⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,081–7,100 · Page 355 of 382
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 226 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1054
the High COloit. D Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The heading of Section 50 of the Sree Sankarayacharya University of Sanskrit Act, 1994 would make it clear that any act done in good faith is protected. E The appellant, being Vice-Chancellor of the University was one of th…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 225 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 989
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
7,081–7,100 · Page 355 of 382
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 226 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1054
the High COloit. D Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The heading of Section 50 of the Sree Sankarayacharya University of Sanskrit Act, 1994 would make it clear that any act done in good faith is protected. E The appellant, being Vice-Chancellor of the University was one of th…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 225 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 989
CONSTITUTION OF IND/A. 1950 G Anic/t=>~ 23, 15(3), 21-A, 24, 39 (e), (f), and 45 rlw s.23 of Juvenile Justice Act- Protection of children against sexual abuse - HELD: Sexual abuse of children is one of the most heinous crimes - There are special safeguards in the 989 H 990 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 3 S.C.R. A Consti…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 224 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 977
s .. 21(b) ~ Revisional power of National Commission - In · the claim petition filed by insured against insurer both, the G ,District Forum and the State Commission, after considering -the evidence on record, ·recorded a finding that on the date of the accident, the driver of the bus was holding a valid licence to driv…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 223 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1033
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 1033 SANGAM SPINNERS LTO. , A v. ' UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 476 of 2003) MARCH 18, 2011 B [DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.] Central Excise Rules, 1944 - rr. 57A and 578 - High , Speed Diesel Oil - MODVAT credit - Benefit of - High C Speed Diesel Oil used for the purpose of gen…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 222 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1024
- - Since the Debts Recovery Tribunal had not determined the debt due, the borrower is directed to deposit with the G Appellate Tribunal an amount of Rs. 15 lakhs within a period of four weeks - Thereafter, appeal to be entertained and decided on merits. s. 18, second proviso - Right to file appeal subject to H 1024 NA…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 221 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 1
[2011] 5 S.C.R. 1 STATE OF M.P. A V. RAMESH AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1289 of 2005) MARCH 18, 2011 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 and s. 302 rlw s. 1208 - Murder - Allegation that respondent no.1 and respondent no.2 murdered the husband of respondent no.2 - Prosecution C prima…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 220 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 970
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This transfer petition has been filed by the father of Ranbir Singh (hereinafter referred · to as 'the deceased'), who according to the prosecution, was killed by the respondents in a fake encounter. On 2nd of July, C 2009, the deceased who was a MBA student had gone to Dehradun in search o…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 22 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 198
Customs Tariff Act, 1975: c s.9-A - Anti dumping duty - Refund of- HELD: In view of the fact that importers and its constituent members have passed on the burden of levy on third persons, they cannot claim refund of the anti-dumping duty levied - Doctrine of __,.__ unjust enrichment is attracted - Customs Tariff (Ident…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 219 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 964
Mahra for the Appellants. c Deepak Kumar and Sudarsh Menon for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER D Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 31.07.2006. · The facts have been given in the impugned j…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 218 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 951
2. With regard to SLP (C) Nos. 4304 of 2009, concerning financial years of 1999-2000 and 2001-2002, the a…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 217 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 946
witnesses are always under constant threat and there is prima facie involvement of all the accused in a case of false encounter. D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. The allegations made against the respondents cannot be brushed aside at this stage. The E CBI after investigation of the matter has already submitted…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 216 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 653
·, In the instant case, respondents filed writ petition claiming benefit of additional transfer development rights (TOR) from the Development Control Regulation for G Greater Bombay, 1991 as they had developed no.t only the export office of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (MCGB) but also done the asphalatin…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 215 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 639
640 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 5 S.C.R. A Petitions and even if those Civil Revisions were filed and could be entertained, all the questions regarding the correctness of the calculation memos had also been finally closed, firstly, by the judgment in civil revision petitions filed by the APSRTC and lastly by dismissal…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 214 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 618
THDC INDIA LTD. v. VOITH HYDRO GMBH CO. AND 619 ANR. 2007. However the tender was not finalized due to legal A battle between the two bidders, respondent No.1 and respondent No.2. Respondent no.1 filed writ petition. The High Court; by the impugned order, passed an interim order staying the whole tender process. • B Al…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 213 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 932
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 932 A B.PREMANAND & OTHERS v. MOHAN KOIKAL & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2684 of 2007) MARCH 16, 2011 B [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Kera/a State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1959: r.27(c) - Seniority - Post of Block Development Officer -C lnter-se seniority between the general category c…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 212 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 920
c Object of its enactment J Discussed. Paragraphs 6A(i), (ii), 6B(A)(ii), 9(a), 9(b), 1OA, 11, 12(1)(c) and 13(3)(a)- Validity of, challenged- Writ petitions and special leave petitions - Registered unrecognized D political parties seeking direction to the Election Commission of India to allot common election symbols t…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 211 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 910
R. Nedumaran for the Appellants. Shyam Diwan, B. Raghunath, Vijay Kumar for the C Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER D Delay condoned. Leave granted. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the E writ appeal filed by…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 210 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 906
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 141 - If a subsequent co .. ordinate bench of equal strength wants to take a different view from the prior decision of a co-ordinate bench, it can only F refer the matter to a larger bench - Otherwise the prior decision of a co-ordinate bench is binding on the subsequent bench of equ…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 21 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 186
~ .. UNITED RICELAND LTD. v. STATE OF HARYANA 187 AND ANR. dismissed the writ petition on the ground of delay and A laches. In the instant appeal, it was contended for the appellant that the date of commencement of an Act which is preceded by an ordinance, is the date of promulgation B of the ordinance; and that the be…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 209 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 899
In the appeal filed by the Revenue, the question for 899 H 900 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011] 3 S.C.R. A consideration before the Court was: whether a payment under an agreement not to compete (negative covenant agreement) is a capital receipt or a revenue receipt. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1. The position…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CONSTITUTION OF IND/A. 1950 G Anic/t=>~ 23, 15(3), 21-A, 24, 39 (e), (f), and 45 rlw s.23 of Juvenile Justice Act- Protection of children against sexual abuse - HELD: Sexual abuse of children is one of the most heinous crimes - There are special safeguards in the 989 H 990 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 3 S.C.R. A Consti…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 224 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 977
s .. 21(b) ~ Revisional power of National Commission - In · the claim petition filed by insured against insurer both, the G ,District Forum and the State Commission, after considering -the evidence on record, ·recorded a finding that on the date of the accident, the driver of the bus was holding a valid licence to driv…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 223 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1033
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 1033 SANGAM SPINNERS LTO. , A v. ' UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 476 of 2003) MARCH 18, 2011 B [DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.] Central Excise Rules, 1944 - rr. 57A and 578 - High , Speed Diesel Oil - MODVAT credit - Benefit of - High C Speed Diesel Oil used for the purpose of gen…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 222 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 1024
- - Since the Debts Recovery Tribunal had not determined the debt due, the borrower is directed to deposit with the G Appellate Tribunal an amount of Rs. 15 lakhs within a period of four weeks - Thereafter, appeal to be entertained and decided on merits. s. 18, second proviso - Right to file appeal subject to H 1024 NA…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 221 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 1
[2011] 5 S.C.R. 1 STATE OF M.P. A V. RAMESH AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 1289 of 2005) MARCH 18, 2011 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 and s. 302 rlw s. 1208 - Murder - Allegation that respondent no.1 and respondent no.2 murdered the husband of respondent no.2 - Prosecution C prima…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 220 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 970
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This transfer petition has been filed by the father of Ranbir Singh (hereinafter referred · to as 'the deceased'), who according to the prosecution, was killed by the respondents in a fake encounter. On 2nd of July, C 2009, the deceased who was a MBA student had gone to Dehradun in search o…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 22 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 198
Customs Tariff Act, 1975: c s.9-A - Anti dumping duty - Refund of- HELD: In view of the fact that importers and its constituent members have passed on the burden of levy on third persons, they cannot claim refund of the anti-dumping duty levied - Doctrine of __,.__ unjust enrichment is attracted - Customs Tariff (Ident…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 219 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 964
Mahra for the Appellants. c Deepak Kumar and Sudarsh Menon for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER D Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 31.07.2006. · The facts have been given in the impugned j…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 218 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 951
2. With regard to SLP (C) Nos. 4304 of 2009, concerning financial years of 1999-2000 and 2001-2002, the a…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 217 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 946
witnesses are always under constant threat and there is prima facie involvement of all the accused in a case of false encounter. D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. The allegations made against the respondents cannot be brushed aside at this stage. The E CBI after investigation of the matter has already submitted…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 216 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 653
·, In the instant case, respondents filed writ petition claiming benefit of additional transfer development rights (TOR) from the Development Control Regulation for G Greater Bombay, 1991 as they had developed no.t only the export office of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (MCGB) but also done the asphalatin…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 215 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 639
640 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 5 S.C.R. A Petitions and even if those Civil Revisions were filed and could be entertained, all the questions regarding the correctness of the calculation memos had also been finally closed, firstly, by the judgment in civil revision petitions filed by the APSRTC and lastly by dismissal…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 214 · [2011] 5 S.C.R. 618
THDC INDIA LTD. v. VOITH HYDRO GMBH CO. AND 619 ANR. 2007. However the tender was not finalized due to legal A battle between the two bidders, respondent No.1 and respondent No.2. Respondent no.1 filed writ petition. The High Court; by the impugned order, passed an interim order staying the whole tender process. • B Al…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 213 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 932
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 932 A B.PREMANAND & OTHERS v. MOHAN KOIKAL & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 2684 of 2007) MARCH 16, 2011 B [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Kera/a State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1959: r.27(c) - Seniority - Post of Block Development Officer -C lnter-se seniority between the general category c…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 212 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 920
c Object of its enactment J Discussed. Paragraphs 6A(i), (ii), 6B(A)(ii), 9(a), 9(b), 1OA, 11, 12(1)(c) and 13(3)(a)- Validity of, challenged- Writ petitions and special leave petitions - Registered unrecognized D political parties seeking direction to the Election Commission of India to allot common election symbols t…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 211 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 910
R. Nedumaran for the Appellants. Shyam Diwan, B. Raghunath, Vijay Kumar for the C Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER D Delay condoned. Leave granted. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the E writ appeal filed by…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 210 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 906
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 141 - If a subsequent co .. ordinate bench of equal strength wants to take a different view from the prior decision of a co-ordinate bench, it can only F refer the matter to a larger bench - Otherwise the prior decision of a co-ordinate bench is binding on the subsequent bench of equ…
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 21 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 186
~ .. UNITED RICELAND LTD. v. STATE OF HARYANA 187 AND ANR. dismissed the writ petition on the ground of delay and A laches. In the instant appeal, it was contended for the appellant that the date of commencement of an Act which is preceded by an ordinance, is the date of promulgation B of the ordinance; and that the be…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2011Full text
2011 INSC 209 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 899
In the appeal filed by the Revenue, the question for 899 H 900 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011] 3 S.C.R. A consideration before the Court was: whether a payment under an agreement not to compete (negative covenant agreement) is a capital receipt or a revenue receipt. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1. The position…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis