⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,681–6,700 · Page 335 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 588 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 372
B The respondent was the second highest bidder for the bid of collection of toll. In terms of the written offer/ bid, the respondent agreed to ke,ep the bid open for acceptance upto 90 days after the last date of receipt of bid. As the highest bidder failed to deposit the security C amount and the first instalment with…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 587 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 349
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,681–6,700 · Page 335 of 382
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 588 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 372
B The respondent was the second highest bidder for the bid of collection of toll. In terms of the written offer/ bid, the respondent agreed to ke,ep the bid open for acceptance upto 90 days after the last date of receipt of bid. As the highest bidder failed to deposit the security C amount and the first instalment with…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 587 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 349
Criminal law - Judgment of acquittal - Sustainability of 349 H 350 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 10 S.C.R A - Held: Merely because the acquittal is found to be wrong and another view can be taken, the judgment of acquittal cannot be upset. According to the prosecution, appellant-accused committed murder of his elder bro…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 586 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 324
D EVIDENCE: Date of birth - Proving of -Medical certificate - Held: The medical certificate produced in· the instant case is described as "Age Proof Certificate" - It is very vague and unreliable -Whether or not any radiological examination or any E ossification test was conducted is not reflected in the certificate - …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 585 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 286
- Impugned judgment of the Single Judge and the Division H 286 SECRETARY, ALL INDIA PRE-MEDICAUPRE-DENTAL EXAMINATION, 287 C.B.S.E. v. KHUSHBOO SHRIVASTAVA Bench of the High Court are set aside and the writ petition is A dismissed - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226. Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Hig…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 584 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 160
H 160 AMITAVA BANERJEE @AMIT @ BAPPA BANERJEE 161 v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL CRIMINAL LAW· Motive - Significance of, and effect of A ·its absence - Discussed. The prosecution case was that the appellant strangulated the victim-deceased to death and buried his dead body in jungle. The trial court convicted the B appellant …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 583 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 140
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. UNION OF INDIA & 141 ANR. between the parties - The original plaint proceeds on the A basis that exercise of power by the Central Government by passing the impugned Notifications ulss.58(3) and 58(4) of the MPR Act was arbitrary, unjust and unfair and had resulted in serious anomalies in the …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 582 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 279
Saurabh Chaudri & ·Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2003) C 11 SCC 146: 2003 (5) Suppl. SCR 152 - referred to. Case Law Reference: 2003 (5) Suppl. SCR 152 referred to Para 5 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7037-7038 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 06.04.2011 of the High Court od Kerala at Ernak…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 581 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 754
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ANR. v. SUNIL KUMAR 755 VAISH & ORS. and acted upon by issuing an order in accordance with Articles A 77(1) and (2) or Articles 166(1) and (2) - The noting in the file or even a decision gets culminated into an order affecting right of the parties only when it is expressed in the name of the Pres…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 580 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 276
276H RAVIRAJ UDUPA v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE 277 COMPANY LTD. & ORS. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. A 7074-7075 o.f 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 31.01.2009 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in MFA No. 7617 of 2003(MV). and MFA. Crob. No. 218 of 2004(MV). B S.N. Bhat for the Appellan…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 58 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 134 A M/S. SHREE SIDHBALI STEELS LTD. AND ORS. V. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 537 of 2000) JANUARY 20, 2011 B [J.M. PANCHAL, DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948: c s. 49 - Notification issued in exercise of powers conferred by s. 49 of the Act, gr…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 579 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 115
116 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 12 S.C.R. A Urban Land Ceiling Act with regard to exemption - The lawyers of the appellant had perused all the relevant documents and on their advise, draft sale deed was prepared and that too after proper inspection of the site and building -· The information sought for by the appellan…
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 578 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 260
Appellant nos. 2 to 4-Constables while patrolling found respondent nos.3 and 4 fighting with each other in an intoxicated condition. They were booked under Sections 107/151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 C and were produced before the Special Executive Magistrate The respondents could not furnish the bonds and…
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 577 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 253
Dispute arose between the writ petitioners and others regarding immovable property. The proceedings · G under Sections 107i151 Cr.P.C. were initiated against the writ petitioners. The grievance of the writ petitioners in two separate writ petitions before the High Court was that the police illegally detained them for o…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 576 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 241
23.4. 1969 cancelled - Revision petition pending before Revenue Minister -- Suit filed before the Court of Munsif -Decreed - Subsequently, Revenue Minister cancelled the F order dated 23.4.1969 - Division Bench of High Court in appeal arising of a writ petition upheld the validity of the order dated 23. 4. 1969 on the …
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 575 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 218
Administrative law: Principle of natural justice -G Applicability of - Held: The requirements of natural justice must depend on the circumstances of the. case, the nature of the inquiry, the rules under which the Tribunal is acting, the subject matter that is being dealt with and so forth - Natural justice. H ' 218 ORI…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 574 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 203
Disposing of the appeal, the Court H HELD: 1. The Division Bench· the High Court rightly SATIMBLA SHA~A AND ORS. v. ST. PAUL'S 205 SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL held that the teachers of private unaided minority schools . A · had no right to claim salary equal to that of their counter-parts working in .Government schools and…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 573 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 196
ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION 197 LTD. v. KHAGESWAR SUNDARAY current pay and pay their current salary accordingly - On A appeal, held: The view taken by the High Court that the decision of OSEB was arbitrary and discriminatory is not sustainable in law - The OSEB as the employer was fully with its powers to dec…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 572 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 1176
[2011] 11 S.C.R. 1176 A KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMIT!, ALLAHABAD v. MIS. BAIDYANATH AYURVED BHAWAN (P) LTD. AND ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 8963 of 2003) B AUGUST 11, 2011 [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 C (the Act 1964) - s.9 - Respondent-company purchased specifie…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 571 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 56
[2011] 10 S.C.R. 56 A MOHD. ARIF @ ASHFAQ v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal Nos. 98-99 of 2009) AUGUST 10, 2011 B [V.S. SIRPURKAR AND T. S. THAKUR, JJ.) CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: C Article 136 - Scope of - Held: Supreme Court ordinarily does not go into the appreciation of evidence, particularly, where there…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 570 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 1138
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 319 - Power under - Ambit and scope of - Explained. H 1138 SAROJBEN ASHWINKUMAR SHAH v. STATE OF 1139 GUJARAT' AND ANR. ~ -' Respondent No. 2 filed a complaint against a A partnership firm and its two partners-accused no. 2 and 3, before the Judicial Magistrate, alleging commission…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Criminal law - Judgment of acquittal - Sustainability of 349 H 350 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 10 S.C.R A - Held: Merely because the acquittal is found to be wrong and another view can be taken, the judgment of acquittal cannot be upset. According to the prosecution, appellant-accused committed murder of his elder bro…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 586 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 324
D EVIDENCE: Date of birth - Proving of -Medical certificate - Held: The medical certificate produced in· the instant case is described as "Age Proof Certificate" - It is very vague and unreliable -Whether or not any radiological examination or any E ossification test was conducted is not reflected in the certificate - …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 585 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 286
- Impugned judgment of the Single Judge and the Division H 286 SECRETARY, ALL INDIA PRE-MEDICAUPRE-DENTAL EXAMINATION, 287 C.B.S.E. v. KHUSHBOO SHRIVASTAVA Bench of the High Court are set aside and the writ petition is A dismissed - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226. Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Hig…
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 584 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 160
H 160 AMITAVA BANERJEE @AMIT @ BAPPA BANERJEE 161 v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL CRIMINAL LAW· Motive - Significance of, and effect of A ·its absence - Discussed. The prosecution case was that the appellant strangulated the victim-deceased to death and buried his dead body in jungle. The trial court convicted the B appellant …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 583 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 140
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. UNION OF INDIA & 141 ANR. between the parties - The original plaint proceeds on the A basis that exercise of power by the Central Government by passing the impugned Notifications ulss.58(3) and 58(4) of the MPR Act was arbitrary, unjust and unfair and had resulted in serious anomalies in the …
Supreme Court of India17 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 582 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 279
Saurabh Chaudri & ·Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2003) C 11 SCC 146: 2003 (5) Suppl. SCR 152 - referred to. Case Law Reference: 2003 (5) Suppl. SCR 152 referred to Para 5 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7037-7038 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 06.04.2011 of the High Court od Kerala at Ernak…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 581 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 754
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ANR. v. SUNIL KUMAR 755 VAISH & ORS. and acted upon by issuing an order in accordance with Articles A 77(1) and (2) or Articles 166(1) and (2) - The noting in the file or even a decision gets culminated into an order affecting right of the parties only when it is expressed in the name of the Pres…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 580 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 276
276H RAVIRAJ UDUPA v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE 277 COMPANY LTD. & ORS. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. A 7074-7075 o.f 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 31.01.2009 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in MFA No. 7617 of 2003(MV). and MFA. Crob. No. 218 of 2004(MV). B S.N. Bhat for the Appellan…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 58 · [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134
[2011] 3 S.C.R. 134 A M/S. SHREE SIDHBALI STEELS LTD. AND ORS. V. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 537 of 2000) JANUARY 20, 2011 B [J.M. PANCHAL, DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948: c s. 49 - Notification issued in exercise of powers conferred by s. 49 of the Act, gr…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 579 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 115
116 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 12 S.C.R. A Urban Land Ceiling Act with regard to exemption - The lawyers of the appellant had perused all the relevant documents and on their advise, draft sale deed was prepared and that too after proper inspection of the site and building -· The information sought for by the appellan…
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 578 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 260
Appellant nos. 2 to 4-Constables while patrolling found respondent nos.3 and 4 fighting with each other in an intoxicated condition. They were booked under Sections 107/151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 C and were produced before the Special Executive Magistrate The respondents could not furnish the bonds and…
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 577 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 253
Dispute arose between the writ petitioners and others regarding immovable property. The proceedings · G under Sections 107i151 Cr.P.C. were initiated against the writ petitioners. The grievance of the writ petitioners in two separate writ petitions before the High Court was that the police illegally detained them for o…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 576 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 241
23.4. 1969 cancelled - Revision petition pending before Revenue Minister -- Suit filed before the Court of Munsif -Decreed - Subsequently, Revenue Minister cancelled the F order dated 23.4.1969 - Division Bench of High Court in appeal arising of a writ petition upheld the validity of the order dated 23. 4. 1969 on the …
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 575 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 218
Administrative law: Principle of natural justice -G Applicability of - Held: The requirements of natural justice must depend on the circumstances of the. case, the nature of the inquiry, the rules under which the Tribunal is acting, the subject matter that is being dealt with and so forth - Natural justice. H ' 218 ORI…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 574 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 203
Disposing of the appeal, the Court H HELD: 1. The Division Bench· the High Court rightly SATIMBLA SHA~A AND ORS. v. ST. PAUL'S 205 SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL held that the teachers of private unaided minority schools . A · had no right to claim salary equal to that of their counter-parts working in .Government schools and…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 573 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 196
ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION 197 LTD. v. KHAGESWAR SUNDARAY current pay and pay their current salary accordingly - On A appeal, held: The view taken by the High Court that the decision of OSEB was arbitrary and discriminatory is not sustainable in law - The OSEB as the employer was fully with its powers to dec…
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 572 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 1176
[2011] 11 S.C.R. 1176 A KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMIT!, ALLAHABAD v. MIS. BAIDYANATH AYURVED BHAWAN (P) LTD. AND ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 8963 of 2003) B AUGUST 11, 2011 [P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 C (the Act 1964) - s.9 - Respondent-company purchased specifie…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 571 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 56
[2011] 10 S.C.R. 56 A MOHD. ARIF @ ASHFAQ v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal Nos. 98-99 of 2009) AUGUST 10, 2011 B [V.S. SIRPURKAR AND T. S. THAKUR, JJ.) CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950: C Article 136 - Scope of - Held: Supreme Court ordinarily does not go into the appreciation of evidence, particularly, where there…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 570 · [2011] 9 S.C.R. 1138
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 319 - Power under - Ambit and scope of - Explained. H 1138 SAROJBEN ASHWINKUMAR SHAH v. STATE OF 1139 GUJARAT' AND ANR. ~ -' Respondent No. 2 filed a complaint against a A partnership firm and its two partners-accused no. 2 and 3, before the Judicial Magistrate, alleging commission…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis