⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,721–1,740 · Page 87 of 382
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 277 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 739
Sessions Court and were released on regular bail – High Court by final order rejecting the plea of parity and taking note of limitations u/s. 37 of NDPS Act, dismissed the application of anticipatory bail – On appeal, Supreme Court noticing that orders granting bail to the co-accused were without taking into notice s. …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 273 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 718
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,721–1,740 · Page 87 of 382
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 277 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 739
Sessions Court and were released on regular bail – High Court by final order rejecting the plea of parity and taking note of limitations u/s. 37 of NDPS Act, dismissed the application of anticipatory bail – On appeal, Supreme Court noticing that orders granting bail to the co-accused were without taking into notice s. …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 273 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 718
WITH Civil Appeal No. 3314 of 2018. D Basant R., C.A. Sundaram, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs., Prashant R. Dahat, Puneet Yadav, T. R. B. Sivakumar, Prashant R. Dahat, Zafar Inayat, M/s K. J. John And Co, Tapesh Kumar Singh, Mohd. Waquas, Aditya Pratap Singh, Aniruddha P. Mayee, Shashibhushan Adgaonkar, Avnish M. Oza, …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 271 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 51
G Evidence: Related witness – Credibility – Held: Related is not equivalent to ‘interested’ - Relationship is not a factor to affect credibility of a witness – Merely because the eye-witnesses are family members their evidence cannot per se be discarded – When there is allegation of interestedness, the same has to be e…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 270 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 68
68 B.N. FIROS v. STATE OF KERALA & ORS. 69 Dismissing the appeal, the Court A HELD : 1.1 The High Court in the impugned order has correctly, held that the provisions of Section 70(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 has to be read conjointly with Section 2(k) and Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957 in order to…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 269 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 83
regarding its right to refuse registration of transfer on sufficient ground, being a statutory appeal u/s. 10F, the High Court should have considered the same among other questions of law – Company Law Board, was of the view that the refusal to register the transfer of shares can be permitted only if the transfer is ot…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 268 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 861
Tenders – Whether a bidder who submits a bid expressly declaring that it is submitting the same independently and without F any partners, consortium or joint venture can rely upon the technical qualifications of any third party for its qualification – Held: No. Tenders – Whether the High Court can independently evaluat…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 268 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 899
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3330 of 2018. D From the Judgment and Order dated 07.04.2016 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in W. P. No. 4676 of 2015 WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 3331 and 3332 of 2018. E Devadatt Kamat, Rajesh Inamdar, Aditya Bhat, Gautam Talukdar, Mishra Saurabh, Seshat…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 266 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 770
2. The 242nd Report of Law Commission of India shows the devastating effect of the crime and the destructive impact on the C right of choice of an individual and the control of the collective over the said freedom. The Commission has emphasized on the intense pressure of the powerful community and how they punish the “…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 263 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 689
the appellant’s interest and to assist the Court as well – The amicus curiae had never made any complaint in the High Court for not giving him more time for preparation of the case – High Court, therefore, ensured compliance with s.377(3). Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. There was due compliance with the re…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 262 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1033
fine imposed by the trial court as part of sentence – s.357 Cr.P.C.(2) comes into play only where any order of payment of compensation utilising the fine imposed as sentence u/s.357(1) Cr.P.C. or compensation as directed u/s. 357(3) Cr.P.C. is made – Present being neither a case of s.357(1) Cr.P.C. nor s.357(3), sub-se…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 260 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 503
defendant and their mother as well as sisters became the legal heirs under Hindu Succession Act inheriting the property being class I heirs – The memorandum of settlement divided the entire property between plaintiff and defendant which document was also claimed to be signed by their mother as well as sisters – Since, …
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 26 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 287
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 287 287 SMT. K. A. ANNAMMA A v. THE SECRETARY, COCHIN CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL SOCIETY LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 197 of 2018) B JANUARY 12, 2018 [R. K. AGRAWAL AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Service dispute – Jurisdiction of the labour court – On facts, service dispute between a…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 258 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 682
G Kiran Kumar Jaipuriar, Anshuman Shrivastava, Advs. for the Appellant. Aniruddha P. Mayee, A. Selvin Raja, Avnish M. Oza, Advs. for the Respondents. H 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 257 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 60
Vijay Kumar, Adv for the Appellant. Ms. Prerna Singh, Guntur Prabhakar, Advs for the Respondent. H 62 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the accused from jail through the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee against the…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 256 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 490
said land for 99 years in favour of the University – Suit properties were a part and parcel of the said land – It is thus clear that University was the lessee of the said land – Further, the declaration register maintained by the Land Tribunal does not contain any entry for having filed declaration forms by the respond…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 255 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 675
*K.S. Krishnaswamy & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. (2006) 13 SCC 215 : [2006] 9 Suppl. SCR 330 – relied on. H 675 676 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference [2006] 9 Suppl. SCR 330 relied on Paras 11, 13, 16 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3173 of 2018. B From the Judgment and Order …
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 253 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 750
G Satyajit A. Desai, Vikram D. Chauhan, Rajesh Lalwali, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Rajesh Kumar-I, Gaurav Kumar Singh, Anant Gautam, Aakash Sehrawat, V. Govinda Ramanan, Soumu Palit, Advs. for the Respondents. H 750 RAKESH BIRANI (D) THROUGH LRS. v. PREM NARAIN 751 SEHGAL & ANR. The following Order of the Court was delivered…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 252 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 96
98 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A B. P. Gupta, (AC), K. S. Rana, Advs for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal by way of special leave petition is filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the final judgment and order dated 6th April, 2007 passed by the H…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 25 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 171
WITH C. A. No. 158 of 2018. Shekhar Naphade, Subramoniam Prasad, Sr. Advs. Abhay Kumar, F S…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 249 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 164
2. The High Court misdirected itself in concluding that the Delection petition did not disclose any cause of action with or without paragraphs 2 & 9 to 11 of the election petition. Indeed, the pleadings of the election petition should be precise and clear containing all the necessary details and particulars as required…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
WITH Civil Appeal No. 3314 of 2018. D Basant R., C.A. Sundaram, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs., Prashant R. Dahat, Puneet Yadav, T. R. B. Sivakumar, Prashant R. Dahat, Zafar Inayat, M/s K. J. John And Co, Tapesh Kumar Singh, Mohd. Waquas, Aditya Pratap Singh, Aniruddha P. Mayee, Shashibhushan Adgaonkar, Avnish M. Oza, …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 271 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 51
G Evidence: Related witness – Credibility – Held: Related is not equivalent to ‘interested’ - Relationship is not a factor to affect credibility of a witness – Merely because the eye-witnesses are family members their evidence cannot per se be discarded – When there is allegation of interestedness, the same has to be e…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 270 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 68
68 B.N. FIROS v. STATE OF KERALA & ORS. 69 Dismissing the appeal, the Court A HELD : 1.1 The High Court in the impugned order has correctly, held that the provisions of Section 70(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 has to be read conjointly with Section 2(k) and Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957 in order to…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 269 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 83
regarding its right to refuse registration of transfer on sufficient ground, being a statutory appeal u/s. 10F, the High Court should have considered the same among other questions of law – Company Law Board, was of the view that the refusal to register the transfer of shares can be permitted only if the transfer is ot…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 268 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 861
Tenders – Whether a bidder who submits a bid expressly declaring that it is submitting the same independently and without F any partners, consortium or joint venture can rely upon the technical qualifications of any third party for its qualification – Held: No. Tenders – Whether the High Court can independently evaluat…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 268 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 899
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3330 of 2018. D From the Judgment and Order dated 07.04.2016 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in W. P. No. 4676 of 2015 WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 3331 and 3332 of 2018. E Devadatt Kamat, Rajesh Inamdar, Aditya Bhat, Gautam Talukdar, Mishra Saurabh, Seshat…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 266 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 770
2. The 242nd Report of Law Commission of India shows the devastating effect of the crime and the destructive impact on the C right of choice of an individual and the control of the collective over the said freedom. The Commission has emphasized on the intense pressure of the powerful community and how they punish the “…
Supreme Court of India26 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 263 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 689
the appellant’s interest and to assist the Court as well – The amicus curiae had never made any complaint in the High Court for not giving him more time for preparation of the case – High Court, therefore, ensured compliance with s.377(3). Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. There was due compliance with the re…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 262 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1033
fine imposed by the trial court as part of sentence – s.357 Cr.P.C.(2) comes into play only where any order of payment of compensation utilising the fine imposed as sentence u/s.357(1) Cr.P.C. or compensation as directed u/s. 357(3) Cr.P.C. is made – Present being neither a case of s.357(1) Cr.P.C. nor s.357(3), sub-se…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 260 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 503
defendant and their mother as well as sisters became the legal heirs under Hindu Succession Act inheriting the property being class I heirs – The memorandum of settlement divided the entire property between plaintiff and defendant which document was also claimed to be signed by their mother as well as sisters – Since, …
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 26 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 287
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 287 287 SMT. K. A. ANNAMMA A v. THE SECRETARY, COCHIN CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL SOCIETY LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 197 of 2018) B JANUARY 12, 2018 [R. K. AGRAWAL AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Service dispute – Jurisdiction of the labour court – On facts, service dispute between a…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 258 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 682
G Kiran Kumar Jaipuriar, Anshuman Shrivastava, Advs. for the Appellant. Aniruddha P. Mayee, A. Selvin Raja, Avnish M. Oza, Advs. for the Respondents. H 684 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 257 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 60
Vijay Kumar, Adv for the Appellant. Ms. Prerna Singh, Guntur Prabhakar, Advs for the Respondent. H 62 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the accused from jail through the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee against the…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 256 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 490
said land for 99 years in favour of the University – Suit properties were a part and parcel of the said land – It is thus clear that University was the lessee of the said land – Further, the declaration register maintained by the Land Tribunal does not contain any entry for having filed declaration forms by the respond…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 255 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 675
*K.S. Krishnaswamy & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. (2006) 13 SCC 215 : [2006] 9 Suppl. SCR 330 – relied on. H 675 676 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference [2006] 9 Suppl. SCR 330 relied on Paras 11, 13, 16 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3173 of 2018. B From the Judgment and Order …
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 253 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 750
G Satyajit A. Desai, Vikram D. Chauhan, Rajesh Lalwali, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Rajesh Kumar-I, Gaurav Kumar Singh, Anant Gautam, Aakash Sehrawat, V. Govinda Ramanan, Soumu Palit, Advs. for the Respondents. H 750 RAKESH BIRANI (D) THROUGH LRS. v. PREM NARAIN 751 SEHGAL & ANR. The following Order of the Court was delivered…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 252 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 96
98 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 3 S.C.R. A B. P. Gupta, (AC), K. S. Rana, Advs for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal by way of special leave petition is filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the final judgment and order dated 6th April, 2007 passed by the H…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 25 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 171
WITH C. A. No. 158 of 2018. Shekhar Naphade, Subramoniam Prasad, Sr. Advs. Abhay Kumar, F S…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 249 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 164
2. The High Court misdirected itself in concluding that the Delection petition did not disclose any cause of action with or without paragraphs 2 & 9 to 11 of the election petition. Indeed, the pleadings of the election petition should be precise and clear containing all the necessary details and particulars as required…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis