted even though she could not take Anatomy. Regulation 21 caps attempts at the First Professional MBBS level, not separately for each paper.

The FIR alleged that two applicants argued loudly on a street after drinking, but identified no obscene or disorderly conduct toward anyone else. The case was quashed on ₹10,000 costs.

Rama Agro Foods’ guarantee was invoked after the principal borrower defaulted. Finding debt and default above ₹1 crore, the tribunal imposed a moratorium and appointed an IRP.

The 25-year-old had spent five years and three months in custody. The court paired Article 21’s speedy-trial guarantee with a reformative approach to young undertrials.

The applicant had remained in custody in the 2007 case while the charge was yet to be framed. The court ordered release on a ₹25,000 bond with reporting and travel conditions.

A Special Court issued process four days after ED filed its complaint, without a pre-cognizance hearing. The order was quashed and the case restored to that stage.

The record credited the appointee with a PhD and technology expertise he did not possess; he had also taken part in shortlisting candidates.

The assessment grew from an initial ₹9.18 lakh allegation without a fresh notice, a disclosed calculation or independent reasons. Two connected employer petitions were allowed.

The Court cancelled bail granted to two accused in a fatal petrol-attack case, rejected another accused’s bail plea, but preserved the bail of a co-accused who was absent from the scene.

The Court upheld Rs.2 lakh compensation for stock destroyed in a factory fire after the insurer neither cross-examined the insured’s witness nor produced evidence supporting its policy defence.

The Court quashed the SC/ST Act prosecution against a school manager because the alleged incident occurred inside an enclosed room and no witness claimed to have heard a caste-based utterance. The IPC proceedings will continue.

The Court held that a gang chart prepared by police and administrative officers cannot supply the crime missing from the statute. It quashed two prosecutions but left proceedings under other penal laws untouched.

Electricity transmission is inherently dangerous, so compensation does not depend on proving fault. But recognised exceptions can still apply, and contested facts cannot be resolved through a High Court writ under Article 226, the Court held.

The court rejected a rise in property value from ₹12 crore to ₹52.61 crore because litigation, encroachments and development burdens were ignored. A ₹2.03 crore deficit demand was quashed.

The petitioner said his name was removed from the electoral roll while his appeal was taken up without notice. The court asked the tribunal to restore and hear the appeal.

The court refused to stop an ongoing investigation into missing files, altered land records and allegedly illegal mutations at the Rajganj land office, directing the SIT to move quickly.

The candidate alleged that the OMR sheet emailed after the challenge window was not hers. The court held that she should have checked the sheets published on the NTA website in time.

Restoring a partition suit, the court held that undervaluation required the statutory inquiry the trial judge had skipped. It also ordered a receiver to collect rent and preserve the property.

The court kept an ex parte restraint on Facebook posts in place, finding no fair-comment or public-interest basis in a post it viewed as hearsay and designed to demean.

The father’s Thakur validity certificate remained operative despite a later fraud notice. The court ordered the daughter’s certificate within one week, subject to reopening if the father’s claim falls.

A student’s first examination counted even though she could not take Anatomy. Regulation 21 caps attempts at the First Professional MBBS level, not separately for each paper.

The FIR alleged that two applicants argued loudly on a street after drinking, but identified no obscene or disorderly conduct toward anyone else. The case was quashed on ₹10,000 costs.

Rama Agro Foods’ guarantee was invoked after the principal borrower defaulted. Finding debt and default above ₹1 crore, the tribunal imposed a moratorium and appointed an IRP.

The 25-year-old had spent five years and three months in custody. The court paired Article 21’s speedy-trial guarantee with a reformative approach to young undertrials.

The applicant had remained in custody in the 2007 case while the charge was yet to be framed. The court ordered release on a ₹25,000 bond with reporting and travel conditions.

A Special Court issued process four days after ED filed its complaint, without a pre-cognizance hearing. The order was quashed and the case restored to that stage.

The record credited the appointee with a PhD and technology expertise he did not possess; he had also taken part in shortlisting candidates.

The assessment grew from an initial ₹9.18 lakh allegation without a fresh notice, a disclosed calculation or independent reasons. Two connected employer petitions were allowed.

The Court cancelled bail granted to two accused in a fatal petrol-attack case, rejected another accused’s bail plea, but preserved the bail of a co-accused who was absent from the scene.

The Court upheld Rs.2 lakh compensation for stock destroyed in a factory fire after the insurer neither cross-examined the insured’s witness nor produced evidence supporting its policy defence.

The Court quashed the SC/ST Act prosecution against a school manager because the alleged incident occurred inside an enclosed room and no witness claimed to have heard a caste-based utterance. The IPC proceedings will continue.

The Court held that a gang chart prepared by police and administrative officers cannot supply the crime missing from the statute. It quashed two prosecutions but left proceedings under other penal laws untouched.

Electricity transmission is inherently dangerous, so compensation does not depend on proving fault. But recognised exceptions can still apply, and contested facts cannot be resolved through a High Court writ under Article 226, the Court held.