⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
781–800 · Page 40 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 26 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 83
T. S. Deobia, Sr. Adv., Saksham Maheshwari, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advs. for the Appellant. A. R. Takkar, Ajay Bansal, Md. Rashid Saeed, Advs. for the Respondent.E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 259 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 357
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
781–800 · Page 40 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 26 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 83
T. S. Deobia, Sr. Adv., Saksham Maheshwari, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advs. for the Appellant. A. R. Takkar, Ajay Bansal, Md. Rashid Saeed, Advs. for the Respondent.E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 259 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 357
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 357 357 MURUGAN & ORS. A v. KESAVA GOUNDER (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1782 of 2019) FEBRUARY 25, 2019 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Limitation Act, 1963 – Arts.60 and 65 – Suit property belonged to one ‘PG’, who had two sons, ‘K’ and ‘B’ and three daughters – ‘PG’ executed Wil…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 256 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1153
– Said Policy circular was specifically adverted to in the subsequent circular dated 19th April, 2006– As per the subsequent circular the Railway Board decided that the policy to offer employment to F displaced persons should not cover displaced persons where only a strip of land had been acquired – At the same time, i…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 255 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 454
454 LULLU VAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. 455 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA itself disputed as there exists no registered document to that effect– A Appellants averred that their name appears in the Estate Department records as lessees– HPC’s order dtd. 20.06.09 declared the appellants to be lessees for 999 years – Said ord…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 254 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 433
B Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court has not at all considered the fact that the offences alleged were non-compoundable offences as per Section 320, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. From the impugned judgments and orders, it appears that the High Court has not at all considered the relevant facts…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 253 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 18
C 2. Therefore, it is evident that the only inquiry as stipulated under the 2000 Act and the 2007 Rules was conducted by the Registrar (Judicial) upon the directions of this Court, after the Court was satisfied upon going through the school certificates adduced by the Appellant that the certificates in question prima D…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 252 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 4
The petitioner has moved these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking an order for the payment of damages by the first respondent-medical college. The basis of H 4 RIYA GEORGE v. KANNUR MEDICAL COLLEGE 5 the claim is that she has lost one year of education as a result of A the legal proceedings emanat…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 251 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 856
- and the possession of villa back to respondent – On appeal held: E There was no reason for the High Court to direct reversal of the situation – Further, there was no satisfactory explanation for condoning delay of 721 days – In the totality of circumstances, High Court erred in condoning delay – Thus, order of the Hi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 250 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 851
of the Appellate Court – On appeal, held: Three Courts below, on appreciation of evidence had found that appellant had committed offence – Such finding being concurrent finding of fact is binding while hearing appeal u/Art.136 of the Constitution – However, appellant has already undergone one month’s jail sentence and …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 25 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 74
2. Though the appellant (plaintiff) was not allowed by the Trial Court/High Court in the earlier round of litigation to institute G a suit as an indigent person under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of CPC, yet he was entitled to file an application/appeal under Order XLIV Rule 1 of CPC and seek permission from the Appellate Court…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 249 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 822
– Third respondent issued notices to the appellant – Despite service of the notices, the appellant failed to make any payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the allotment letter – Despite being afforded multiple opportunities to effect payment of the balance sale consideration, the appellant continued t…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 248 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 383
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The statement of PW1 was recorded at 8.45 AM by PW19-Police Inspector soon after the occurrence. Lodging of the FIR by PW1 is supported by PW2 and PW3 who D have found that PW1 was already in Police Station lodging the complaint. The testimony of PW19 regarding lodging of FIR…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 247 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 295
[2019] 11 S.C.R. 295 295 DATTATRAYA @ DATTA AMBO ROKADE A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1110-1111 of 2015) FEBRUARY 21, 2019 B [N. V. RAMANA, DEEPAK GUPTA AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367 and 201 r/w ss. 3,4,5 (i) (l) and (m) of the Protection of Chi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 246 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 815
815 816 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A awarded in the rarest of rare cases – Keeping in view all the circumstances of the case, regardless of the brutal nature of crime, the present is not a fit case where death sentence should be executed – Death sentence commuted to life imprisonment – However, keeping in vi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 245 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 829
containers from the premises – Rejected – Respondent filed writ petition, inter alia, seeking permission to remove the containers lying on the premises – Single Judge while holding that there are different views taken by two different Division Benches of the Calcutta High Court in Canoro Resources and Indian Rayon on t…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 244 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 504
at section 2(i)(iv) apply, evidence must be led to show that…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 242 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 64
64 RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LIMITED v. STATE BANK OF 65 INDIA Court inter alia ordered that as a last opportunity, the amount must A be paid on or before 15.12.2018 – Second application to extend time – Dismissed, as withdrawn – Second contempt petition filed by Ericsson for non-payment of INR 550 Crore on or before 15.1…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 241 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 617
Petitioner filed G.As. in the respective execution cases, objecting the enforceability of the foreign awards – Rejected – On appeal, held: Grounds urged by the petitioner in the earlier round regarding the maintainability of the execution case could not have been considered in isolation and de hors the issue of enforce…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 240 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 836
Part II, 302. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court interfered with and reduced the sentence awarded by the Trial Court on rather irrelevant considerations, while ignoring the relevant factors and the C governing principles for the award of punishment and hence, the order impugned cannot be sustained.…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 24 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 51
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, E the Court HELD: The Single Judge ought to have first set out the brief facts of the case with a view to understand the factual matrix and then should have examined the challenge made to the proceedings on the question involved with a view to record the F fin…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 357 357 MURUGAN & ORS. A v. KESAVA GOUNDER (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 1782 of 2019) FEBRUARY 25, 2019 B [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Limitation Act, 1963 – Arts.60 and 65 – Suit property belonged to one ‘PG’, who had two sons, ‘K’ and ‘B’ and three daughters – ‘PG’ executed Wil…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 256 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1153
– Said Policy circular was specifically adverted to in the subsequent circular dated 19th April, 2006– As per the subsequent circular the Railway Board decided that the policy to offer employment to F displaced persons should not cover displaced persons where only a strip of land had been acquired – At the same time, i…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 255 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 454
454 LULLU VAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. 455 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA itself disputed as there exists no registered document to that effect– A Appellants averred that their name appears in the Estate Department records as lessees– HPC’s order dtd. 20.06.09 declared the appellants to be lessees for 999 years – Said ord…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 254 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 433
B Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court has not at all considered the fact that the offences alleged were non-compoundable offences as per Section 320, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. From the impugned judgments and orders, it appears that the High Court has not at all considered the relevant facts…
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 253 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 18
C 2. Therefore, it is evident that the only inquiry as stipulated under the 2000 Act and the 2007 Rules was conducted by the Registrar (Judicial) upon the directions of this Court, after the Court was satisfied upon going through the school certificates adduced by the Appellant that the certificates in question prima D…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 252 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 4
The petitioner has moved these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking an order for the payment of damages by the first respondent-medical college. The basis of H 4 RIYA GEORGE v. KANNUR MEDICAL COLLEGE 5 the claim is that she has lost one year of education as a result of A the legal proceedings emanat…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 251 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 856
- and the possession of villa back to respondent – On appeal held: E There was no reason for the High Court to direct reversal of the situation – Further, there was no satisfactory explanation for condoning delay of 721 days – In the totality of circumstances, High Court erred in condoning delay – Thus, order of the Hi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 250 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 851
of the Appellate Court – On appeal, held: Three Courts below, on appreciation of evidence had found that appellant had committed offence – Such finding being concurrent finding of fact is binding while hearing appeal u/Art.136 of the Constitution – However, appellant has already undergone one month’s jail sentence and …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 25 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 74
2. Though the appellant (plaintiff) was not allowed by the Trial Court/High Court in the earlier round of litigation to institute G a suit as an indigent person under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of CPC, yet he was entitled to file an application/appeal under Order XLIV Rule 1 of CPC and seek permission from the Appellate Court…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 249 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 822
– Third respondent issued notices to the appellant – Despite service of the notices, the appellant failed to make any payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the allotment letter – Despite being afforded multiple opportunities to effect payment of the balance sale consideration, the appellant continued t…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 248 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 383
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The statement of PW1 was recorded at 8.45 AM by PW19-Police Inspector soon after the occurrence. Lodging of the FIR by PW1 is supported by PW2 and PW3 who D have found that PW1 was already in Police Station lodging the complaint. The testimony of PW19 regarding lodging of FIR…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 247 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 295
[2019] 11 S.C.R. 295 295 DATTATRAYA @ DATTA AMBO ROKADE A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1110-1111 of 2015) FEBRUARY 21, 2019 B [N. V. RAMANA, DEEPAK GUPTA AND INDIRA BANERJEE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 376(2)(f), 377, 363, 364, 367 and 201 r/w ss. 3,4,5 (i) (l) and (m) of the Protection of Chi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 246 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 815
815 816 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A awarded in the rarest of rare cases – Keeping in view all the circumstances of the case, regardless of the brutal nature of crime, the present is not a fit case where death sentence should be executed – Death sentence commuted to life imprisonment – However, keeping in vi…
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 245 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 829
containers from the premises – Rejected – Respondent filed writ petition, inter alia, seeking permission to remove the containers lying on the premises – Single Judge while holding that there are different views taken by two different Division Benches of the Calcutta High Court in Canoro Resources and Indian Rayon on t…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 244 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 504
at section 2(i)(iv) apply, evidence must be led to show that…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 242 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 64
64 RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LIMITED v. STATE BANK OF 65 INDIA Court inter alia ordered that as a last opportunity, the amount must A be paid on or before 15.12.2018 – Second application to extend time – Dismissed, as withdrawn – Second contempt petition filed by Ericsson for non-payment of INR 550 Crore on or before 15.1…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 241 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 617
Petitioner filed G.As. in the respective execution cases, objecting the enforceability of the foreign awards – Rejected – On appeal, held: Grounds urged by the petitioner in the earlier round regarding the maintainability of the execution case could not have been considered in isolation and de hors the issue of enforce…
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2019Full text
2019 INSC 240 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 836
Part II, 302. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court interfered with and reduced the sentence awarded by the Trial Court on rather irrelevant considerations, while ignoring the relevant factors and the C governing principles for the award of punishment and hence, the order impugned cannot be sustained.…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 24 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 51
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, E the Court HELD: The Single Judge ought to have first set out the brief facts of the case with a view to understand the factual matrix and then should have examined the challenge made to the proceedings on the question involved with a view to record the F fin…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis