⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,241–5,260 · Page 263 of 382
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 56 · [2013] 2 S.C.R. 899
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, A. Mariarputham, AG, J.S. Attri, Dr. E Manish Singhvi, Ajay Bansal, Manjit Singh, AAG, Sunil Verma, G.B. Singh, Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Prasoon Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Sharawat, Anitha Shenoy (A.C.), Yasif Rauf, Priyanka Bharihoke, R.K. Rathore, Rashmi Malhotra, M. Khairati, D.S. Mahra, B.K. Prasad, Shr…
Supreme Court of India23 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 559 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 261
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,241–5,260 · Page 263 of 382
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 56 · [2013] 2 S.C.R. 899
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, A. Mariarputham, AG, J.S. Attri, Dr. E Manish Singhvi, Ajay Bansal, Manjit Singh, AAG, Sunil Verma, G.B. Singh, Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Prasoon Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Sharawat, Anitha Shenoy (A.C.), Yasif Rauf, Priyanka Bharihoke, R.K. Rathore, Rashmi Malhotra, M. Khairati, D.S. Mahra, B.K. Prasad, Shr…
Supreme Court of India23 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 559 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 261
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. The approach of the High Court cannot be appreciated. As per the extant rules for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (Mechanical) 8 years regular service as Assistant Engineer is imperative. The Rules do not provide for any relaxation in this behalf. This is clear F fr…
Supreme Court of India23 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 558 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 249
The respondents were prosecuted for committing offences punishable ulss.457, 354, 506, 302 and 201 read with s.34 IPC. The prosecution case was that on F 11.10.1995, at about 11.00 p.m. the three accused-respondents entered the room of the informant and molested her. Hearing her shouts, her father, who was sleeping in …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 557 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 762
No doubt that a secured creditor may initially resort to the G procedure under section 13(4) and on facing resistance, he may still approach the Magistrate under section 14. But, it is not mandatory for the secured creditor to make attempt to obtain possession on his own before approaching the Magistrate under section …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 556 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 532
534 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 8 S.C.R. A (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, despite the availability of remedy u/s. 17 of the Act, a case was made out for interference. Hence he present appeals by the Bank as well as the auction-purchaser. Allowing the appeals, the Court8 HELD: 1.1. Single Judge of the High Court was not ju…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 555 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 252
G Sai Krishna Rajgopal, Vaibhav V., Shantanu Sood, Aamna Hasan, Julien, Vijay Kumar for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Leave granted. H YOUNG ACHIEVERS v. IMS LEARNING RESOURCES 255 PVT. LTD. [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] 2. IMS Learning Resources Private Limited, the A …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 554 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 241
241 H 242 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 8 S.C.R. A The question which arose for consideration in tile instant appeals was whether limitation for filmg application for re-determination of compensation tinder Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would commence from the date of the award or from the date B of know…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 553 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 240
F PENAL CODE, 1860: s. 504 - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace - Ingredients - Explained. Respondent no. 2, filed a complaint case against her G sister-in-law (accused-appellant) stating that the latter entered the Puja room and proceeded to drag the :oevara' out in such a manner that all its fr…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 552 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 230
V. Kanagaraj, Kovilan Poongkuntran, Gebtha Kovilan for the Appellants. F Yogesh Kanna, A Santha Kumaran, S. Sasikala for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G P.SATHASIVAM, CJI. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Ma…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 551 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 227
Words and Phrases - "Sufficient cause" - Meaning of C The land of the appellants was acquired in pursuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Thereafter, an award under Section 11 of the Act was made fixing the market value of the land. The appellants preferred references under Sectio…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 550 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 212
214 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 9 S.C:R. A Closing the matter for the time being, the Court Held: 1.1 Rule SA of Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 enables this Court to deal with a situation where an AOR commits misconduct or he/she conducts himself/herself in a manner unbecoming of an AOR. This8 Court is comp…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 55 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 557
- Division Bench affirmed the order - On appeal, held: Recommendation made by the High Powered Review Committee was indubitably arbitrary - There was no material F before the Committee to conclude that appellant possessed assets beyond his known source of income - In regard to a/legation with regard to issuance of back…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 549 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 520
I.' DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY v. RAJU, THROUGH 521 MEMBER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD In appeal, union of India contended that the petition A was not maintainable because third party/stranger does not have any right to participate in criminal prosecution, which is primarily function of the State. Issuing notice in the Special …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 548 · [2013] 11 S.C.R. 846
- High Court allowed the claim of the promotee on the grounds that the seNice rules provided to decide seniority w.e.f. the date of arising of vacancy; and that there has been0 hostile discrimination against the promotee as other 10 promotees had been accorded seniority w.e.f. the date of arising of vacancy - Held: Con…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 547 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 511
V.K. Sasikala vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police (2012) 9 SCC 771: 2012 (10) SCR 641 - F distinguished. Case Law Reference: 2012 (10) SCR 641 distinguished Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal G No. 5897 of 2013. From the judgment and Order dated 25.02.2013 of the High Court of Bombay …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 546 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 215
Several civil suits were also pending between the mortgagor and the mortgagee and it is during the course F of those proceedings, evidently, respondent no.1 was inducted as a tenant. 'G' filed civil suit against the respondents for recovery of possession, damages for use and occupation. The trial court dismissed the su…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 545 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 199
H PROF. KV RAJENDRAN v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 201 CBCID SOUTH ZONE, CHENNAI State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of A Democratic Rights, 2010 (2) SCR 979 =AIR 2010 SC 1476; Sakiri Vasu v. State of UP, 2011 (3) SCR 597 = AIR 2008 SC 907; Ashok Kumar Todi v. Kishwar Jahan & Ors., AIR 2011 SC 1254; Gudalur…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 544 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 117
Appointments of two persons as Vice-Chancellors of Magadh and Veer Kunwar Singh Universities in terms of F Notifications dated 9.4.2010 and 15.4.2010 were challenged by the appellant and another on the ground that the Chancell…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 543 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 105
PENAL CODE, 1860: F ss. 498-A, 304-B and 302 - Death of a married woman by bum injuries - Acquittal of husband by trial court - Set aside by High Court with a direction for decision afresh - Held: The investigation and the evidence of prosecution witnesses do G not reveal any harassment and ill-treatment to the decease…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 542 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 91
The services of the respondent-workman, who was engaged by the appellant-employer on 1.11.1984 as 'Mistri' on muster roll, were terminated on 18.2.1986, G without issuing one month's prior notice or payment of salary in lieu thereof or any retrenchment compensation to him. The workman raised an industrial dispute in 19…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1. The approach of the High Court cannot be appreciated. As per the extant rules for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (Mechanical) 8 years regular service as Assistant Engineer is imperative. The Rules do not provide for any relaxation in this behalf. This is clear F fr…
Supreme Court of India23 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 558 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 249
The respondents were prosecuted for committing offences punishable ulss.457, 354, 506, 302 and 201 read with s.34 IPC. The prosecution case was that on F 11.10.1995, at about 11.00 p.m. the three accused-respondents entered the room of the informant and molested her. Hearing her shouts, her father, who was sleeping in …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 557 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 762
No doubt that a secured creditor may initially resort to the G procedure under section 13(4) and on facing resistance, he may still approach the Magistrate under section 14. But, it is not mandatory for the secured creditor to make attempt to obtain possession on his own before approaching the Magistrate under section …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 556 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 532
534 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 8 S.C.R. A (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, despite the availability of remedy u/s. 17 of the Act, a case was made out for interference. Hence he present appeals by the Bank as well as the auction-purchaser. Allowing the appeals, the Court8 HELD: 1.1. Single Judge of the High Court was not ju…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 555 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 252
G Sai Krishna Rajgopal, Vaibhav V., Shantanu Sood, Aamna Hasan, Julien, Vijay Kumar for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Leave granted. H YOUNG ACHIEVERS v. IMS LEARNING RESOURCES 255 PVT. LTD. [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] 2. IMS Learning Resources Private Limited, the A …
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 554 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 241
241 H 242 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 8 S.C.R. A The question which arose for consideration in tile instant appeals was whether limitation for filmg application for re-determination of compensation tinder Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would commence from the date of the award or from the date B of know…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 553 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 240
F PENAL CODE, 1860: s. 504 - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace - Ingredients - Explained. Respondent no. 2, filed a complaint case against her G sister-in-law (accused-appellant) stating that the latter entered the Puja room and proceeded to drag the :oevara' out in such a manner that all its fr…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 552 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 230
V. Kanagaraj, Kovilan Poongkuntran, Gebtha Kovilan for the Appellants. F Yogesh Kanna, A Santha Kumaran, S. Sasikala for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G P.SATHASIVAM, CJI. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Ma…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 551 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 227
Words and Phrases - "Sufficient cause" - Meaning of C The land of the appellants was acquired in pursuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Thereafter, an award under Section 11 of the Act was made fixing the market value of the land. The appellants preferred references under Sectio…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 550 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 212
214 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 9 S.C:R. A Closing the matter for the time being, the Court Held: 1.1 Rule SA of Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 enables this Court to deal with a situation where an AOR commits misconduct or he/she conducts himself/herself in a manner unbecoming of an AOR. This8 Court is comp…
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2013Full text
2013 INSC 55 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 557
- Division Bench affirmed the order - On appeal, held: Recommendation made by the High Powered Review Committee was indubitably arbitrary - There was no material F before the Committee to conclude that appellant possessed assets beyond his known source of income - In regard to a/legation with regard to issuance of back…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 549 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 520
I.' DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY v. RAJU, THROUGH 521 MEMBER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD In appeal, union of India contended that the petition A was not maintainable because third party/stranger does not have any right to participate in criminal prosecution, which is primarily function of the State. Issuing notice in the Special …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 548 · [2013] 11 S.C.R. 846
- High Court allowed the claim of the promotee on the grounds that the seNice rules provided to decide seniority w.e.f. the date of arising of vacancy; and that there has been0 hostile discrimination against the promotee as other 10 promotees had been accorded seniority w.e.f. the date of arising of vacancy - Held: Con…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 547 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 511
V.K. Sasikala vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police (2012) 9 SCC 771: 2012 (10) SCR 641 - F distinguished. Case Law Reference: 2012 (10) SCR 641 distinguished Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal G No. 5897 of 2013. From the judgment and Order dated 25.02.2013 of the High Court of Bombay …
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 546 · [2013] 8 S.C.R. 215
Several civil suits were also pending between the mortgagor and the mortgagee and it is during the course F of those proceedings, evidently, respondent no.1 was inducted as a tenant. 'G' filed civil suit against the respondents for recovery of possession, damages for use and occupation. The trial court dismissed the su…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 545 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 199
H PROF. KV RAJENDRAN v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 201 CBCID SOUTH ZONE, CHENNAI State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of A Democratic Rights, 2010 (2) SCR 979 =AIR 2010 SC 1476; Sakiri Vasu v. State of UP, 2011 (3) SCR 597 = AIR 2008 SC 907; Ashok Kumar Todi v. Kishwar Jahan & Ors., AIR 2011 SC 1254; Gudalur…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 544 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 117
Appointments of two persons as Vice-Chancellors of Magadh and Veer Kunwar Singh Universities in terms of F Notifications dated 9.4.2010 and 15.4.2010 were challenged by the appellant and another on the ground that the Chancell…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 543 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 105
PENAL CODE, 1860: F ss. 498-A, 304-B and 302 - Death of a married woman by bum injuries - Acquittal of husband by trial court - Set aside by High Court with a direction for decision afresh - Held: The investigation and the evidence of prosecution witnesses do G not reveal any harassment and ill-treatment to the decease…
Supreme Court of India16 Aug 2013Full text
2013 INSC 542 · [2013] 9 S.C.R. 91
The services of the respondent-workman, who was engaged by the appellant-employer on 1.11.1984 as 'Mistri' on muster roll, were terminated on 18.2.1986, G without issuing one month's prior notice or payment of salary in lieu thereof or any retrenchment compensation to him. The workman raised an industrial dispute in 19…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis