⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,161–3,180 · Page 159 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 18 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 137
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The motive for the alleged assault is the grudge of the accused-A who contested in the college student election in which P. W.8 also contested, who stated to have ultimately won the elections. According to the case of the prosecution, all the appellants gathered under a mang…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 179 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 981
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,161–3,180 · Page 159 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 18 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 137
Dismissing the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1. The motive for the alleged assault is the grudge of the accused-A who contested in the college student election in which P. W.8 also contested, who stated to have ultimately won the elections. According to the case of the prosecution, all the appellants gathered under a mang…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 179 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 981
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The final order passed by the Consolidation Officer was without opportunity or notice of hearing to. the F appellant and proforma respondents subsequent to adjournment of the matter without further dates. The order itself mentions only the presence of TR and not the appel…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 178 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 992
JAIDEV INDER SINGH v. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT 993 TRUST the challenge on the acquisition and there was no issue on the A claim for allotment under the Rules as a local displaced person. [Para 8, 9) [995-H; 996-A-B] 1.3 The challenge on the acquisition was finally concluded before the High Court by judgment dated 27.09.200…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 177 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 672
B Manoj Swarup, Ajay Kumar, Ms. Prerna Mann for the Appellant. T. K. Prabhakaran, Deepak Prabhakaran, Gopal Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I . Leave granted. c 2. The appellant was employed by the respondent initially as Boiler Attendant in the year 1983 in the Company in…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 173 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 426
Armed Forces - Command tenure - Scope of judicial review - Held: Command tenure is a policy matter - Scope ofjudicial review c is extremely .. limited - Defence experts or the Government to determine the tenure of a commanding officer for Arms or Arms Support having regard to variety of factors - Stipulation of a comma…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 171 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 561
- In the petition itself, two addresses of respondent were given - EHigh Court alloll'ed the petition and quashed the complaint - On appeal, held: Appellate order dated 30.9.1999. disclosed that the passenger alleged the involvement of the respondent - In law, if such statement is otherwise admissible and reliable, con…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 170 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 973
Case Law Reference (1981) 1 Karnataka Law Journal 1 approved Paras 14, 15 1994 (1.) KLJ 385 approved Paras 14, 15 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. I 35 l- D 1352 of2016. from the Judgment and Order dated 27.07.2010 and 01.06.2011 of the High Court ofKarnataka in RSA No. 323 of2008 and in Review Petition …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 17 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 555
K. T. S. Tulsi. Kuber Boddh. "iaYandeep Matta. 1\iraj Gupta. Raj G Kamal for the Appellant. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, AAG, 1\ ishant Bislrnoi Kuld ip Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court \\as delivered by H DARSllAN SIN(ill \. STAT!'. or l'LINJAB PRAFllLLA C. PANT, .J. I. This appeal is directed against judgn1…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 168 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 570
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 570 A STATE OF KARNATAKA v. DATTARAJ & OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 326of2012) B FEBRUARY 15, 2016 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.498A, 304B r!w s.34 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - ss.3, 4 and 6 -Dowry death - Victim deceased was c subjected to dowry demands, cruelty an…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 167 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 193
WITH F C.A. No. 1348 of2016 & C.A. No. 1350 of2016 Harshvardhan Reddy, Senthil Jagadeesan, Aman Vachher, Ashutosh Qubey, Abhishek Chauhan, (For P.N. Puri), Advs. for the G Appellants. Satyajit A. Desai, Akash Kakade, Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered b…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 166 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 611
- It was the legal obligation of the Committee to ensure that a copy Gof the video recording was supplied to the members·- Failure to supply a copy of the video recording or affording an opportunity to the petitioners to view the video recording resulted in the violation of the principles of natural justice-denial of a…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 164 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 71
Partly allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court HELD 1.1 An appeal under Section 173 of the Motor FVehicles Act is essentially in the nature of first appeal alike Section 96 of CPC and, therefore, the High Court is equally under legal obligation to decide all issues arising in the case both…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 163 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 675
HELD: 1. The prosecution case revolves around the E testimonies of the eye-witnesses, the existence of conspiracy and the recovery of the alleged weapons. The prosecution produced 71 witnesses in total, of which 6 were stated to be eye-witnesses. However, on perusal of the material on record, only PW2 and PW3 seem to b…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 162 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 583
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 583 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA A v. SYED UMAR SAYED ABBAS & ORS. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 345-346of2012) B FEBRUARY 12, 2016 . [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.) Penal Code,,1860: ss.302 and 307 r!w s.120-B - Murder - · Victim-deceased sitting in panda/ with PW-6 -Accused persons caine there and opened…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 161 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 305
'Establishment' - Meaning of. in the context of Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969. F 'Grocer)!' -:- Meaninf{ of. Dismissin2 the appeals, the Court HELD: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10000 OF 2010: 1. Clause 5 of the Schedule to the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Ot…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 160 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 931
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Section 95(3)(ii) of the Jharkhand Value Added H 931 - 932 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A Tax Act, 2005 envisages that a registered dealer who was enjoying the benefit of exemption of tax is allowed to convert the facility of exemption from payment of tax under the …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 159 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 80
E Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Anuj Sarma, Ms. Niharika, (For M/s. K. J. John & Co.), Advs. with him for the Appellant. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., K. Raghavacharyulu, Sridhar Potaraju, Kai lash Pandey, Gaichang Pou Gangmei, Ranjit Singh,Arjun Singh, A. F Mukunda Rao Angara, Ms. Aru…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 157 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1059
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: · 1. The prosecution has b·een able to"prove the guilt of the 'appetlant beyond an reasonable doubt. There was no infirmity or illegality in the judgment passed by the two co11rts. F Hence, the judgment of conviction must sllstain in I'aw. {Para 7)[1063-H; 10(i4-A) . l.1. The vict…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 153 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 997
Mohd. Youszif i: .·lfaq Johan (Sm!.) and Another (2006) 1 sec 627 - relied on. Case Law Reference (2006) 1 sec 627 relied on Para 10 H 997 998 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A CR1MINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 110 of2016. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2012 of the High Court of Judic…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 15 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 66
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: The medical evidence on record proved that the deceased died a homicidal death and cause of death was asphyxia due to strangulation. As far as relation between the accused and the deceased is concerned, the prosecution evidence on record, as stated by PW-1 and PW-2 was corroborate…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The final order passed by the Consolidation Officer was without opportunity or notice of hearing to. the F appellant and proforma respondents subsequent to adjournment of the matter without further dates. The order itself mentions only the presence of TR and not the appel…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 178 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 992
JAIDEV INDER SINGH v. AMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT 993 TRUST the challenge on the acquisition and there was no issue on the A claim for allotment under the Rules as a local displaced person. [Para 8, 9) [995-H; 996-A-B] 1.3 The challenge on the acquisition was finally concluded before the High Court by judgment dated 27.09.200…
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 177 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 672
B Manoj Swarup, Ajay Kumar, Ms. Prerna Mann for the Appellant. T. K. Prabhakaran, Deepak Prabhakaran, Gopal Jain for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. I . Leave granted. c 2. The appellant was employed by the respondent initially as Boiler Attendant in the year 1983 in the Company in…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 173 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 426
Armed Forces - Command tenure - Scope of judicial review - Held: Command tenure is a policy matter - Scope ofjudicial review c is extremely .. limited - Defence experts or the Government to determine the tenure of a commanding officer for Arms or Arms Support having regard to variety of factors - Stipulation of a comma…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 171 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 561
- In the petition itself, two addresses of respondent were given - EHigh Court alloll'ed the petition and quashed the complaint - On appeal, held: Appellate order dated 30.9.1999. disclosed that the passenger alleged the involvement of the respondent - In law, if such statement is otherwise admissible and reliable, con…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 170 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 973
Case Law Reference (1981) 1 Karnataka Law Journal 1 approved Paras 14, 15 1994 (1.) KLJ 385 approved Paras 14, 15 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. I 35 l- D 1352 of2016. from the Judgment and Order dated 27.07.2010 and 01.06.2011 of the High Court ofKarnataka in RSA No. 323 of2008 and in Review Petition …
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 17 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 555
K. T. S. Tulsi. Kuber Boddh. "iaYandeep Matta. 1\iraj Gupta. Raj G Kamal for the Appellant. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, AAG, 1\ ishant Bislrnoi Kuld ip Singh for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court \\as delivered by H DARSllAN SIN(ill \. STAT!'. or l'LINJAB PRAFllLLA C. PANT, .J. I. This appeal is directed against judgn1…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 168 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 570
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 570 A STATE OF KARNATAKA v. DATTARAJ & OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 326of2012) B FEBRUARY 15, 2016 [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: ss.498A, 304B r!w s.34 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - ss.3, 4 and 6 -Dowry death - Victim deceased was c subjected to dowry demands, cruelty an…
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 167 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 193
WITH F C.A. No. 1348 of2016 & C.A. No. 1350 of2016 Harshvardhan Reddy, Senthil Jagadeesan, Aman Vachher, Ashutosh Qubey, Abhishek Chauhan, (For P.N. Puri), Advs. for the G Appellants. Satyajit A. Desai, Akash Kakade, Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered b…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 166 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 611
- It was the legal obligation of the Committee to ensure that a copy Gof the video recording was supplied to the members·- Failure to supply a copy of the video recording or affording an opportunity to the petitioners to view the video recording resulted in the violation of the principles of natural justice-denial of a…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 164 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 71
Partly allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High Court, the Court HELD 1.1 An appeal under Section 173 of the Motor FVehicles Act is essentially in the nature of first appeal alike Section 96 of CPC and, therefore, the High Court is equally under legal obligation to decide all issues arising in the case both…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 163 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 675
HELD: 1. The prosecution case revolves around the E testimonies of the eye-witnesses, the existence of conspiracy and the recovery of the alleged weapons. The prosecution produced 71 witnesses in total, of which 6 were stated to be eye-witnesses. However, on perusal of the material on record, only PW2 and PW3 seem to b…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 162 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 583
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 583 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA A v. SYED UMAR SAYED ABBAS & ORS. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 345-346of2012) B FEBRUARY 12, 2016 . [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.) Penal Code,,1860: ss.302 and 307 r!w s.120-B - Murder - · Victim-deceased sitting in panda/ with PW-6 -Accused persons caine there and opened…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 161 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 305
'Establishment' - Meaning of. in the context of Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969. F 'Grocer)!' -:- Meaninf{ of. Dismissin2 the appeals, the Court HELD: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10000 OF 2010: 1. Clause 5 of the Schedule to the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Ot…
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 160 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 931
Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Section 95(3)(ii) of the Jharkhand Value Added H 931 - 932 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A Tax Act, 2005 envisages that a registered dealer who was enjoying the benefit of exemption of tax is allowed to convert the facility of exemption from payment of tax under the …
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 159 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 80
E Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Anuj Sarma, Ms. Niharika, (For M/s. K. J. John & Co.), Advs. with him for the Appellant. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., K. Raghavacharyulu, Sridhar Potaraju, Kai lash Pandey, Gaichang Pou Gangmei, Ranjit Singh,Arjun Singh, A. F Mukunda Rao Angara, Ms. Aru…
Supreme Court of India11 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 157 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1059
Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: · 1. The prosecution has b·een able to"prove the guilt of the 'appetlant beyond an reasonable doubt. There was no infirmity or illegality in the judgment passed by the two co11rts. F Hence, the judgment of conviction must sllstain in I'aw. {Para 7)[1063-H; 10(i4-A) . l.1. The vict…
Supreme Court of India10 Feb 2016Full text
2016 INSC 153 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 997
Mohd. Youszif i: .·lfaq Johan (Sm!.) and Another (2006) 1 sec 627 - relied on. Case Law Reference (2006) 1 sec 627 relied on Para 10 H 997 998 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A CR1MINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 110 of2016. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2012 of the High Court of Judic…
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 15 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 66
Allowing the appeal, the Court E HELD: The medical evidence on record proved that the deceased died a homicidal death and cause of death was asphyxia due to strangulation. As far as relation between the accused and the deceased is concerned, the prosecution evidence on record, as stated by PW-1 and PW-2 was corroborate…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis