⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,881–3,900 · Page 195 of 382
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 323 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 355
356 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 7 S.C.R. A Per Court: In view of difference of opinion, matter referred to Larger Bench - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898- s. 493-Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - r.30. B s. 24(8) - Power to appoint Special Public Prosecutor-Criminal case tra…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 321 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 373
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,881–3,900 · Page 195 of 382
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 323 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 355
356 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 7 S.C.R. A Per Court: In view of difference of opinion, matter referred to Larger Bench - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898- s. 493-Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - r.30. B s. 24(8) - Power to appoint Special Public Prosecutor-Criminal case tra…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 321 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 373
G Navnit Kumar, Corporate Law Group, Abir Phukan, V. ·Shyamohan, Shreyas Mehrotra, Apoorv Damodaran for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H GANGA DHAR KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 375 ORS. PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed A against judgment and order dated 20.3.2014, passed …
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 319 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 609
RATNAM High Court of Judicature Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in A Criminal Petition No. 6213 of 2007 with Crl. A. Nos. 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131, & 132 B of 2013. Guntur Prabhakar, Prerna Singh, D. Mahesh Babu for the Appellants. K. Maruti Rao, K. Subba Rao, Aniruddha P. Mayee, V. C Sridhar Reddy, V. N. Raghupat…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 318 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1062
- Held: Conjoint reading of the technical services E agreement and the purchase order, do not lead to the conclusion that fees for the technical services agreement is in any way a pre-condition for the sale of the plant itself - Technical services agreement read as a whole is only to successfully set up, commission and…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 317 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 19
- Compensation. *Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427 - relied on. CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Crl) No. 129 of 2006 G Colin Gonsalves, Aparna Bhat, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Tanima Kishore, Sumit Kumar, Shivangi Singh, Sumeeta Choudhary, Jyoti Mendiratta for the Petitioner. H 19 20 SUPREME COURT …
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 316 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 185
- Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions allowed. CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal M. P. D 3655-3656 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1240-1241 of 2010. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2010 of the High Court at Calcutta in Death Reference 2 of 2005 in E Sessions Case No. 79 of 2002 with CRA 428 of 2005. Wl1H C…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 316 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 185
- Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions allowed. CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal M. P. D 3655-3656 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1240-1241 of 2010. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2010 of the High Court at Calcutta in Death Reference 2 of 2005 in E Sessions Case No. 79 of 2002 with CRA 428 of 2005. Wl1H C…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 314 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 341
F K. Rajeev for the Appellants. Roy Abraham, Reena Roy, Chandrani Prasad, Himinder Lal, Jogy Scaria, Apoorv Damodaran, Liz Mathew, Temple Law Firm for the Respondents. G The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER 341 H 342 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 4 S.C.R. A I.A. N0.6 Learned counsel appearing for the app…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 312 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 947
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 947 RAJA@ RAJINDER A v. STATE OF HARYANA (Crimi~al Appeal No. 486 of 2010) B APRIL 10, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND N.V. RAMANA,JJ.] c Penal Code, 1860: ss.302, 201 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence - Held: The evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased was last seen with the accused…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 311 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 274
Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, fortheAppellant. Shashi Juneja, C. D. Singh, Vanshaja Shukla (A.C.) for C the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LAUT, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 20.11.2007 D passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing Crimina…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 305 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 67
68 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A tainly bound to conflict with personal interest- On facts, sub-mission that the disqualification prescribed uls. 9A operates only at the threshold thereby rendering a person ineligible for contesting any election thus, the petitioner did not incur any disqualification; and tha…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 301 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 551
551 H 552 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. It cannot be said that Section 300 Cr.P.C. will be an embargo to obstruct the right of the appellant to file a second complaint against the B respondent. The respondent had not been tried, in furtherance of the previous compla…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 300 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 413
with 8 C. A. Nos. 4491-4493 of 2004 Pridesh Kapur, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Rupinder Singh, V. Balachandran, for the Appellant. C Guru Kirshna Kumar, Niranjana Singh, S. A. Haseeb, Anil Katiyar, 8. V. Balaram Das, for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. K. SIKRI, J. D CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4494 OF 200…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 30 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court E HELD: 1. In a suit filed by a co-sharerer, coparcener,. co-owner or joint owner, as the case may be, for partition and separate possession of his/her share qua others,. it is necessary for the Court to examine, in the first F . instance, the nature…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 3 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: The plea of the appellant was that the amount could not be credited by him on 13.8.1990 as the cash F actually paid by the policy holder on that day was short and, as such the act on the part of the appellant was bonafide. This explanation was not convincing, as the cashier would …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 299 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 93
Jaideep Gupta, Santosh Kumar for the Appellant. H 96 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A Arunabh Chowdhury, Karma Dorjee, Gainilung Panmei (for Anupam Lal Das) for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted.8 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the j…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 298 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 818
- Approach of the two courts below in deciding the issue 818H S.J. COKE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL 819 COALFIELDS LTD. though it was of reversal cannot be approved - On facts, A untenable pleas were being raised by CCL just to defeat the legitimate claim of the citizens determined in their favour by this Court in …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 297 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 906
BIVASH CHANDRA DEBNATH @ BIVASH D v. STATE 907 OF WEST BENGAL not punishable uls.302 but uls.304 Part I. A Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. There are four eye witnesses who have deposed about the role of the appellants in commission of the crime. In his deposition, PW-1 specifically B stated that the accu…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 296 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 1075
- Discussed. F Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Order XIV Rule 2, CPC confers power upon the Court to pronounce judgment on all the issues. But there is an exception to that general Rule i.e., where G issues both of law and fact arise in the same suit and the Court is of the opinion that the case or any part …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 295 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 199
- Will - Sale. Evidence - Proof of a Will- Standard of- Held: Proof of a Will stands on higher degree, in comparison to other documents - There must be clear evidence regarding G execution of the Will - Will. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The law presumes in favour of marriage H 199 200 SUPREME COURT REPOR…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
G Navnit Kumar, Corporate Law Group, Abir Phukan, V. ·Shyamohan, Shreyas Mehrotra, Apoorv Damodaran for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by H GANGA DHAR KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 375 ORS. PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed A against judgment and order dated 20.3.2014, passed …
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 319 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 609
RATNAM High Court of Judicature Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in A Criminal Petition No. 6213 of 2007 with Crl. A. Nos. 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131, & 132 B of 2013. Guntur Prabhakar, Prerna Singh, D. Mahesh Babu for the Appellants. K. Maruti Rao, K. Subba Rao, Aniruddha P. Mayee, V. C Sridhar Reddy, V. N. Raghupat…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 318 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1062
- Held: Conjoint reading of the technical services E agreement and the purchase order, do not lead to the conclusion that fees for the technical services agreement is in any way a pre-condition for the sale of the plant itself - Technical services agreement read as a whole is only to successfully set up, commission and…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 317 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 19
- Compensation. *Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427 - relied on. CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Crl) No. 129 of 2006 G Colin Gonsalves, Aparna Bhat, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Tanima Kishore, Sumit Kumar, Shivangi Singh, Sumeeta Choudhary, Jyoti Mendiratta for the Petitioner. H 19 20 SUPREME COURT …
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 316 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 185
- Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions allowed. CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal M. P. D 3655-3656 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1240-1241 of 2010. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2010 of the High Court at Calcutta in Death Reference 2 of 2005 in E Sessions Case No. 79 of 2002 with CRA 428 of 2005. Wl1H C…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 316 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 185
- Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions allowed. CRIMINALAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal M. P. D 3655-3656 of 2015 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1240-1241 of 2010. From the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2010 of the High Court at Calcutta in Death Reference 2 of 2005 in E Sessions Case No. 79 of 2002 with CRA 428 of 2005. Wl1H C…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 314 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 341
F K. Rajeev for the Appellants. Roy Abraham, Reena Roy, Chandrani Prasad, Himinder Lal, Jogy Scaria, Apoorv Damodaran, Liz Mathew, Temple Law Firm for the Respondents. G The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER 341 H 342 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015) 4 S.C.R. A I.A. N0.6 Learned counsel appearing for the app…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 312 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 947
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 947 RAJA@ RAJINDER A v. STATE OF HARYANA (Crimi~al Appeal No. 486 of 2010) B APRIL 10, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND N.V. RAMANA,JJ.] c Penal Code, 1860: ss.302, 201 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence - Held: The evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased was last seen with the accused…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 311 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 274
Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, fortheAppellant. Shashi Juneja, C. D. Singh, Vanshaja Shukla (A.C.) for C the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LAUT, J. 1. This appeal by special leave challenges the judgment and order dated 20.11.2007 D passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing Crimina…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 305 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 67
68 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A tainly bound to conflict with personal interest- On facts, sub-mission that the disqualification prescribed uls. 9A operates only at the threshold thereby rendering a person ineligible for contesting any election thus, the petitioner did not incur any disqualification; and tha…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 301 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 551
551 H 552 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. It cannot be said that Section 300 Cr.P.C. will be an embargo to obstruct the right of the appellant to file a second complaint against the B respondent. The respondent had not been tried, in furtherance of the previous compla…
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 300 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 413
with 8 C. A. Nos. 4491-4493 of 2004 Pridesh Kapur, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Rupinder Singh, V. Balachandran, for the Appellant. C Guru Kirshna Kumar, Niranjana Singh, S. A. Haseeb, Anil Katiyar, 8. V. Balaram Das, for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A. K. SIKRI, J. D CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4494 OF 200…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 30 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1
Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court E HELD: 1. In a suit filed by a co-sharerer, coparcener,. co-owner or joint owner, as the case may be, for partition and separate possession of his/her share qua others,. it is necessary for the Court to examine, in the first F . instance, the nature…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 3 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: The plea of the appellant was that the amount could not be credited by him on 13.8.1990 as the cash F actually paid by the policy holder on that day was short and, as such the act on the part of the appellant was bonafide. This explanation was not convincing, as the cashier would …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 299 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 93
Jaideep Gupta, Santosh Kumar for the Appellant. H 96 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A Arunabh Chowdhury, Karma Dorjee, Gainilung Panmei (for Anupam Lal Das) for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted.8 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the j…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 298 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 818
- Approach of the two courts below in deciding the issue 818H S.J. COKE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL 819 COALFIELDS LTD. though it was of reversal cannot be approved - On facts, A untenable pleas were being raised by CCL just to defeat the legitimate claim of the citizens determined in their favour by this Court in …
Supreme Court of India16 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 297 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 906
BIVASH CHANDRA DEBNATH @ BIVASH D v. STATE 907 OF WEST BENGAL not punishable uls.302 but uls.304 Part I. A Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. There are four eye witnesses who have deposed about the role of the appellants in commission of the crime. In his deposition, PW-1 specifically B stated that the accu…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 296 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 1075
- Discussed. F Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Order XIV Rule 2, CPC confers power upon the Court to pronounce judgment on all the issues. But there is an exception to that general Rule i.e., where G issues both of law and fact arise in the same suit and the Court is of the opinion that the case or any part …
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 295 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 199
- Will - Sale. Evidence - Proof of a Will- Standard of- Held: Proof of a Will stands on higher degree, in comparison to other documents - There must be clear evidence regarding G execution of the Will - Will. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The law presumes in favour of marriage H 199 200 SUPREME COURT REPOR…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis