⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,361–3,380 · Page 169 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 995 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 122
Jyotendrasinghji vs. S.I. Tripathi and Others (201 ITR 611) - referred to. c Case Law Reference 2011 (2) SCR 1087 Referred to. Para 7 1991 (55) E.L.T. 444 S.C. Referred to. Para 10 1965 (1) SCR 900 Referred to. .,·:Para 11 D 1987 (28) E.L. T. 56 (S.C.) Referred to. Para 11 (201 ITR 611) Referred to. Para 13 CIVIL APPEL…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 994 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 175
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,361–3,380 · Page 169 of 382
Supreme Court of India7 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 995 · [2015] 7 S.C.R. 122
Jyotendrasinghji vs. S.I. Tripathi and Others (201 ITR 611) - referred to. c Case Law Reference 2011 (2) SCR 1087 Referred to. Para 7 1991 (55) E.L.T. 444 S.C. Referred to. Para 10 1965 (1) SCR 900 Referred to. .,·:Para 11 D 1987 (28) E.L. T. 56 (S.C.) Referred to. Para 11 (201 ITR 611) Referred to. Para 13 CIVIL APPEL…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 994 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 175
HELD: 1.1 The test identification parade was not held. The two witnesses-PW-2 and PW-3 identified the accused-appellants in court. As per their evidence they had seen the accused-appellants in torch light and they had also seen them running away. They chased them H 175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A but th…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 993 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 770
G Pinky Anand, ASG, Ritesh Kumar, K. Subba Rao, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellants. S. K. Bagaria (AC.), K. A. Singh, Prity Kunwar, George Thomas, Ejaz Maqbool for the Respondent. H UNION OF INDIA v. UTIAM STEEL LTD. 773 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A R.F. NARIMAN, J. 1. The respondent herein was engage…
Supreme Court of India1 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 992 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 633
G Sanjay Singh, Rajeev Singh for the Appellants. Gaurav Bhatia, AAG, Gaurav Srivastava, Abhishek Chaudhary, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Kripa Suankar Prasad, Sukanta Kumar Biswal, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra for the H Respondents. SAVITRI PANDEYv. STATE OF U.P. 635 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A PRAFULLA C. PANT, J…
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 991 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 252
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI v. M/S ARYAN 253 ELECTRONICS contrary to the facts on record - The order of Tribunal is set A aside and order of Commissioner is affirmed insofar as it relates to redemption of the value declared by the respondent at Rs. 36 per piece and fixing the value at Rs. 73. 94 per piece, as well as…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 990 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 962
- Held: Not called for - Concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courls below based on evidence - There E being clear evidence as to the act of the accused to set the wife on fire, absence of pre-meditation would not reduce the offence of murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Subsequent pouring of …
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 99 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 63
E Bias - Retired judge appointed as inquiry officer by respondent-University to conduct Disciplinary inquiry against the appellant - Retired judge before his appointment as judge was a lawyer of respondent-University - Held: Disciplinary authority should not engage F such retiredjudge as inquiry officer as it may amoun…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 989 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 326
THE GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD v. G.C. PANDYA 327 sought his remedy - As such, there was no error in the A impugned order - The only error committed by trial court was that instead of directing appellant-board to consider promotion of respondent w.e.f. 1.1.2002, it declared promotion of the respondent w.e.f. said date with…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 988 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 399
- Central Excise (valuation) Rules, 1975 - r. 7. Allowing the appeals, the court 399 H 400 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A HELD: It is not a case where Section 4(1) (a) of the Act is applicable. That is the common case of the parties. As per Section 4(1)(a) of the Act, normal prices of the goods, viz., the pric…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 987 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 789
Appeal: Power of appellate court while exercising the appellate jurisdiction against the judgment of acquittal -Scope of, discussed. c Witnesses: Injured witnesses/Related/Interested witnesses - Reliability of their testimony. Dismissing the appeal, the Court D HELD: 1. On a perusal of the testimony of PW- 13 and the i…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 986 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 777
Harikesh Singh, Chander Shekhar Ashri for the Appellants. F Ajay Bansal, MG, Kuldip Singh for the Respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This criminal appeal has been G preferred against the judgment dated 20.8.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No…
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 985 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 579
[2015] 3 S.C.R. 579 SHANTI LAL MEENA A v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI, CBI B (Criminal Appeal No. 585 of 2015) APRIL 07, 2015 [T. S. THAKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] C Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988- ss. 7, 13(2) rw s. 13(1)(d) - Commission of offence under - Quantum of sentence - Determination of- Public ser…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 984 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 182
Padal Venkata Rama Reddy alias Ramu v. Kowuri Satyanarayana Reddy and others 2011 (9) SCR 623: (2011) 12 sec 437 - referred to. G Case Law Reference 2011 (9) SCR 623 Referred to. Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal H Appeal No. 1771 of2010. 182 S. KRISHNAMOORTHY v. CHELLAMMAL 183 From the Judgment and Ord…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 983 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 841
Allowing the appeals arid remitting the matter to judicial Magistrate, the Court. G HELD: 1. Cognizance of an offence on con.plaint is taken for tile purpose of issuing process to the 841 H 842 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A accused. Since it is a process of taking judicial notice of certain facts which consti…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 982 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 555
555 556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The order of compulsory retirement is not a punishment. It also does not cast a stigma. But when by any incorporation or some reference or B otherwise some stigma is attached to the order of compulsory retirement, it would be treat…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 980 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 793
Qamar Jahan (Appellant-In-Person). Vinay Garg, Tanmay Agarwal, Uday Singh, for the Respondents. H 793 794 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015) 3 S.C.R. A The following Judgment of the Court was delivered 1. The appellants filed a complaint (Original Petition No. 102 of 2000) before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Comm…
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 979 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 737
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Second appeal uls. 100 of CPC, cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of.law F involved in it. The question formulated by the High Court in the present case, cannot be termed to be a question of law, much less a substantial question of law. The question formulat…
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 978 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 997
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 997 VIPULBHAI M. CHAUDHARY A v. GUJARAT COOPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 3047 of 2015 etc.) MARCH 19, 2015 [ANIL R. DAVE AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] c Cooperative Society: Removal of Chairperson/elected office bearer by a motion of no-confidence in the absence of …
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 977 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 921
Sandeep Singh Tiwari, Yogendra Kumar Dubey and Shiv Sagar Tiwar, for the Appellants. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Rana Sandip B. (for S-iegal Association) for the Respondent. C The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. The present appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order d…
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 976 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 729
Allowing the appeals, the Court · F HELD: 1. Recruitment process must be completed as per terms and conditions in the advertisement and as per rules existing when the recruitment process 'began. In the present case, the Division Bench has gone G to great lengths in examining the issue whether B.P.Ed. and D.P.Ed. qualif…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
HELD: 1.1 The test identification parade was not held. The two witnesses-PW-2 and PW-3 identified the accused-appellants in court. As per their evidence they had seen the accused-appellants in torch light and they had also seen them running away. They chased them H 175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 6 S.C.R. A but th…
Supreme Court of India5 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 993 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 770
G Pinky Anand, ASG, Ritesh Kumar, K. Subba Rao, B. Krishna Prasad for the Appellants. S. K. Bagaria (AC.), K. A. Singh, Prity Kunwar, George Thomas, Ejaz Maqbool for the Respondent. H UNION OF INDIA v. UTIAM STEEL LTD. 773 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A R.F. NARIMAN, J. 1. The respondent herein was engage…
Supreme Court of India1 May 2015Full text
2015 INSC 992 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 633
G Sanjay Singh, Rajeev Singh for the Appellants. Gaurav Bhatia, AAG, Gaurav Srivastava, Abhishek Chaudhary, Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Kripa Suankar Prasad, Sukanta Kumar Biswal, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra for the H Respondents. SAVITRI PANDEYv. STATE OF U.P. 635 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A PRAFULLA C. PANT, J…
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 991 · [2015] 6 S.C.R. 252
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI v. M/S ARYAN 253 ELECTRONICS contrary to the facts on record - The order of Tribunal is set A aside and order of Commissioner is affirmed insofar as it relates to redemption of the value declared by the respondent at Rs. 36 per piece and fixing the value at Rs. 73. 94 per piece, as well as…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 990 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 962
- Held: Not called for - Concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courls below based on evidence - There E being clear evidence as to the act of the accused to set the wife on fire, absence of pre-meditation would not reduce the offence of murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Subsequent pouring of …
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2015Full text
2015 INSC 99 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 63
E Bias - Retired judge appointed as inquiry officer by respondent-University to conduct Disciplinary inquiry against the appellant - Retired judge before his appointment as judge was a lawyer of respondent-University - Held: Disciplinary authority should not engage F such retiredjudge as inquiry officer as it may amoun…
Supreme Court of India13 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 989 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 326
THE GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD v. G.C. PANDYA 327 sought his remedy - As such, there was no error in the A impugned order - The only error committed by trial court was that instead of directing appellant-board to consider promotion of respondent w.e.f. 1.1.2002, it declared promotion of the respondent w.e.f. said date with…
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 988 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 399
- Central Excise (valuation) Rules, 1975 - r. 7. Allowing the appeals, the court 399 H 400 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A HELD: It is not a case where Section 4(1) (a) of the Act is applicable. That is the common case of the parties. As per Section 4(1)(a) of the Act, normal prices of the goods, viz., the pric…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 987 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 789
Appeal: Power of appellate court while exercising the appellate jurisdiction against the judgment of acquittal -Scope of, discussed. c Witnesses: Injured witnesses/Related/Interested witnesses - Reliability of their testimony. Dismissing the appeal, the Court D HELD: 1. On a perusal of the testimony of PW- 13 and the i…
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 986 · [2015] 5 S.C.R. 777
Harikesh Singh, Chander Shekhar Ashri for the Appellants. F Ajay Bansal, MG, Kuldip Singh for the Respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This criminal appeal has been G preferred against the judgment dated 20.8.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No…
Supreme Court of India7 Apr 2015Full text
2015 INSC 985 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 579
[2015] 3 S.C.R. 579 SHANTI LAL MEENA A v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI, CBI B (Criminal Appeal No. 585 of 2015) APRIL 07, 2015 [T. S. THAKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] C Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988- ss. 7, 13(2) rw s. 13(1)(d) - Commission of offence under - Quantum of sentence - Determination of- Public ser…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 984 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 182
Padal Venkata Rama Reddy alias Ramu v. Kowuri Satyanarayana Reddy and others 2011 (9) SCR 623: (2011) 12 sec 437 - referred to. G Case Law Reference 2011 (9) SCR 623 Referred to. Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal H Appeal No. 1771 of2010. 182 S. KRISHNAMOORTHY v. CHELLAMMAL 183 From the Judgment and Ord…
Supreme Court of India31 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 983 · [2015] 4 S.C.R. 841
Allowing the appeals arid remitting the matter to judicial Magistrate, the Court. G HELD: 1. Cognizance of an offence on con.plaint is taken for tile purpose of issuing process to the 841 H 842 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 4 S.C.R. A accused. Since it is a process of taking judicial notice of certain facts which consti…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 982 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 555
555 556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 3 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The order of compulsory retirement is not a punishment. It also does not cast a stigma. But when by any incorporation or some reference or B otherwise some stigma is attached to the order of compulsory retirement, it would be treat…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 980 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 793
Qamar Jahan (Appellant-In-Person). Vinay Garg, Tanmay Agarwal, Uday Singh, for the Respondents. H 793 794 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2015) 3 S.C.R. A The following Judgment of the Court was delivered 1. The appellants filed a complaint (Original Petition No. 102 of 2000) before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Comm…
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 979 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 737
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Second appeal uls. 100 of CPC, cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of.law F involved in it. The question formulated by the High Court in the present case, cannot be termed to be a question of law, much less a substantial question of law. The question formulat…
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 978 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 997
[2015) 3 S.C.R. 997 VIPULBHAI M. CHAUDHARY A v. GUJARAT COOPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS B (Civil Appeal No. 3047 of 2015 etc.) MARCH 19, 2015 [ANIL R. DAVE AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] c Cooperative Society: Removal of Chairperson/elected office bearer by a motion of no-confidence in the absence of …
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 977 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 921
Sandeep Singh Tiwari, Yogendra Kumar Dubey and Shiv Sagar Tiwar, for the Appellants. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Rana Sandip B. (for S-iegal Association) for the Respondent. C The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. The present appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order d…
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2015Full text
2015 INSC 976 · [2015] 3 S.C.R. 729
Allowing the appeals, the Court · F HELD: 1. Recruitment process must be completed as per terms and conditions in the advertisement and as per rules existing when the recruitment process 'began. In the present case, the Division Bench has gone G to great lengths in examining the issue whether B.P.Ed. and D.P.Ed. qualif…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis