⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,421–1,440 · Page 72 of 382
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 719 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 986
E Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Gagan Gupta, Abhishek Atrey, P. N. Puri, Abhishek Puri, Ms. Reeta Dewan Puri, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff against the final judgment F and order …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 718 · [2018] 11 S.C.R. 329
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,421–1,440 · Page 72 of 382
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 719 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 986
E Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Gagan Gupta, Abhishek Atrey, P. N. Puri, Abhishek Puri, Ms. Reeta Dewan Puri, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff against the final judgment F and order …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 718 · [2018] 11 S.C.R. 329
[2018] 11 S.C.R. 329 329 RAJDEEP GHOSH A v. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 766 of 2018) AUGUST 17, 2018 B [ARUN MISHRA AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Medical Colleges and Dental Colleges of Assam (Regulations of Admission into 1st year MBBS/BDS Courses) Rules, 2017 – r.3(1)(c) – Eligibility for State quota sea…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 716 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 844
G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos. 1428-1429 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 22.01.2009 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1432 of 2005 and H 1549 of 2005. 844 STATE OF KARNATAKA v. P. RAVIKUMAR @ RAVI ETC. 845 Joseph Aristotle, Ms. Prya Aristotle, Ms. A…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 714 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1006
1006 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS9 S.C.R. 1006 [2018] 9 S.C.R. A MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB (Criminal Appeal No. 1880 of 2011) B AUGUST 16, 2018 [RANJAN GOGOI, R. BANUMATHI AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Fairness and impartiality in investigation – Informant and C invest…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 712 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 953
WITH F SLP(Crl.) No. 6747 of 2018. Shikhil Suri & Shiv Kumar Suri, Advs. for the Petitioners. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Though these two special leave G petitions are completely unconnected but they present one common feature and as such we propose to deal with these two special…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 711 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 974
M/s. Sicom Investments and Finance Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Drolia and Anr. (2017) SCC Online Bom 9725; B Sanjeev Shriya v. State Bank of India and Ors. (2018) 2 All LJ 769 (decided on 06.09.2017) – referred to 1.2 Section 14 refers to four matters that may be prohibited once the moratorium comes into effect. In each of th…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 710 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 959
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 959 959 K. KISHAN A v. M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 21824 of 2017) AUGUST 14, 2018 B [R.F. NARIMAN AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: s.9 – Invocation of the Code in respect of an operational debt where an arbitral award has been passed against the ope…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 71 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 233
be permitted to be blocked by frivolous litigation – It is the solemn duty of the court to apply the correct law without waiting for an objection – Any departure, if permissible, has to be for reasons discussed, of the case falling under a defined exception – High Court ought not to have entertained the writ petition i…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 709 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1069
was no relationship of landlord-tenant between the parties – Thus, ground under the provision of the Rent Act was not made out – The assertion of appellants that pressure was exerted through the police to enter the compromise is prima facie acceptable – Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 – s. 10(2)…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 708 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 995
financial loss caused to bank and that as per bipartite settlement, forfeiture of gratuity is permissible only in case misconduct leading to dismissal has caused financial loss to the bank and only to that extent – Held: It was not the case of the appellant-bank that the misconduct of respondent caused any financial lo…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 705 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 910
which the accused was carrying in his hands would not amount to search of person and as such s.50 would not apply and further, the case property parcels of samples and sealed samples were duly produced before Magistrate – Based on the said finding, High Court reversed the order of acquittal and convicted appellant u/s.…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 703 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 919
Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: When the doctor gave opinion that the suicide cannot be ruled out and the death of the deceased could have been due to suicide which was accepted by the High Court; when the High Court has a view which is a plausible view, there is no ground to take a different view. There is no…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 702 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 922
E CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos. 1133-1135 of 2010 From the Judgment and Order dated 06.03.2007 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1438 of 2003 c/w Criminal Appeal No. 1580 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 1591 of F 2003. V. N. Raghupathy, Adv. for the appellant. Th…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 700 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1083
S. R. Singh, Sr. Adv., Mangal Prasad, Ms. Shweta Yadav, Kuldeep Yadav, Adarsh Verma, Yash Pal Dhingra, Abhishek Gola, Sudhir Naagar, Advs. for the appearing parties. H RAM CHANDRA SINGH v. RAJARAM AND ORS. 1085 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The singular question involved in this a…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 70 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 709
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 709 709 LATESH @ DADU BABURAO KARLEKAR A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal No. 1301 of 2015) JANUARY 30, 2018 B [N. V. RAMANA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 302 and 307 – Prosecution case that six accused persons armed with various weapons, on account of some old enmity, assault…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 697 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 810
K. ANBAZHAGAN & ANR. v. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL 811 HIGH COURT OF MADRAS & ANR. Service law – Judicial Service – Appointments – Contractual, A Ad-hoc and Tenure Appointments – Explained – Fundamental Rules of the Tamil Nadu Government – Fundamental Rule 9(30-A). Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Eleventh Fina…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 696 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 1005
1005 1006 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A as damages and this is followed as a general law – However, in the instant case, project proponent directed to pay damages of Rs.100 crores or 10% of the Project – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or.XLVII. Disposing of the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. A review petitio…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 693 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1064
1064 K.S. RAJAN (D) THROUGH LRS. v. THE STATE OF 1065 KERALA & ANR. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 6281- A 6282 of 2009. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.03.2003 and 06.12.2006 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in LAA. No. 905 of 1995 and Review Petition No.205 of 2004 respectively. B Chand…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 692 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1052
E Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The appellants are permitted to file an application before the High Court for amending their review petition, filed in disposed of second appeal, raising all their grievances against the manner in which the second appeal came F to be disposed of in the light of alleged …
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 691 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1056
set aside. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Committee though considered some documents filed by the appellant but did not consider all the F documents on which the appellant had placed reliance. The High Court in its writ jurisdiction declined to go into the merits of the writ petition stating that since th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2018] 11 S.C.R. 329 329 RAJDEEP GHOSH A v. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 766 of 2018) AUGUST 17, 2018 B [ARUN MISHRA AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.] Medical Colleges and Dental Colleges of Assam (Regulations of Admission into 1st year MBBS/BDS Courses) Rules, 2017 – r.3(1)(c) – Eligibility for State quota sea…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 716 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 844
G CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos. 1428-1429 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 22.01.2009 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1432 of 2005 and H 1549 of 2005. 844 STATE OF KARNATAKA v. P. RAVIKUMAR @ RAVI ETC. 845 Joseph Aristotle, Ms. Prya Aristotle, Ms. A…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 714 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1006
1006 SUPREME COURT[2018]REPORTS9 S.C.R. 1006 [2018] 9 S.C.R. A MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB (Criminal Appeal No. 1880 of 2011) B AUGUST 16, 2018 [RANJAN GOGOI, R. BANUMATHI AND NAVIN SINHA, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Fairness and impartiality in investigation – Informant and C invest…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 712 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 953
WITH F SLP(Crl.) No. 6747 of 2018. Shikhil Suri & Shiv Kumar Suri, Advs. for the Petitioners. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Though these two special leave G petitions are completely unconnected but they present one common feature and as such we propose to deal with these two special…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 711 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 974
M/s. Sicom Investments and Finance Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Drolia and Anr. (2017) SCC Online Bom 9725; B Sanjeev Shriya v. State Bank of India and Ors. (2018) 2 All LJ 769 (decided on 06.09.2017) – referred to 1.2 Section 14 refers to four matters that may be prohibited once the moratorium comes into effect. In each of th…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 710 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 959
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 959 959 K. KISHAN A v. M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 21824 of 2017) AUGUST 14, 2018 B [R.F. NARIMAN AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: s.9 – Invocation of the Code in respect of an operational debt where an arbitral award has been passed against the ope…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 71 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 233
be permitted to be blocked by frivolous litigation – It is the solemn duty of the court to apply the correct law without waiting for an objection – Any departure, if permissible, has to be for reasons discussed, of the case falling under a defined exception – High Court ought not to have entertained the writ petition i…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 709 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1069
was no relationship of landlord-tenant between the parties – Thus, ground under the provision of the Rent Act was not made out – The assertion of appellants that pressure was exerted through the police to enter the compromise is prima facie acceptable – Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 – s. 10(2)…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 708 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 995
financial loss caused to bank and that as per bipartite settlement, forfeiture of gratuity is permissible only in case misconduct leading to dismissal has caused financial loss to the bank and only to that extent – Held: It was not the case of the appellant-bank that the misconduct of respondent caused any financial lo…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 705 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 910
which the accused was carrying in his hands would not amount to search of person and as such s.50 would not apply and further, the case property parcels of samples and sealed samples were duly produced before Magistrate – Based on the said finding, High Court reversed the order of acquittal and convicted appellant u/s.…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 703 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 919
Dismissing the appeal, the Court E HELD: When the doctor gave opinion that the suicide cannot be ruled out and the death of the deceased could have been due to suicide which was accepted by the High Court; when the High Court has a view which is a plausible view, there is no ground to take a different view. There is no…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 702 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 922
E CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal Nos. 1133-1135 of 2010 From the Judgment and Order dated 06.03.2007 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1438 of 2003 c/w Criminal Appeal No. 1580 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 1591 of F 2003. V. N. Raghupathy, Adv. for the appellant. Th…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 700 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1083
S. R. Singh, Sr. Adv., Mangal Prasad, Ms. Shweta Yadav, Kuldeep Yadav, Adarsh Verma, Yash Pal Dhingra, Abhishek Gola, Sudhir Naagar, Advs. for the appearing parties. H RAM CHANDRA SINGH v. RAJARAM AND ORS. 1085 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. 1. The singular question involved in this a…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2018Full text
2018 INSC 70 · [2018] 1 S.C.R. 709
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 709 709 LATESH @ DADU BABURAO KARLEKAR A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal No. 1301 of 2015) JANUARY 30, 2018 B [N. V. RAMANA AND AMITAVA ROY, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 302 and 307 – Prosecution case that six accused persons armed with various weapons, on account of some old enmity, assault…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 697 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 810
K. ANBAZHAGAN & ANR. v. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL 811 HIGH COURT OF MADRAS & ANR. Service law – Judicial Service – Appointments – Contractual, A Ad-hoc and Tenure Appointments – Explained – Fundamental Rules of the Tamil Nadu Government – Fundamental Rule 9(30-A). Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Eleventh Fina…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 696 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 1005
1005 1006 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A as damages and this is followed as a general law – However, in the instant case, project proponent directed to pay damages of Rs.100 crores or 10% of the Project – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Or.XLVII. Disposing of the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. A review petitio…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 693 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1064
1064 K.S. RAJAN (D) THROUGH LRS. v. THE STATE OF 1065 KERALA & ANR. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 6281- A 6282 of 2009. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.03.2003 and 06.12.2006 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in LAA. No. 905 of 1995 and Review Petition No.205 of 2004 respectively. B Chand…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 692 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1052
E Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The appellants are permitted to file an application before the High Court for amending their review petition, filed in disposed of second appeal, raising all their grievances against the manner in which the second appeal came F to be disposed of in the light of alleged …
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 691 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 1056
set aside. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Committee though considered some documents filed by the appellant but did not consider all the F documents on which the appellant had placed reliance. The High Court in its writ jurisdiction declined to go into the merits of the writ petition stating that since th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis