⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
41–60 · Page 3 of 10
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 66 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 608
his concurring judgment Justice 0. Chinnappa Reddy held as follows: G "25. Judged in the light shed by Maneka Gandhi and Bachan Singh, it is impossible to uphold Section 303 as valid. Section 303 excludes judicial discretion. The … struck down as unconstitutional." 46. It is now well settled that in view of decision in Maneka C Gandhi vs. Union of India - (1978) 1 SCC 248, Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab - (1980) 2 SCC 684 and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India14 May 2015Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
41–60 · Page 3 of 10
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2012Full text
2012 INSC 66 · [2012] 4 S.C.R. 608
his concurring judgment Justice 0. Chinnappa Reddy held as follows: G "25. Judged in the light shed by Maneka Gandhi and Bachan Singh, it is impossible to uphold Section 303 as valid. Section 303 excludes judicial discretion. The … struck down as unconstitutional." 46. It is now well settled that in view of decision in Maneka C Gandhi vs. Union of India - (1978) 1 SCC 248, Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab - (1980) 2 SCC 684 and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India14 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 414 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 853
which require a Mahatma Gandhi to own up Himalayan blunders and unfold unpleasant truths truthfully. c 78. In Maneka Gandhi (supra), this Court observed thus
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2021Full text
2021 INSC 324 · [2021] 14 S.C.R. 611
privileges can override Article 19 but not Article 21 stood Foverruled in view of the judicial pronouncements in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India43 and R.C. Cooper v. Union of India44. It would be relevant to reproduce para
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 388 · [2012] 12 S.C.R. 256
SCC 386: 1997 (4) Suppl. SCR 68; Chintaman Rao v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (1950) SCR 759; Maneka Gandhi D v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Brij Bhushan v. State
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 912 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106
Supp SCC 1; E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu &Another1974 (2) SCR348: (1974) 4 SCC 3; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & D Another 1978 (2) SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248 -referred
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 789 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 961
Supp SCC 1; EP Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu [1974] 2 SCR 348 : (1974) 4 SCC 3; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978] 2 SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248; State of Andhra Pradesh v. McDowell
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 355 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 596
principles of natural justice would be against the proprieties of justice. This has been restated in the post Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India& Anr.29 era in a series of judgments. This Court, in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 May 2014Full text
2014 INSC 358 · [2014] 6 S.C.R. 873
India and F Ors. (2006) 7 SCC 1: 2006 (5) Suppl. SCR 1; Union of India v. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association (2010) 11 SCC 1: 2010 (6) SCR 857; K. T. Plantation (P} Ltd. & Anr … Indra Sawhney (2) v. Union of India and Ors. (2000) 1 SCC 168: 1999 (5) Suppl. SCR 229; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2016Full text
2018 INSC 686 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 606
whether the legislation violated the right guaranteed under Article 19( I)( c). Relying upon the decisions in Ma/1eka Gandhi v. Union of India, ( 1978) 1 SCC 248; All India Bank Employees' Association v. National Industrial Tribunal, AIR … running an institution or otherwise. The Court said: "From a reading of the two decisions, namely, Smt. Maneka Gandhi s case (supra), (seven-Judges Bench) and All India G Bank Employees Associations case (supra), (jive-Judges Bench), the
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 May 2019Full text
2019 INSC 680 · [2019] 7 S.C.R. 738
Ratlam v. Shri Vardichand and others (1980) 4 SCC 162 : [1981] 1 SCR 97 ; Secretary and G Mahatama Gandhi Mission and another v. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena and others (2017) 4 SCC 449 ; Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka … Chandigarh Administration and others v. Rajni Vali and others (2000) 2 SCC 42 : [2000] 1 SCR 158 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and B another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 ; State of Haryana and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 236 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 58
under Article 21 can never be suspended, and amended Article 359(1) to give effect to this. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India , decided nine years after Tilokchand Motichand , Article 21 has been given its new dimension
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 234 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 358
where the need for promptitude or the urgency of taking action so demands, as pointed out in Maneka Gandhi case [(1978) 1 SCC 248 : (1978) 2 SCR 621, 676] at p. 681. If legislation and the necessities
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 219 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 465
Reports Case Law Cited S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India [1967] 2 SCR 703 : AIR 1967 SC 1427; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978] 2 SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248; Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Matched in judgment text
Rajasthan High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:RJ-JP:23947 · CW/5036/2026
business guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India reported in 1978 AIR 597 has categorically held that any procedure which deprives
Matched in judgment text
Punjab & Haryana High Court15 Jul 2026Full text
CRM-M/36098/2026
ensure 'reasonable, just and fair' procedure which has a creative connotation after the decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi." The Court further observed : "92. Of course, no length of time is per se too long to pass
Matched in judgment text
Orissa High Court18 Aug 2026Full text
CRLREV/302/2026
for issuance of an NOC for the purpose of obtaining a passport. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr., (1978) 1 SCC 248, has held that the right to travel abroad
Matched in judgment text
Madras High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
WP/21240/2026
applicant and the authorities. The above violation is against the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Maneka Gandhi – Vs – Union of India (1978 (1) SCC 248) and State of Orissa – Vs – Dr.Binapani Dei (AIR
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WA/1963/2025
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WA/1961/2025
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court17 Jun 2026Full text
2026:KHC:29664 · WP/23497/2021
argument, he has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another1. The impugned order passed by respondent No.1 is in violation of principles
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2015 INSC 414 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 853
which require a Mahatma Gandhi to own up Himalayan blunders and unfold unpleasant truths truthfully. c 78. In Maneka Gandhi (supra), this Court observed thus
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2021Full text
2021 INSC 324 · [2021] 14 S.C.R. 611
privileges can override Article 19 but not Article 21 stood Foverruled in view of the judicial pronouncements in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India43 and R.C. Cooper v. Union of India44. It would be relevant to reproduce para
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2012Full text
2012 INSC 388 · [2012] 12 S.C.R. 256
SCC 386: 1997 (4) Suppl. SCR 68; Chintaman Rao v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (1950) SCR 759; Maneka Gandhi D v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Brij Bhushan v. State
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 912 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106
Supp SCC 1; E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu &Another1974 (2) SCR348: (1974) 4 SCC 3; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & D Another 1978 (2) SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248 -referred
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India17 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 789 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 961
Supp SCC 1; EP Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu [1974] 2 SCR 348 : (1974) 4 SCC 3; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978] 2 SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248; State of Andhra Pradesh v. McDowell
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2020Full text
2020 INSC 355 · [2020] 10 S.C.R. 596
principles of natural justice would be against the proprieties of justice. This has been restated in the post Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India& Anr.29 era in a series of judgments. This Court, in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 May 2014Full text
2014 INSC 358 · [2014] 6 S.C.R. 873
India and F Ors. (2006) 7 SCC 1: 2006 (5) Suppl. SCR 1; Union of India v. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association (2010) 11 SCC 1: 2010 (6) SCR 857; K. T. Plantation (P} Ltd. & Anr … Indra Sawhney (2) v. Union of India and Ors. (2000) 1 SCC 168: 1999 (5) Suppl. SCR 229; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2016Full text
2018 INSC 686 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 606
whether the legislation violated the right guaranteed under Article 19( I)( c). Relying upon the decisions in Ma/1eka Gandhi v. Union of India, ( 1978) 1 SCC 248; All India Bank Employees' Association v. National Industrial Tribunal, AIR … running an institution or otherwise. The Court said: "From a reading of the two decisions, namely, Smt. Maneka Gandhi s case (supra), (seven-Judges Bench) and All India G Bank Employees Associations case (supra), (jive-Judges Bench), the
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 May 2019Full text
2019 INSC 680 · [2019] 7 S.C.R. 738
Ratlam v. Shri Vardichand and others (1980) 4 SCC 162 : [1981] 1 SCR 97 ; Secretary and G Mahatama Gandhi Mission and another v. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena and others (2017) 4 SCC 449 ; Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka … Chandigarh Administration and others v. Rajni Vali and others (2000) 2 SCC 42 : [2000] 1 SCR 158 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and B another (1978) 1 SCC 248 : [1978] 2 SCR 621 ; State of Haryana and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 236 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 58
under Article 21 can never be suspended, and amended Article 359(1) to give effect to this. In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India , decided nine years after Tilokchand Motichand , Article 21 has been given its new dimension
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 234 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 358
where the need for promptitude or the urgency of taking action so demands, as pointed out in Maneka Gandhi case [(1978) 1 SCC 248 : (1978) 2 SCR 621, 676] at p. 681. If legislation and the necessities
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 219 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 465
Reports Case Law Cited S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India [1967] 2 SCR 703 : AIR 1967 SC 1427; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978] 2 SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248; Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Matched in judgment text
Rajasthan High Court30 Jun 2026Full text
2026:RJ-JP:23947 · CW/5036/2026
business guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India reported in 1978 AIR 597 has categorically held that any procedure which deprives
Matched in judgment text
Punjab & Haryana High Court15 Jul 2026Full text
CRM-M/36098/2026
ensure 'reasonable, just and fair' procedure which has a creative connotation after the decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi." The Court further observed : "92. Of course, no length of time is per se too long to pass
Matched in judgment text
Orissa High Court18 Aug 2026Full text
CRLREV/302/2026
for issuance of an NOC for the purpose of obtaining a passport. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr., (1978) 1 SCC 248, has held that the right to travel abroad
Matched in judgment text
Madras High Court8 Jul 2026Full text
WP/21240/2026
applicant and the authorities. The above violation is against the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Maneka Gandhi – Vs – Union of India (1978 (1) SCC 248) and State of Orissa – Vs – Dr.Binapani Dei (AIR
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WA/1963/2025
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WA/1961/2025
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court17 Jun 2026Full text
2026:KHC:29664 · WP/23497/2021
argument, he has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another1. The impugned order passed by respondent No.1 is in violation of principles
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis