⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,221–4,240 · Page 212 of 382
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 851 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1383
Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv., for the Appellants. D R. K. Raizada, Sr. Adv., Vivek Gupta, Amitesh Mishra (For M/s. Karanjawala & Co.), Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 'PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. E 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, arises from the judgment and order …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,221–4,240 · Page 212 of 382
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 851 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1383
Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv., for the Appellants. D R. K. Raizada, Sr. Adv., Vivek Gupta, Amitesh Mishra (For M/s. Karanjawala & Co.), Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 'PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. E 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, arises from the judgment and order …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 850 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 149
SECY., DEPT. OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES & PENSION v. 151 T.V.L.N. MALLIKARJUNARAO the constitutional protection against hostile or arbitrary A discrimination. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the difference in the pay structures of entry grade of Data Entry Operators and the ·next higher grades. In these ca…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 85 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 959
Respondent no.7 also filed SLPs challenging the findings of the Single Judge with regard to suppression/ concealment which was not set aside by the Division Bench of the High Court. The said SLP was dismissed. D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD~ 1. After the selection for the dealership was finalized by the Corpora…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 849 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 245
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. Evidence on record discloses that there was no standing crop in between the lands and the view F was clear enabling PW 3 and PW 4 to see the occurrence. PW3 and PW4 are independent witnesses and their testimonies corroborate each other and there is no reason for them to false…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 848 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 377
Guru Krishna Kumar, Subhasish Bhowmick, Niti Luthra, S.C. Patel for the Appellants. B Y. Prabhakara Rao for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. c 2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Durgapur Casual Workers Union and others (hereina…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 847 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 397
Samir Ali Khan, Aditya Narayan Singh, Mishra Saurabh for E the Respondent. • ~ I ' The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the F judgment and order dated 12.8.2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur1in Criminal Appeal No.1537 of1998. · · 2. The …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 846 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 229
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1.1. In the instant case, PW 2-mother of the deceased, who is the key witness of the case, though supported the prosecution story in her examination-in-chief, but turned hostile in the cross-examination. PW 3-mother-in-law of the appellant and PW 10-sister of the informant also tu…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 845 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 239
240 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 11 S.C.R. • A proceedings, the complainant having its head office at Chandigarh and further nowhere the appellants have made out a case that all the cheques were payable at Faridabad. Therefore, the question of jurisdiction is of no consequence, which would be decided by the trial court…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 844 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 817
14. 07.2011 - Issued u/s. 33 of Bombay Police Act rlw. s. 144 Cr.P.C - Prohibiting hookah bars - Validity of - Held: The word . 'regulate' under the Police .Act would not include the power to prohibit - Power u/s. 144 Cr.P.C. is for passing c temporary orders which cannot last beyond 2 months - Hence the order is not v…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 843 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 370
- Single Judge of High Court set aside the order holding that judgment of Supreme Court was per incuriam - Division Bench of High Court upheld the judgment - Held: High Court D committed serious error in law by not following the judgment passed by Supreme Court - Such a course adopted by High Court was against the law …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 841 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 453
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The liberty is a priceless treasure for a E human being. It is founded on the bed rock of constitutional 'right and accentuated further on human rights principle. It is basically a natural right. It cannot be allowed to be paralysed and immobilized. Deprivation of liberty of a pe…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 840 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1331
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1331 M/S MSP INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. A v. M.P. ROAD DEVL. CORP. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 10778 of 2014) B DECEMBER 05, 2014 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 16 - Whether a party to an arbitration proceeding may be permitted to raise objections u/s. 34 with rega…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 84 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 356
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963: G s.28 - Application for rescission - Suit for specific performance decreed in 1984 - Execution petition filed in 1990 - Application uls 28 filed in 1999 - Held: Though execution petition was filed within the time prescribed, the efflux of time assumes importance and seriousness in the 356H R…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 839 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 220
Meenakshi Arora, Rahul Narayan, Mohit Singh, Mahima, Vasav Anantharaman for the Appellant. H 222 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 11 S.C.R. A Jesal, Swati Vaibhav, Hemantika Wahi for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. 1. The sole appellant, 8 Kanchanben is the mother-in-law of …
Supreme Court of India4 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 837 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 360
Krishnan Venugopal, Abhinav Mukerji, Aman Gupta for the F Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY U. LALIT, J. 1. Leave granted. This appeal challenges the order dated 30.05.2013 passed by the High G Court of Delhi in Arbitration Petition No.212 of 2011 appointing an arbitrator to adjudicate the dis…
Supreme Court of India4 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 835 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 72
KAREDLAPARTHASARADHI v. GANG ULA RAMANAMMA 73 (D) THROUGH L.RS deciding the issue as to whether respondent no. 1 was the A legal representative of deceased defendant no. 1 and if so, whether in the capacity of adopted son or as legatee on the strength of Will - Retaining the session of the appeal,· the matter is remitt…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 832 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 879
F Evidence: Rules of evidence - Scope of applicability- To /about cases - Held: Strict rules of evidence are not applicable to the proceedings before the labour court- Labour Laws. Burden of proof - Burden to prove· the fact that the G workman was in actual and continuous service of the employer for a particular period…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 831 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 499
1.1 (the star witness) and also as noted in the Exhibit P-18, the complaint, the mahazar as well as P-55 sketch ·read along with the version of PW-15, the evidence of PW-11 could not have been believed insofar as it related C to the actual occurrence, which admittedly was taking place inside his banana shop, the length…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 830 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 347
[2014] 12 S.C.R. 347 PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF PUNE A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 10717 of 2014) DECEMBER 03, 2014 B [RANJAN GOGOi AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.] Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: s.48(7) -Imposition of penalty - Whether the ·excavation activity even for the purposes of l…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 83 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 459
The appellants, related as nephew and aunt, were arrested by the State police and a case was registered G against them for offences punishable u/ss 121, 124(1) and 1208, IPC, s. 8 (1) (2) (3) of the Chhattisgarh Jansuraksha Adhiniyam and ss. 10 and 13 of the Unlawful Activities Act, on the ground that on 8.9.2011, the …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2014 INSC 850 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 149
SECY., DEPT. OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES & PENSION v. 151 T.V.L.N. MALLIKARJUNARAO the constitutional protection against hostile or arbitrary A discrimination. Therefore, no exception can be taken to the difference in the pay structures of entry grade of Data Entry Operators and the ·next higher grades. In these ca…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 85 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 959
Respondent no.7 also filed SLPs challenging the findings of the Single Judge with regard to suppression/ concealment which was not set aside by the Division Bench of the High Court. The said SLP was dismissed. D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD~ 1. After the selection for the dealership was finalized by the Corpora…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 849 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 245
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. Evidence on record discloses that there was no standing crop in between the lands and the view F was clear enabling PW 3 and PW 4 to see the occurrence. PW3 and PW4 are independent witnesses and their testimonies corroborate each other and there is no reason for them to false…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 848 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 377
Guru Krishna Kumar, Subhasish Bhowmick, Niti Luthra, S.C. Patel for the Appellants. B Y. Prabhakara Rao for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. c 2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Durgapur Casual Workers Union and others (hereina…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 847 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 397
Samir Ali Khan, Aditya Narayan Singh, Mishra Saurabh for E the Respondent. • ~ I ' The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the F judgment and order dated 12.8.2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur1in Criminal Appeal No.1537 of1998. · · 2. The …
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 846 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 229
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: 1.1. In the instant case, PW 2-mother of the deceased, who is the key witness of the case, though supported the prosecution story in her examination-in-chief, but turned hostile in the cross-examination. PW 3-mother-in-law of the appellant and PW 10-sister of the informant also tu…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 845 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 239
240 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 11 S.C.R. • A proceedings, the complainant having its head office at Chandigarh and further nowhere the appellants have made out a case that all the cheques were payable at Faridabad. Therefore, the question of jurisdiction is of no consequence, which would be decided by the trial court…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 844 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 817
14. 07.2011 - Issued u/s. 33 of Bombay Police Act rlw. s. 144 Cr.P.C - Prohibiting hookah bars - Validity of - Held: The word . 'regulate' under the Police .Act would not include the power to prohibit - Power u/s. 144 Cr.P.C. is for passing c temporary orders which cannot last beyond 2 months - Hence the order is not v…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 843 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 370
- Single Judge of High Court set aside the order holding that judgment of Supreme Court was per incuriam - Division Bench of High Court upheld the judgment - Held: High Court D committed serious error in law by not following the judgment passed by Supreme Court - Such a course adopted by High Court was against the law …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 841 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 453
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The liberty is a priceless treasure for a E human being. It is founded on the bed rock of constitutional 'right and accentuated further on human rights principle. It is basically a natural right. It cannot be allowed to be paralysed and immobilized. Deprivation of liberty of a pe…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 840 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1331
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1331 M/S MSP INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. A v. M.P. ROAD DEVL. CORP. LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 10778 of 2014) B DECEMBER 05, 2014 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 16 - Whether a party to an arbitration proceeding may be permitted to raise objections u/s. 34 with rega…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 84 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 356
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963: G s.28 - Application for rescission - Suit for specific performance decreed in 1984 - Execution petition filed in 1990 - Application uls 28 filed in 1999 - Held: Though execution petition was filed within the time prescribed, the efflux of time assumes importance and seriousness in the 356H R…
Supreme Court of India5 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 839 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 220
Meenakshi Arora, Rahul Narayan, Mohit Singh, Mahima, Vasav Anantharaman for the Appellant. H 222 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2014] 11 S.C.R. A Jesal, Swati Vaibhav, Hemantika Wahi for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. 1. The sole appellant, 8 Kanchanben is the mother-in-law of …
Supreme Court of India4 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 837 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 360
Krishnan Venugopal, Abhinav Mukerji, Aman Gupta for the F Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY U. LALIT, J. 1. Leave granted. This appeal challenges the order dated 30.05.2013 passed by the High G Court of Delhi in Arbitration Petition No.212 of 2011 appointing an arbitrator to adjudicate the dis…
Supreme Court of India4 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 835 · [2014] 13 S.C.R. 72
KAREDLAPARTHASARADHI v. GANG ULA RAMANAMMA 73 (D) THROUGH L.RS deciding the issue as to whether respondent no. 1 was the A legal representative of deceased defendant no. 1 and if so, whether in the capacity of adopted son or as legatee on the strength of Will - Retaining the session of the appeal,· the matter is remitt…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 832 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 879
F Evidence: Rules of evidence - Scope of applicability- To /about cases - Held: Strict rules of evidence are not applicable to the proceedings before the labour court- Labour Laws. Burden of proof - Burden to prove· the fact that the G workman was in actual and continuous service of the employer for a particular period…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 831 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 499
1.1 (the star witness) and also as noted in the Exhibit P-18, the complaint, the mahazar as well as P-55 sketch ·read along with the version of PW-15, the evidence of PW-11 could not have been believed insofar as it related C to the actual occurrence, which admittedly was taking place inside his banana shop, the length…
Supreme Court of India3 Dec 2014Full text
2014 INSC 830 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 347
[2014] 12 S.C.R. 347 PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF PUNE A v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 10717 of 2014) DECEMBER 03, 2014 B [RANJAN GOGOi AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.] Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: s.48(7) -Imposition of penalty - Whether the ·excavation activity even for the purposes of l…
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 83 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 459
The appellants, related as nephew and aunt, were arrested by the State police and a case was registered G against them for offences punishable u/ss 121, 124(1) and 1208, IPC, s. 8 (1) (2) (3) of the Chhattisgarh Jansuraksha Adhiniyam and ss. 10 and 13 of the Unlawful Activities Act, on the ground that on 8.9.2011, the …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis