Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 10
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 172 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 327
SCC 1; V. Rajeshwari (Smt) vs. T. C. Saravanabava (2004) 1 SCC 551: 2003 (6) Suppl. SCR 927; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union H 342 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 146 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 406
Judged in the light shed by Maneka
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 10
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 172 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 327
SCC 1; V. Rajeshwari (Smt) vs. T. C. Saravanabava (2004) 1 SCC 551: 2003 (6) Suppl. SCR 927; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union H 342 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 146 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 406
Judged in the light shed by Maneka
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2014) 2 SCC 1
act. Parallelly, he underscored the impact of Article 21 on Section 154 of the Code by referring to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248, wherein this Court has applied Article 21 to several provisions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 791 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 489
Dead) through LRs and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 5 SCC 553 in which Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India has been quoted where it has been laid down that the "audi alteram partem
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 748 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 713
Kutty Haji vs. State of Kera/a 2002 (2) Crimes 143; Re: Subbaratnam and Ors. AIR 1949 Madras 663; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Chairman Board of Mining Examination 0and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2013Full text
2013 INSC 673 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 430
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. (1974) 4 sec 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) D 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2013Full text
2013 INSC 615 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 125
contained in Section 438 must be saved, not jettisoned. No doubt can linger B after the decision in Maneka Gandhi [1978]2SCR621 that in order to meet the challenge of Article 21 of the . Constitution, the procedure established
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 448 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 469
SCC 489; E.P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1974 (2) SCR 348 = (1974) 4 SCC 3; and Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 =(1978) 1 SCC 248 - held inapplicable
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 275 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 1004
Suppl. SCR 385; A.K. Praipak vs. Union of India A (1969) 2 sec 262: 1970 (1) SCR 457; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of /ndia.(1978) 1 sec 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union of India vs. Tutsi Ram
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 249 · [2013] 6 S.C.R. 676
without unreasonable delay. [Para 47] [754-C-F] Jagmohan Singh VS. State of U.P. (1973) 1 sec 20; Maneka Gandhi VS. Union of India (1978) 1 sec
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 246 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 831
SCALE 709; Mohd. Khalid vs. State of West Bengal (2002) 7 SCC 334: 2002 (2) Suppl. SCR 31; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Abdul Rehman Antulay and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2013Full text
2013 INSC 179 · [2013] 15 S.C.R. 1
decades, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in A.K. Gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India that the procedure contemplated by Article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness. The
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 59 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 52
the due process of law which has been read into the Constitution. [Para 20) [111-H; 112-A]. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - referred
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 52 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 330
their status as independent Members of the House. Mr. Venugopal referred to the t\No instances when Mrs. Maneka Gandhi was E elected to the Lok Sabha as an independent Member from Pilibhit in Uttar Pradesh and had
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2012Full text
2012 INSC 497 · [2012] 11 S.C.R. 440
Punjab National Bank and Ors. v. Kunj Behari Misra (1998) 7 SCC 84: 1998 (1) Suppl. SCR 22; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621 and Roop Singh Negi
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Oct 2012Full text
2012 INSC 468 · [2012] 9 S.C.R. 515
SCC 420 this Court has pointed out that the concept of liberty has now G been widened by Maneka Gandhi case (1978) 1 SCC 248 where Article 21 as construed by this Court has added new dimensions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 428 · [2012] 9 S.C.R. 311
Building upon his opinion delivered in Royappa's case (supra), Bhagwati, J., held in Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India & Anr. 39: C "The principle of reasonableness, which legally as well as philosophically, is an essential element
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 392 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 1
appointment, except, where the classification is on the face of it, unjust. [Para 40) [55-B-D] D Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - relied on. 1.9. There
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 392 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 1
appointment, except, where the classification is on the face of it, unjust. [Para 40) [55-B-D] D Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - relied on. 1.9. There
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2012Full text
2012 INSC 342 · [2012] 7 S.C.R. 329
reasonable, just and fair' procedure which has a creative connotation after the decision of this Court in B Maneka Gandhi." The Court further observed
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2014) 2 SCC 1
act. Parallelly, he underscored the impact of Article 21 on Section 154 of the Code by referring to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248, wherein this Court has applied Article 21 to several provisions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 791 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 489
Dead) through LRs and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 5 SCC 553 in which Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India has been quoted where it has been laid down that the "audi alteram partem
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 748 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 713
Kutty Haji vs. State of Kera/a 2002 (2) Crimes 143; Re: Subbaratnam and Ors. AIR 1949 Madras 663; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Chairman Board of Mining Examination 0and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2013Full text
2013 INSC 673 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 430
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. (1974) 4 sec 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) D 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2013Full text
2013 INSC 615 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 125
contained in Section 438 must be saved, not jettisoned. No doubt can linger B after the decision in Maneka Gandhi [1978]2SCR621 that in order to meet the challenge of Article 21 of the . Constitution, the procedure established
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 448 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 469
SCC 489; E.P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1974 (2) SCR 348 = (1974) 4 SCC 3; and Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 =(1978) 1 SCC 248 - held inapplicable
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 275 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 1004
Suppl. SCR 385; A.K. Praipak vs. Union of India A (1969) 2 sec 262: 1970 (1) SCR 457; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of /ndia.(1978) 1 sec 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union of India vs. Tutsi Ram
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 249 · [2013] 6 S.C.R. 676
without unreasonable delay. [Para 47] [754-C-F] Jagmohan Singh VS. State of U.P. (1973) 1 sec 20; Maneka Gandhi VS. Union of India (1978) 1 sec
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 246 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 831
SCALE 709; Mohd. Khalid vs. State of West Bengal (2002) 7 SCC 334: 2002 (2) Suppl. SCR 31; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Abdul Rehman Antulay and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2013Full text
2013 INSC 179 · [2013] 15 S.C.R. 1
decades, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in A.K. Gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India that the procedure contemplated by Article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness. The
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 59 · [2012] 3 S.C.R. 52
the due process of law which has been read into the Constitution. [Para 20) [111-H; 112-A]. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - referred
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2012Full text
2012 INSC 52 · [2012] 2 S.C.R. 330
their status as independent Members of the House. Mr. Venugopal referred to the t\No instances when Mrs. Maneka Gandhi was E elected to the Lok Sabha as an independent Member from Pilibhit in Uttar Pradesh and had
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India30 Oct 2012Full text
2012 INSC 497 · [2012] 11 S.C.R. 440
Punjab National Bank and Ors. v. Kunj Behari Misra (1998) 7 SCC 84: 1998 (1) Suppl. SCR 22; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621 and Roop Singh Negi
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Oct 2012Full text
2012 INSC 468 · [2012] 9 S.C.R. 515
SCC 420 this Court has pointed out that the concept of liberty has now G been widened by Maneka Gandhi case (1978) 1 SCC 248 where Article 21 as construed by this Court has added new dimensions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 428 · [2012] 9 S.C.R. 311
Building upon his opinion delivered in Royappa's case (supra), Bhagwati, J., held in Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India & Anr. 39: C "The principle of reasonableness, which legally as well as philosophically, is an essential element
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 392 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 1
appointment, except, where the classification is on the face of it, unjust. [Para 40) [55-B-D] D Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - relied on. 1.9. There
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 392 · [2013] 13 S.C.R. 1
appointment, except, where the classification is on the face of it, unjust. [Para 40) [55-B-D] D Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 - relied on. 1.9. There
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2012Full text
2012 INSC 342 · [2012] 7 S.C.R. 329
reasonable, just and fair' procedure which has a creative connotation after the decision of this Court in B Maneka Gandhi." The Court further observed
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis