⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,661–1,680 · Page 84 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 352 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 391
of transactions of a composite combination would be against the sprit and provision of the Act – Regulation 9(4) cannot be interpreted to enable consummation by a composite combination before giving notice to the Commission – By applying the ultimate objective test also, it is apparent that market purchases were within…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 351 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 490
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,661–1,680 · Page 84 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 352 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 391
of transactions of a composite combination would be against the sprit and provision of the Act – Regulation 9(4) cannot be interpreted to enable consummation by a composite combination before giving notice to the Commission – By applying the ultimate objective test also, it is apparent that market purchases were within…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 351 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 490
husband to pay permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent-wife – Aggrieved with the part of order which directed appellant to pay permanent alimony, appellant filed appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, which was dismissed – Whether the Division Bench of t…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 350 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 446
E 1.3 The main reason behind enacting such proviso is that the tenant, in such circumstances, would not suffer any hardship, if he is asked to vacate the tenanted premises pursuant to eviction decree passed against him on the ground of arrears of rent under Section 20(2)(a) of the Act because he or any member of his fa…
Supreme Court of India18 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 35 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 336
338 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 1 S.C.R. A Mathalone v. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. [1954] SCR 117 – relied on. 4. #Ankitech’s case, in stating that no change was made by introducing the deeming fiction insofar as the expression “shareholder” is concerned, is wrongly decided and therefore, requires to be reconsider…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 349 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1027
2. The petitioner-Company has filed two petitions for the appointment of Arbitrator and its parent company viz., IBI Group has also filed two petitions of the same nature. Since the point of consideration is same in all these four petitions, purpose would be served if we moot G the case of either of the petition and wo…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 348 · [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1050
1050 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 1050 [2018] 7 S.C.R. A LOK PRAHARI, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S. N. SHUKLA & ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA B THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 3798 of 2018) APRIL 16, 2018 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] C Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members o…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 347 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1075
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 1075 1075 MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. A v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 3807-3825 of 2018) APRIL 16, 2018 B [R. K. AGRAWAL AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.4, 9, 18 and 23 – Land in Firozpur village acquired by respondent-State for construction of Mini …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 346 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 727
M. C. Dhingra, Ashwin Kr. Gupta, Gaurav Dhingra, Piyush Kant Roy, Advs. for the Appellant. H MOHD. ALI v. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS 729 D. K. Thakur, AAG, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. for the A Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. K. AGRAWAL J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal has been filed …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 344 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1086
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Purpose of acquisition – ‘Public Purpose’ – What is – Held: Public purpose is not capable of precise definition – It would broadly include the purpose in which the general interest of the society as opposed to the particular interest H 1086 MANIMEGALAI v. SPL. TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION 10…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 343 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 749
Criminal Law: Circumstantial evidence – Last seen theory – Presumption of guilt – Burden to rebut on accused. H 749 750 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The testimony of PW-11 is established and inspires full confidence, it is well established that it is the accused who w…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 342 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 739
possession in an independent suit is indicative of the fact that the plaintiff/respondent Nos.1 & 2 were in possession – Plaintiffs-Respondent Nos.1 & 2 are entitled for benefit of s.53-A of Transfer of Property Act – No illegality with the judgment passed by the High Court in granting specific performance in favour of…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 341 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 315
– A Public Prosecutor filing a complaint u/s. 199 (2) Cr.P.C. without due satisfaction that the materials/allegations in complaint discloses an offence against an Authority or against a public functionary G which adversely affects the interests of the State would be abhorrent to the principles on the basis of which the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 339 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 291
H 291 292 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 4 S.C.R. A Disposing of the writ petition, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Government employee during his life time or after his retirement is entitled to get the benefit of the medical facilities and no fetters can be placed on his rights. It is acceptable to common sense, that ultimate …
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 338 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 324
HELD: 1.1 The trial court and the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by respondent No.2 under Order 7 G Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and thereby erred in dismissing the suit as being barred by the provisions of Order 2 Rule 2 by taking recourse to the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 337 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1062
H 1062 M/S OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. v. M/S OSWAL AGRO 1063 MILLS LTD. Arbitration – ‘De novo’ hearing – Meaning of – Discussed. A Interpretation of Statutes – Purposive interpretation – When to be given – Discussed. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The very essence of the law of arbitration is to B settle the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 336 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 566
566 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 566 [2018] 5 S.C.R. A KERALA AYURVEDA PARAMPARYA VAIDYA FORUM v. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 897 of 2009) B APRIL 13, 2018 [R. K. AGRAWAL AND MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.] Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 – s.38 and ss.23, 32– Appellant-associatio…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 335 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 701
performance of the officer i.e., the service records including the last five years, preceding the year for which the selection list is to be prepared as per the guidelines – As crucial date for determining the eligibility of the officers is 1st January of the particular year for which selections are made, the Annual Co…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 333 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 387
Directing the Registry to place the appeals before the Chief E Justice of India in view of difference of opinion, by the Court HELD: Per Ranjan Gogoi, J.– 1.1 Under the pre-amended provisions of the Act, coconut oil was not covered by any specific FHeading and had been classified under Heading 15.03 which dealt with fi…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 332 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 551
*State of Uttar Pradesh v Dinesh Singh Chauhan (2016) G 9 SCC 749 : [2016] 6 SCR 571; R Chitralekha v. State of Mysore [1964] 6 SCR 368; Kumari Chitra Ghosh v. Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 228 : [1970] 1 SCR 413; Modern Dental College and Research Centre v State of Madhya Pradesh (2016) 7 SCC 353; K Duraisamy v. H 551 5…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 332 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 541
*State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Dinesh Singh Chauhan (2016) 9 SCC 749 : [2016] 6 SCR 571; F R. Chitralekha and Another v. State of Mysore and Others [1964] 6 SCR 368; Kumari Chitra Ghosh and Another v. Union of India and Others (1969) 2 SCC 228 : [1970] 1 SCR 413; Gujarat University and Another v. Krishna Rangana…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
husband to pay permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent-wife – Aggrieved with the part of order which directed appellant to pay permanent alimony, appellant filed appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, which was dismissed – Whether the Division Bench of t…
Supreme Court of India17 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 350 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 446
E 1.3 The main reason behind enacting such proviso is that the tenant, in such circumstances, would not suffer any hardship, if he is asked to vacate the tenanted premises pursuant to eviction decree passed against him on the ground of arrears of rent under Section 20(2)(a) of the Act because he or any member of his fa…
Supreme Court of India18 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 35 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 336
338 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 1 S.C.R. A Mathalone v. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. [1954] SCR 117 – relied on. 4. #Ankitech’s case, in stating that no change was made by introducing the deeming fiction insofar as the expression “shareholder” is concerned, is wrongly decided and therefore, requires to be reconsider…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 349 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1027
2. The petitioner-Company has filed two petitions for the appointment of Arbitrator and its parent company viz., IBI Group has also filed two petitions of the same nature. Since the point of consideration is same in all these four petitions, purpose would be served if we moot G the case of either of the petition and wo…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 348 · [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1050
1050 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS7 S.C.R. 1050 [2018] 7 S.C.R. A LOK PRAHARI, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S. N. SHUKLA & ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA B THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 3798 of 2018) APRIL 16, 2018 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.] C Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members o…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 347 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1075
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 1075 1075 MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. A v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 3807-3825 of 2018) APRIL 16, 2018 B [R. K. AGRAWAL AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.4, 9, 18 and 23 – Land in Firozpur village acquired by respondent-State for construction of Mini …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 346 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 727
M. C. Dhingra, Ashwin Kr. Gupta, Gaurav Dhingra, Piyush Kant Roy, Advs. for the Appellant. H MOHD. ALI v. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS 729 D. K. Thakur, AAG, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Adv. for the A Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. K. AGRAWAL J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal has been filed …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 344 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1086
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Purpose of acquisition – ‘Public Purpose’ – What is – Held: Public purpose is not capable of precise definition – It would broadly include the purpose in which the general interest of the society as opposed to the particular interest H 1086 MANIMEGALAI v. SPL. TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION 10…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 343 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 749
Criminal Law: Circumstantial evidence – Last seen theory – Presumption of guilt – Burden to rebut on accused. H 749 750 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 6 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The testimony of PW-11 is established and inspires full confidence, it is well established that it is the accused who w…
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 342 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 739
possession in an independent suit is indicative of the fact that the plaintiff/respondent Nos.1 & 2 were in possession – Plaintiffs-Respondent Nos.1 & 2 are entitled for benefit of s.53-A of Transfer of Property Act – No illegality with the judgment passed by the High Court in granting specific performance in favour of…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 341 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 315
– A Public Prosecutor filing a complaint u/s. 199 (2) Cr.P.C. without due satisfaction that the materials/allegations in complaint discloses an offence against an Authority or against a public functionary G which adversely affects the interests of the State would be abhorrent to the principles on the basis of which the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 339 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 291
H 291 292 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 4 S.C.R. A Disposing of the writ petition, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Government employee during his life time or after his retirement is entitled to get the benefit of the medical facilities and no fetters can be placed on his rights. It is acceptable to common sense, that ultimate …
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 338 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 324
HELD: 1.1 The trial court and the High Court erred in allowing the application filed by respondent No.2 under Order 7 G Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and thereby erred in dismissing the suit as being barred by the provisions of Order 2 Rule 2 by taking recourse to the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 337 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 1062
H 1062 M/S OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. v. M/S OSWAL AGRO 1063 MILLS LTD. Arbitration – ‘De novo’ hearing – Meaning of – Discussed. A Interpretation of Statutes – Purposive interpretation – When to be given – Discussed. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The very essence of the law of arbitration is to B settle the…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 336 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 566
566 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 566 [2018] 5 S.C.R. A KERALA AYURVEDA PARAMPARYA VAIDYA FORUM v. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 897 of 2009) B APRIL 13, 2018 [R. K. AGRAWAL AND MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.] Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 – s.38 and ss.23, 32– Appellant-associatio…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 335 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 701
performance of the officer i.e., the service records including the last five years, preceding the year for which the selection list is to be prepared as per the guidelines – As crucial date for determining the eligibility of the officers is 1st January of the particular year for which selections are made, the Annual Co…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 333 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 387
Directing the Registry to place the appeals before the Chief E Justice of India in view of difference of opinion, by the Court HELD: Per Ranjan Gogoi, J.– 1.1 Under the pre-amended provisions of the Act, coconut oil was not covered by any specific FHeading and had been classified under Heading 15.03 which dealt with fi…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 332 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 551
*State of Uttar Pradesh v Dinesh Singh Chauhan (2016) G 9 SCC 749 : [2016] 6 SCR 571; R Chitralekha v. State of Mysore [1964] 6 SCR 368; Kumari Chitra Ghosh v. Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 228 : [1970] 1 SCR 413; Modern Dental College and Research Centre v State of Madhya Pradesh (2016) 7 SCC 353; K Duraisamy v. H 551 5…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2018Full text
2018 INSC 332 · [2018] 3 S.C.R. 541
*State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Dinesh Singh Chauhan (2016) 9 SCC 749 : [2016] 6 SCR 571; F R. Chitralekha and Another v. State of Mysore and Others [1964] 6 SCR 368; Kumari Chitra Ghosh and Another v. Union of India and Others (1969) 2 SCC 228 : [1970] 1 SCR 413; Gujarat University and Another v. Krishna Rangana…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis