Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,621–6,640 · Page 332 of 382
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 641 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 373
[2011] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 373 KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v GOBINDA CHANDRA MAKAL & ANR (Civil Appeal No. 5938 of 2007) SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 B [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND MARKANDEY KATJU, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - s. 23 - Acquisition of land falling under Mouza Madurdaha, District 24 Parganas (Sout/1) wit…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,621–6,640 · Page 332 of 382
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 641 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 373
[2011] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 373 KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A v GOBINDA CHANDRA MAKAL & ANR (Civil Appeal No. 5938 of 2007) SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 B [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND MARKANDEY KATJU, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - s. 23 - Acquisition of land falling under Mouza Madurdaha, District 24 Parganas (Sout/1) wit…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 640 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 328
[2011] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 328 A THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. SHAUNAK H.SATYA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 7571 of 2011) B SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND. A. K. PATNAIK, JJ.] Right to Information Act, 2005 - s.8(1)(d) - Examination c of candidates for enrolment as Chartered Accountants -Examinat…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 64 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 556
Despite an injunction order of the court, the appellants made an attempt to construct a drain towards -+ the house of 'BT'. This led to an altercation between the F parties. The appellants- 'BS', 'GS' and 'OS' and others armed with 'gandasi' and 'dangs' caused injuries to 'BT' and the eye-witnesses. 'BT' later succumbe…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 639 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 281
Respondent No. 3 filed an FIR against her husband and 'SK' alleging offences u/ss. 366, 376, 406, 420, 506, 344 read with s. 34 IPC. Pursuant thereto, investigation was carried out. Charge-sheet was submitted in the court u/s. 173 Cr.P.C. naming few persons as accused. This G resulted in registration of three more FIRs…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 638 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 122
H 122 PIRTHI v. MOHAN SINGH & ORS. 123 Dismissing· the appeal, the Court A HELD: 1. It is true that the suit, in the instant case, was filed prior to the amendment in the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913. The Pre-e.mption law has been amended and notified by Gazette Notification dated 8 17 .05.1995. Section 15 as amended p…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 637 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 112
the Single Judge as well as the impugned order of the Division Bench of the High Court D are, therefore, set aside and the writ· petition of respondent nos.1 to 3 is disposed of with the direction that the distribution licensee will find out whether there is any other way in which electric line can be drawn for supply …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 636 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 105
Pramod Swarup, Pareena Swarup, Pradeep Misra for the G Petitioner. The following Order of the Court was delivered 105 H 106 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A 0 R D E R Heard Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner-State of U.P. The allegations against the respondent accused, which …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 635 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 1
Constitution of India, 1950: C Article 14 - Class legislation - Permissibility of - Held: Article 14 forbids class legislation - However, it does not forbid reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation - Thus, class legislation is permitted in law provided the classification is founded on an intelligible di…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 634 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 95
The question which arose for consideration in the instant case was whether in respect of a series of offences arising out of the same transaction, some of H which were committed within India and some outside THOTA VENKATESWARLU v. STATE OF A.P. TR. 97 PRINCL. SEC. & ANR. India, such offences could be tried together, wi…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 633 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 844
- Penal Code, 1860 - s.498-A. F The marriage of the appellant and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 27 .11.2004 and the couple went to Gajarat where the appellant-husband was employed. Subsequently, differences arose between them and the wife, respondent no. 2, on 12.5.2006 made a complaint to G the Senior Superintend…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 632 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 819
Steel Authority of India v. National Union Waterfront Workers 2001 (7) SCC 1: 2001 (2) Suppl. SCR 343 - held inapplicable. G Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union 1997 (9)' SCC377: 1996 (9) Suppl. SCR 579 - referred to. 819 H 820 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 10 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference: 2001 (2) Sup…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 631 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 804
NITINBHAI SAEVATILAL SHAH & ANR. Ii. MANUBHAI 805 MANJIBHAI PANCHAL & ANR. case and there should be one - The impugned judgment is A set aside and the matter remanded to Metropolitan Magistrate for retrial in accordance with law - Jurisdiction - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - s. 138. ss. 461 and 465 -Void proceedin…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 630 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 799
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7548 of 2011. 799 H 800 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 10 S.C.R. A From the Judgment & Order dated 9.6.2008 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LP.A. No. 176 of 2008. Nagendra Rai, Shantanu Sagar, Smarhar Singh, Abhishek Kumar Singh, Gopi Raman, P. Agarwal, Preeti R…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 63 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 929
Identification - Photo identification and identification of the accused by the witnesses done for the first time before the trial court without being corroborated by Test Identification Parade or any other material - Evidentiary value - Held: D Though such identification is permissible but cannot be given credence with…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 629 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 375
1.3 The appellant no doubt inflicted the injury on the deceased with' the intention of causing such bodily injury which could result in her death and in that view of the facts and circumstance, knowledge will have to be attributed to him that he inflicted injury on the deceased D to cause death of the victim which was …
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 628 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 301
G The arbitrator directed the appellant to release all plants, machineries and equipment for use by the respondent. The appellant was also regtrained from creating any third party interest, or otherwise to deal with the properties at the work site and/or camp site. He also H recorded that the interim orders were being …
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 627 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 393
Gaurab Banerjee, ASG, Navin Prakash, Puneet Jain, Sushil Kumar Jain, Bina Gupta, Gopal Prasad, Gopal Singh, B Chandan Kumar for the appearing parites. The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. After the respondent No.1, Patna Electric Supply C Company Limited (PESCO), was taken over by the appellant, Biha…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 626 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 881
882 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A appellant - The matter in that behalf is still pending final hearing before the Single Judge - The parties are left to raise all their contentions before the Single Judge, who shall decide the matter in accordance with law - However, with regard to the interim· order…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 625 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 866
In the instant appeal, the appellant contended that it had only conducted various tests like moisture test, etc. to determine quality and quantity of Helium gas in the H 868 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A cylinders; and that even after the activity of testing, Helium gas remained as Helium gas only an…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 624 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 787
0.17 - r.1, proviso-Adjournments- Held: It is high time that courts become sensitive to delays in justice delivery G system and realize that adjournments do dent the efficacy of judicial process - The courts, particularly trial courts, must ensure that on every date of hearing, effective progress takes place in the sui…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2011 INSC 640 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 328
[2011] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 328 A THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. SHAUNAK H.SATYA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 7571 of 2011) B SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 [R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND. A. K. PATNAIK, JJ.] Right to Information Act, 2005 - s.8(1)(d) - Examination c of candidates for enrolment as Chartered Accountants -Examinat…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 64 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 556
Despite an injunction order of the court, the appellants made an attempt to construct a drain towards -+ the house of 'BT'. This led to an altercation between the F parties. The appellants- 'BS', 'GS' and 'OS' and others armed with 'gandasi' and 'dangs' caused injuries to 'BT' and the eye-witnesses. 'BT' later succumbe…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 639 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 281
Respondent No. 3 filed an FIR against her husband and 'SK' alleging offences u/ss. 366, 376, 406, 420, 506, 344 read with s. 34 IPC. Pursuant thereto, investigation was carried out. Charge-sheet was submitted in the court u/s. 173 Cr.P.C. naming few persons as accused. This G resulted in registration of three more FIRs…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 638 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 122
H 122 PIRTHI v. MOHAN SINGH & ORS. 123 Dismissing· the appeal, the Court A HELD: 1. It is true that the suit, in the instant case, was filed prior to the amendment in the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913. The Pre-e.mption law has been amended and notified by Gazette Notification dated 8 17 .05.1995. Section 15 as amended p…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 637 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 112
the Single Judge as well as the impugned order of the Division Bench of the High Court D are, therefore, set aside and the writ· petition of respondent nos.1 to 3 is disposed of with the direction that the distribution licensee will find out whether there is any other way in which electric line can be drawn for supply …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 636 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 105
Pramod Swarup, Pareena Swarup, Pradeep Misra for the G Petitioner. The following Order of the Court was delivered 105 H 106 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A 0 R D E R Heard Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner-State of U.P. The allegations against the respondent accused, which …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 635 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 1
Constitution of India, 1950: C Article 14 - Class legislation - Permissibility of - Held: Article 14 forbids class legislation - However, it does not forbid reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation - Thus, class legislation is permitted in law provided the classification is founded on an intelligible di…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 634 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 95
The question which arose for consideration in the instant case was whether in respect of a series of offences arising out of the same transaction, some of H which were committed within India and some outside THOTA VENKATESWARLU v. STATE OF A.P. TR. 97 PRINCL. SEC. & ANR. India, such offences could be tried together, wi…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 633 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 844
- Penal Code, 1860 - s.498-A. F The marriage of the appellant and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 27 .11.2004 and the couple went to Gajarat where the appellant-husband was employed. Subsequently, differences arose between them and the wife, respondent no. 2, on 12.5.2006 made a complaint to G the Senior Superintend…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 632 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 819
Steel Authority of India v. National Union Waterfront Workers 2001 (7) SCC 1: 2001 (2) Suppl. SCR 343 - held inapplicable. G Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union 1997 (9)' SCC377: 1996 (9) Suppl. SCR 579 - referred to. 819 H 820 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 10 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference: 2001 (2) Sup…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 631 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 804
NITINBHAI SAEVATILAL SHAH & ANR. Ii. MANUBHAI 805 MANJIBHAI PANCHAL & ANR. case and there should be one - The impugned judgment is A set aside and the matter remanded to Metropolitan Magistrate for retrial in accordance with law - Jurisdiction - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - s. 138. ss. 461 and 465 -Void proceedin…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 630 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 799
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7548 of 2011. 799 H 800 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 10 S.C.R. A From the Judgment & Order dated 9.6.2008 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LP.A. No. 176 of 2008. Nagendra Rai, Shantanu Sagar, Smarhar Singh, Abhishek Kumar Singh, Gopi Raman, P. Agarwal, Preeti R…
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 63 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 929
Identification - Photo identification and identification of the accused by the witnesses done for the first time before the trial court without being corroborated by Test Identification Parade or any other material - Evidentiary value - Held: D Though such identification is permissible but cannot be given credence with…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 629 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 375
1.3 The appellant no doubt inflicted the injury on the deceased with' the intention of causing such bodily injury which could result in her death and in that view of the facts and circumstance, knowledge will have to be attributed to him that he inflicted injury on the deceased D to cause death of the victim which was …
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 628 · [2011] 14 S.C.R. 301
G The arbitrator directed the appellant to release all plants, machineries and equipment for use by the respondent. The appellant was also regtrained from creating any third party interest, or otherwise to deal with the properties at the work site and/or camp site. He also H recorded that the interim orders were being …
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 627 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 393
Gaurab Banerjee, ASG, Navin Prakash, Puneet Jain, Sushil Kumar Jain, Bina Gupta, Gopal Prasad, Gopal Singh, B Chandan Kumar for the appearing parites. The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. After the respondent No.1, Patna Electric Supply C Company Limited (PESCO), was taken over by the appellant, Biha…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 626 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 881
882 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A appellant - The matter in that behalf is still pending final hearing before the Single Judge - The parties are left to raise all their contentions before the Single Judge, who shall decide the matter in accordance with law - However, with regard to the interim· order…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 625 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 866
In the instant appeal, the appellant contended that it had only conducted various tests like moisture test, etc. to determine quality and quantity of Helium gas in the H 868 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A cylinders; and that even after the activity of testing, Helium gas remained as Helium gas only an…
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2011Full text
2011 INSC 624 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 787
0.17 - r.1, proviso-Adjournments- Held: It is high time that courts become sensitive to delays in justice delivery G system and realize that adjournments do dent the efficacy of judicial process - The courts, particularly trial courts, must ensure that on every date of hearing, effective progress takes place in the sui…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis