⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,521–3,540 · Page 177 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 793 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 579
[2015] 12 S.C.R. 579 PRAKASH & ORS. A v. PHULAVATI & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.7217 of2013) B OCTOBER 16, 2015 [ANIL R. DAVE AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005: ss. 6(1 ), 6(3), 6(5) - Whether the Act will have c retrospective operation - Held: No - The legislature has. expressly made the Am…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 792 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 308
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,521–3,540 · Page 177 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 793 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 579
[2015] 12 S.C.R. 579 PRAKASH & ORS. A v. PHULAVATI & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.7217 of2013) B OCTOBER 16, 2015 [ANIL R. DAVE AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, JJ.] Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005: ss. 6(1 ), 6(3), 6(5) - Whether the Act will have c retrospective operation - Held: No - The legislature has. expressly made the Am…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 792 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 308
308 PRATAP Kl SHORE PANDA v. AGNI CHARAN DAS 309 of Lower Division Assistant in the Office of Department of A Secretariat) Rules, 1951-rr.3, 9. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The Umadevi doctrine is that if· employment of persons is contrary to or de hors the statutory provisioris and/or Rules and Regulatio…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 791 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1029
1029 1030 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A entitled to claim mesne profit for the balance amount i.e.Rs.1701- p.m. and not for his entitlement to the entire mesne profit - The order dated 21.4.2009 could not have been construed so as to deprive the applicant to claim mesne profit@ Rs.301- p.m. as the same was a…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 79 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 844
26. 12. 2009 - Writ petition challenging the decision of D Selection Committee dismissed on the ground that there was no illegality in the selection process of the appellant - Writ appeal - Appointment of appellant set aside on the ground that the order dated 26. 12. 2009 was not complied with - As a result respondent …
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 789 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 708
(2015] 11 S.C.R. 708 A BALU@BALASUBRAMANIAM &ANR. v. STATE (U.T. OF PONDICHERRY) (Criminal Appeal No. 502 of 2007) B OCTOBER 16,2015 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860: c ss.325, 326 and 324- Conviction by trial courl, of the appellants-accused alongwith 3 other accused u/ss. 3021149 and 148 …
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 788 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 133
Pritesh Kapur, Kabir Hathi, Jesal Wahi, Hemantika Wahi for the Appellant. · E Meenakshi Arora, Shirish D. Patel, Bina Gupta, Ranjit B. Raut for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal lays siege to the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at …
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 783 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 220
220 SUMER BUILDERS PVT. LTD. v. NARENDRAGORANI 221 the land is situate - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - A s.9- Jurisdiction. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Under Section 120 of the Code of Civil 8Procedure, 1908, Sections 16, 17 and 20 are not applicable to the High Court in original civil jurisdic…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 782 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1099
1100 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 13 S.C.R. A any miscarriage of justice in the present case as the confirmation of.sale was grossly illegal and in contravention of the government notification - The action of the sale officer has resulted in deprivation of the right to livelihood of the appellants guaranteed u/Art. 21 …
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 781 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1056
With Crl. A. No. 259 of 2013. H KRISHIKALULLA v. SHYAMVITHALRAO DEVKATTA 1059 Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv., Chirag M. Shroff, Bhaskar A Das, Nitin Mishra, Mrs. Mitali Gupta, VikramAditya Narayan, Advs. with him, for the Appellants. Ramsuresh Vishwakarma, Rajiv Kumar Sinha, Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Kunal A. Cheema, Nishan…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 780 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 717
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In a given case, the competent authority G may, while deciding the issue of suitability of the probationer to be confirmed, ignore the act(s) of misconduct and terminate his service without casting any aspersion or stigma which may adversely affect his H 717 718 SUPREME COURT REP…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 78 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 550
M.V. JAYARAJAN v. HIGH COURT OF KERALA 551 obstruct and impede its functioning and not merely to A criticise its pronouncement which was not to his liking. His conduct leaves him unquestionably guilty of the offence of Contempt of Courts, calling for him to be punished for his illegal act. He has shown no remorse or co…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 778 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1080
[2015] 13 S.C.R. 1080 A M/S. MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE &ANR. (Civil Appeal NoS.10547-10548 of 2011) B OCTOBER 15, 2015 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.) Income-Tax Act, 1961: c s. 37 - Business Expenditure - Deduction - Certain amount claimed as revenue expenditure by the As…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 776 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1042
K.A. KOTRAPPAREDDYv. RAYARAMANJUNATHA 1043 REDDY@ N.R. MANJUNATHA suffer from the vice of perversity-As against accused Nos. 11 A and 12, alibi is sufficiently proved. Brahm Swaroop & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2010 (15) SCR 1 : (2011) 6 SCC 288; D.K. Basu v. State of WB. 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 284: B (1997) 1 sec 41…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 775 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 898
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal Nos. 1793-1794 of 2011. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.07 .2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal F No. 11 of 2008 and Criminal Reference No. 4 of 2007 WITH Crl. A. No. 1795-1796 of 2011. Gagan Gupta, Sunny Choudhary, Mishra Saurabh…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 770 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1070
2. The requirement of adoption of moderation of marks to a particular kind of examination and scaling to others are, at best, opinions, exercise of which requires an in-depth consideration of questions that are more H 1072 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A suitable for the experts in the field. Holding of public…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 77 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1063
Amarendra Sharan, Navin Chawla, Arpit Maheshwari, E Aprajita for the Appellants. Pinky Anand, ASG, Maneesha Dhir, K. P. S. Kohli, Prashant Jain, Gagan Gupta, Sanjay Kapur, Lekha F Vishwanath, Mo hit Paul, Amit Bansal, Gaurav Goyal, Madhu Sikri for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUDHANSU JYO…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 769 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 882
884 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. \ Appeal No. 65 of 2006. Guntur Prabhaltar, G. Pramod Kumar, Advs., for the Appellant. A. Venkateswara Rao, D. Mahesh Babu,Advs., for the B Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. r · 2. This appeal is directed against the Judgm…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 768 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1130
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 1130 A FARUK ILAHI TAMBOLI &ANR. v. B.S. SHANKARRAO KOKATE (D) BY LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.8648 OF 2015) B OCTOBER 14, 2015 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Rent control and eviction: c Bonafide need ~ Tenanted shop measuring 9. 7 sq. meters -Appel/ants-Landlords seeking eviction of ten…
Supreme Court of India13 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 767 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 498
SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATT v. UNION OF INDIA 499 mail exchange between the then AAG and oiher functionaries A tantamounts to causing prejudice or amounts to substantial. interference in any other manner in due course of justice -Further, not a case of scandalizing the court or in any manner affecting fair decision of the co…
Supreme Court of India12 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 765 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 861
G And in the Matter.of: MANESAR INDUSTRIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION Annam D. N. Rao, Adv., for the Appellant. M. Vil:lhuti S. Gupta, Dr. Kailash Chand, SanjeevAnand, H Rajnish G., Advs., for the Respondents. H.S.l.D.C. v. PRAN SUKH & ORS. 863 [VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.] The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A VIKRAMAJIT SEN, …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
308 PRATAP Kl SHORE PANDA v. AGNI CHARAN DAS 309 of Lower Division Assistant in the Office of Department of A Secretariat) Rules, 1951-rr.3, 9. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The Umadevi doctrine is that if· employment of persons is contrary to or de hors the statutory provisioris and/or Rules and Regulatio…
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 791 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1029
1029 1030 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A entitled to claim mesne profit for the balance amount i.e.Rs.1701- p.m. and not for his entitlement to the entire mesne profit - The order dated 21.4.2009 could not have been construed so as to deprive the applicant to claim mesne profit@ Rs.301- p.m. as the same was a…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 79 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 844
26. 12. 2009 - Writ petition challenging the decision of D Selection Committee dismissed on the ground that there was no illegality in the selection process of the appellant - Writ appeal - Appointment of appellant set aside on the ground that the order dated 26. 12. 2009 was not complied with - As a result respondent …
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 789 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 708
(2015] 11 S.C.R. 708 A BALU@BALASUBRAMANIAM &ANR. v. STATE (U.T. OF PONDICHERRY) (Criminal Appeal No. 502 of 2007) B OCTOBER 16,2015 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860: c ss.325, 326 and 324- Conviction by trial courl, of the appellants-accused alongwith 3 other accused u/ss. 3021149 and 148 …
Supreme Court of India16 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 788 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 133
Pritesh Kapur, Kabir Hathi, Jesal Wahi, Hemantika Wahi for the Appellant. · E Meenakshi Arora, Shirish D. Patel, Bina Gupta, Ranjit B. Raut for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal lays siege to the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at …
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 783 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 220
220 SUMER BUILDERS PVT. LTD. v. NARENDRAGORANI 221 the land is situate - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - A s.9- Jurisdiction. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Under Section 120 of the Code of Civil 8Procedure, 1908, Sections 16, 17 and 20 are not applicable to the High Court in original civil jurisdic…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 782 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1099
1100 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 13 S.C.R. A any miscarriage of justice in the present case as the confirmation of.sale was grossly illegal and in contravention of the government notification - The action of the sale officer has resulted in deprivation of the right to livelihood of the appellants guaranteed u/Art. 21 …
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 781 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1056
With Crl. A. No. 259 of 2013. H KRISHIKALULLA v. SHYAMVITHALRAO DEVKATTA 1059 Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv., Chirag M. Shroff, Bhaskar A Das, Nitin Mishra, Mrs. Mitali Gupta, VikramAditya Narayan, Advs. with him, for the Appellants. Ramsuresh Vishwakarma, Rajiv Kumar Sinha, Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Kunal A. Cheema, Nishan…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 780 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 717
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In a given case, the competent authority G may, while deciding the issue of suitability of the probationer to be confirmed, ignore the act(s) of misconduct and terminate his service without casting any aspersion or stigma which may adversely affect his H 717 718 SUPREME COURT REP…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 78 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 550
M.V. JAYARAJAN v. HIGH COURT OF KERALA 551 obstruct and impede its functioning and not merely to A criticise its pronouncement which was not to his liking. His conduct leaves him unquestionably guilty of the offence of Contempt of Courts, calling for him to be punished for his illegal act. He has shown no remorse or co…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 778 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1080
[2015] 13 S.C.R. 1080 A M/S. MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE &ANR. (Civil Appeal NoS.10547-10548 of 2011) B OCTOBER 15, 2015 [MADAN B. LOKUR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.) Income-Tax Act, 1961: c s. 37 - Business Expenditure - Deduction - Certain amount claimed as revenue expenditure by the As…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 776 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1042
K.A. KOTRAPPAREDDYv. RAYARAMANJUNATHA 1043 REDDY@ N.R. MANJUNATHA suffer from the vice of perversity-As against accused Nos. 11 A and 12, alibi is sufficiently proved. Brahm Swaroop & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2010 (15) SCR 1 : (2011) 6 SCC 288; D.K. Basu v. State of WB. 1996 (10) Suppl. SCR 284: B (1997) 1 sec 41…
Supreme Court of India15 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 775 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 898
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal Nos. 1793-1794 of 2011. From the Judgment and Order dated 23.07 .2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal F No. 11 of 2008 and Criminal Reference No. 4 of 2007 WITH Crl. A. No. 1795-1796 of 2011. Gagan Gupta, Sunny Choudhary, Mishra Saurabh…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 770 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1070
2. The requirement of adoption of moderation of marks to a particular kind of examination and scaling to others are, at best, opinions, exercise of which requires an in-depth consideration of questions that are more H 1072 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. A suitable for the experts in the field. Holding of public…
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 77 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1063
Amarendra Sharan, Navin Chawla, Arpit Maheshwari, E Aprajita for the Appellants. Pinky Anand, ASG, Maneesha Dhir, K. P. S. Kohli, Prashant Jain, Gagan Gupta, Sanjay Kapur, Lekha F Vishwanath, Mo hit Paul, Amit Bansal, Gaurav Goyal, Madhu Sikri for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SUDHANSU JYO…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 769 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 882
884 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 12 S.C.R. \ Appeal No. 65 of 2006. Guntur Prabhaltar, G. Pramod Kumar, Advs., for the Appellant. A. Venkateswara Rao, D. Mahesh Babu,Advs., for the B Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. r · 2. This appeal is directed against the Judgm…
Supreme Court of India14 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 768 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1130
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 1130 A FARUK ILAHI TAMBOLI &ANR. v. B.S. SHANKARRAO KOKATE (D) BY LRS. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.8648 OF 2015) B OCTOBER 14, 2015 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Rent control and eviction: c Bonafide need ~ Tenanted shop measuring 9. 7 sq. meters -Appel/ants-Landlords seeking eviction of ten…
Supreme Court of India13 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 767 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 498
SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATT v. UNION OF INDIA 499 mail exchange between the then AAG and oiher functionaries A tantamounts to causing prejudice or amounts to substantial. interference in any other manner in due course of justice -Further, not a case of scandalizing the court or in any manner affecting fair decision of the co…
Supreme Court of India12 Oct 2015Full text
2015 INSC 765 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 861
G And in the Matter.of: MANESAR INDUSTRIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION Annam D. N. Rao, Adv., for the Appellant. M. Vil:lhuti S. Gupta, Dr. Kailash Chand, SanjeevAnand, H Rajnish G., Advs., for the Respondents. H.S.l.D.C. v. PRAN SUKH & ORS. 863 [VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.] The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A VIKRAMAJIT SEN, …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis