⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,441–4,460 · Page 223 of 382
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 577 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 598
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1.1. The respondents had prayed for pay scale which was being given to persons holding a promotional post (Laboratory Assistant) by contending that the nature of work was similar. However, the posts of Laboratory 598 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH v. TILAK RAJ 599 Attendant and Laborator…
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 576 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 171
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,441–4,460 · Page 223 of 382
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 577 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 598
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1.1. The respondents had prayed for pay scale which was being given to persons holding a promotional post (Laboratory Assistant) by contending that the nature of work was similar. However, the posts of Laboratory 598 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH v. TILAK RAJ 599 Attendant and Laborator…
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 576 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 171
Jayant K. Sud, Chirag Khurana, Jaikirty, Vikash Singh for the appellant. S. Janani, Deepak Goel, Sunando Raha for the F respondent. · The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. Leave granted. G 2. In this appeal, by special leave, the assail is to the judgment and decree dated 25.07 .2013 passed by t…
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 575 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1123
HELD: 1.1. The inquiry under 0. 7, r. 11(a) of CPC' is only as to whether the facts as pleaded disclose a cause of action and not complete cause of action. The limited inquiry is only tq see whether the petition should be thrown out at the threshold. In an election petition, the E requiremenf u/s 83 of the RP Act is to…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 571 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1111
[2014] 7 S.C.R. 1111 DENY BORA A V. STATE OF ASSAM (Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2013) AUGUST 27, 2014 B [DIPAK MISRA AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 - Conviction on testimony of sole eye-witness - c Propriety of - A doctor shot dead by two miscreants -Conviction by Designated Court uls 302, but ac…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 570 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 355
356 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 10 S.C.R. A appellate court was able to pronounce the judgment from the materials before it without taking into consideration the additional evidence sought to be adduced. In the case at hand, numerous opportunities were granted to file the documents, but the plaintiffs chose not to ava…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 57 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 853
The question for consideration before the Court 853 H · 854 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 1 S.C.R. A was: whether clause IMT 17 for which premium was paid to the insurer in respect of the lorry would cover the deceased or not. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1. The High Court has clearly fallen in error in hold…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 568 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 965
[2014] 9 S.C.R. 965 MANOJ NARULA A v. UNION OF INDIA (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 of 2005) AUGUST 27, 2014 B [R.M. LODHA, CJI, DIPAK MISRA, MADAN 8. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND S.A. BOBDE, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 75 and 164 - Scope and purpose of -Legality of person with criminal background C and/or cha…
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 566 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 447
2. Whether the respondents are guilty under Section 379 IPC or not is a matter of evidence. The fact that 'the police chose to file a chargesheet under Section 406 and E 420 IPC is not conclusive regarding the offences for which the respondents-accused are to be tried. The trial Court can always frame an appropriate ch…
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 565 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 582
PARADEEP PHOSPHATE LTD. v. PARADEEP PHOSPHATE 583 MAZDOOR UNION implemented, the High Court rightly directed to implement the A same - Order passed by the High Court not called for interference. The State Government issued Notification dated 28.04.2000 for abolition of the Contract Labour in respect of workers engaged …
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 564 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1098
D Jos Chiramel, Anish Kumar Gupta, Pankaj Kumar Dua for the Appellant. G. Umapathy, Rakesh K. Sharma, S. Ramsubramanian for the Respondent. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PINAKI CHAN!?RA GHOSE, J. 1. These appeals have been filed assailing the common judgment and order dated 1.9.2009 passed by the Madras …
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 563 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 454
[2014) 9 S.C.R. 454 A BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 1842 of 2014) AUGUST 26, 2014 B / [T.S. THAKUR, C. NAGAPPAN AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 rlw s. 149; s. 307 rlw s. 149; s. 449 C rlw s.149; s.148 and s.323 rlw s.149 - Assault launched by unlawful assembly arme…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 562 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 446
[2014] 8 S.C.R. 446 A MANOHAR LAL SHARMA v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS. (Writ Petition (Crl.) 120 of 2012) B AUGUST 25, 2014. [R.M. LODHA, CJI MADAN, B. LOKUR AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] c CONSTITUTION OF /NOIA, 1~50: Art. 39 (b) - Material resources of community- Allocation of coal blocks - Held: It cannot be said that…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 561 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1512
BALWANTRAI SALUJA&ANR. ETC. ETC. v.AIRINDIA 1513 LTD.&ORS. · a Division Bench or a smaller number of Judges - A Constitution of India, 1950-Art. 141. Doctrines/Principles: Doctrine of piercing the corporate veil - Applicability of- Discussed. s Answering the referred question and dismissing the appeals, the Court · HEL…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 559 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 435
- Appellants' case that sale was without consideration and respondent in connivance with the other persons managed to keep appellants out of possession - Prima facie, the sale deed alleged to have been executed by appellants in favour of the respondent is null and void and the same does not F confer any right, title or…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 558 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 1084
Dismissing the appeals of accused no. 1, 2 and 4 and ~allowing the appeal of accused no. 3, the Court. HELD: 1; The deposition of PW-21 clearly implicated accused No.s. 1, 2 and 4. The picture that emerged was that accused no.1 caused the deceased to be killed and H 1086 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 8 S.C.R. A for this…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 556 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 727
G Words and Phrases - 'Transaction value' - Meaning of, in the context of customs valuation. CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 433-434 of2006. H 727 728 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 14 S.C.R. I A From the judgment and order dated 23.08.2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and:§wvice Tax Appellate Tribunal, W…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 555 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1096
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1096 A V. SREERAMACHANDRAAVADHANI (D) BY LRS. v. SHAIKABDUL RAHIMANDANR. (Civil Appeal No. 2364 of 2005) B AUGUST 21, 2014 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND ROHINTON FALi NARIMAN, JJ.] c Mohammedan Law - Gifts (hiba) - Conditional gifts -Nature and effect of- Held: Under Mohammad an Law, a gift has to be uncon…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 554 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1412
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1412 A SINGH RAM (D) THR. L.Rs. v. SHEO RAM & ORS. ' (Civil Appeal No. 5198 of 2008) B AUGUST 21, 2014 [T. S. THAKUR, C. NAGAPPAN AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] c Limitation Act, 1963- Schedule, Article 61 - Limitation for redemption of usufructuary mortgage - Invocation of -Held: Right of usufructuary mo…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 552 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 279
Jayant Bhushan, Dhruv Mehta, Madhav Khurana, Diksha H SHIVGIRI ASSOCIATES v. METSO MINERALS (INDIA) 281 PVT. LTD. Rai, G. Sivabalamurugan, Anis Mohd., B.R. Pandey, L.K. A Pandey, Raghav Chadha, P.V. Yogeswaran, Munawwar Naseem, Sameer Abhayankar, Nitin Khare for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was deli…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 551 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 414
WITH E Civil Appeal No. 7840 of 2014. Shekhar Naphade, Praseena Elizabeth Joseph, Madhurima Tatia, Gaurav Mitra and M.P. Shorawala for the F Appellant · Liz Mathew, M.F. Philip for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Y. EQBAL, J. ·1. Leave granted.G 2. These two appeals are directed against th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Jayant K. Sud, Chirag Khurana, Jaikirty, Vikash Singh for the appellant. S. Janani, Deepak Goel, Sunando Raha for the F respondent. · The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. Leave granted. G 2. In this appeal, by special leave, the assail is to the judgment and decree dated 25.07 .2013 passed by t…
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 575 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1123
HELD: 1.1. The inquiry under 0. 7, r. 11(a) of CPC' is only as to whether the facts as pleaded disclose a cause of action and not complete cause of action. The limited inquiry is only tq see whether the petition should be thrown out at the threshold. In an election petition, the E requiremenf u/s 83 of the RP Act is to…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 571 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1111
[2014] 7 S.C.R. 1111 DENY BORA A V. STATE OF ASSAM (Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2013) AUGUST 27, 2014 B [DIPAK MISRA AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 - Conviction on testimony of sole eye-witness - c Propriety of - A doctor shot dead by two miscreants -Conviction by Designated Court uls 302, but ac…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 570 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 355
356 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 10 S.C.R. A appellate court was able to pronounce the judgment from the materials before it without taking into consideration the additional evidence sought to be adduced. In the case at hand, numerous opportunities were granted to file the documents, but the plaintiffs chose not to ava…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 57 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 853
The question for consideration before the Court 853 H · 854 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014) 1 S.C.R. A was: whether clause IMT 17 for which premium was paid to the insurer in respect of the lorry would cover the deceased or not. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1. The High Court has clearly fallen in error in hold…
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 568 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 965
[2014] 9 S.C.R. 965 MANOJ NARULA A v. UNION OF INDIA (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 of 2005) AUGUST 27, 2014 B [R.M. LODHA, CJI, DIPAK MISRA, MADAN 8. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND S.A. BOBDE, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 75 and 164 - Scope and purpose of -Legality of person with criminal background C and/or cha…
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 566 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 447
2. Whether the respondents are guilty under Section 379 IPC or not is a matter of evidence. The fact that 'the police chose to file a chargesheet under Section 406 and E 420 IPC is not conclusive regarding the offences for which the respondents-accused are to be tried. The trial Court can always frame an appropriate ch…
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 565 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 582
PARADEEP PHOSPHATE LTD. v. PARADEEP PHOSPHATE 583 MAZDOOR UNION implemented, the High Court rightly directed to implement the A same - Order passed by the High Court not called for interference. The State Government issued Notification dated 28.04.2000 for abolition of the Contract Labour in respect of workers engaged …
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 564 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1098
D Jos Chiramel, Anish Kumar Gupta, Pankaj Kumar Dua for the Appellant. G. Umapathy, Rakesh K. Sharma, S. Ramsubramanian for the Respondent. E The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PINAKI CHAN!?RA GHOSE, J. 1. These appeals have been filed assailing the common judgment and order dated 1.9.2009 passed by the Madras …
Supreme Court of India26 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 563 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 454
[2014) 9 S.C.R. 454 A BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 1842 of 2014) AUGUST 26, 2014 B / [T.S. THAKUR, C. NAGAPPAN AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302 rlw s. 149; s. 307 rlw s. 149; s. 449 C rlw s.149; s.148 and s.323 rlw s.149 - Assault launched by unlawful assembly arme…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 562 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 446
[2014] 8 S.C.R. 446 A MANOHAR LAL SHARMA v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS. (Writ Petition (Crl.) 120 of 2012) B AUGUST 25, 2014. [R.M. LODHA, CJI MADAN, B. LOKUR AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] c CONSTITUTION OF /NOIA, 1~50: Art. 39 (b) - Material resources of community- Allocation of coal blocks - Held: It cannot be said that…
Supreme Court of India25 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 561 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1512
BALWANTRAI SALUJA&ANR. ETC. ETC. v.AIRINDIA 1513 LTD.&ORS. · a Division Bench or a smaller number of Judges - A Constitution of India, 1950-Art. 141. Doctrines/Principles: Doctrine of piercing the corporate veil - Applicability of- Discussed. s Answering the referred question and dismissing the appeals, the Court · HEL…
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 559 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 435
- Appellants' case that sale was without consideration and respondent in connivance with the other persons managed to keep appellants out of possession - Prima facie, the sale deed alleged to have been executed by appellants in favour of the respondent is null and void and the same does not F confer any right, title or…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 558 · [2014] 8 S.C.R. 1084
Dismissing the appeals of accused no. 1, 2 and 4 and ~allowing the appeal of accused no. 3, the Court. HELD: 1; The deposition of PW-21 clearly implicated accused No.s. 1, 2 and 4. The picture that emerged was that accused no.1 caused the deceased to be killed and H 1086 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 8 S.C.R. A for this…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 556 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 727
G Words and Phrases - 'Transaction value' - Meaning of, in the context of customs valuation. CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 433-434 of2006. H 727 728 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 14 S.C.R. I A From the judgment and order dated 23.08.2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and:§wvice Tax Appellate Tribunal, W…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 555 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1096
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1096 A V. SREERAMACHANDRAAVADHANI (D) BY LRS. v. SHAIKABDUL RAHIMANDANR. (Civil Appeal No. 2364 of 2005) B AUGUST 21, 2014 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND ROHINTON FALi NARIMAN, JJ.] c Mohammedan Law - Gifts (hiba) - Conditional gifts -Nature and effect of- Held: Under Mohammad an Law, a gift has to be uncon…
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 554 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1412
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 1412 A SINGH RAM (D) THR. L.Rs. v. SHEO RAM & ORS. ' (Civil Appeal No. 5198 of 2008) B AUGUST 21, 2014 [T. S. THAKUR, C. NAGAPPAN AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] c Limitation Act, 1963- Schedule, Article 61 - Limitation for redemption of usufructuary mortgage - Invocation of -Held: Right of usufructuary mo…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 552 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 279
Jayant Bhushan, Dhruv Mehta, Madhav Khurana, Diksha H SHIVGIRI ASSOCIATES v. METSO MINERALS (INDIA) 281 PVT. LTD. Rai, G. Sivabalamurugan, Anis Mohd., B.R. Pandey, L.K. A Pandey, Raghav Chadha, P.V. Yogeswaran, Munawwar Naseem, Sameer Abhayankar, Nitin Khare for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was deli…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 551 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 414
WITH E Civil Appeal No. 7840 of 2014. Shekhar Naphade, Praseena Elizabeth Joseph, Madhurima Tatia, Gaurav Mitra and M.P. Shorawala for the F Appellant · Liz Mathew, M.F. Philip for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Y. EQBAL, J. ·1. Leave granted.G 2. These two appeals are directed against th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis