Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,001–5,020 · Page 251 of 382
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 775 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 904
State of Bihar and BHALCO contended that assets F and liabilities of erstwhile BHALCO having been taken over by JHALCO, it is duty of JHALCO to carry out the obligations; and that grievance with regard to non-payment of sa…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 774 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 629
- Departmental proceedings also initiated - Suspension reviewed from time to time - Tribunal quashing suspension orders with certain directions - Order not challenged - 0 Further suspension orders passed irrespective the order of Tribunal - Quashed by Tribunal - Held: It was not permissible for appellants to pass any f…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
5,001–5,020 · Page 251 of 382
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 775 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 904
State of Bihar and BHALCO contended that assets F and liabilities of erstwhile BHALCO having been taken over by JHALCO, it is duty of JHALCO to carry out the obligations; and that grievance with regard to non-payment of sa…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 774 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 629
- Departmental proceedings also initiated - Suspension reviewed from time to time - Tribunal quashing suspension orders with certain directions - Order not challenged - 0 Further suspension orders passed irrespective the order of Tribunal - Quashed by Tribunal - Held: It was not permissible for appellants to pass any f…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 773 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 617
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1. Order 2 Rule 2, CPC requir~s the unity of E all claims based on the same cause of action in one suit, it does not contemplate unity of distinct and separate cause of action. If a plaintiff is entitled to seek reliefs against the defendant in respect of the same cause of action…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 772 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 607
The appellant filed Writ Petition before the High Court seeking transfer of investigation from respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 to any other senior officer of Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI'). as the said respondents had been abusing their investigating powers and adopted unfair G and improper means. On submission of …
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 771 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 457
In a case registered against unknown officers of the Enforcement Directorate, alleging false implication of suspects under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, C 1973, a look out notice through the Interpol was issued against the appellant, who was a Deputy Director, Enforcement, and was absconding. The appellant was a…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 770 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 446
PATHAN MOHAMMED SULEMAN REHMATKHAN v. 447 STATE OF GUJARAT depending upon the exigencies of a situation guided by A appropriate financial policy notified in public interest - That is what has been done in the instant case - Public Interest Litigation. Comptroller and Auditor General of India: B Power of CAG - Explained…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2013Full text
2013 INSC 77 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 758
- University Pension Regulations, 1990 - Regulations 2(i), 22 and 23 - Service Jaw - Pension. The respondents in the instant appeals were F appointed as ad hoc Assistant Professors/Lecturers in terms of s. 3(3) of the Rajasthan Universities Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974. Their services wer…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 769 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 907
Anil Kumar (for S.K. Verma) for the Petitioner. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. We are, in this case, concerned with the question G whether medical doctors discharging functions of medical officers i.e. treating patients in Employees' State Insurance Corporation…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 768 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 596
[2013) 12 S.C.R. 596 A HARYANA WAKF BOARD v. MAHESH KUMAR (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1094 7 of 2012) NOVEMBER 21, 2013 B [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] Haryana Wakf Act, 1995 - s. 7 r/w s. 85 - Interpretation of - Jurisdiction of the Tribunal (constituted under the Act) to C determine disputes regard…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 767 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 588
B. CHANDRIKA v. SANTHOSH & ANR 589 Police, after due enquiry. The High Court, however, A dismissed the Revision Petition, and therefore the instant appeal. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The power of the Magistrate to take B cognizance of an offence on a complaint or a protest petition on the same or similar a…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 766 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 435
[2013] 12 S.C.R. 435 SUBHASISH MONDAL @ BIJOY A v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Criminal Appeal No. 1391 of 2008) NOVEMBER 21, B [SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c s.302 -Double murder -- Accused charged with murder of his elder brother and mother - Circumstantial evidence -Conviction b…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 765 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 421
421 H 422 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 12 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A person who fulfils the eligibility conditions as per the recruitment rules cannot be excluded even from appearing in the qualifying written examination by fixing higher educational qualification 8 bench mark. That would be p…
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 764 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 411
- In the instant proceedings, it is not a case requiring interference in exercise of power u/s 482 - The proceedings cannot be termed as an abuse of the process of court G because the a/legations if accepted in entirety are most likely to make out criminal offence alleged against accused-respondents -- The interest of …
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 763 · [2013] 16 S.C.R. 910
Allowing the appeals filed by accused Nos. 2 and 3 Fand partly allowing the appeal of accused No. 1, the Court HELD: 1.1. In the present case, there is no direct evidence of an eye-witness on how the deceased suffered the injuries which has caused his death and therefore the High Court has relied on circumstantial G ev…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 762 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 400
s.154 and s.2(d) rlw s.200- 'Informant' and 'complainant' - Distinction between - Explained. On the basis of a report given by the informant (PW- 2) alleging that when he made a protest as the accused G persons were grazing their cattle in his land and thereby damaging the crop the appellant assaulted him with a stick,…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 761 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 1043
1044 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2013) 17 S.C.R. A based on that enquiry and, therefore, it cannot be said to be a consent decree. When a decree is passed without any dispute being raised or contested in the court of first instance, the decree being passed on consent cannot be appealed against. [Para 17] [1052-H; 1053-A-C] …
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 760 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 889
The incident of 19.06.2013 at Gokal Puri Police Station in Delhi occurred in course of a protest by the volunteers of AAP. The protestors wanted registration of F an FIR in respect of an alleged occurrence of rape but allegedly the police was reluctant to register the FIR and hence a number of volunteers Including the …
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2013Full text
2013 INSC 76 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 739
The husband of respondent no. 1 lost his life In a motor accident while working in the employment of the F Port Trust. The dependents filed a claim petition u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Subsequently, the employer-Port Trust Intimated the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner of the motor accident and deposite…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 759 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 397
B. V. Nagesh and Another vs. H. V. Sreenivasa Murthy 2010 (11) SCR 784 (2010) 13 sec 530 - relied on. = G Case Law Reference: 2010 (11) SCR 784 relied on para 7 397 H 398 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2013] 12 S.C.R. A CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 10490 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.08.2006 …
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 758 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 848
[2013) 14 S.C.R. 848 A BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA AND ANOTHER v. WILLINGDON SPORTS CLUB AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 5840 of 2013) NOVEMBER 18, 2013 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.i Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - s.394(1)(e) rlw. Part IV Schedule M and s. 3(ff) - Licence under - Need c for - Whethe…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 773 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 617
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1. Order 2 Rule 2, CPC requir~s the unity of E all claims based on the same cause of action in one suit, it does not contemplate unity of distinct and separate cause of action. If a plaintiff is entitled to seek reliefs against the defendant in respect of the same cause of action…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 772 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 607
The appellant filed Writ Petition before the High Court seeking transfer of investigation from respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 to any other senior officer of Central Bureau of Investigation ('CBI'). as the said respondents had been abusing their investigating powers and adopted unfair G and improper means. On submission of …
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 771 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 457
In a case registered against unknown officers of the Enforcement Directorate, alleging false implication of suspects under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, C 1973, a look out notice through the Interpol was issued against the appellant, who was a Deputy Director, Enforcement, and was absconding. The appellant was a…
Supreme Court of India22 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 770 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 446
PATHAN MOHAMMED SULEMAN REHMATKHAN v. 447 STATE OF GUJARAT depending upon the exigencies of a situation guided by A appropriate financial policy notified in public interest - That is what has been done in the instant case - Public Interest Litigation. Comptroller and Auditor General of India: B Power of CAG - Explained…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2013Full text
2013 INSC 77 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 758
- University Pension Regulations, 1990 - Regulations 2(i), 22 and 23 - Service Jaw - Pension. The respondents in the instant appeals were F appointed as ad hoc Assistant Professors/Lecturers in terms of s. 3(3) of the Rajasthan Universities Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974. Their services wer…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 769 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 907
Anil Kumar (for S.K. Verma) for the Petitioner. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. We are, in this case, concerned with the question G whether medical doctors discharging functions of medical officers i.e. treating patients in Employees' State Insurance Corporation…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 768 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 596
[2013) 12 S.C.R. 596 A HARYANA WAKF BOARD v. MAHESH KUMAR (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 1094 7 of 2012) NOVEMBER 21, 2013 B [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] Haryana Wakf Act, 1995 - s. 7 r/w s. 85 - Interpretation of - Jurisdiction of the Tribunal (constituted under the Act) to C determine disputes regard…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 767 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 588
B. CHANDRIKA v. SANTHOSH & ANR 589 Police, after due enquiry. The High Court, however, A dismissed the Revision Petition, and therefore the instant appeal. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The power of the Magistrate to take B cognizance of an offence on a complaint or a protest petition on the same or similar a…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 766 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 435
[2013] 12 S.C.R. 435 SUBHASISH MONDAL @ BIJOY A v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Criminal Appeal No. 1391 of 2008) NOVEMBER 21, B [SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c s.302 -Double murder -- Accused charged with murder of his elder brother and mother - Circumstantial evidence -Conviction b…
Supreme Court of India21 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 765 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 421
421 H 422 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 12 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A person who fulfils the eligibility conditions as per the recruitment rules cannot be excluded even from appearing in the qualifying written examination by fixing higher educational qualification 8 bench mark. That would be p…
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 764 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 411
- In the instant proceedings, it is not a case requiring interference in exercise of power u/s 482 - The proceedings cannot be termed as an abuse of the process of court G because the a/legations if accepted in entirety are most likely to make out criminal offence alleged against accused-respondents -- The interest of …
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 763 · [2013] 16 S.C.R. 910
Allowing the appeals filed by accused Nos. 2 and 3 Fand partly allowing the appeal of accused No. 1, the Court HELD: 1.1. In the present case, there is no direct evidence of an eye-witness on how the deceased suffered the injuries which has caused his death and therefore the High Court has relied on circumstantial G ev…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 762 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 400
s.154 and s.2(d) rlw s.200- 'Informant' and 'complainant' - Distinction between - Explained. On the basis of a report given by the informant (PW- 2) alleging that when he made a protest as the accused G persons were grazing their cattle in his land and thereby damaging the crop the appellant assaulted him with a stick,…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 761 · [2013] 17 S.C.R. 1043
1044 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2013) 17 S.C.R. A based on that enquiry and, therefore, it cannot be said to be a consent decree. When a decree is passed without any dispute being raised or contested in the court of first instance, the decree being passed on consent cannot be appealed against. [Para 17] [1052-H; 1053-A-C] …
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 760 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 889
The incident of 19.06.2013 at Gokal Puri Police Station in Delhi occurred in course of a protest by the volunteers of AAP. The protestors wanted registration of F an FIR in respect of an alleged occurrence of rape but allegedly the police was reluctant to register the FIR and hence a number of volunteers Including the …
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2013Full text
2013 INSC 76 · [2013] 1 S.C.R. 739
The husband of respondent no. 1 lost his life In a motor accident while working in the employment of the F Port Trust. The dependents filed a claim petition u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Subsequently, the employer-Port Trust Intimated the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner of the motor accident and deposite…
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 759 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 397
B. V. Nagesh and Another vs. H. V. Sreenivasa Murthy 2010 (11) SCR 784 (2010) 13 sec 530 - relied on. = G Case Law Reference: 2010 (11) SCR 784 relied on para 7 397 H 398 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2013] 12 S.C.R. A CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 10490 of 2013. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.08.2006 …
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 758 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 848
[2013) 14 S.C.R. 848 A BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA AND ANOTHER v. WILLINGDON SPORTS CLUB AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 5840 of 2013) NOVEMBER 18, 2013 B [G.S. SINGHVI AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.i Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - s.394(1)(e) rlw. Part IV Schedule M and s. 3(ff) - Licence under - Need c for - Whethe…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis