⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 382
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 376 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The High Court was justified in holding that both the civil suits were barred and thus were not triable by the Civil Court in the light of express bar contained in Section 26 of the F Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972. [Para 17] [4-E] 2. Mere perusal of the plaint in …
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2019Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
681–700 · Page 35 of 382
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 376 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1
Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The High Court was justified in holding that both the civil suits were barred and thus were not triable by the Civil Court in the light of express bar contained in Section 26 of the F Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972. [Para 17] [4-E] 2. Mere perusal of the plaint in …
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 372 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 391
391 392 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A General Insurance (Termination, Superannuation and Retirement of Officers and Development Staff) Scheme, 1976 – Cl. 4(4A) – General Insurance (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995 – Appellant tendered his resignation on 1.10.1993, however, termed it as ‘premature retirement’ …
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 371 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1005
HELD: 1.1 The instant case is basically a matrimonial dispute wherein, the husband who is the complainant has levelled allegations against the wife and her other family members. Though Gin the FIR, the complainant has mentioned that 15 women and 35 men came by vehicles but the names of 11 persons alone were disclosed i…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 369 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1076
– Revision of pay of respondent in accordance with the Rules of D 2008, fixing pay u/r. 7 – Representation by respondent for fixation of pay u/r. 11, however, pay not fixed u/r. 11 – Application before the tribunal for correct fixation of pay u/r. 11 – Dismissal of application as also review – However, in writ petition…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 368 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 504
– In writ appeal, Division Bench of High Court held that appointment order should have been issued as the candidate was acquitted in the criminal case giving him benefit of doubt – On appeal, held: If acquittal in criminal case is based on benefit of doubt or any other D technical reason, the employer can take into con…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 367 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 202
– High Court in second appeal erred in ignoring the effect of the earlier order in writ proceedings – Thus, judgment of the Trial Court dismissing the civil suit restored. H 202 POORAN SINGH v. DHANIRAM (SINCE DEAD) THR. 203 LEGAL HEIRS The Predecessor-in-interest of appellant executed a sale A deed of the suit propert…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 366 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 190
– Held: In C.A.@ SLP(C) No.5513/14, main order was passed by the High Court in the lead appeal filed by another landowner- Hari Singh – Hari Singh’s case also arose out of the same land acquisition F proceedings out of which the present bunch of appeal arises – In Hari Singh’s case, the High Court threadbare examined t…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 365 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 471
– Applications submitted be reconsidered as against the 82 vacancies (out of 511 vacancies, 429 posts were filled) and in addition, against B any other vacancies that may presently exist in respect of the Sambalpur Division and those which may arise in the next two years. Lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 364 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 372
Tiruchanur village in Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District is a E minor Inam village and therefore attracts the provisions of the 1956 Act – Entire land comprised in Survey No.234 is classified as “Peddacheruvu Poramboke” (Tank) – All the communal government poramboke lands fall u/s.2-A of the 1956 Act – These land…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 362 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 499
H 499 500 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: The finding of the Single Judge of the High Court is not sustainable that the cheques were not issued for creating any liability or debt, but ‘only’ for the payment of balance consideration and that in consequence, there was no …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 360 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1055
Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander (2012) 9 SCC 460 : [2012] 7 SCR 988; State of Rajasthan v. Fatehkaran Mehdu (2017) 3 SCC 198 : [2017] 2 SCR 491; Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (NCT) of Delhi (2009) 16 SCC 605 : [2009] 13 SCR 230; Rajbir Singh v. State of U P (2006) 4 SCC 51 : [2006] 2 SCR 1134 – relied on. H 1055 1056 SU…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 36 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 100
100 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 100 [2019] 1 S.C.R. A ALOK KUMAR VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1309 of 2018) B JANUARY 08, 2019 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 – ss.8(1)(a), (d) and 11 – Competence of the CVC and the…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 359 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 357
H 357 358 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.The short question which is posed for consideration before this Court is, right of a married daughter by way of succession in the “lease premises” and whether with respect to “lease premises”, a married daughter shall have a B righ…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 358 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 484
– ECGC rejected the claim of the first respondent inter alia invoking G exclusionary provision – First respondent’s complaint allowed by the State Commission – National Commission confirmed the order – On appeal, held: First respondent was unable to produce the relevant documents as required by ECGC – Further, ECGC rai…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 357 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 1069
1070 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff has specifically admitted that the plaintiff and his brother executed the gift deed on 06.03.1981. It is admitted that the gift deed is a registered gift deed. It also emerges from the plaint that till 2003, neither the …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 356 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 1084
– The question framed by High Court cannot be said to be substantial question of law – Thus, High Court exceeded its jurisdiction while deciding the second appeal – First Appellate Court, on appreciation F of evidence, gave cogent reasons and High Court wrongly interfered with the same. Allowing the appeal, the Court H…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 355 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1040
The following Order of the Court was passed O R D E R G 1. Pursuant to the Order dated December 6, 2018 passed by this Court, we are informed by Senior Counsel Mr. D. A. Dave representing the State Trading Corporation of India, and Mr. Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate for the Respondents, that the amount of Rs. 600 crores …
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 354 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 700
H 700 MUKESH CHAND v. STATE(NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. 701 From the Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2018 of the High Court A of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl. M.A. No. 49292 of 2018 in Crl. M.C. No. 2757 of 2018 . V. K. Sharma, Anil Kumar Gautam, Advs. for the Appellant. K. M. Nataraj, ASG, Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Amit Kumar (for BB.…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 353 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 313
Dismissing the Writ Petition, the Court HELD: 1. When contempt is committed in the face of the Court, judges’ hands are not tied behind their backs. The majesty of this Court as well as the administration of justice both demand that contemptuous behavior of this kind be dealt with sternly. An early judgment of this Cou…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 352 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1049
appeal, held: Merely on entertaining a different view on interpretation of rule 75, it was not open to Division Bench of High Court to review previous judgment and order passed by a different Division Bench of High Court – High Court while deciding the review has committed a fundamental jurisdictional error – It has ac…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2019 INSC 372 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 391
391 392 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A General Insurance (Termination, Superannuation and Retirement of Officers and Development Staff) Scheme, 1976 – Cl. 4(4A) – General Insurance (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995 – Appellant tendered his resignation on 1.10.1993, however, termed it as ‘premature retirement’ …
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 371 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1005
HELD: 1.1 The instant case is basically a matrimonial dispute wherein, the husband who is the complainant has levelled allegations against the wife and her other family members. Though Gin the FIR, the complainant has mentioned that 15 women and 35 men came by vehicles but the names of 11 persons alone were disclosed i…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 369 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1076
– Revision of pay of respondent in accordance with the Rules of D 2008, fixing pay u/r. 7 – Representation by respondent for fixation of pay u/r. 11, however, pay not fixed u/r. 11 – Application before the tribunal for correct fixation of pay u/r. 11 – Dismissal of application as also review – However, in writ petition…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 368 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 504
– In writ appeal, Division Bench of High Court held that appointment order should have been issued as the candidate was acquitted in the criminal case giving him benefit of doubt – On appeal, held: If acquittal in criminal case is based on benefit of doubt or any other D technical reason, the employer can take into con…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 367 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 202
– High Court in second appeal erred in ignoring the effect of the earlier order in writ proceedings – Thus, judgment of the Trial Court dismissing the civil suit restored. H 202 POORAN SINGH v. DHANIRAM (SINCE DEAD) THR. 203 LEGAL HEIRS The Predecessor-in-interest of appellant executed a sale A deed of the suit propert…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 366 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 190
– Held: In C.A.@ SLP(C) No.5513/14, main order was passed by the High Court in the lead appeal filed by another landowner- Hari Singh – Hari Singh’s case also arose out of the same land acquisition F proceedings out of which the present bunch of appeal arises – In Hari Singh’s case, the High Court threadbare examined t…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 365 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 471
– Applications submitted be reconsidered as against the 82 vacancies (out of 511 vacancies, 429 posts were filled) and in addition, against B any other vacancies that may presently exist in respect of the Sambalpur Division and those which may arise in the next two years. Lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93…
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 364 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 372
Tiruchanur village in Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District is a E minor Inam village and therefore attracts the provisions of the 1956 Act – Entire land comprised in Survey No.234 is classified as “Peddacheruvu Poramboke” (Tank) – All the communal government poramboke lands fall u/s.2-A of the 1956 Act – These land…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 362 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 499
H 499 500 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: The finding of the Single Judge of the High Court is not sustainable that the cheques were not issued for creating any liability or debt, but ‘only’ for the payment of balance consideration and that in consequence, there was no …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 360 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1055
Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander (2012) 9 SCC 460 : [2012] 7 SCR 988; State of Rajasthan v. Fatehkaran Mehdu (2017) 3 SCC 198 : [2017] 2 SCR 491; Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (NCT) of Delhi (2009) 16 SCC 605 : [2009] 13 SCR 230; Rajbir Singh v. State of U P (2006) 4 SCC 51 : [2006] 2 SCR 1134 – relied on. H 1055 1056 SU…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 36 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 100
100 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 100 [2019] 1 S.C.R. A ALOK KUMAR VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1309 of 2018) B JANUARY 08, 2019 [RANJAN GOGOI, CJI, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 – ss.8(1)(a), (d) and 11 – Competence of the CVC and the…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 359 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 357
H 357 358 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.The short question which is posed for consideration before this Court is, right of a married daughter by way of succession in the “lease premises” and whether with respect to “lease premises”, a married daughter shall have a B righ…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 358 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 484
– ECGC rejected the claim of the first respondent inter alia invoking G exclusionary provision – First respondent’s complaint allowed by the State Commission – National Commission confirmed the order – On appeal, held: First respondent was unable to produce the relevant documents as required by ECGC – Further, ECGC rai…
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 357 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 1069
1070 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 4 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The plaintiff has specifically admitted that the plaintiff and his brother executed the gift deed on 06.03.1981. It is admitted that the gift deed is a registered gift deed. It also emerges from the plaint that till 2003, neither the …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 356 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 1084
– The question framed by High Court cannot be said to be substantial question of law – Thus, High Court exceeded its jurisdiction while deciding the second appeal – First Appellate Court, on appreciation F of evidence, gave cogent reasons and High Court wrongly interfered with the same. Allowing the appeal, the Court H…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 355 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 1040
The following Order of the Court was passed O R D E R G 1. Pursuant to the Order dated December 6, 2018 passed by this Court, we are informed by Senior Counsel Mr. D. A. Dave representing the State Trading Corporation of India, and Mr. Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate for the Respondents, that the amount of Rs. 600 crores …
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 354 · [2019] 4 S.C.R. 700
H 700 MUKESH CHAND v. STATE(NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. 701 From the Judgment and Order dated 10.12.2018 of the High Court A of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl. M.A. No. 49292 of 2018 in Crl. M.C. No. 2757 of 2018 . V. K. Sharma, Anil Kumar Gautam, Advs. for the Appellant. K. M. Nataraj, ASG, Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Amit Kumar (for BB.…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 353 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 313
Dismissing the Writ Petition, the Court HELD: 1. When contempt is committed in the face of the Court, judges’ hands are not tied behind their backs. The majesty of this Court as well as the administration of justice both demand that contemptuous behavior of this kind be dealt with sternly. An early judgment of this Cou…
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2019Full text
2019 INSC 352 · [2019] 5 S.C.R. 1049
appeal, held: Merely on entertaining a different view on interpretation of rule 75, it was not open to Division Bench of High Court to review previous judgment and order passed by a different Division Bench of High Court – High Court while deciding the review has committed a fundamental jurisdictional error – It has ac…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis