⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 10
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2021Full text
2021 INSC 209 · [2021] 3 S.C.R. 859
Constitution and that the same is in conflict with F the judgment of the seven-Judge Bench in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India16.” The Judgment of a Bench of two Judges of this Court in Pooran Chandra
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2020Full text
2020 INSC 620 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 583
Puttaswamy and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. C (2017) 10 SCC 1 : [2017] 10 SCR 569 ;
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 10
Supreme Court of India25 Mar 2021Full text
2021 INSC 209 · [2021] 3 S.C.R. 859
Constitution and that the same is in conflict with F the judgment of the seven-Judge Bench in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India16.” The Judgment of a Bench of two Judges of this Court in Pooran Chandra
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India29 Oct 2020Full text
2020 INSC 620 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 583
Puttaswamy and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. C (2017) 10 SCC 1 : [2017] 10 SCR 569 ;
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India26 Oct 2020Full text
2020 INSC 608 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 915
that touches upon the rights contained in Article 21. [Paras 11.1 and 11.6][935-B-C; 938-G] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 – followed. D The Law Commission
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2020Full text
2020 INSC 492 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 718
just, fair and reasonable having regard to the requirement of Articles 14 and 21 as explained in Maneka Gandhi. This is especially so, as “law” in both the Articles 21 and 300-A is H 786 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2020Full text
2020 INSC 489 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 510
independent and robust but at the same time respectful to the institution. [Para 81][576-G-H] F Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621– followed. Secretary, Ministry
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 364 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 361
entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this G Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India: (1978) 1 SCC 248 that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution. 18. Thus
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 344 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 28
SCR 79; E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr., (1974) 4 SCC 3 : [1974] 2 SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr., (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621; R.C. Poudyal v. Union
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 238 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 814
and 16 strike at arbitrariness in State action and ensure fairness and equality of treatment. In C Maneka Gandhi case (1978) 1 SCC 248, it was further held that the principle of reasonableness, which legally as well
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 341 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 984
view was further elaborated and affirmed in D.S. Nakara v. Union of India [[1983] 1 SCC 305]. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [[1978] 2 S.C.R. 621] it was observed that Art. 14 strikes at arbitrariness
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1237 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 886
AIR 1958 SC 86 : [1958] SCR 595 ; Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 107 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 ; Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1146 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 936
Romila Thapar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 753 : [2018] 11 SCR 951 – G held inapplicable. Mrs. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621; Commissioner of Police, Delhi
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1054 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 229
declaring the demand arbitrary. It is well settled that B arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution vide Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India17. Hence, the party is not remediless in this situation.” 15. In Har Devi Asnani11
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India1 May 2018Full text
2018 INSC 437 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 655
for in-house mechanism to ensure that there is no undue delay in completing investigation – Delay/laches – Investigation. E Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 237 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 409
Article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in State action. (See: E.P. ROYAPPA v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, and B MANEKA GANDHI v. UNION OF INDIA). Further, there would have been also force in the contention of the petitioners that
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India9 May 2018Full text
2017 INSC 314 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1
Khudiram Das v. State of West Bengal and others [1975] 2 SCR 832 : (1975) 2 SCC 81; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India D and another [1978] 1 SCC 248; M. Nagaraj and others v. Union of India
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2018) 10 SCC 1
its sound, it is natural and human. It is a combination of thought and feeling. 85 131. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and another56, Krishna Iyer, J. observed that life is a terrestrial opportunity for unfolding
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 884 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 571
Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 488 : [1980) 2 SCR 557; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of F India and Am: (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978) 2 SCR 621; Charles Sobraj v. Superintendent Central Jail Tihar
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 150 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 945
freshening flow of fair procedure. The meaning of 'life' given by Field, J., approved in Kharak Singh' and Maneka Gandhi' bears excerption
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 955 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 515
India (1983) 1 SCC 305: 1983 (2) SCR 165; Re: Special Courts Bill (1979) 2 SCR 476; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 2 SCR 621; Subra111anian Swamy v. CBI (2014) 8 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 May 2016Full text
2016 INSC 427 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 865
SCR 759; State of Madras v. V.G Row AIR 1952 SC 196 : 1952 SCR 597; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and B another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : AIR 1978 SC 597 : 1978 (2) SCR 621; R.C. Cooper
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India26 Oct 2020Full text
2020 INSC 608 · [2020] 12 S.C.R. 915
that touches upon the rights contained in Article 21. [Paras 11.1 and 11.6][935-B-C; 938-G] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 – followed. D The Law Commission
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2020Full text
2020 INSC 492 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 718
just, fair and reasonable having regard to the requirement of Articles 14 and 21 as explained in Maneka Gandhi. This is especially so, as “law” in both the Articles 21 and 300-A is H 786 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2020Full text
2020 INSC 489 · [2020] 8 S.C.R. 510
independent and robust but at the same time respectful to the institution. [Para 81][576-G-H] F Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621– followed. Secretary, Ministry
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 364 · [2020] 9 S.C.R. 361
entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this G Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India: (1978) 1 SCC 248 that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution. 18. Thus
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India22 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 344 · [2020] 6 S.C.R. 28
SCR 79; E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr., (1974) 4 SCC 3 : [1974] 2 SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr., (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621; R.C. Poudyal v. Union
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India2 Mar 2020Full text
2020 INSC 238 · [2020] 4 S.C.R. 814
and 16 strike at arbitrariness in State action and ensure fairness and equality of treatment. In C Maneka Gandhi case (1978) 1 SCC 248, it was further held that the principle of reasonableness, which legally as well
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 341 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 984
view was further elaborated and affirmed in D.S. Nakara v. Union of India [[1983] 1 SCC 305]. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [[1978] 2 S.C.R. 621] it was observed that Art. 14 strikes at arbitrariness
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1237 · [2019] 16 S.C.R. 886
AIR 1958 SC 86 : [1958] SCR 595 ; Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 107 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 ; Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1146 · [2019] 15 S.C.R. 936
Romila Thapar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 753 : [2018] 11 SCR 951 – G held inapplicable. Mrs. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621; Commissioner of Police, Delhi
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2019Full text
2019 INSC 1054 · [2019] 12 S.C.R. 229
declaring the demand arbitrary. It is well settled that B arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution vide Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India17. Hence, the party is not remediless in this situation.” 15. In Har Devi Asnani11
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India1 May 2018Full text
2018 INSC 437 · [2018] 5 S.C.R. 655
for in-house mechanism to ensure that there is no undue delay in completing investigation – Delay/laches – Investigation. E Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2018Full text
2018 INSC 237 · [2018] 10 S.C.R. 409
Article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in State action. (See: E.P. ROYAPPA v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, and B MANEKA GANDHI v. UNION OF INDIA). Further, there would have been also force in the contention of the petitioners that
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India9 May 2018Full text
2017 INSC 314 · [2018] 4 S.C.R. 1
Khudiram Das v. State of West Bengal and others [1975] 2 SCR 832 : (1975) 2 SCC 81; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India D and another [1978] 1 SCC 248; M. Nagaraj and others v. Union of India
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2018) 10 SCC 1
its sound, it is natural and human. It is a combination of thought and feeling. 85 131. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and another56, Krishna Iyer, J. observed that life is a terrestrial opportunity for unfolding
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2017Full text
2017 INSC 884 · [2017] 11 S.C.R. 571
Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 488 : [1980) 2 SCR 557; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of F India and Am: (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978) 2 SCR 621; Charles Sobraj v. Superintendent Central Jail Tihar
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2017Full text
2017 INSC 150 · [2017] 1 S.C.R. 945
freshening flow of fair procedure. The meaning of 'life' given by Field, J., approved in Kharak Singh' and Maneka Gandhi' bears excerption
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 955 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 515
India (1983) 1 SCC 305: 1983 (2) SCR 165; Re: Special Courts Bill (1979) 2 SCR 476; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 2 SCR 621; Subra111anian Swamy v. CBI (2014) 8 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 May 2016Full text
2016 INSC 427 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 865
SCR 759; State of Madras v. V.G Row AIR 1952 SC 196 : 1952 SCR 597; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and B another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : AIR 1978 SC 597 : 1978 (2) SCR 621; R.C. Cooper
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis