⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,581–6,600 · Page 330 of 382
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 68 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 1062
DURBAL v. STATE OF U.P. 1063 could not be held perverse - High Court ought not to have A interfered with the judgment of the trial Court merely because there was a possibility of taking a different view - A-2 entitled to benefit of doubt and acquitted. According to the prosecution, pursuant to an earlier B altercation …
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 679 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 377
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
6,581–6,600 · Page 330 of 382
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2011Full text
2011 INSC 68 · [2011] 1 S.C.R. 1062
DURBAL v. STATE OF U.P. 1063 could not be held perverse - High Court ought not to have A interfered with the judgment of the trial Court merely because there was a possibility of taking a different view - A-2 entitled to benefit of doubt and acquitted. According to the prosecution, pursuant to an earlier B altercation …
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 679 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 377
378 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011] 11 S.C.R. A accused to bring the gun and to fire upon the deceased so as to kill him, which is corrobor?ited - Thus, it is proved and established that the appellants had the common intention of killing the deceased - They intentionally become a party to commit the murder of the deceased…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 678 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 1054
- The cross-examination of eye. witnesses on behalf of the accused indicated that none of the accused was in fact misled by so.-ca/led error pointe"d out by High Court - The remand of case to trial court for fresh consideration on the H 1054 SANTOSH KUMAR! v. STATE OF J & K & ORS. 1055 point of charge was not warranted…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 677 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 1000
(2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1000 A AJITSINGH HARNAMSINGH GUJRAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal No. 1969 of 2009) SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 B [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Murder - Accused burnt C his wife and three children to death by pouring petrol on them and setting…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 676 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 871
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Ors. (1997) 2 SCC 353: 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 973 - referred to. c Case Law Reference: 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 973 Referred to Para 9 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7785 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 28.09.2007 of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. No. 7987 (W) of …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 675 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 675
[2011] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 675 PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. A v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7780 OF 2011) SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 B [DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.] Water charges - Levy of increased water charges -Challenged, on ground that it could not be given retrospective effect - Held: …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 674 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 496
Compulsory retirement - Held: Is not considered to be E a punishment - Un-communicated adverse remarks can be taken into consideration while deciding the question whether an official should be made to retire compulsorily or not -Therefore the principles of natural justice are not attracted -Thus, the fact that the adve…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 673 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 374
1135-1136 of 2009. G From the Judgment & Order dated 28.09.2007 of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. 7987 (W) of 2002. Avijit Bhattacharjee, Sarbani Kar, Debnjani Das H 374 FRIENDS OF VICTORIA MEMORIAL v. HOWRAH 375 GANATANTRIK NAGARIK SAMITY Purkayashta, Bidyabrata Acharya, Pranab Kumar Mullick for A the Petitioner. Res…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 672 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 326
- Held: The power and discretion vested in the President by virtue of Regulation 16(a) of the Pension Regulations, to forfeit0 and deny the pension in full or in part to an officer, who is dismissed or cashiered, is independent of the punishment imposed uls. 71 of the Act by the court martial - High Court having held t…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 671 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 365
366 SUPREME COURT REPORTS· [2011) 11 S.C.R. A material collected by the SIT, to the court which had taken cognizance of Crime Report No. 67 of 2002, as required uls 173(2) - However, if for any stated reason the SIT opines in its report that there is no sufficient evidence or reasonable grounds for proceeding ag.ainst …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 670 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 1
--- [2011] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1 SHRI AMBYA KALYA MHATRE (D) THROUGH LEGAL A HEIRS & ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Civil Appeal No. 7784 of 2011) B SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 [R.V. RAVEENDRAN, H.L. GOKHALE AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss. 18 and 23 - Lands C belonging to appellants acquired for New…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 669 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 454
G. REDDEIAH v. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 455 PRADESH & ANR. no violation of any of the safeguards - In view of enormous A activities of the detenue violating various provisions of /PC, the A.P. Act and the Rules, and his habituality in pursuing the same type of offences, the reasoning of the Detaining Authority as approved …
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 668 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 300
Compensation ....; HELD: The power and jurisdiction of G Supreme Court and High Courts to grant monetary compensation in exercise of its jurisdiction respectively under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution to a victim whose fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution are H 302 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 667 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 299
Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 58 - Differences between Art.58 of the 1963 Limitation Act and Art.120 of the 1908 Limitation Act - Discussed - Indian Limitation Act, 1908 -Article 120. E Appellant No.2-'L' and his three brothers, who claim to have purchased land comprised in khasra Nos.27281 167412 and 27281167413 tota…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 666 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 269
H MARATHWADA GRAMIN BANK KARAMCHARI SANGHATANA v. MNGT. OF 271 MARATHWADA GRAMIN BANK Dismissing the appeals, the Court A HELD: .1. Owing to huge accumulated losses of the respondent bank, the bank though continued to pay a~cording to the provisions of the statutory Scheme, but discontinued payment of provident fund in…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 665 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 435
436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 12 S.C.R. A laws house and during his life time, he had no other source of income except from. the tenanted lands. 'P' purchased certain lands A(4)-A(6) under a Sale Deed from the income of the land gifted to her by her father. Thereafter, with the income from the said two lands, 'P' ,8…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 664 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 263
264 SUPREME COURT REPORTS '[2011) 11 S.C.R. A. proceedings before the Inquiry Officer - Moreover it was established from the records and the report of the Inquiry Officer that no medical certificate was produced by the appellant before the Inquiry Officer during the departmental proceeding - Contention that period of a…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 663 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 249
- They could raise industrial disputes concerning their dismissal from service - Thus, the judgment passed by first appellate court as also Patna High Court was illegal and without jurisdiction - Judgment and decree under challenge 249 H 250 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A are set aside and suit is dismissed -…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 662 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 246
F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7756 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 09.08.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Special Appeal No. 1066 G of 2004. R.D. Upadhyay, Dr. Madan Sharma, J.P. Tripathy, Ashay Upadhyay for the Appellants. H 246 MUKHIYAKARYAPALAKADHIKARI, U. P. KHADITA…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 661 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 237
238 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A satisfactory - Thus, so long an order is not passed holding that the service of the appellant is good and satisfactory, it could not have been held that his service could be regularised automatically by a deeming provision. B Kedar Nath Bahl vs. The State of Punjab and Ors. …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
378 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011] 11 S.C.R. A accused to bring the gun and to fire upon the deceased so as to kill him, which is corrobor?ited - Thus, it is proved and established that the appellants had the common intention of killing the deceased - They intentionally become a party to commit the murder of the deceased…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 678 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 1054
- The cross-examination of eye. witnesses on behalf of the accused indicated that none of the accused was in fact misled by so.-ca/led error pointe"d out by High Court - The remand of case to trial court for fresh consideration on the H 1054 SANTOSH KUMAR! v. STATE OF J & K & ORS. 1055 point of charge was not warranted…
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 677 · [2011] 13 S.C.R. 1000
(2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1000 A AJITSINGH HARNAMSINGH GUJRAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Criminal Appeal No. 1969 of 2009) SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 B [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 - Murder - Accused burnt C his wife and three children to death by pouring petrol on them and setting…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 676 · [2011] 10 S.C.R. 871
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Ors. (1997) 2 SCC 353: 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 973 - referred to. c Case Law Reference: 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 973 Referred to Para 9 D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7785 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 28.09.2007 of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. No. 7987 (W) of …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 675 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 675
[2011] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 675 PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD. A v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7780 OF 2011) SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 B [DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA AND ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.] Water charges - Levy of increased water charges -Challenged, on ground that it could not be given retrospective effect - Held: …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 674 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 496
Compulsory retirement - Held: Is not considered to be E a punishment - Un-communicated adverse remarks can be taken into consideration while deciding the question whether an official should be made to retire compulsorily or not -Therefore the principles of natural justice are not attracted -Thus, the fact that the adve…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 673 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 374
1135-1136 of 2009. G From the Judgment & Order dated 28.09.2007 of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. 7987 (W) of 2002. Avijit Bhattacharjee, Sarbani Kar, Debnjani Das H 374 FRIENDS OF VICTORIA MEMORIAL v. HOWRAH 375 GANATANTRIK NAGARIK SAMITY Purkayashta, Bidyabrata Acharya, Pranab Kumar Mullick for A the Petitioner. Res…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 672 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 326
- Held: The power and discretion vested in the President by virtue of Regulation 16(a) of the Pension Regulations, to forfeit0 and deny the pension in full or in part to an officer, who is dismissed or cashiered, is independent of the punishment imposed uls. 71 of the Act by the court martial - High Court having held t…
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 671 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 365
366 SUPREME COURT REPORTS· [2011) 11 S.C.R. A material collected by the SIT, to the court which had taken cognizance of Crime Report No. 67 of 2002, as required uls 173(2) - However, if for any stated reason the SIT opines in its report that there is no sufficient evidence or reasonable grounds for proceeding ag.ainst …
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 670 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 1
--- [2011] 15 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 1 SHRI AMBYA KALYA MHATRE (D) THROUGH LEGAL A HEIRS & ORS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (Civil Appeal No. 7784 of 2011) B SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 [R.V. RAVEENDRAN, H.L. GOKHALE AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss. 18 and 23 - Lands C belonging to appellants acquired for New…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 669 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 454
G. REDDEIAH v. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 455 PRADESH & ANR. no violation of any of the safeguards - In view of enormous A activities of the detenue violating various provisions of /PC, the A.P. Act and the Rules, and his habituality in pursuing the same type of offences, the reasoning of the Detaining Authority as approved …
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 668 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 300
Compensation ....; HELD: The power and jurisdiction of G Supreme Court and High Courts to grant monetary compensation in exercise of its jurisdiction respectively under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution to a victim whose fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution are H 302 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2011…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 667 · [2011] 15 S.C.R. 299
Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 58 - Differences between Art.58 of the 1963 Limitation Act and Art.120 of the 1908 Limitation Act - Discussed - Indian Limitation Act, 1908 -Article 120. E Appellant No.2-'L' and his three brothers, who claim to have purchased land comprised in khasra Nos.27281 167412 and 27281167413 tota…
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 666 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 269
H MARATHWADA GRAMIN BANK KARAMCHARI SANGHATANA v. MNGT. OF 271 MARATHWADA GRAMIN BANK Dismissing the appeals, the Court A HELD: .1. Owing to huge accumulated losses of the respondent bank, the bank though continued to pay a~cording to the provisions of the statutory Scheme, but discontinued payment of provident fund in…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 665 · [2011] 12 S.C.R. 435
436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 12 S.C.R. A laws house and during his life time, he had no other source of income except from. the tenanted lands. 'P' purchased certain lands A(4)-A(6) under a Sale Deed from the income of the land gifted to her by her father. Thereafter, with the income from the said two lands, 'P' ,8…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 664 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 263
264 SUPREME COURT REPORTS '[2011) 11 S.C.R. A. proceedings before the Inquiry Officer - Moreover it was established from the records and the report of the Inquiry Officer that no medical certificate was produced by the appellant before the Inquiry Officer during the departmental proceeding - Contention that period of a…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 663 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 249
- They could raise industrial disputes concerning their dismissal from service - Thus, the judgment passed by first appellate court as also Patna High Court was illegal and without jurisdiction - Judgment and decree under challenge 249 H 250 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A are set aside and suit is dismissed -…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 662 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 246
F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 7756 of 2011. From the Judgment & Order dated 09.08.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Special Appeal No. 1066 G of 2004. R.D. Upadhyay, Dr. Madan Sharma, J.P. Tripathy, Ashay Upadhyay for the Appellants. H 246 MUKHIYAKARYAPALAKADHIKARI, U. P. KHADITA…
Supreme Court of India8 Sep 2011Full text
2011 INSC 661 · [2011] 11 S.C.R. 237
238 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A satisfactory - Thus, so long an order is not passed holding that the service of the appellant is good and satisfactory, it could not have been held that his service could be regularised automatically by a deeming provision. B Kedar Nath Bahl vs. The State of Punjab and Ors. …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis