25 May 2026
25 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119731/2024
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119731/2024 · for the respondent
Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,001–1,025 of 3,086 · Page 41 of 124
25 May 2026
25 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119731/2024 · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 1,001–1,025 of 3,086 · Page 41 of 124
25 May 2026
25 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/119731/2024 · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/03/72116/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the applicant / complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Asit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. The argum
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/96009/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/95331/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/90666/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102634/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102421/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/97977/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/120491/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/117172/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 44 - Complaint Number — NCR44/02/772/2024 Vivek Gaharwar v. Patel Advance JV Date :- 24/05 /2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing under Section-34. On call, Advocate Shri Gyanendra is present on be
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/1257/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's petition was presented through video conferencing. The file came up. On the call, learned advocate Shri Rishendra [?] appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The complainant
20 May 2026
20 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130956/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
20 May 2026
20 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/107120/2023 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 May 2026
19 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/110265/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96102/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 8.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. When called, the complainant was absent. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. During today's hearing the complainant was absent. The file is to be presented for further hearing on 42.08
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125578/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94103/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
15 May 2026
15 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent
Due to unavailability of the Bench, it has not been possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed on date: 45-05-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 03-06-2026. Date: 45--05--2026 (Chandrasen Yadav) L.C.R.A. A.O. Bench, Lucknow
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/133953/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Manshi Yadav, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant, in
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102179/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/112661/2023 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/109403/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's petition was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned Advocate Shri P.K. Rai appeared on behalf of the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate reque
Complaint No. NCR145/03/72116/2021 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the complainant
The applicant / complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. Upon call, learned counsel Mr. Punit Jain, proxy counsel for learned counsel Mr. Manendra Kumar, appeared on behalf of the applicant / complainant. Learned counsel Mr. Asit Kumar appeared on behalf of the respondent. The argum
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/96009/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/95331/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
22 May 2026
22 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/90666/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102634/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. Sect-39/1/NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102634/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102421/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/11/102370/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was put up. On call, his representative C.A. Shri Yogesh Goyal appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared on behalf of the respondent. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. Time
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/97977/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/120491/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/117172/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 44 - Complaint Number — NCR44/02/772/2024 Vivek Gaharwar v. Patel Advance JV Date :- 24/05 /2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing under Section-34. On call, Advocate Shri Gyanendra is present on be
21 May 2026
21 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/1257/2020 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 24.05.2026 The complainant's petition was presented through video conferencing. The file came up. On the call, learned advocate Shri Rishendra [?] appeared for the complainant, and learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. Both parties were heard and the file was perused. The complainant
20 May 2026
20 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/07/130956/2025 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
20 May 2026
20 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/03/107120/2023 · Bench 3 · for the complainant
19 May 2026
19 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/110265/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR145/06/96102/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
Date: 8.05.2026 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. The file was presented. When called, the complainant was absent. Learned advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared for the opposite party. During today's hearing the complainant was absent. The file is to be presented for further hearing on 42.08
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/125578/2024 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
18 May 2026
18 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/05/94103/2022 · Bench 3 · for the respondent
15 May 2026
15 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/10/133170/2025 · for the respondent
Due to unavailability of the Bench, it has not been possible to conduct hearing of the said complaint fixed on date: 45-05-2026. Therefore, in view of the above, the file be put up for hearing on date 03-06-2026. Date: 45--05--2026 (Chandrasen Yadav) L.C.R.A. A.O. Bench, Lucknow
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/12/133953/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, Ms. Manshi Yadav, learned advocate for the complainant, appeared. For the opposite party, proxy advocate Shri Punit Jain appeared on behalf of the learned advocate Shri [?] Kumar. The learned advocate for the complainant, in
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Execution orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/11/102179/2022 · Adjudicating Officer Gautam Budh Nagar Status-Disposed · for the respondent
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/08/112661/2023 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
13 May 2026
13 May 2026Hearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/06/109403/2023 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
The complainant's petition was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, learned Advocate Shri P.K. Rai appeared on behalf of the complainant. On behalf of the respondent, learned Advocate Shri Manendra Kumar's proxy, Advocate Shri Puneet Jain, appeared. The complainant's learned advocate reque