⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,001–4,020 · Page 201 of 382
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 171 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 882
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 882 A UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH B (Civil Appeal Nos.2466-2467 of 2015) FEBRUARY 26, 2015 rr.s. THAKUR AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] c Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 -Proviso to s. 47 - Employee of Central Reserve Police …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 170 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 860
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
4,001–4,020 · Page 201 of 382
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 171 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 882
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 882 A UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH B (Civil Appeal Nos.2466-2467 of 2015) FEBRUARY 26, 2015 rr.s. THAKUR AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] c Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 -Proviso to s. 47 - Employee of Central Reserve Police …
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 170 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 860
Sushil Kumar Jain, Khushbu Jain (for Pratibha Jain) for the Appellant. G Ayesha Chawdhry, Musharraf Chawdhry, C. D. Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAVINDRA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 863 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.] PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. 1. This appeal by A special leave arises …
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 17 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 16
SITIKANATHA MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA 17 of the said regularization.- The appellant had to be taken A as having been regularized on the post of Professor with effect from 27th January, 1997. [para 12-13] [23-B-D] State of M.P. 'Vs. Sandhya Tomar 2012 (11) SCR 839 = 2013 (11) SCC 357, State of Rajasthan vs. S.N. Tiwari 2…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 169 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 722
H. L. GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA 723 appellant guilty of grave misconduct - However delinquency A established was of .negligence and not misconduct -Therefore finding that appellant was guilty of grave misconduct cannot be accepted - In the absence of conclusion of grave negligence, punishment order set aside - Jurisdict…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 168 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 687
E Kanwar Singh & Ors. vs. Union of India 1998 (8) SCC 136: 1998 (2) Suppl. SCR 505 - held inapplicable Case law reference F 1998 (2) Suppl. SCR 505 held inapplicable Paras 2, 6 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 8161-8185 of2011 G From the Judgment and Order dated 06.08.2010 of the High Court of Gujarat at…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 167 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 871
K. T. S. Tulsi, Huzefa Ahmadi, Pradhuman Gohil, Taruna Singh, Kuber Boddh, Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Prabuodha Sharma, Charu Mathur for the Appellants. D Nitin Sangra, Hemantika Wahi, Swati Vaibhav, Preeti Bhardwaj, Puja for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E PINAKI CHA…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 166 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 912
Kishor Lombad, S. Rajappa for the Appellant. G Prashant S. Kenjale, Aniruddha Mayee for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1 This appeal has been H TEJRAM PATIL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 915 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.] preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th A November,…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 164 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 678
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H BADRU RAM & ORS. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN 680 R. F. NARIMAN, J. 1. This is an appeal by four persons A who have been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with 149 IPC, each of whom are to suffer life imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- together with various other lesser…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 163 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 243
244 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A ·reinstated in service forthwith with all the benefits relating to seniority and his caste and also be paid back wages upto 75 per cent - Social status certificate. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 Three things that need to be established by a person who claims to b…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 162 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 237
Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misrimal Solanki (2014) 3 SCC 183: 2014 (1) SCR 783; Union of 237 H 238 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A India v. Shiv Raj (2014) 6 SCC 564; Bimla Devi v. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 583 - relied on. Case Law Reference 2014 (1) SCR 783 relied on. Para 4 B (2014) 6 sec 5…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 161 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 835
M. Narayanan Nambiar v. State of Kera/a, 1963 Supp. (2) SCR 724; Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement 2005 (1) Suppl. SCR 49 =(2005) 4 SCC 530 - followed. E Appasaheb v. State of Maharashtra 2007 (1) SCR 164 = (2007) 9 SCC 721; Vipin Jaiswal vs. State of Andhra Pradesh 2013 (3) SCR 449 =2013 (3) sec 68…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 160 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 197
F Answering tt~e question referred, the Court HELD: 1. Writ jurisdiction is constitutionally conferred on all High Courts. A writ of certiorari lies against patently erroneous or without jurisdiction orders of Tribunals or authorities or courts other than G judicial courts. There are no precedents in India for High Cou…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 16 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 363
Partly allowing the appeal filed by the accused- G appellants and dismissing the appeal filed by the State, the Court HELD: 1.1 The concurrent views of the courts below 363 H 364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A regarding their overt acts is concurred with as the same is proved by the version of eye witnesses pa…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 154 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 45
[2015] 4 S.C.R. 45 MACKINON MACKENZIE & COMPANY LTD. A v. MACKINNON EMPLOYEES UNION B (Civil Appeal No. 5319 of2008) FEBRUARY 25, 2015 [V. GOPALA GOWDA AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.) c INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947: s. 25F - Retrenchment notice - Conditions precedent for retrenchment- One month's notice and one month's salary -…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 153 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 650
Allowing the appeal, the Court H 650 651 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A HELD: 1.1 The language of section 2(5) of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 defining 'Thika Tenant' is fairly and reasonably clear. The said Section also reflects the intention of the legislature. The meaning of the word 'any structure'…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 152 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 606
- to be refunded to the respondents with interest@ 9% p.a. -In addition, the appellant to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,0001- to the respondents - Evidence Act, 1872-s.92- Equity. H 606 607 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the court HELD: 1. The appellant pleaded that as per the agreement betw…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 151 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 264
S. PERU MAL v. K. AMBIKA 265 1.2 The injured claimant is to be compensated for A his permanent disability and also for loss of earning due to his inability, the whole idea is to put claimant in the same position as he was prior to the accident. The claimant was a poultry labourer, he would have earned not less than Rs.…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 150 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 524
Rama Mukherjee, B. V. Bairam Das, Chelan Chawla, Anil Katiyar for the Appellants. C Col. S. R. Kalka!, R. C. Kaushik for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D N.V. RAMANA, J. 1.This appeal arise…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 15 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 328
Dismissing ·the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1. After analyzing the evidence and arriving at the conclusion that 'JG' could not have been convicted, for there was no evidence on record, he has proceeded to scrutinize the evidence against the G appellant. One of the facets for arriving at the conclusion that accused coul…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 148 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 255
R. Chandrachud for the Appellant. D Bhakti Vardhan Singh, R. C. Kohli for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. The appellant-husband in this civil appeal has assailed the judgment dated 24.11.2008 passed E by the High Court of Calcutta Circuit Bench at Port Blair in F.A. No.003 …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Sushil Kumar Jain, Khushbu Jain (for Pratibha Jain) for the Appellant. G Ayesha Chawdhry, Musharraf Chawdhry, C. D. Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H RAVINDRA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 863 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.] PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. 1. This appeal by A special leave arises …
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 17 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 16
SITIKANATHA MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA 17 of the said regularization.- The appellant had to be taken A as having been regularized on the post of Professor with effect from 27th January, 1997. [para 12-13] [23-B-D] State of M.P. 'Vs. Sandhya Tomar 2012 (11) SCR 839 = 2013 (11) SCC 357, State of Rajasthan vs. S.N. Tiwari 2…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 169 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 722
H. L. GULATI v. UNION OF INDIA 723 appellant guilty of grave misconduct - However delinquency A established was of .negligence and not misconduct -Therefore finding that appellant was guilty of grave misconduct cannot be accepted - In the absence of conclusion of grave negligence, punishment order set aside - Jurisdict…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 168 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 687
E Kanwar Singh & Ors. vs. Union of India 1998 (8) SCC 136: 1998 (2) Suppl. SCR 505 - held inapplicable Case law reference F 1998 (2) Suppl. SCR 505 held inapplicable Paras 2, 6 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 8161-8185 of2011 G From the Judgment and Order dated 06.08.2010 of the High Court of Gujarat at…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 167 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 871
K. T. S. Tulsi, Huzefa Ahmadi, Pradhuman Gohil, Taruna Singh, Kuber Boddh, Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Prabuodha Sharma, Charu Mathur for the Appellants. D Nitin Sangra, Hemantika Wahi, Swati Vaibhav, Preeti Bhardwaj, Puja for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E PINAKI CHA…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 166 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 912
Kishor Lombad, S. Rajappa for the Appellant. G Prashant S. Kenjale, Aniruddha Mayee for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1 This appeal has been H TEJRAM PATIL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 915 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J.] preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th A November,…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 164 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 678
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H BADRU RAM & ORS. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN 680 R. F. NARIMAN, J. 1. This is an appeal by four persons A who have been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with 149 IPC, each of whom are to suffer life imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- together with various other lesser…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 163 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 243
244 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A ·reinstated in service forthwith with all the benefits relating to seniority and his caste and also be paid back wages upto 75 per cent - Social status certificate. Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1 Three things that need to be established by a person who claims to b…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 162 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 237
Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misrimal Solanki (2014) 3 SCC 183: 2014 (1) SCR 783; Union of 237 H 238 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A India v. Shiv Raj (2014) 6 SCC 564; Bimla Devi v. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 583 - relied on. Case Law Reference 2014 (1) SCR 783 relied on. Para 4 B (2014) 6 sec 5…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 161 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 835
M. Narayanan Nambiar v. State of Kera/a, 1963 Supp. (2) SCR 724; Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement 2005 (1) Suppl. SCR 49 =(2005) 4 SCC 530 - followed. E Appasaheb v. State of Maharashtra 2007 (1) SCR 164 = (2007) 9 SCC 721; Vipin Jaiswal vs. State of Andhra Pradesh 2013 (3) SCR 449 =2013 (3) sec 68…
Supreme Court of India26 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 160 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 197
F Answering tt~e question referred, the Court HELD: 1. Writ jurisdiction is constitutionally conferred on all High Courts. A writ of certiorari lies against patently erroneous or without jurisdiction orders of Tribunals or authorities or courts other than G judicial courts. There are no precedents in India for High Cou…
Supreme Court of India9 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 16 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 363
Partly allowing the appeal filed by the accused- G appellants and dismissing the appeal filed by the State, the Court HELD: 1.1 The concurrent views of the courts below 363 H 364 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A regarding their overt acts is concurred with as the same is proved by the version of eye witnesses pa…
Supreme Court of India25 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 154 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 45
[2015] 4 S.C.R. 45 MACKINON MACKENZIE & COMPANY LTD. A v. MACKINNON EMPLOYEES UNION B (Civil Appeal No. 5319 of2008) FEBRUARY 25, 2015 [V. GOPALA GOWDA AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.) c INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947: s. 25F - Retrenchment notice - Conditions precedent for retrenchment- One month's notice and one month's salary -…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 153 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 650
Allowing the appeal, the Court H 650 651 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A HELD: 1.1 The language of section 2(5) of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 defining 'Thika Tenant' is fairly and reasonably clear. The said Section also reflects the intention of the legislature. The meaning of the word 'any structure'…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 152 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 606
- to be refunded to the respondents with interest@ 9% p.a. -In addition, the appellant to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,0001- to the respondents - Evidence Act, 1872-s.92- Equity. H 606 607 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the court HELD: 1. The appellant pleaded that as per the agreement betw…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 151 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 264
S. PERU MAL v. K. AMBIKA 265 1.2 The injured claimant is to be compensated for A his permanent disability and also for loss of earning due to his inability, the whole idea is to put claimant in the same position as he was prior to the accident. The claimant was a poultry labourer, he would have earned not less than Rs.…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 150 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 524
Rama Mukherjee, B. V. Bairam Das, Chelan Chawla, Anil Katiyar for the Appellants. C Col. S. R. Kalka!, R. C. Kaushik for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D N.V. RAMANA, J. 1.This appeal arise…
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 15 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 328
Dismissing ·the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1. After analyzing the evidence and arriving at the conclusion that 'JG' could not have been convicted, for there was no evidence on record, he has proceeded to scrutinize the evidence against the G appellant. One of the facets for arriving at the conclusion that accused coul…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 148 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 255
R. Chandrachud for the Appellant. D Bhakti Vardhan Singh, R. C. Kohli for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. The appellant-husband in this civil appeal has assailed the judgment dated 24.11.2008 passed E by the High Court of Calcutta Circuit Bench at Port Blair in F.A. No.003 …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis