⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,381–3,400 · Page 170 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 975 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 528
G A. K. Sanghi, Nisha Bagchi, Ritesh Kumar, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellant. Neelima Tripathi, S. Majuvdan (For Dr. Kailash Chand) for the Respondent. H 530 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. The respondent herein is the manufacturers of composite di…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 974 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1061
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,381–3,400 · Page 170 of 382
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 975 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 528
G A. K. Sanghi, Nisha Bagchi, Ritesh Kumar, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellant. Neelima Tripathi, S. Majuvdan (For Dr. Kailash Chand) for the Respondent. H 530 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. The respondent herein is the manufacturers of composite di…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 974 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1061
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 1061 M/S. M.P. AGENCIES A v. STATE OF KERALA B (Civil-Appeal No.1440 of 2010 etc.) MARCH 18, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] c Kerela Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - s. 6 - Levy of tax - Classification of goods - "Ujala Supreme" and Ujala Stiff and Shine - Appellant distributor for "Ujala Su…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 973 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1001
S. C. Paul, Resham Singh, Roopa Paul, Satyendra Kumar for the Appellant. • E Amit Kumar, AAG, Vishwa Pratap Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta for the Respondsnt. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. Heard. 2. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 6.02.2012, passed by the High C…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 972 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1012
State of West Bengal v Mir Mohammad Omar and Others (2000) 8 SCC 382 - referred to. H 1012 NAVAL KISHORE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 1013 Case Law Reference A (2000) 8 sec 382 referred to. Para 17 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 2246 of 2011. B From the Judgment and Order dated 05.03.2010 of the High C…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 971 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1029
with C. A. No. 2633 of 2005. Sushil Kumar Jain, Sonal Jain for the Appellants. c Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Aviral Shukla, Amit A. Pai, M. Qamaruddin for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal (Civil Appeal No. 2581 of 2005), preferred under Section 38 of the …
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 970 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 686
Allowing the appeal and the Interlocutory applications, the Court HELD: 1. Wherever in the Shetty Commission H 686 ALL INDIAJUDGESASSN. v. UNION OF INDIA 687 recommendation, depending upon the nature of job A performed by different categories of employees, a higher scale of pay came to be recommended for the non-judici…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 97 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1022
Anurag Tomar, Dharam Singh, Naik H. K. (For Naresh E Kumar) for the Appellant. 8. V. Niren, V. N. Raghupathy, Prasouk Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered byF ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This criminal appeal is filed by the accused against the judgment and final order dated 24.05.2011 passed …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 969 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 313
V. Lakshmikumaran, M. P. Devanath, R. Ramachandran, Ms. L. Charanaya, Aditya Bhattacharya, Prashanth S. B Shivadass, Vivek Sharma, Advs., for the Appellant. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Sanjai Kumar Pathak, T. C. Sharma, Ms. S. Manchanda, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs., with himfor the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court …
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 968 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 652
WITH Crl.A. No. 464of2015 H 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A A. Mariarputham, S. N. Bhat, E. C. Vidya Sagar, Jennifer John, Subhash Chandra Sagar, V. N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, Sanjay R. Hegde for the appearing parties. 'Mt: ... The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KAL…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 967 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 772
1.2 The voluntary character of the Home Guards Organization was not explicit in the 1962 Act because of the use of word "appointment as members", though it was explicit from 1962 Rules. For the said reasons, the G State Government issued West Bengal Home Guards (Amendment) Act, 1990. From the statement of objects and r…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 966 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 246
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Under common law, the rights of the landlord to evict a tenant by way of suit before a civil court of competent jurisdiction exist as long as it is not c abridged by a special legislation conferring protection in favour of the tenant. [Para 21] [266-F] 1.2 Ordinarily a Cour…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 965 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 162
Ranjeet Kumar, S. G., Sidharth Luthra, B. Sunita Rao, Anurag for the Appellant. E Shyam Divan, Sumit Goel, Kumar Shashank, Aayush Agarwal, Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh (for Parekh & Co.) for the Respondents. The ::Judgment of the Court was delivered by F SUDHANl:!U JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 964 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 171
1.2 Considering the fact that the statement of the key witness PW-9 was recorded almost after three years of the incident, and the cross-examination was not done 171 H 172 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A on the same day when the examination-in-chief was recorded, there was every reason to believe that the witne…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 963 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 579
1.2 The statutory authorities-MCI, MH&FW, UGC and MHRD and the Government were toothless tigers when G it came to retaining admission of the 2nd batch of students in the academic year 2009-10 or taking quick remedial steps after the admissions were made. Unless the statutory authorities and the Government realize and a…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 962 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 133
134 SUPREME COURT REPORTS , [2015] 2 S.C.R. A for taking penal action against the respondents - National Commission rightly declined to exercise the power u/s. 21 to set aside the order of the State Commission as no second appeal is provided against the order of the State Commission in view of sub-sec. 2 of s. 27A - Th…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 961 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 145
(2008) 5 SCC 668; S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta o Bhalla and Anr. 2005 (3) Suppl. SCR 371 : (2005) 8 SCC 89; S.K. Alagh v. State of UP 2008 (2) SCR 1088: (2008) 5 SCC 662; Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd. 2010 (12) SCR 551: (2010) 10 SCC 479; GHCL Employees Stock O…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 960 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 987
(2015] 4 S.C.R. 987 KRISHNAMOORTHY A V. SIVAKUMAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.14 78 of 2015) B FEBRUARY 05, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.] Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - s.260 - 'Undue influence' - Whether failure to disclose criminal cases C pending against a candidate would come within the concept of 'un…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 96 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1014
2. Case of the petitioners is that they have been convicted and sentenced under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code ("IPC") and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. H 1016 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A Against the said conviction and sentence, their appeal has been dismissed and revision petition…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 959 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 981
981 H 982 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A 2. The High Court was right in setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and remanding the matter for fresh decision. Even though the respondent-Company had not brought on record any document before the trial Court, yet it had produced B certain do…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 958 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 789
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal F No. 9 of 2012. From the judgment and Order dated 08.04.2011 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in criminal Appeal No. 107 of 2002. G Brajesh Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Tandale for the Appellant. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Rashmi Malhotra, Disha Vaish, Arvind Kumar Sharma f…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
[2015] 2 S.C.R. 1061 M/S. M.P. AGENCIES A v. STATE OF KERALA B (Civil-Appeal No.1440 of 2010 etc.) MARCH 18, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] c Kerela Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - s. 6 - Levy of tax - Classification of goods - "Ujala Supreme" and Ujala Stiff and Shine - Appellant distributor for "Ujala Su…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 973 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1001
S. C. Paul, Resham Singh, Roopa Paul, Satyendra Kumar for the Appellant. • E Amit Kumar, AAG, Vishwa Pratap Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta for the Respondsnt. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. Heard. 2. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 6.02.2012, passed by the High C…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 972 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1012
State of West Bengal v Mir Mohammad Omar and Others (2000) 8 SCC 382 - referred to. H 1012 NAVAL KISHORE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 1013 Case Law Reference A (2000) 8 sec 382 referred to. Para 17 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 2246 of 2011. B From the Judgment and Order dated 05.03.2010 of the High C…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 971 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 1029
with C. A. No. 2633 of 2005. Sushil Kumar Jain, Sonal Jain for the Appellants. c Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Aviral Shukla, Amit A. Pai, M. Qamaruddin for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal (Civil Appeal No. 2581 of 2005), preferred under Section 38 of the …
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 970 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 686
Allowing the appeal and the Interlocutory applications, the Court HELD: 1. Wherever in the Shetty Commission H 686 ALL INDIAJUDGESASSN. v. UNION OF INDIA 687 recommendation, depending upon the nature of job A performed by different categories of employees, a higher scale of pay came to be recommended for the non-judici…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 97 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1022
Anurag Tomar, Dharam Singh, Naik H. K. (For Naresh E Kumar) for the Appellant. 8. V. Niren, V. N. Raghupathy, Prasouk Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered byF ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This criminal appeal is filed by the accused against the judgment and final order dated 24.05.2011 passed …
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 969 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 313
V. Lakshmikumaran, M. P. Devanath, R. Ramachandran, Ms. L. Charanaya, Aditya Bhattacharya, Prashanth S. B Shivadass, Vivek Sharma, Advs., for the Appellant. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Sanjai Kumar Pathak, T. C. Sharma, Ms. S. Manchanda, B. Krishna Prasad, Advs., with himfor the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court …
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 968 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 652
WITH Crl.A. No. 464of2015 H 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A A. Mariarputham, S. N. Bhat, E. C. Vidya Sagar, Jennifer John, Subhash Chandra Sagar, V. N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, Sanjay R. Hegde for the appearing parties. 'Mt: ... The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KAL…
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 967 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 772
1.2 The voluntary character of the Home Guards Organization was not explicit in the 1962 Act because of the use of word "appointment as members", though it was explicit from 1962 Rules. For the said reasons, the G State Government issued West Bengal Home Guards (Amendment) Act, 1990. From the statement of objects and r…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 966 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 246
Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Under common law, the rights of the landlord to evict a tenant by way of suit before a civil court of competent jurisdiction exist as long as it is not c abridged by a special legislation conferring protection in favour of the tenant. [Para 21] [266-F] 1.2 Ordinarily a Cour…
Supreme Court of India17 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 965 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 162
Ranjeet Kumar, S. G., Sidharth Luthra, B. Sunita Rao, Anurag for the Appellant. E Shyam Divan, Sumit Goel, Kumar Shashank, Aayush Agarwal, Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh (for Parekh & Co.) for the Respondents. The ::Judgment of the Court was delivered by F SUDHANl:!U JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by…
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 964 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 171
1.2 Considering the fact that the statement of the key witness PW-9 was recorded almost after three years of the incident, and the cross-examination was not done 171 H 172 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 2 S.C.R. A on the same day when the examination-in-chief was recorded, there was every reason to believe that the witne…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 963 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 579
1.2 The statutory authorities-MCI, MH&FW, UGC and MHRD and the Government were toothless tigers when G it came to retaining admission of the 2nd batch of students in the academic year 2009-10 or taking quick remedial steps after the admissions were made. Unless the statutory authorities and the Government realize and a…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 962 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 133
134 SUPREME COURT REPORTS , [2015] 2 S.C.R. A for taking penal action against the respondents - National Commission rightly declined to exercise the power u/s. 21 to set aside the order of the State Commission as no second appeal is provided against the order of the State Commission in view of sub-sec. 2 of s. 27A - Th…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 961 · [2015] 2 S.C.R. 145
(2008) 5 SCC 668; S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta o Bhalla and Anr. 2005 (3) Suppl. SCR 371 : (2005) 8 SCC 89; S.K. Alagh v. State of UP 2008 (2) SCR 1088: (2008) 5 SCC 662; Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd. 2010 (12) SCR 551: (2010) 10 SCC 479; GHCL Employees Stock O…
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 960 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 987
(2015] 4 S.C.R. 987 KRISHNAMOORTHY A V. SIVAKUMAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No.14 78 of 2015) B FEBRUARY 05, 2015 [DIPAK MISRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.] Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - s.260 - 'Undue influence' - Whether failure to disclose criminal cases C pending against a candidate would come within the concept of 'un…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 96 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 1014
2. Case of the petitioners is that they have been convicted and sentenced under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code ("IPC") and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. H 1016 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A Against the said conviction and sentence, their appeal has been dismissed and revision petition…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 959 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 981
981 H 982 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 1 S.C.R. A 2. The High Court was right in setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and remanding the matter for fresh decision. Even though the respondent-Company had not brought on record any document before the trial Court, yet it had produced B certain do…
Supreme Court of India28 Jan 2015Full text
2015 INSC 958 · [2015] 1 S.C.R. 789
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal F No. 9 of 2012. From the judgment and Order dated 08.04.2011 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in criminal Appeal No. 107 of 2002. G Brajesh Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Tandale for the Appellant. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Rashmi Malhotra, Disha Vaish, Arvind Kumar Sharma f…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis