⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,401–1,420 · Page 71 of 382
Supreme Court of India24 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 744 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 100
Pursuant to the notification issued by the State Government for holding panchayat elections in West Bengal, the election process commenced. The election notification led to various G litigations. Before the Division Bench of the High Court, issue arose as regards acceptance of nomination already filed in the electronic…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 740 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 912
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,401–1,420 · Page 71 of 382
Supreme Court of India24 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 744 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 100
Pursuant to the notification issued by the State Government for holding panchayat elections in West Bengal, the election process commenced. The election notification led to various G litigations. Before the Division Bench of the High Court, issue arose as regards acceptance of nomination already filed in the electronic…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 740 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 912
filed writ petition seeking voluntary retirement – High Court allowed the writ petitions – Aggrieved State Government filed instant appeal – Held: Under r.56 as applicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh, notice of voluntary retirement does not come into effect automatically on the expiry of the three months period – Und…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 738 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 11
ANANT SON OF SIDHESHWAR DUKRE v. PRATAP SON OF 13 ZHAMNNAPPA LAMZANE & ANR. for special diet and attendance charges separately before this A Court, therefore, it is appropriate to award Rs. 2,50,000/- as claimed on account of recurring medical expenses. [Para 7.4] [19-C-E] 6. The Appellant has claimed Rs. 90,000 for at…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 734 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 959
her husband was being taken for shooting somebody, does not fit with the natural human behavior to inspire any confidence – There was no direct evidence which led the prosecution to clearly prove that deceased was shot at the abandoned house as alleged – Thus, prosecution could not establish its case beyond reasonable …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 733 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 50
over 8 flats along with 16 parking spaces to respondent no. 1 – On appeal, held: Interim mandatory injunction can be passed only when circumstances are clear and prima facie material clearly justify a finding that status quo has been altered by one of the parties to the litigation and the interest of justice demanded t…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 732 · [2018] 12 S.C.R. 1085
P. P. Malhotra, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs., Mohit Paul, Vineet Malhotra, Yasir Rauf, Vishal Gohri, Anugrah Niraj Ekka, Shubhendu Kaushik, Aneesh Mittal, Ms. Shreya Sharma, Ms. Anupama Kaul, D S. Ravi Shankar,…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 731 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 22
the execution proceedings – The High Court has acted in excess of jurisdiction by directing the appointment of a Chartered Accountant, particularly at this stage – The impugned order of the High Court is set aside – Having regard to the fact that the dispute between the parties arose out of a contract of 1980 and an aw…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 731 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 12
the execution proceedings – The High Court has acted in excess of jurisdiction by directing the appointment of a Chartered Accountant, particularly at this stage – The impugned order of the High Court is set aside – Having regard to the fact that the dispute between the parties arose out of a contract of 1980 and an aw…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 730 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 26
petition had expired, the period spent between the filing of the earlier petition and its withdrawal may be excluded. Trial Court allowed the application under Order 7 Rule 11. However, the District Judge as also the High Court set aside the same. Hence, the present appeal. G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The Ha…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 729 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 70
B Sushil Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv., Ms. Astha Prasad, Ashish K. Singh, Ashish Prasad, Amalesh Prasad, Anupam Bhargava, Puneet Jain, Abhinav Gupta, Harsh Jain, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this ap…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 728 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 76
78 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A permissible and secrecy of voting has no room and further where the discipline of the political party/parties matters, it is clear that such choice will have a negative impact.[Para 23] [96-B-D] Manoj Narula v. Union of India (2014) 9 SCC 1 : [2014] 9 SCR 965 – relied on. B 5…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 727 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 35
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 35 35 M/S. SONELL CLOCKS AND GIFTS LTD. A v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. (Civil Appeal Nos.1217-1218 of 2017) AUGUST 21, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA, CJI, A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Insurance policy – Breach of – Claim for compensation – On facts, appe…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 725 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 949
WITH C.A. Nos. 7223, 7220, 7215, 7230, 7216, 7232, 7233, 7224, 7214, 7213, 7212, 7231, 7211, 7229, 7228, 7227, 7226, 7234, 7238, 7210, 7217, 7218, 7219, 7239, 7221, 7222, 7209, 7236, 7225 of 2018 C A.N.S. Nadkarni, Sandeep Sethi, ASGs, Gaurav Banerjee, Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advs., Ashok K. Srivastava, Arijit Prasad, Sanjai K…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 724 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 937
and permitting the parties thereafter to lead evidence on the same – On appeal, Held: Once courts in Mumbai have exclusive jurisdiction in terms of agreement read with the NSE bye-laws then it is the Mumbai courts alone, before which s.34 application was to be filed – High Court erred in remanding the matter for a full…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 723 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 934
question – High Court rejected the application for stay observing that since the required land is lying vacant, there is no reason to grant any stay – On appeal, held: High Court did not give adequate reason for not granting stay and the reason given was not in itself justified reason – Matter remitted to High Court to…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 722 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 925
925 926 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 2218 of 2011 From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2006 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision No. 413 of 2001. B Dr. Monika Gusain, Ms. Manpreet Kaur Bhalla, Niraj Jha, Vinod Sharm…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 721 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 929
B WITH C.A. Nos. 9700/2014 and 9704/2014 Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., D. M. Nargolkar, Ms. Sujata Kurdukar, Gagan Sanghi, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. In Civil Appeal No. 751 of 2008 1. This appeal is filed against the final j…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 905
C. U. Singh, S. R. Singh, Brijender Chahar, Sr. Advs., Y. E Prabhakara Rao, J. P. Mishra, P. V. Dinesh, R. R. Kumar, Atulesh Kumar, Swetank Shantanu, Vishwa Pal Singh, Dr. Pooja Jha, Ronak Karanpuria, Sumit Sharma, Nagendra Singh, R. Prakash, Ms. Nandita Jha, Ajit Pudussery, K. Vijayan, Ajeet Singh Verma, C. Paramasiva…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 899
WITH C.A. No. 10511 of 2011 C. U. Singh, S. R. Singh, Brijender Chahar, Sr. Advs., Y. Prabhakara Rao, J. P. Mishra, P. V. Dinesh, R. R. Kumar, Atulesh Kumar, D Swetank Shantanu, Vishwa Pal Singh, Dr. Pooja Jha, Ronak Karanpuria, Sumit Sharma, Nagendra Singh, R. Prakash, Ms. Nandita Jha, Ajit Pudussery, K. Vijayan, Ajee…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 909
two depots at Kerala finding no dissimilarity in two set of these cases – Held: No reason to deny the relief granted by High Court to workers – There is no good ground to take any other view in the case than the one taken by Madras High Court in similar case and in the impugned orders. F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
filed writ petition seeking voluntary retirement – High Court allowed the writ petitions – Aggrieved State Government filed instant appeal – Held: Under r.56 as applicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh, notice of voluntary retirement does not come into effect automatically on the expiry of the three months period – Und…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 738 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 11
ANANT SON OF SIDHESHWAR DUKRE v. PRATAP SON OF 13 ZHAMNNAPPA LAMZANE & ANR. for special diet and attendance charges separately before this A Court, therefore, it is appropriate to award Rs. 2,50,000/- as claimed on account of recurring medical expenses. [Para 7.4] [19-C-E] 6. The Appellant has claimed Rs. 90,000 for at…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 734 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 959
her husband was being taken for shooting somebody, does not fit with the natural human behavior to inspire any confidence – There was no direct evidence which led the prosecution to clearly prove that deceased was shot at the abandoned house as alleged – Thus, prosecution could not establish its case beyond reasonable …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 733 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 50
over 8 flats along with 16 parking spaces to respondent no. 1 – On appeal, held: Interim mandatory injunction can be passed only when circumstances are clear and prima facie material clearly justify a finding that status quo has been altered by one of the parties to the litigation and the interest of justice demanded t…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 732 · [2018] 12 S.C.R. 1085
P. P. Malhotra, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advs., Mohit Paul, Vineet Malhotra, Yasir Rauf, Vishal Gohri, Anugrah Niraj Ekka, Shubhendu Kaushik, Aneesh Mittal, Ms. Shreya Sharma, Ms. Anupama Kaul, D S. Ravi Shankar,…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 731 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 22
the execution proceedings – The High Court has acted in excess of jurisdiction by directing the appointment of a Chartered Accountant, particularly at this stage – The impugned order of the High Court is set aside – Having regard to the fact that the dispute between the parties arose out of a contract of 1980 and an aw…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 731 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 12
the execution proceedings – The High Court has acted in excess of jurisdiction by directing the appointment of a Chartered Accountant, particularly at this stage – The impugned order of the High Court is set aside – Having regard to the fact that the dispute between the parties arose out of a contract of 1980 and an aw…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 730 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 26
petition had expired, the period spent between the filing of the earlier petition and its withdrawal may be excluded. Trial Court allowed the application under Order 7 Rule 11. However, the District Judge as also the High Court set aside the same. Hence, the present appeal. G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The Ha…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 729 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 70
B Sushil Kumar Jain, Sr. Adv., Ms. Astha Prasad, Ashish K. Singh, Ashish Prasad, Amalesh Prasad, Anupam Bhargava, Puneet Jain, Abhinav Gupta, Harsh Jain, Ms. Ankita Gupta, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C S. ABDUL NAZEER, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this ap…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 728 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 76
78 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A permissible and secrecy of voting has no room and further where the discipline of the political party/parties matters, it is clear that such choice will have a negative impact.[Para 23] [96-B-D] Manoj Narula v. Union of India (2014) 9 SCC 1 : [2014] 9 SCR 965 – relied on. B 5…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 727 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 35
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 35 35 M/S. SONELL CLOCKS AND GIFTS LTD. A v. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. (Civil Appeal Nos.1217-1218 of 2017) AUGUST 21, 2018 B [DIPAK MISRA, CJI, A. M. KHANWILKAR AND DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Insurance policy – Breach of – Claim for compensation – On facts, appe…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 725 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 949
WITH C.A. Nos. 7223, 7220, 7215, 7230, 7216, 7232, 7233, 7224, 7214, 7213, 7212, 7231, 7211, 7229, 7228, 7227, 7226, 7234, 7238, 7210, 7217, 7218, 7219, 7239, 7221, 7222, 7209, 7236, 7225 of 2018 C A.N.S. Nadkarni, Sandeep Sethi, ASGs, Gaurav Banerjee, Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advs., Ashok K. Srivastava, Arijit Prasad, Sanjai K…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 724 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 937
and permitting the parties thereafter to lead evidence on the same – On appeal, Held: Once courts in Mumbai have exclusive jurisdiction in terms of agreement read with the NSE bye-laws then it is the Mumbai courts alone, before which s.34 application was to be filed – High Court erred in remanding the matter for a full…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 723 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 934
question – High Court rejected the application for stay observing that since the required land is lying vacant, there is no reason to grant any stay – On appeal, held: High Court did not give adequate reason for not granting stay and the reason given was not in itself justified reason – Matter remitted to High Court to…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 722 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 925
925 926 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 2218 of 2011 From the Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2006 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision No. 413 of 2001. B Dr. Monika Gusain, Ms. Manpreet Kaur Bhalla, Niraj Jha, Vinod Sharm…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 721 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 929
B WITH C.A. Nos. 9700/2014 and 9704/2014 Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., D. M. Nargolkar, Ms. Sujata Kurdukar, Gagan Sanghi, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. In Civil Appeal No. 751 of 2008 1. This appeal is filed against the final j…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 905
C. U. Singh, S. R. Singh, Brijender Chahar, Sr. Advs., Y. E Prabhakara Rao, J. P. Mishra, P. V. Dinesh, R. R. Kumar, Atulesh Kumar, Swetank Shantanu, Vishwa Pal Singh, Dr. Pooja Jha, Ronak Karanpuria, Sumit Sharma, Nagendra Singh, R. Prakash, Ms. Nandita Jha, Ajit Pudussery, K. Vijayan, Ajeet Singh Verma, C. Paramasiva…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 899
WITH C.A. No. 10511 of 2011 C. U. Singh, S. R. Singh, Brijender Chahar, Sr. Advs., Y. Prabhakara Rao, J. P. Mishra, P. V. Dinesh, R. R. Kumar, Atulesh Kumar, D Swetank Shantanu, Vishwa Pal Singh, Dr. Pooja Jha, Ronak Karanpuria, Sumit Sharma, Nagendra Singh, R. Prakash, Ms. Nandita Jha, Ajit Pudussery, K. Vijayan, Ajee…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2018Full text
2018 INSC 720 · [2018] 9 S.C.R. 909
two depots at Kerala finding no dissimilarity in two set of these cases – Held: No reason to deny the relief granted by High Court to workers – There is no good ground to take any other view in the case than the one taken by Madras High Court in similar case and in the impugned orders. F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis