⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,521–7,540 · Page 377 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 298 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 577
MAHARASHTRA prosecution produced, in support of its case{ witnesses A who were inimical to the accused persons. It is crystal clear from the records that land of Gat No. 170 was the bone of contention between the complainant party and the accused. Civil cases with regard to the question of title and ownership to the sa…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 295 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 528
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,521–7,540 · Page 377 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 298 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 577
MAHARASHTRA prosecution produced, in support of its case{ witnesses A who were inimical to the accused persons. It is crystal clear from the records that land of Gat No. 170 was the bone of contention between the complainant party and the accused. Civil cases with regard to the question of title and ownership to the sa…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 295 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 528
G JS died leaving behind his wife, four sons and three daughters. He executed a Will and named his wife and appellant-son as executors. The respondent-son of the testator was not given any share. The testator had purchased certain land in the name of his wife and H 528 SAMIR CHANDRA DAS v. BIBHAS CHANDRA DAS 529 & ORS.…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 293 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 466
F Dismissing the Special Leave Petition, the Court HELD: 1.1. There is no reason to interfere with the order of the tribunal as upheld by the High Court. Admittedly, out of all the 22 vacant posts, the first 14 posts G were to be filled up by candidates from the open category and the remaining 8 vacancies were reserved…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 287 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 698
(2) of Civil Services Examination Rules is not inconsistent with G Rule 16 (1) of the Rules or Articles 14, 16 (4) and 335 of the Constitution - By operation of Rule 16 (2), the reserved status of an MRC candidate is protected so that his! her better performance does not deny him of the chance to be allotted 698H UNION…
Supreme Court of India6 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 285 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 624
A. Subba Rao for the Petitioner. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. Despite service of notice, the respondents have not appeared to contest the Special Leave Petition which is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th April, 2007, passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in G S.A.…
Supreme Court of India6 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 279 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 1173
1174 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 7 S.C.R. A Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No. 7431 of 1993 and CWP No. 12091 of 2000. Debasis Misra for the· Appellants. Sanjay Singh, Ugra Shankar Prasad for the Respondents. B The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. These appeals by way of special l…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 275 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 881
- HELD: The directions made by High Court are clearly beyond courts' jurisdiction in a public interest litigation as they interfere with the functioning of independent State agencies in matters which are beyond their control insofar as E uninterrupted supply of electricity is concerned - It cannot be ignored that short…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 274 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1202
Prosecution case was that the deceased, alongwith PW-1 and PW-2 was on way to court to attend a case. F Appellants anned with a pistol fired a shot at the deceased and thereafter ran away from the spot: The incident took place at 11.15 A.M. The deceased was seriously injured and was taken to hospital and examined by th…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 27 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 219
[2010] 1 S.C.R. 219 M/S. MANDVI CO-OP BANK LTD. A v. NIMESH B. THAKORE (Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2010 ) JANUARY 11, 2010 B [TARUN CHATTERJEE AND AFTAB ALAM, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: ss.145(1) and (2) -Affidavit of a deponent is in the nature c of examination-in-Chief - On being summoned under s. 145(2), …
Supreme Court of India4 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 269 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 585
585 H 586 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 7 S.C.R. A confidence motion in reference to Kshettra Samiti/ Panchayat, the block period was of 12 months and the majority of more than half of the total number of members of Kshettra Samiti was required. The 1961 Act was amended several times in 1965, 1976, 1990, 1994 and B 1998…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 268 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 990
In appeal to this Court the main stand of the appellant was in relation to the jurisdiction and lack of knowledge of the fact that the goods in stock were E hypothecated to the Bank along with the plant and machinery. While pressing into service the definition of the word 'debt' appearing in s.2(g) of the Act, it was v…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 266 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 702
Bail - Interim bail - HELD: The power to grant regular bail includes the power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the application for regular bail - This power is inherent in the power to grant bail, particularly, in view of Article E 21 of the Constitution which contemplates that a person should not be co…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 264 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1156
- Contempt of Court. F *Rajesh Ranjan Yadav Alias Pappu Yadav vs. CBI through its Director (2006) 9 Suppl. SCR 40 = (2007) 1 SCC 70, referred to. Contempt of Court: G Tactics of Bench hopping - During the course of hearing of the appeal against order of High Court granting bail to the accused whose application for bail…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 262 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1081
- SLPs dismissed- Subsequent writ petition irrpublic interest filed challenging validity and legality of the Notifications -HELD: In the earlier litigation, issue of validity or legality of the Notifications was never raised, nor the writ petitioner in the H 1081 1082 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 5 S.C.R. A subsequent …
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 261 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1039
[2010) 5 S.C.R. 1039 NORTH DELHI POWER LIMITED A v. GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4269 of 2006) 8 MAY 03, 2010 - [V.S. SIRPURKAR AND SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.] Service Law: c Re-organization of Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) - Statutory transfer scheme - Tripartite agreements between …
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 26 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 255
1.3. For the purposes of s.48 of the Act, one must I~ NAVIN JINDAL v. ASSTI. COMMISSIONER OF 257 INCOME TAX keep in mind the important principle that chargeability A and computation has to go hand in hand. Computation is an integral part of chargeability under the Act. It is for this reason that the right to subscribe …
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 259 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 666
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (C.8.1.) v. 667 HOPESON NINGSHEN & ORS. accused is a member - This creates a risk of intimidation of A witnesses as well as undue prejudice seeping into the minds of those who may be involved in the legal proceedings in· different capacities - In the circumstances, the considered view of…
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 257 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 646
F The respondent companies are engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of family planning products including Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCPs). The respondent no. 3-Union of India floated an open tender to procure the OCPs. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 requested G respondent No. 3 to .issue the tender inquiry docume…
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 253 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 605
G 1.3. The appellant was the person who had allegedly inflicted the knife blows on the deceased. In this view of the matter, there is absolutely no doubt that he was the primary assailant. It is also clear from the record H including the statements u/s. 313 Cr.P.C that it was the DILPESH BALCHANDRA PANCHAL v. STATE OF …
Supreme Court of India28 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 250 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 368
VIJENDER KUMAR @ VIJAY v. STATE OF DELHI 369 Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 351 of A 2005. Sanjeev Bhatnagar, Brig. M.L. Khatter, Kusum Chaudhary for the Appellant. Ashok Bhan, Sadhana Sandhu, Anil Katiyar for the B Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER .C 1. In the light …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
G JS died leaving behind his wife, four sons and three daughters. He executed a Will and named his wife and appellant-son as executors. The respondent-son of the testator was not given any share. The testator had purchased certain land in the name of his wife and H 528 SAMIR CHANDRA DAS v. BIBHAS CHANDRA DAS 529 & ORS.…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 293 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 466
F Dismissing the Special Leave Petition, the Court HELD: 1.1. There is no reason to interfere with the order of the tribunal as upheld by the High Court. Admittedly, out of all the 22 vacant posts, the first 14 posts G were to be filled up by candidates from the open category and the remaining 8 vacancies were reserved…
Supreme Court of India7 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 287 · [2010] 6 S.C.R. 698
(2) of Civil Services Examination Rules is not inconsistent with G Rule 16 (1) of the Rules or Articles 14, 16 (4) and 335 of the Constitution - By operation of Rule 16 (2), the reserved status of an MRC candidate is protected so that his! her better performance does not deny him of the chance to be allotted 698H UNION…
Supreme Court of India6 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 285 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 624
A. Subba Rao for the Petitioner. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ALTAMAS KABIR, J. 1. Despite service of notice, the respondents have not appeared to contest the Special Leave Petition which is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th April, 2007, passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in G S.A.…
Supreme Court of India6 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 279 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 1173
1174 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 7 S.C.R. A Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No. 7431 of 1993 and CWP No. 12091 of 2000. Debasis Misra for the· Appellants. Sanjay Singh, Ugra Shankar Prasad for the Respondents. B The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. These appeals by way of special l…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 275 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 881
- HELD: The directions made by High Court are clearly beyond courts' jurisdiction in a public interest litigation as they interfere with the functioning of independent State agencies in matters which are beyond their control insofar as E uninterrupted supply of electricity is concerned - It cannot be ignored that short…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 274 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1202
Prosecution case was that the deceased, alongwith PW-1 and PW-2 was on way to court to attend a case. F Appellants anned with a pistol fired a shot at the deceased and thereafter ran away from the spot: The incident took place at 11.15 A.M. The deceased was seriously injured and was taken to hospital and examined by th…
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 27 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 219
[2010] 1 S.C.R. 219 M/S. MANDVI CO-OP BANK LTD. A v. NIMESH B. THAKORE (Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2010 ) JANUARY 11, 2010 B [TARUN CHATTERJEE AND AFTAB ALAM, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: ss.145(1) and (2) -Affidavit of a deponent is in the nature c of examination-in-Chief - On being summoned under s. 145(2), …
Supreme Court of India4 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 269 · [2010] 7 S.C.R. 585
585 H 586 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 7 S.C.R. A confidence motion in reference to Kshettra Samiti/ Panchayat, the block period was of 12 months and the majority of more than half of the total number of members of Kshettra Samiti was required. The 1961 Act was amended several times in 1965, 1976, 1990, 1994 and B 1998…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 268 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 990
In appeal to this Court the main stand of the appellant was in relation to the jurisdiction and lack of knowledge of the fact that the goods in stock were E hypothecated to the Bank along with the plant and machinery. While pressing into service the definition of the word 'debt' appearing in s.2(g) of the Act, it was v…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 266 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 702
Bail - Interim bail - HELD: The power to grant regular bail includes the power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the application for regular bail - This power is inherent in the power to grant bail, particularly, in view of Article E 21 of the Constitution which contemplates that a person should not be co…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 264 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1156
- Contempt of Court. F *Rajesh Ranjan Yadav Alias Pappu Yadav vs. CBI through its Director (2006) 9 Suppl. SCR 40 = (2007) 1 SCC 70, referred to. Contempt of Court: G Tactics of Bench hopping - During the course of hearing of the appeal against order of High Court granting bail to the accused whose application for bail…
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 262 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1081
- SLPs dismissed- Subsequent writ petition irrpublic interest filed challenging validity and legality of the Notifications -HELD: In the earlier litigation, issue of validity or legality of the Notifications was never raised, nor the writ petitioner in the H 1081 1082 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 5 S.C.R. A subsequent …
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 261 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 1039
[2010) 5 S.C.R. 1039 NORTH DELHI POWER LIMITED A v. GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4269 of 2006) 8 MAY 03, 2010 - [V.S. SIRPURKAR AND SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.] Service Law: c Re-organization of Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) - Statutory transfer scheme - Tripartite agreements between …
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2010Full text
2010 INSC 26 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 255
1.3. For the purposes of s.48 of the Act, one must I~ NAVIN JINDAL v. ASSTI. COMMISSIONER OF 257 INCOME TAX keep in mind the important principle that chargeability A and computation has to go hand in hand. Computation is an integral part of chargeability under the Act. It is for this reason that the right to subscribe …
Supreme Court of India3 May 2010Full text
2010 INSC 259 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 666
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (C.8.1.) v. 667 HOPESON NINGSHEN & ORS. accused is a member - This creates a risk of intimidation of A witnesses as well as undue prejudice seeping into the minds of those who may be involved in the legal proceedings in· different capacities - In the circumstances, the considered view of…
Supreme Court of India30 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 257 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 646
F The respondent companies are engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of family planning products including Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCPs). The respondent no. 3-Union of India floated an open tender to procure the OCPs. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 requested G respondent No. 3 to .issue the tender inquiry docume…
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 253 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 605
G 1.3. The appellant was the person who had allegedly inflicted the knife blows on the deceased. In this view of the matter, there is absolutely no doubt that he was the primary assailant. It is also clear from the record H including the statements u/s. 313 Cr.P.C that it was the DILPESH BALCHANDRA PANCHAL v. STATE OF …
Supreme Court of India28 Apr 2010Full text
2010 INSC 250 · [2010] 5 S.C.R. 368
VIJENDER KUMAR @ VIJAY v. STATE OF DELHI 369 Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 351 of A 2005. Sanjeev Bhatnagar, Brig. M.L. Khatter, Kusum Chaudhary for the Appellant. Ashok Bhan, Sadhana Sandhu, Anil Katiyar for the B Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER .C 1. In the light …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis