Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,841–4,860 · Page 243 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 111 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1101
placing such a juvenile under the care of a parent, guardian or other person who was willing to ensure his good behaviour during the period of observation as fixed by the Juvenile Welfare Board. The JJ Act, 2000 introduced a separate chapter i.e. Chapter IV under the B head 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' for…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 110 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1093
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,841–4,860 · Page 243 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 111 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1101
placing such a juvenile under the care of a parent, guardian or other person who was willing to ensure his good behaviour during the period of observation as fixed by the Juvenile Welfare Board. The JJ Act, 2000 introduced a separate chapter i.e. Chapter IV under the B head 'Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration' for…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 110 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1093
D The petitioners filed writ petitions before the High Court seeking a writ of declaration that the execution of sentence of death pursuant to the letter No. F.No.14/1/ 1999-Judicial Cell dated 12.08.2011 issued by the Union E of India, was unconstitutional, and prayed for commutation of the sentence of death to impris…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 11 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 135
- Orders impugned suffer from grave error and, as such, are set aside. ss. 227, 239 and 245 - Discharge of accused - G Explained. PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988: 135 H 136 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 1 S.C.R. A s. 13(2) rlw 13(1) (e) ·-A/legations that State Ministers purchased properties in the names of their rel…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 109 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1003
Prior to the constitution of integrated Sikkim Police Force w.e.f. 11.09.2000, there were three different services viz. Sikkim Police Force, Sikkim Armed Police and Sikkim D Vigilance Police in the State of Sikkim. All the three forces were governed by separate service rules. There was entry level of constable in all t…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 108 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1112
V. Giri (A.C.), Huzefa Ahmadi, Anunaya Mehta, Mohd.G Sadique T.A., Ejaz Maqbool, Tanima Kishore, Mrigank Prabhakar, Rohan Sharma, Hemantika Wahi. Parul Kumari for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAMESHCHANDRA AMBALAL JOSHI v. STATE OF 1115 GUJARAT CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. 1. Accor…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 107 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078
[2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078 A VIJAY KUMAR V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 441 of 2009) FEBRUARY 18, 2014 B [T.S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c ss. 302 rlw 120-B, 460 and 382 - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts below - Held: Witness has made material improvements while deposing in cou…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 106 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1069
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Sonia Malhotra, Shreekant N. Terdal, Yasir Rauf for the Appellant. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Soma Mullick for the Respondent. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. This appeal has been filed by the Union of India G challenging the judgment and order of the Calcutt…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 105 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 990
BHASKAR LAL SHARMA & ANR. v. MONICA & ORS. 991 finally concluded by the trial court - Trial court directed to A ' complete trial expeditiously. s. 125 - Maintenance granted u/s. 125 by trial court - Writ petition u/Article 32 for service of notice on the husband (respondent)-and for payment of the arrears of maintenanc…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1046 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 543
(2012) 9 SCC 446: 2012 (7) SCR 584; Shahzad Hasan Khan V. lshtiaq Hasan Khan and Anr. (1987) 2 sec 684: 1987 (3) SCR 34; State of Maharashtra V. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao (1989) Supp (2) sec 605: 1989 (1) Suppl. SCR 315; G M. Jagan Mohan Rao v. P. V. Mohan Rao (2010) 15 SCC 491; Harjit Singh V. State of Punjab (2002…
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1045 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 868
SHASHIKALA DEVI v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA 871 2.1. Pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of A grace but is a payment for past services rendered by the employee. If pension is not a bounty, but a right which the employee a…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1043 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 293
Ajay Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 15 SCC 83; Jitendra Singh alias Babboo Singh and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2013) 11 SCC 193 - relied on. Hariram v. State State of Rajasthan (2009) 13 SCC 193; F Abuzar Hussain @ Guizar Hossain v. State of West Bengal 2012 (9) SCR 244:(2012) 10 SCC 489,; Yakub Abdul…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1042 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 488
Section 7(4)(b) provides that an arbitration agreement can be culled out from an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a G record of the agreement. Reading the provisions it can safely be concluded that an arbitration agreement even though in writing need not be signed …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1041 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1489
c ORDER, 1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner claiming the benefit of the provision under the Juvenile Justice (Care. and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter called, 'the D Act'). The petitioner claimed that he was born on 14th April, 1980 and that the incident occurred on 18th June, 1997. He, t…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1040 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362
1364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A matter of investigation. The issue is sensitive not only because of loss of an invaluable human life but also because of the reasons which are sought to be attributed for the sordid affair. The circumstances which the petitioner has referred to in the writ petition and the …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 104 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 955
956 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1 A given wide powers not only to enforce the rights but even to create new rights, with the underlying objective to achieve social justice - The said sweeping power conferred upon the Tribunal is not unbridled - It is, thus, this fine balancing which is required to be achieved…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1039 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 265
and Order dated 27-05.2008 of the F Securities Appellate Tribunal,…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1038 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 278
WITH C.A. No. 10909 of 2014. D G.S. Chaturvedi (for Surya Kant), Jagat Arora (for Rajiv Nanda) for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S. KHEHAR, J. Civil Appeal No.10908 of 2014 1. The appellants were promoted from the Junior Management Grade Scale-I (hereinafter referred to as the F …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1037 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 305
Sudhir Kilshreshtha for the Appellant. D A. Mariarputham, Yusuf Khan (for Aruna Mathur) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. The appellant was inducted into the employment of the parent Human Resource Development Department, of the Government of Sikkim, as a Graduate Teache…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1036 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 255
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court erred in law in allowing the wage revision F benefits to the employees, who were not covered either under communication dated 8.8.2006 issued by the Government of India or the consequential Office Order dated 25.8.2006 whereby …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1034 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 308
Chetan Chawla, T.A. Khan, B.V. Balramdas, Arvind Kumar Sharma for the Respondent. . F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by · ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 10 of the Special Court (Tri'al of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short "the Special C…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
D The petitioners filed writ petitions before the High Court seeking a writ of declaration that the execution of sentence of death pursuant to the letter No. F.No.14/1/ 1999-Judicial Cell dated 12.08.2011 issued by the Union E of India, was unconstitutional, and prayed for commutation of the sentence of death to impris…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 11 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 135
- Orders impugned suffer from grave error and, as such, are set aside. ss. 227, 239 and 245 - Discharge of accused - G Explained. PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988: 135 H 136 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 1 S.C.R. A s. 13(2) rlw 13(1) (e) ·-A/legations that State Ministers purchased properties in the names of their rel…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 109 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1003
Prior to the constitution of integrated Sikkim Police Force w.e.f. 11.09.2000, there were three different services viz. Sikkim Police Force, Sikkim Armed Police and Sikkim D Vigilance Police in the State of Sikkim. All the three forces were governed by separate service rules. There was entry level of constable in all t…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 108 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1112
V. Giri (A.C.), Huzefa Ahmadi, Anunaya Mehta, Mohd.G Sadique T.A., Ejaz Maqbool, Tanima Kishore, Mrigank Prabhakar, Rohan Sharma, Hemantika Wahi. Parul Kumari for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAMESHCHANDRA AMBALAL JOSHI v. STATE OF 1115 GUJARAT CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. 1. Accor…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 107 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078
[2014] 1 S.C.R. 1078 A VIJAY KUMAR V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 441 of 2009) FEBRUARY 18, 2014 B [T.S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: c ss. 302 rlw 120-B, 460 and 382 - Circumstantial evidence - Conviction by courts below - Held: Witness has made material improvements while deposing in cou…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 106 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1069
P.P. Malhotra, ASG, Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Sonia Malhotra, Shreekant N. Terdal, Yasir Rauf for the Appellant. Pranab Kumar Mullick, Soma Mullick for the Respondent. F The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. This appeal has been filed by the Union of India G challenging the judgment and order of the Calcutt…
Supreme Court of India18 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 105 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 990
BHASKAR LAL SHARMA & ANR. v. MONICA & ORS. 991 finally concluded by the trial court - Trial court directed to A ' complete trial expeditiously. s. 125 - Maintenance granted u/s. 125 by trial court - Writ petition u/Article 32 for service of notice on the husband (respondent)-and for payment of the arrears of maintenanc…
Supreme Court of India18 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1046 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 543
(2012) 9 SCC 446: 2012 (7) SCR 584; Shahzad Hasan Khan V. lshtiaq Hasan Khan and Anr. (1987) 2 sec 684: 1987 (3) SCR 34; State of Maharashtra V. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao (1989) Supp (2) sec 605: 1989 (1) Suppl. SCR 315; G M. Jagan Mohan Rao v. P. V. Mohan Rao (2010) 15 SCC 491; Harjit Singh V. State of Punjab (2002…
Supreme Court of India17 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1045 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 868
SHASHIKALA DEVI v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA 871 2.1. Pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of A grace but is a payment for past services rendered by the employee. If pension is not a bounty, but a right which the employee a…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1043 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 293
Ajay Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 15 SCC 83; Jitendra Singh alias Babboo Singh and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2013) 11 SCC 193 - relied on. Hariram v. State State of Rajasthan (2009) 13 SCC 193; F Abuzar Hussain @ Guizar Hossain v. State of West Bengal 2012 (9) SCR 244:(2012) 10 SCC 489,; Yakub Abdul…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1042 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 488
Section 7(4)(b) provides that an arbitration agreement can be culled out from an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a G record of the agreement. Reading the provisions it can safely be concluded that an arbitration agreement even though in writing need not be signed …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1041 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1489
c ORDER, 1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner claiming the benefit of the provision under the Juvenile Justice (Care. and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter called, 'the D Act'). The petitioner claimed that he was born on 14th April, 1980 and that the incident occurred on 18th June, 1997. He, t…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1040 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362
1364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A matter of investigation. The issue is sensitive not only because of loss of an invaluable human life but also because of the reasons which are sought to be attributed for the sordid affair. The circumstances which the petitioner has referred to in the writ petition and the …
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 104 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 955
956 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. 1 A given wide powers not only to enforce the rights but even to create new rights, with the underlying objective to achieve social justice - The said sweeping power conferred upon the Tribunal is not unbridled - It is, thus, this fine balancing which is required to be achieved…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1039 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 265
and Order dated 27-05.2008 of the F Securities Appellate Tribunal,…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1038 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 278
WITH C.A. No. 10909 of 2014. D G.S. Chaturvedi (for Surya Kant), Jagat Arora (for Rajiv Nanda) for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S. KHEHAR, J. Civil Appeal No.10908 of 2014 1. The appellants were promoted from the Junior Management Grade Scale-I (hereinafter referred to as the F …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1037 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 305
Sudhir Kilshreshtha for the Appellant. D A. Mariarputham, Yusuf Khan (for Aruna Mathur) for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. The appellant was inducted into the employment of the parent Human Resource Development Department, of the Government of Sikkim, as a Graduate Teache…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1036 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 255
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: The Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court erred in law in allowing the wage revision F benefits to the employees, who were not covered either under communication dated 8.8.2006 issued by the Government of India or the consequential Office Order dated 25.8.2006 whereby …
Supreme Court of India2 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 1034 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 308
Chetan Chawla, T.A. Khan, B.V. Balramdas, Arvind Kumar Sharma for the Respondent. . F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by · ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 10 of the Special Court (Tri'al of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (for short "the Special C…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis