⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,421–3,440 · Page 172 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 935 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1035
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 1035 MANGUSINGH A v. DHARMENDRA&ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 2230 of 2011) B DECEMBER 16, 2015 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860- s. 302 rlw. s. 25 of Arms Act, 1959 -Prosecution under- Initial FIR on the basis of confessional c statement of the accused - Later another FIR by P…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 933 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 46
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,421–3,440 · Page 172 of 382
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 935 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1035
[2015] 10 S.C.R. 1035 MANGUSINGH A v. DHARMENDRA&ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 2230 of 2011) B DECEMBER 16, 2015 [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.) Penal Code, 1860- s. 302 rlw. s. 25 of Arms Act, 1959 -Prosecution under- Initial FIR on the basis of confessional c statement of the accused - Later another FIR by P…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 933 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 46
46 SRI JAGANNATH TEMPLE MANAGING COMMITTEE v. 47 SIDDHA MATH & ORS. to the Temple of Lord Jagannath at Puri within the meaning A of the Temple Act, 1955 are deemed to be Trust Estates is in direct contravention of the provisions of the Temple Act, 1955, and is struck down - Notification dated 18. 03. 1974, whereby the …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 932 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 179
Dismissing the appeals, the Court .G HELD: 1. It was contended that the identity of the deceased was not verified by the Metropolitan Magistrate PW-7. The evidence of PW-7 the Magistrate was to the effect that PW-12, the doctor identified the patient to him H 179 180 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 15S.C.R. A though he ha…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 931 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1145
- Delay in completion of departmental proceedings was not wholly attributable to the appellant but it was equally H 1145 1146 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 10 S.C.R. A attributable to the respondents as well - It is the duty of the employer to ensure that the departmental inquiry initiated against the delinquent employe…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 930 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1087
1088 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A category of rarest of the rare cases and thus, no need of scaling each and every aggravating and mitigating circumstances - Sentence awarded by the courts below adequate - Thus, order passed by the High Court does not call for interference - Sentence/sentencing. B CRIMINALA…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 93 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 989
[2015) 1 S.C.R. 989 KANDIVALI COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AND A ANOTHER v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 1431 of 2015 etc.} B FEBRUARY 04, 2015 [M.Y. EQBAL AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 - s.368(5) - C Trade Refuse Charges - Imposition - Revis…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 929 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1110
1112 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A welfare and reforms. A just balance can always be made by holding that the exercise of judicial power to determine essential religious practices, though always available being an inherent power to protect the guarantees u/Articles 25, 26, the exercise thereo_f must B always…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 928 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 974
974 K.B. RAMACHANDRA RAJE URS (DEAD) BY LRS. v. 975 STATE OF KARNATAKA Of mandatory requirement of s. 18 of the Act - Sequence of A events demonstrates that State action did not conform to the requirements of law - The Act contemplates vesting of the land in the Government after an award is passed and compensation is p…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 925 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 966
(2015] 10 S.C.R 966 A LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUST v. MAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS (CivilAppeal No. 14565 of2015) B DECEMBER 15, 2015 [M.Y. EQBALAND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Wakf Act, 1995 - s. 83(as amended by 2013 Act) -c Constitution of tribunal -Amendment of s. 83(4) whereby three members tribunal to be constituted by the S…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 924 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1096
Piyush Sharma, Vikram Saini, A. K. Mishra for the Appellants. B Soayi B. Qureshi, Ravi Prakash, Udita Singh, Chandra Prakash, Rahul Kumar, Meenakshi Midha, C. S. Ashri, Taniya Pandey for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c ARUN MISHRA, J. 1.Leave granted. 2. The appeal arises out of judgment a…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 922 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1049
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas c Swami Suvama Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust & Ors. vs. \I. R. Rudani & Ors. ( 1989) 2 SCC 691 : 1989 (2) SCR 697; T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. VS. State of Kamataka & Ors. (2002) 8 sec 481 -: referred to. D Breen vs. A.E.U. (1971) 2 QB 175; R. vs. Panel on Take-overs and Merger…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 921 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 22
WITH C.A. Nos.1763-1764of2009, 7007, 7550&3768-3769 C of 2011, 2204 & 2205 of 2013, 957-959 & 7854-7865 of 2014 K. Radhakrishnan, Subramonium Prasad, Sr.Advs., Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Ms. B. Sunita Rao, T. C. Sharma, Ms. Pooja Sharma, B. Krishna Prasad, V. Lakshmikumaran, M. P. D Devanath, Ms. L. Charanaya, HemantBajaj,Anand…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 92 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 341
342 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A and loss of interest on the capital for which the respondent was entitled to reasonable compensation -Evidence of precise amount of Joss may not be possible but in absence of any evidence by the party committing breach that no loss was suffered by the party 8 complaining of b…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 915 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 250
2. The Administrative Committee of the High Court had examined the past record, annual confidential D reports, work done statements, and other relevant record/ material pertaining to the petitioner, and had opined that he had lost his utility, and had become deadwood. Thus, in addition to the annual confidential report…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 913 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1077
G Allowing the appeal, the Court. HELD: 1. The substantive challenge to an order of preventive detention when the order of detention is limited to the scope of Sec.tion 3 of the COFEPOSA Act, is far greater. After the declaration under Section 12A of H 1077 . 1078 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A the COFEPOSA A…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 912 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106
[2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106 A RAJBALA & OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA& OTHERS (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 671 of2015) B DECEMBER 10, 2015 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] c Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 [As amended by Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015]: s.175(1)(t) and (u) [As inserted by Haryana Panch…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 91 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 287
- Held: The legislature cannot directly annul a judgment of F a court - s. 6 directly sought to upset a final judgment inter-parties and was bad on this count and is unconstitutional-A bare reading of the Statement of Objects of the Amendment Act shows that the Kera/a Legislature wished to interfere with G two judgment…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 909 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1254
SAT PARKASH v. STATE OF HARYANAANDANOTHER 1255 establish, that the deceased had not been persuaded or A compelled to marry the appellant before her death -Therefore, offence uls.366 was also not made out - The inducing of the minor to constitute an offence u/s. 366A, should have· been with reference to an intent to for…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 908 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1232
[2015] 13 S.C.R.1232 A SODEXO SVC INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 4385-4386 of 2015) B DECEMBER 09, 2015 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949: ss.2(25), c 2(31A), 2(42) - Octroi or Local Body Tax- Imposition of, on Meal Vouchers- In the i…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 907 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 900
WITH Conmt. Pet. (C) No. 382 of 2015 in SLP (~rl.) No. 2372/2015 G Pritpal Nijjar, Aditya Singla, Ambika Nijjar, Am it Kumar, Ritika Singh, A. Venayagam Balan, for the Appellants. Jagjit Singh, Bhagat Singh, Dr. Kailash Chand, Dr. Abhishek Atrey, P. K. Dey, D. s. Mahra, for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was d…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
46 SRI JAGANNATH TEMPLE MANAGING COMMITTEE v. 47 SIDDHA MATH & ORS. to the Temple of Lord Jagannath at Puri within the meaning A of the Temple Act, 1955 are deemed to be Trust Estates is in direct contravention of the provisions of the Temple Act, 1955, and is struck down - Notification dated 18. 03. 1974, whereby the …
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 932 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 179
Dismissing the appeals, the Court .G HELD: 1. It was contended that the identity of the deceased was not verified by the Metropolitan Magistrate PW-7. The evidence of PW-7 the Magistrate was to the effect that PW-12, the doctor identified the patient to him H 179 180 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 15S.C.R. A though he ha…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 931 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1145
- Delay in completion of departmental proceedings was not wholly attributable to the appellant but it was equally H 1145 1146 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015] 10 S.C.R. A attributable to the respondents as well - It is the duty of the employer to ensure that the departmental inquiry initiated against the delinquent employe…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 930 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1087
1088 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A category of rarest of the rare cases and thus, no need of scaling each and every aggravating and mitigating circumstances - Sentence awarded by the courts below adequate - Thus, order passed by the High Court does not call for interference - Sentence/sentencing. B CRIMINALA…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 93 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 989
[2015) 1 S.C.R. 989 KANDIVALI COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AND A ANOTHER v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No. 1431 of 2015 etc.} B FEBRUARY 04, 2015 [M.Y. EQBAL AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.] Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 - s.368(5) - C Trade Refuse Charges - Imposition - Revis…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 929 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1110
1112 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A welfare and reforms. A just balance can always be made by holding that the exercise of judicial power to determine essential religious practices, though always available being an inherent power to protect the guarantees u/Articles 25, 26, the exercise thereo_f must B always…
Supreme Court of India16 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 928 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 974
974 K.B. RAMACHANDRA RAJE URS (DEAD) BY LRS. v. 975 STATE OF KARNATAKA Of mandatory requirement of s. 18 of the Act - Sequence of A events demonstrates that State action did not conform to the requirements of law - The Act contemplates vesting of the land in the Government after an award is passed and compensation is p…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 925 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 966
(2015] 10 S.C.R 966 A LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUST v. MAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS (CivilAppeal No. 14565 of2015) B DECEMBER 15, 2015 [M.Y. EQBALAND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Wakf Act, 1995 - s. 83(as amended by 2013 Act) -c Constitution of tribunal -Amendment of s. 83(4) whereby three members tribunal to be constituted by the S…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 924 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1096
Piyush Sharma, Vikram Saini, A. K. Mishra for the Appellants. B Soayi B. Qureshi, Ravi Prakash, Udita Singh, Chandra Prakash, Rahul Kumar, Meenakshi Midha, C. S. Ashri, Taniya Pandey for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by c ARUN MISHRA, J. 1.Leave granted. 2. The appeal arises out of judgment a…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 922 · [2015] 10 S.C.R. 1049
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas c Swami Suvama Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust & Ors. vs. \I. R. Rudani & Ors. ( 1989) 2 SCC 691 : 1989 (2) SCR 697; T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. VS. State of Kamataka & Ors. (2002) 8 sec 481 -: referred to. D Breen vs. A.E.U. (1971) 2 QB 175; R. vs. Panel on Take-overs and Merger…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 921 · [2015] 15 S.C.R. 22
WITH C.A. Nos.1763-1764of2009, 7007, 7550&3768-3769 C of 2011, 2204 & 2205 of 2013, 957-959 & 7854-7865 of 2014 K. Radhakrishnan, Subramonium Prasad, Sr.Advs., Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Ms. B. Sunita Rao, T. C. Sharma, Ms. Pooja Sharma, B. Krishna Prasad, V. Lakshmikumaran, M. P. D Devanath, Ms. L. Charanaya, HemantBajaj,Anand…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 92 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 341
342 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A and loss of interest on the capital for which the respondent was entitled to reasonable compensation -Evidence of precise amount of Joss may not be possible but in absence of any evidence by the party committing breach that no loss was suffered by the party 8 complaining of b…
Supreme Court of India11 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 915 · [2015] 14 S.C.R. 250
2. The Administrative Committee of the High Court had examined the past record, annual confidential D reports, work done statements, and other relevant record/ material pertaining to the petitioner, and had opined that he had lost his utility, and had become deadwood. Thus, in addition to the annual confidential report…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 913 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 1077
G Allowing the appeal, the Court. HELD: 1. The substantive challenge to an order of preventive detention when the order of detention is limited to the scope of Sec.tion 3 of the COFEPOSA Act, is far greater. After the declaration under Section 12A of H 1077 . 1078 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 11 S.C.R. A the COFEPOSA A…
Supreme Court of India10 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 912 · [2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106
[2015] 12 S.C.R. 1106 A RAJBALA & OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA& OTHERS (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 671 of2015) B DECEMBER 10, 2015 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] c Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 [As amended by Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015]: s.175(1)(t) and (u) [As inserted by Haryana Panch…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 91 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 287
- Held: The legislature cannot directly annul a judgment of F a court - s. 6 directly sought to upset a final judgment inter-parties and was bad on this count and is unconstitutional-A bare reading of the Statement of Objects of the Amendment Act shows that the Kera/a Legislature wished to interfere with G two judgment…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 909 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1254
SAT PARKASH v. STATE OF HARYANAANDANOTHER 1255 establish, that the deceased had not been persuaded or A compelled to marry the appellant before her death -Therefore, offence uls.366 was also not made out - The inducing of the minor to constitute an offence u/s. 366A, should have· been with reference to an intent to for…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 908 · [2015] 13 S.C.R. 1232
[2015] 13 S.C.R.1232 A SODEXO SVC INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 4385-4386 of 2015) B DECEMBER 09, 2015 [A. K. SIKRI AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949: ss.2(25), c 2(31A), 2(42) - Octroi or Local Body Tax- Imposition of, on Meal Vouchers- In the i…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2015Full text
2015 INSC 907 · [2015] 11 S.C.R. 900
WITH Conmt. Pet. (C) No. 382 of 2015 in SLP (~rl.) No. 2372/2015 G Pritpal Nijjar, Aditya Singla, Ambika Nijjar, Am it Kumar, Ritika Singh, A. Venayagam Balan, for the Appellants. Jagjit Singh, Bhagat Singh, Dr. Kailash Chand, Dr. Abhishek Atrey, P. K. Dey, D. s. Mahra, for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was d…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis