⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,841–1,860 · Page 93 of 382
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 129 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 620
622 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 2 S.C.R. A Ms. Rekha Rastogi, Pranab Kumar Mullick, Mrs. Soma Mullick, Sebat Kumar Devria, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The present appeals take exception to the judgment of the…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 128 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 626
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,841–1,860 · Page 93 of 382
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 129 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 620
622 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 2 S.C.R. A Ms. Rekha Rastogi, Pranab Kumar Mullick, Mrs. Soma Mullick, Sebat Kumar Devria, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The present appeals take exception to the judgment of the…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 128 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 626
628 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 1 S.C.R. A Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Anjali Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. These appeals take exception to B the judgment and order dated 1st February, 2016 passed by the…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 127 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 629
D 1.2 The compensation awarded by the High Court is enhanced from Rs.5,01,500/- to Rs.6,74,300/- [Rupees six lakh seventy four thousand three hundred only]. The respondent Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount as indicated above with interest at 9% (nine percent) E per annum less the amou…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 126 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 636
B Rakesh Kumar Yadav (For Dr. Kailash Chand), Advs. for the Appellants. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The sole question to be answered C in this appeal is: whether the High Court was right in applying multiplier 14 for determining com…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 125 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 940
940 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 940 [2018] 2 S.C.R. A SAMPURNA BEHURA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 473 of 2005) B FEBRUARY 09, 2018 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Public Interest Litigation: Non-implementation or tardy implementation of laws beneficial to children-Juvenile Justice …
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 122 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 443
Transport Authority allowed the application for modification of time schedule for movement of the vehicle, by order dated 15.12.2014 – Matter was heard by the Authority on 16.10.2014, where chairperson and two members were present, however, the order was delivered on 15.12.2014 with the signatures of Chairperson and on…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1219 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1217
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case, the workman did not choose to assail either the termination of his services following the enquiry or the fresh appointment. Continuity can be granted when F an order of termination is set aside, to ensure that there is no hiatus in service. All that was …
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1218 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 901
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 571 of 2018 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India F With Writ Petition (C) No. 798 of 2018. Aman Lekhi, ASG, J. K. Sethi, Dy. Adv. Gen., Nidhesh Gupta, Vikas Singh, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advs., Akshat Shrivastava, Mrs. Pooja GShrivastava, Tarun Gupta, Hima…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1216 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 840
840 SUPREME[2018]COURT14REPORTSS.C.R. 840 [2018] 14 S.C.R. A MANOHAR LAL SHARMA v. NARENDRA DAMODARDAS MODI & ORS. (Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 225 of 2018) B DECEMBER 14, 2018 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art 32 – Public interest litigation – Issue relating to procu…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1215 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 870
870 AKHIL BHARTVARSHIYA MARWARI AGARWAL JATIYA 871 KOSH v. BRIJLAL TIBREWAL Disposing of the matters, the Court A HELD: 1.1 While passing order below the “Note for speaking to the Minutes”, the High Court travelled beyond its jurisdiction in regard to the scope of deciding a “Note for speaking to the Minutes”. A “Note …
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1213 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 936
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO No.7010/2011. 2. The appellant, original owner of a Santro Car sold said vehicle H 938 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 13 S…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1212 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 1242
– In instant case, it is a matter for trial to record correctness or otherwise of allegations made in the plaint – The merits and demerits of the matter cannot be gone into, while deciding the application filed u/Or.VII, r.11 of CPC – At this stage only averments in the F plaint are to be looked into and from a reading…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1211 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1209
1210 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. A Sibo Sankar Mishra, Niranjan Sahu, Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, Advs. for the Appellant. Som Raj Choudhury, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 29.08.20…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1210 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 603
Karnataka Stamp Act,1957 – ss.38, 39 – Discretion to Deputy Commissioner – Scope of – Discussed. G Karnataka Stamp Act,1957 – ss.33 and 39 – Contradistinction between – Object of – Discussed. H 603 604 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 13 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The statute envisages that when …
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 121 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 653
E CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 12.01.2017 of the High Court of High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Bail Application No. 2160 of 2016. F WITH Crl. A. Nos. 246, 247, 248, 249 and 250 of 2018. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv., Farrukh Rasheed, Zahid Hussain, …
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1209 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1223
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11969 of 2018. G From the Judgment and Order dated 08.11.2012 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No. 657 of 2012. With Civil Appeal Nos. 11970-11972, 11973-11974 of 2018. H 1223 1224 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. A M…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1208 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 909
Bishan…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1206 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 1253
– Plaintiff failed to establish that the sale deed in favour of appellant E was vitiated by undue influence or fraud – Under Mohammmedan Law, making oral gift is permissible, but the respondent No.1 failed to prove as to how at the time of oral gift, possession of the suit property was delivered to him – Thus oral gift…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1205 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 828
828 SUPREME[2018]COURT14REPORTSS.C.R. 828 [2018] 14 S.C.R. A V. RAVI KUMAR v. STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SALEM, TAMIL NADU & ORS. B (Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 2011) DECEMBER 14, 2018 [R. BANUMATHI AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 420 and 409 r/w. s.34 – Appellant alleged…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1204 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1241
approved. M/S. TATA MOTORS LIMITED v. STATE OF JHARKHAND 1243 Bolani Ores Ltd. v. State of Orissa (1974) 2 SCC 777 ; A Travancore Tea Estates Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (1980) 3 SCC 619 ; M/s Central Coal Fields Ltd. v. State of Orissa & Ors. 1992 Supp. (3) SCC 133 – referred to. 1.5 It was submitted tha…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
628 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 1 S.C.R. A Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Anjali Sharma, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Amrreeta Swaarup, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. These appeals take exception to B the judgment and order dated 1st February, 2016 passed by the…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 127 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 629
D 1.2 The compensation awarded by the High Court is enhanced from Rs.5,01,500/- to Rs.6,74,300/- [Rupees six lakh seventy four thousand three hundred only]. The respondent Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount as indicated above with interest at 9% (nine percent) E per annum less the amou…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 126 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 636
B Rakesh Kumar Yadav (For Dr. Kailash Chand), Advs. for the Appellants. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The sole question to be answered C in this appeal is: whether the High Court was right in applying multiplier 14 for determining com…
Supreme Court of India9 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 125 · [2018] 2 S.C.R. 940
940 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 940 [2018] 2 S.C.R. A SAMPURNA BEHURA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 473 of 2005) B FEBRUARY 09, 2018 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.] Public Interest Litigation: Non-implementation or tardy implementation of laws beneficial to children-Juvenile Justice …
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 122 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 443
Transport Authority allowed the application for modification of time schedule for movement of the vehicle, by order dated 15.12.2014 – Matter was heard by the Authority on 16.10.2014, where chairperson and two members were present, however, the order was delivered on 15.12.2014 with the signatures of Chairperson and on…
Supreme Court of India7 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1219 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1217
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case, the workman did not choose to assail either the termination of his services following the enquiry or the fresh appointment. Continuity can be granted when F an order of termination is set aside, to ensure that there is no hiatus in service. All that was …
Supreme Court of India6 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1218 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 901
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 571 of 2018 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India F With Writ Petition (C) No. 798 of 2018. Aman Lekhi, ASG, J. K. Sethi, Dy. Adv. Gen., Nidhesh Gupta, Vikas Singh, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advs., Akshat Shrivastava, Mrs. Pooja GShrivastava, Tarun Gupta, Hima…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1216 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 840
840 SUPREME[2018]COURT14REPORTSS.C.R. 840 [2018] 14 S.C.R. A MANOHAR LAL SHARMA v. NARENDRA DAMODARDAS MODI & ORS. (Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 225 of 2018) B DECEMBER 14, 2018 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art 32 – Public interest litigation – Issue relating to procu…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1215 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 870
870 AKHIL BHARTVARSHIYA MARWARI AGARWAL JATIYA 871 KOSH v. BRIJLAL TIBREWAL Disposing of the matters, the Court A HELD: 1.1 While passing order below the “Note for speaking to the Minutes”, the High Court travelled beyond its jurisdiction in regard to the scope of deciding a “Note for speaking to the Minutes”. A “Note …
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1213 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 936
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO No.7010/2011. 2. The appellant, original owner of a Santro Car sold said vehicle H 938 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 13 S…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1212 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 1242
– In instant case, it is a matter for trial to record correctness or otherwise of allegations made in the plaint – The merits and demerits of the matter cannot be gone into, while deciding the application filed u/Or.VII, r.11 of CPC – At this stage only averments in the F plaint are to be looked into and from a reading…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1211 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1209
1210 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. A Sibo Sankar Mishra, Niranjan Sahu, Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, Advs. for the Appellant. Som Raj Choudhury, Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 29.08.20…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1210 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 603
Karnataka Stamp Act,1957 – ss.38, 39 – Discretion to Deputy Commissioner – Scope of – Discussed. G Karnataka Stamp Act,1957 – ss.33 and 39 – Contradistinction between – Object of – Discussed. H 603 604 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 13 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The statute envisages that when …
Supreme Court of India8 Feb 2018Full text
2018 INSC 121 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 653
E CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 12.01.2017 of the High Court of High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Bail Application No. 2160 of 2016. F WITH Crl. A. Nos. 246, 247, 248, 249 and 250 of 2018. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv., Farrukh Rasheed, Zahid Hussain, …
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1209 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1223
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11969 of 2018. G From the Judgment and Order dated 08.11.2012 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No. 657 of 2012. With Civil Appeal Nos. 11970-11972, 11973-11974 of 2018. H 1223 1224 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 14 S.C.R. A M…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1208 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 909
Bishan…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1206 · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 1253
– Plaintiff failed to establish that the sale deed in favour of appellant E was vitiated by undue influence or fraud – Under Mohammmedan Law, making oral gift is permissible, but the respondent No.1 failed to prove as to how at the time of oral gift, possession of the suit property was delivered to him – Thus oral gift…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1205 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 828
828 SUPREME[2018]COURT14REPORTSS.C.R. 828 [2018] 14 S.C.R. A V. RAVI KUMAR v. STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SALEM, TAMIL NADU & ORS. B (Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 2011) DECEMBER 14, 2018 [R. BANUMATHI AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 420 and 409 r/w. s.34 – Appellant alleged…
Supreme Court of India14 Dec 2018Full text
2018 INSC 1204 · [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1241
approved. M/S. TATA MOTORS LIMITED v. STATE OF JHARKHAND 1243 Bolani Ores Ltd. v. State of Orissa (1974) 2 SCC 777 ; A Travancore Tea Estates Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (1980) 3 SCC 619 ; M/s Central Coal Fields Ltd. v. State of Orissa & Ors. 1992 Supp. (3) SCC 133 – referred to. 1.5 It was submitted tha…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis