⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,161–4,180 · Page 209 of 382
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 963 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 386
[2014] 5 S.C.R. 386 A INDIAN BANK ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 18 of 2013) APRIL 21, 2014.B [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND VIKRAMAJIT SEN, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: s.138 - Object of -Discussed. c ss. 143 to 147 (as inserted by) Negotiable Instruments (Amendment a…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 962 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 302
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,161–4,180 · Page 209 of 382
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 963 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 386
[2014] 5 S.C.R. 386 A INDIAN BANK ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 18 of 2013) APRIL 21, 2014.B [K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND VIKRAMAJIT SEN, JJ.] Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: s.138 - Object of -Discussed. c ss. 143 to 147 (as inserted by) Negotiable Instruments (Amendment a…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 962 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 302
ss. 4 and 9 - Removing of dump· from mining area and keeping it beyond mining area - Held: Dumping of minerals outside the leased area of the mining lessees is not permissible under MMDR Act and Rules made thereunder F - The moment mineral is removed or consumed from the leased area, the holder of a mining lease has to…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 96 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1021
D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. There is no dispute that the vehicles were coming in opposite direction. Also, the driver of the bus E had filed a complaint before the police and the police had registered an FIR. Except the driver of both the vehicles and the doctor who treated the appellant, there was no ot…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 957 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 780
c Amendment in judgment - Held: Para 22 of judgment dated 14.3.2014 is amended to the effect that the judgment of trial court is confirmed on Issue No. Ill also and suit of plaintiffs stands dismissed. D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2009 of the Hi…
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 955 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 605
[2014] 11 S.C.R. 605• HARSHAD GOVARDHAN SONDAGAR A v. INTERNATIONAL ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 736 of 2014) B APRIL 03, 2014 [A.K. PATNAIK AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - ss. 13, 14 and C 17 …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 954 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 646
D A.K. Chawla (AC) for the Appellant. Anip Sachthey, Shagun Matta for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.A. no.207 of 2002. 3. The appellants herein are accused nos.1 and 3 F…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 95 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 537
- As a safeguard, the Constitution has also recognized that in the internal administration of High Court, no. other power, except the Chief Justice should have domain - In order to D enable a judicial intervention, it would require only a very strong and convincing reason to show that this power has been abused. Art.22…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 948 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 226
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 226H MADAN LAL v. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 227 HELD: A The appellants have stated that they have no grievance against any of the selected candidates in the particular selection. Therefore, if at all, the appellants' grievances are to be considered, relating to B ascertainment of q…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 946 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 156
F 1.3 It cannot be accepted that since actual grant was not produced, the case pleaded by the defendants that the plaintiff held the land as old grant was not proved. The GLR maintained under the Cantonment Land Administration Rules supports the defendants' case that G the plaintiff held the land on old grant basis. Th…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 945 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 529
All the writ petitions were heard together and by a common judgment, the High Court set aside the orders of the DIG, CBI granting approval in three cases on its G finding that CBI "could not have invoked MCOCA in four different cases on same set of facts and four different charge-sheets". However, in the fourth case, t…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 944 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 779
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. D 3867 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2009 of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad in FA No. 468 of 2004. Chandan Ramamurthi for the Appellants. E Preshit Surshe (Mentioned By), Shivaji M. Jadhav, Naresh Kumar for the Respondents. The following Order o…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 938 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 97
- It is a pity that the time of the Court which is becoming acutely precious because of the piling arrears has to be wasted on hearing such matters - There is an urgent need to G put a check on such frivolous litigation - Bar to realise that great burden upon the Bench of dispensing justice imposes a simultaneous duty …
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 934 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 417
the single judge with direction that if the land in question is required by the Administration for public purpose, it would be entitled to 0 resort to appropriate provisions of law for acquiring the same. Lieutenant Governor appealed before Supreme Court where it was held that the representations filed by the legal hei…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 933 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 1054
(2014] 3 S.C.R. 1054 A STATE OF KERALA & ORS. v. B. SURENDRA DAS ETC. (Civil Appeal Nos. 3196-98 of 2014) MARCH 5, 2014 B [H.L. GOKHALE AND J. CHELAMESWAR, JJ.] ABKARI POLICY: Kera/a Abkari Policy - Object of - Held: Is to curb the rampant alcoholism in the State of Kera/a, which C claims to have the highest consumptio…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 930 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 70
Kamini Jaiswal, Shilpi Dey, Krishna Tiwari for the Appellant. Abhishek Atrey, Babita Tyagi for the Respondent. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the E High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.176 of 2010.…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 93 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 470
[2014] 2 S.C.R. 470 A DR. PURSHOTAM KUMAR KAUNDAL v. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS (Civil App~al No.1956 of 2014) FEBRUARY 11, 2014 B [RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI AND MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] HIMACHAL PRADESH MEDICAL EDUCATION C SERVICE RULES, 1999: r.2(n) - Promotion to the post of Assistant Professor in Pharmacology - Respondent no…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 928 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 49
Govind Goel, Sanjoy Kr. Yadav, Ankit Goel (for Dr. Kailash F Chand) for the Appellant. Jayant K. Sud, AAG, Ujas Kumar, Jasleen Chahal (for Kuldeep Singh) for the Responde…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 927 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 55
T.V.S. Raghavendra Sreyas, Urmila Sirur for the Appellant. 55 H 56 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A Ajay Marwah, Pragati Neekhra for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 8 1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 4.12.2009 passed by …
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 92 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 480
[2014] 2 S.C.R. 480 A DR. SUHAS H. POPHALE v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ITS ESTATE OFFICER (Civil Appeal No. 1970 of 2014) B FEBRUARY 11, 2014 [H.L. GOKHALE AND J. CHELAMESWAR JJ.) PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED C OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971: ss.15 and 2(e) r/w s.2(d) - "Public premises" - Eviction of unautho…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 919 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 287
2012 (7) sec. 795 relied on para 8 CRIMINAL AP PELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 314 of 2014. G From the Judgment and Order dated 05.05.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Cr. Misc. No. 16213 of 2010. 287 H 288 · SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. A Anuj Prakash, Samir Ali Khan for the Appellan…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
ss. 4 and 9 - Removing of dump· from mining area and keeping it beyond mining area - Held: Dumping of minerals outside the leased area of the mining lessees is not permissible under MMDR Act and Rules made thereunder F - The moment mineral is removed or consumed from the leased area, the holder of a mining lease has to…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 96 · [2014] 1 S.C.R. 1021
D Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. There is no dispute that the vehicles were coming in opposite direction. Also, the driver of the bus E had filed a complaint before the police and the police had registered an FIR. Except the driver of both the vehicles and the doctor who treated the appellant, there was no ot…
Supreme Court of India4 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 957 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 780
c Amendment in judgment - Held: Para 22 of judgment dated 14.3.2014 is amended to the effect that the judgment of trial court is confirmed on Issue No. Ill also and suit of plaintiffs stands dismissed. D CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2009 of the Hi…
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 955 · [2014] 11 S.C.R. 605
[2014] 11 S.C.R. 605• HARSHAD GOVARDHAN SONDAGAR A v. INTERNATIONAL ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 736 of 2014) B APRIL 03, 2014 [A.K. PATNAIK AND V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.] Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - ss. 13, 14 and C 17 …
Supreme Court of India3 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 954 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 646
D A.K. Chawla (AC) for the Appellant. Anip Sachthey, Shagun Matta for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.A. no.207 of 2002. 3. The appellants herein are accused nos.1 and 3 F…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 95 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 537
- As a safeguard, the Constitution has also recognized that in the internal administration of High Court, no. other power, except the Chief Justice should have domain - In order to D enable a judicial intervention, it would require only a very strong and convincing reason to show that this power has been abused. Art.22…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 948 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 226
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 226H MADAN LAL v. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 227 HELD: A The appellants have stated that they have no grievance against any of the selected candidates in the particular selection. Therefore, if at all, the appellants' grievances are to be considered, relating to B ascertainment of q…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 946 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 156
F 1.3 It cannot be accepted that since actual grant was not produced, the case pleaded by the defendants that the plaintiff held the land as old grant was not proved. The GLR maintained under the Cantonment Land Administration Rules supports the defendants' case that G the plaintiff held the land on old grant basis. Th…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 945 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 529
All the writ petitions were heard together and by a common judgment, the High Court set aside the orders of the DIG, CBI granting approval in three cases on its G finding that CBI "could not have invoked MCOCA in four different cases on same set of facts and four different charge-sheets". However, in the fourth case, t…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 944 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 779
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. D 3867 of 2014. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2009 of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad in FA No. 468 of 2004. Chandan Ramamurthi for the Appellants. E Preshit Surshe (Mentioned By), Shivaji M. Jadhav, Naresh Kumar for the Respondents. The following Order o…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 938 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 97
- It is a pity that the time of the Court which is becoming acutely precious because of the piling arrears has to be wasted on hearing such matters - There is an urgent need to G put a check on such frivolous litigation - Bar to realise that great burden upon the Bench of dispensing justice imposes a simultaneous duty …
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 934 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 417
the single judge with direction that if the land in question is required by the Administration for public purpose, it would be entitled to 0 resort to appropriate provisions of law for acquiring the same. Lieutenant Governor appealed before Supreme Court where it was held that the representations filed by the legal hei…
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 933 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 1054
(2014] 3 S.C.R. 1054 A STATE OF KERALA & ORS. v. B. SURENDRA DAS ETC. (Civil Appeal Nos. 3196-98 of 2014) MARCH 5, 2014 B [H.L. GOKHALE AND J. CHELAMESWAR, JJ.] ABKARI POLICY: Kera/a Abkari Policy - Object of - Held: Is to curb the rampant alcoholism in the State of Kera/a, which C claims to have the highest consumptio…
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 930 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 70
Kamini Jaiswal, Shilpi Dey, Krishna Tiwari for the Appellant. Abhishek Atrey, Babita Tyagi for the Respondent. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the E High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.176 of 2010.…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 93 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 470
[2014] 2 S.C.R. 470 A DR. PURSHOTAM KUMAR KAUNDAL v. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS (Civil App~al No.1956 of 2014) FEBRUARY 11, 2014 B [RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI AND MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] HIMACHAL PRADESH MEDICAL EDUCATION C SERVICE RULES, 1999: r.2(n) - Promotion to the post of Assistant Professor in Pharmacology - Respondent no…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 928 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 49
Govind Goel, Sanjoy Kr. Yadav, Ankit Goel (for Dr. Kailash F Chand) for the Appellant. Jayant K. Sud, AAG, Ujas Kumar, Jasleen Chahal (for Kuldeep Singh) for the Responde…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 927 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 55
T.V.S. Raghavendra Sreyas, Urmila Sirur for the Appellant. 55 H 56 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 4 S.C.R. A Ajay Marwah, Pragati Neekhra for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered ORDER 8 1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 4.12.2009 passed by …
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 92 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 480
[2014] 2 S.C.R. 480 A DR. SUHAS H. POPHALE v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ITS ESTATE OFFICER (Civil Appeal No. 1970 of 2014) B FEBRUARY 11, 2014 [H.L. GOKHALE AND J. CHELAMESWAR JJ.) PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED C OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971: ss.15 and 2(e) r/w s.2(d) - "Public premises" - Eviction of unautho…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 919 · [2014] 2 S.C.R. 287
2012 (7) sec. 795 relied on para 8 CRIMINAL AP PELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 314 of 2014. G From the Judgment and Order dated 05.05.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Cr. Misc. No. 16213 of 2010. 287 H 288 · SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 2 S.C.R. A Anuj Prakash, Samir Ali Khan for the Appellan…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis