⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,361–4,380 · Page 219 of 382
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 669 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 910
Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 910 STATE OF UTIAR PRADESH v. PREETAM SINGH 911 HELD: 1.1. The directions by the State Government as A contemplated u/s 2(1) of the Uttar Pradesh State Control Over Public Corporations Act, 1975 could be issued to the Vikas Parishad only in respect of questions of policy having a nexu…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 668 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 717
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,361–4,380 · Page 219 of 382
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 669 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 910
Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 910 STATE OF UTIAR PRADESH v. PREETAM SINGH 911 HELD: 1.1. The directions by the State Government as A contemplated u/s 2(1) of the Uttar Pradesh State Control Over Public Corporations Act, 1975 could be issued to the Vikas Parishad only in respect of questions of policy having a nexu…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 668 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 717
WITH Crl. A. No. 1423 of 2009. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Jasbir Singh Malik (For F S. K. Sabharwal), Adv., for the Appellant. Roopansh Purohit, AAG, Ramesh Kumar, Ms. Naresh· Bakshi and Daya Krishan Sharma, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals are…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 667 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 524
5. In view of the plea that by virtue of Section 24 (2) E of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, ResettlementAct, 2013 the subject of acquisition shall be deemed to have lapsed, certain factual aspects viz., (i) whether F possession of the land measuring 1Kanai11 Marlas …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 666 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1273
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High E Court, the Court HELD : Any finding on the correctness of the appellant's appointment seriously affects his right. The High Court, while proceeding to examine the correctness of the order dated 4.2.1991, ought to have called upon F the parties to produce all the ma…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 665 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 641
G P.P. Rao, P. Vishwanath Shetty, D. Ramakrishna Reddy, D. Bharathi Reddy for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H 644 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 10 S.C.R. A T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. This appeal has been placed before this larger bench pursuant to a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 664 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 54
G WITH Crl.A.No. 1256 & 1367 of 1999 W.P. (c) No. 316.of 2008. H 56 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 12 S.C.R. A Contempt Petiton (C) No. 47 of 2011 in W.P. (Civil) No. 316 of 2008. T.C. (C) No. 27 of 2011. Manjit Singh, Suryanarayana Singh, AAGs, Shekhar B Naphade, B.H. Marlapalle, Gopal Sankaranayanan, Vikramaditya, Rohi…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 663 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1265
From the judgment and order dated 03.04.2014 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in W.P. D No. 87 (S/B) of 2014. Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv., and Kamlendra Mishra, Adv. for the Appellant. The following Order of the Court was passed : E ORDER It is mentioned today by Mr. Pallav Shishodia, learned s…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 663 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1238
1238 VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEYv. UNION OF INDIA &ANR. 1239 but also to send a signal to others who might dare in future to A expose any mal~administration - Right to judicial remedies for-the redressal of either personal or public grievances is a constitutional right of the subjects (both citizens and non-citizens) of this …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 661 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 559
2.2. In the instant case, the parties have entered into H concluded contract, agreeing to terms and conditions of SWAN GOLD MINING LTD. v. HINDUSTAN COPPER 561 LTD. the said contract, which was finally acted upon. In such A a case, the parties to the said contract cannot back out and challenge the award on the ground t…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 660 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1164
D High Court Of Judicature at Madras in CMA No.2862 of 2011. R. Balasubramanian, B. Karunakaran, S.Usha Reddy for the Appellant. Ranjit Kumar, S.G., Zoheb Hossain, Rauf Rahim for the E Respondent. The Judgment of the_Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C.PA~T, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the jud…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 659 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 702
Sanjay Parikh, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. Vishruti Vijay, Advs. for the Appellant. P. Vishwantha Shetty, Sr. Adv., Ms. Kheyali Sarkar, E.C. Vidya Sagar, Ms. Jennifer Joh, Advs. for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed aga…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 658 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1359
Sandhya Goswami, Saryaya Krishna, Mahender P.S. Tamar and Jabar Singh, Advs., for the Appellant. E . Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Abhisth Kumar and Som Raj Choudhury,Advs., forthe Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.1. We have heard learned counsel for F the appellant …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 657 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1354
Mukesh K. Giri, Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Saryaya Krishna, Mahender P.S. Tomar, Jabar Singh, Advs. for the C Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals by special leave by the State are directed against the common judgment and order D dated 27'h May, 2005 passed by the High Cour…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 656 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 536
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. It is common to all the theories of jurisprudence that the notion that law must possess a G certain form; contain a clear mandate/explicit command which may be prescriptive, permissive or penal and the law must also seek to achieve a clearly identifiable purpose. While the form …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 655 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 506
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: The availing of money from a nationalized bank in the manner, as alleged by the investigating agency, vividly exposits fiscal impurity and, in a way, financial fraud. The modus operandi as narrated in the chargesheet cannot be put in the compartment of an G individual or personal …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 653 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1
P.N. Puri, Dhiraj for the Appellants. Ajay Bansal, AAG, Kuldip Singh, Gaurav Yadava for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.1044 of D 1998, …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 652 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1096
INSTITUTE OF LAW v. NEERAJ SHARMA 1097• Lease Hold basis in Chandigarh Scheme, 1996 - cl. 18. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The settlement of the land in favour of the appellant-Institute was done within a few days without 8 following the mandatory procedure for the allotment of land. The intention of t…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 650 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 26
[2014] 12 S.C.R. 26 A YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. SAVITRI PANDEY & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 605 of 2012) SEPTEMBER 19, 2014B [R.M. LODHA, CJI, KURIAN JOSEPH AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - ss. 138 and 142 -C Dishonour of cheque - Complaint filed before the expiry of the period of 15 days stipula…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 65 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 138
Dhruv Mehta, P.B. Suresh, Vipin Nair, Udayaditya Banerjee (for Temple Law Firm…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 647 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 559
SLP (Civil) No. 31006 of 2012. N.K. Kaul, ASG, N. Rai. B. Sunita Rao, Ritu Bhardwaj, Anurag, Annam D.N. Rao Neelam Jain, Vaishali R. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Ashish Giri, Swati Chandra, B. Krishna Prasad, D Himanshu Shekhar for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MADAN B. LOKUR, J. 1. Leave …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
WITH Crl. A. No. 1423 of 2009. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv., Jasbir Singh Malik (For F S. K. Sabharwal), Adv., for the Appellant. Roopansh Purohit, AAG, Ramesh Kumar, Ms. Naresh· Bakshi and Daya Krishan Sharma, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals are…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 667 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 524
5. In view of the plea that by virtue of Section 24 (2) E of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, ResettlementAct, 2013 the subject of acquisition shall be deemed to have lapsed, certain factual aspects viz., (i) whether F possession of the land measuring 1Kanai11 Marlas …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 666 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1273
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High E Court, the Court HELD : Any finding on the correctness of the appellant's appointment seriously affects his right. The High Court, while proceeding to examine the correctness of the order dated 4.2.1991, ought to have called upon F the parties to produce all the ma…
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 665 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 641
G P.P. Rao, P. Vishwanath Shetty, D. Ramakrishna Reddy, D. Bharathi Reddy for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H 644 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 10 S.C.R. A T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. This appeal has been placed before this larger bench pursuant to a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court …
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 664 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 54
G WITH Crl.A.No. 1256 & 1367 of 1999 W.P. (c) No. 316.of 2008. H 56 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 12 S.C.R. A Contempt Petiton (C) No. 47 of 2011 in W.P. (Civil) No. 316 of 2008. T.C. (C) No. 27 of 2011. Manjit Singh, Suryanarayana Singh, AAGs, Shekhar B Naphade, B.H. Marlapalle, Gopal Sankaranayanan, Vikramaditya, Rohi…
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 663 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1265
From the judgment and order dated 03.04.2014 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in W.P. D No. 87 (S/B) of 2014. Pallav Shishodia, Sr.Adv., and Kamlendra Mishra, Adv. for the Appellant. The following Order of the Court was passed : E ORDER It is mentioned today by Mr. Pallav Shishodia, learned s…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 663 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1238
1238 VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEYv. UNION OF INDIA &ANR. 1239 but also to send a signal to others who might dare in future to A expose any mal~administration - Right to judicial remedies for-the redressal of either personal or public grievances is a constitutional right of the subjects (both citizens and non-citizens) of this …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 661 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 559
2.2. In the instant case, the parties have entered into H concluded contract, agreeing to terms and conditions of SWAN GOLD MINING LTD. v. HINDUSTAN COPPER 561 LTD. the said contract, which was finally acted upon. In such A a case, the parties to the said contract cannot back out and challenge the award on the ground t…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 660 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 1164
D High Court Of Judicature at Madras in CMA No.2862 of 2011. R. Balasubramanian, B. Karunakaran, S.Usha Reddy for the Appellant. Ranjit Kumar, S.G., Zoheb Hossain, Rauf Rahim for the E Respondent. The Judgment of the_Court was delivered by PRAFULLA C.PA~T, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the jud…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 659 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 702
Sanjay Parikh, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. Vishruti Vijay, Advs. for the Appellant. P. Vishwantha Shetty, Sr. Adv., Ms. Kheyali Sarkar, E.C. Vidya Sagar, Ms. Jennifer Joh, Advs. for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed aga…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 658 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1359
Sandhya Goswami, Saryaya Krishna, Mahender P.S. Tamar and Jabar Singh, Advs., for the Appellant. E . Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Abhisth Kumar and Som Raj Choudhury,Advs., forthe Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J.1. We have heard learned counsel for F the appellant …
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 657 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1354
Mukesh K. Giri, Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Saryaya Krishna, Mahender P.S. Tomar, Jabar Singh, Advs. for the C Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals by special leave by the State are directed against the common judgment and order D dated 27'h May, 2005 passed by the High Cour…
Supreme Court of India22 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 656 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 536
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. It is common to all the theories of jurisprudence that the notion that law must possess a G certain form; contain a clear mandate/explicit command which may be prescriptive, permissive or penal and the law must also seek to achieve a clearly identifiable purpose. While the form …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 655 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 506
Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: The availing of money from a nationalized bank in the manner, as alleged by the investigating agency, vividly exposits fiscal impurity and, in a way, financial fraud. The modus operandi as narrated in the chargesheet cannot be put in the compartment of an G individual or personal …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 653 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1
P.N. Puri, Dhiraj for the Appellants. Ajay Bansal, AAG, Kuldip Singh, Gaurav Yadava for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.1044 of D 1998, …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 652 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 1096
INSTITUTE OF LAW v. NEERAJ SHARMA 1097• Lease Hold basis in Chandigarh Scheme, 1996 - cl. 18. A Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The settlement of the land in favour of the appellant-Institute was done within a few days without 8 following the mandatory procedure for the allotment of land. The intention of t…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 650 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 26
[2014] 12 S.C.R. 26 A YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. SAVITRI PANDEY & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 605 of 2012) SEPTEMBER 19, 2014B [R.M. LODHA, CJI, KURIAN JOSEPH AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - ss. 138 and 142 -C Dishonour of cheque - Complaint filed before the expiry of the period of 15 days stipula…
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2014Full text
2014 INSC 65 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 138
Dhruv Mehta, P.B. Suresh, Vipin Nair, Udayaditya Banerjee (for Temple Law Firm…
Supreme Court of India18 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 647 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 559
SLP (Civil) No. 31006 of 2012. N.K. Kaul, ASG, N. Rai. B. Sunita Rao, Ritu Bhardwaj, Anurag, Annam D.N. Rao Neelam Jain, Vaishali R. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Ashish Giri, Swati Chandra, B. Krishna Prasad, D Himanshu Shekhar for the Appearing Parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MADAN B. LOKUR, J. 1. Leave …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis