⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,101–3,120 · Page 156 of 382
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 290 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 881
- The fact that Police chose not to send up a suspect to face trial does not affect power of the trial court uls. 319 to sw111i10n such a person on account of evidence recorded during trial -,- This is the factual scenario in the case at hand also - It would not be proper to deal with detailed merits of the prosecution…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 289 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 45
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,101–3,120 · Page 156 of 382
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 290 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 881
- The fact that Police chose not to send up a suspect to face trial does not affect power of the trial court uls. 319 to sw111i10n such a person on account of evidence recorded during trial -,- This is the factual scenario in the case at hand also - It would not be proper to deal with detailed merits of the prosecution…
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 289 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 45
G 1.4 It is directed that the court should not normally insist on appearance of Good Samaritans as that causes delay, expenses and inconvenience. Tlte concerned court should exercise the power to appoint the Commission for examination of Good Samaritans in accordance with the provisions contained in section 284 of the …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 287 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 685
Disposing of the appeal and the petition, the Court B HELD: 1.1 For a fair and objective system of appointment, there ought to be a fair and realistic assessment of the requirement, for otherwise the appointments may be made not because they are required but because they come handy for political aggrandisement, appease…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 284 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 876
Rajinder \Vali, B. K. Satija, Ad vs .• for the Appellant. Nidesh Gupta, Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs., Tarun Gupta, Punect, H 878 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Atul S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Mis. Khaitan & Co., Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. KURIAN, J. !. Leave granted. B…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 282 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 419
Case Law Reference 2009 (7) SCR 518 distinguished. Paras CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTON: Criminal Appeal No. 2147 of2009. E From the Judgment and Order dated 09 .02.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in C.R.A. No. 7of1991. WITH C.A. No. 2295 of2009 F P. K. Ghosh, Sr. Adv., Ankur S. Kulkarni, …
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 281 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1025
(9) of s. 41 invalidates clause ./(viii) of the agreement by effecting a deletion thereof with retrospective effect (the date of coming into operation of the Principal Act to the State ofGoa)-State Amendment, by no means, sets the law in a collision course with the Central/ F Principal enactment - As regards, States co…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 280 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 541
542 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A revival of the company is a live issue pending before High Court, a fact which cannot be ignored by :his Court in deciding the above issue against the appellants - For these reasons, the order of the High Court is upheld. Disposing of the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. Section…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 279 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 791
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 791 . MIS. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. A V. STATE OF HARYANA (Civil Appeal No. 1410 of2007) B MARCH29,2016. [DIPAK MISRA AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.) Central Sales Tax Act, 1956: s.8(5) - Whether the notification dated 04.09.1995 issued under s.8(5) of the CST Act is relatable to the exemption of goods or …
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 278 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 861
D S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv., Prashant Singh, Kanti Kumar, Ramesh war Prasad, Advs., for the Appellant. Ms. Prema Singh, Guntur Prabhakar, Advs., for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by: MADAN B. LO KUR, J. I. The petitioner was directly recruited E in the Group-I services as a Regional Transport Off…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 277 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 347
Aliowing the appeals, the Cnurt HELD:. 1. It is not "disputed that in the earlier round of litigation, appellants filed Writ Petitions. It is also not disputed that in said writ petitions the factum relating to pledge made in H favour of appellants by rcsponilcnt No.5 was considered, and the 347 348 SIJPREME COIJRT REP…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 273 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 376
Public Interest Litigation - Suo motu initiation of PIL - When - Held: Court can initiate suo motu proceedings in respect pf certain issues which come within domain of public interest - But it depends upon the nature of the issue involved - There cannot be uncontrolled G or unguided exercise of epistolary jurisdiction.…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 271 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 902
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition (C) Nos. D 1879-1881 of2015 in W. P. (c) Nos. 13/2003, 197/2004 & 302/2012. WITH REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1876-1877 OF 2015 IN W. P. (C) NO. 197 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1834 OF 2015 IN W. P. E (C) NO. 197 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 2703-2705 OF 2015 IN W. P. (C)…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 270 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1008
1010 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Pradesh upholding the freezing of the bank accounts of APSC being unsustainable in law is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the State ·of Andhra Pradesh and APSC are allowed. Having allowed the appeal filed by APSC, the action of freezing of the bank …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 27 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 616
s. 34 - Common intention - Connotation of - Held: Common intention implies pre-arranged plan - Under s.34 a pre-concert in F the sense of a distinct previous plan is not necessary to be proved -Essence of liability uls. 34 is conscious mind of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular res…
Supreme Court of India2 May 2016Full text
2016 INSC 267 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 579
[2016] 3 S.C.R. 579 MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE & ORS. A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4060,of2009) B MAY02,2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, A.K. SIKRI, R.K. AGRAWAL, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavasayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh cKa Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nird…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 267 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 575
576 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat atJabalpur in Writ Petition No. 2732 of2009. K. K. Venugopal, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Advs. Puneet Jain, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Vikas Singh, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. B Advs.,…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 265 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 810
(2016] 2 S.C.R. 810 A UNION OF INDIA v. MIS. AMBlCA CONSTRUCTION (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11114 of2009) B MARCH 16,2016 [RANJAN GOGOi, ARUN MISHRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.] Arbitration Act,19./0: ss.3, 31 - Puwer of arbitrator to award pendente lite interest in case contract bars the same - Held: Ifc contrac…
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 264 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 555
556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A in Form 25 in compliance with the requirement of statute under proviso to s.83(l)(c) - Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Form 25 - Constitution of India - Art. 225 - High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Or. VIL r. 11. Dismissing the appea…
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 263 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 905
Disposing of the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Having regard to the fact that 9 persons initially came forward but they all petered out and ultimately left only R Corpn. and R Constructions Pvt. Ltd. in the fray, the fact that R Constructions Pvt. Ltd. was the only other bidder which offered a sum.ofRs.7 crores about …
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 260 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 412
WITH C. A. Nos. 14728 & 14729 0f2015 Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Jitendra M. Malkan, Ms. Dharita Malkan, Ms. Arunima Singh, Ms. Sangya Arora, Advs., for the Appellant. G Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Purushottam Kumar Jha, Ms. Niharika (For Mis. K. J. John & Co.), Advs., with him for t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
G 1.4 It is directed that the court should not normally insist on appearance of Good Samaritans as that causes delay, expenses and inconvenience. Tlte concerned court should exercise the power to appoint the Commission for examination of Good Samaritans in accordance with the provisions contained in section 284 of the …
Supreme Court of India30 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 287 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 685
Disposing of the appeal and the petition, the Court B HELD: 1.1 For a fair and objective system of appointment, there ought to be a fair and realistic assessment of the requirement, for otherwise the appointments may be made not because they are required but because they come handy for political aggrandisement, appease…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 284 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 876
Rajinder \Vali, B. K. Satija, Ad vs .• for the Appellant. Nidesh Gupta, Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advs., Tarun Gupta, Punect, H 878 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Atul S. Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Mis. Khaitan & Co., Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. KURIAN, J. !. Leave granted. B…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 282 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 419
Case Law Reference 2009 (7) SCR 518 distinguished. Paras CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTON: Criminal Appeal No. 2147 of2009. E From the Judgment and Order dated 09 .02.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in C.R.A. No. 7of1991. WITH C.A. No. 2295 of2009 F P. K. Ghosh, Sr. Adv., Ankur S. Kulkarni, …
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 281 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1025
(9) of s. 41 invalidates clause ./(viii) of the agreement by effecting a deletion thereof with retrospective effect (the date of coming into operation of the Principal Act to the State ofGoa)-State Amendment, by no means, sets the law in a collision course with the Central/ F Principal enactment - As regards, States co…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 280 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 541
542 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 2 S.C.R. A revival of the company is a live issue pending before High Court, a fact which cannot be ignored by :his Court in deciding the above issue against the appellants - For these reasons, the order of the High Court is upheld. Disposing of the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. Section…
Supreme Court of India29 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 279 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 791
[2016] 2 S.C.R. 791 . MIS. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. A V. STATE OF HARYANA (Civil Appeal No. 1410 of2007) B MARCH29,2016. [DIPAK MISRA AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.) Central Sales Tax Act, 1956: s.8(5) - Whether the notification dated 04.09.1995 issued under s.8(5) of the CST Act is relatable to the exemption of goods or …
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 278 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 861
D S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv., Prashant Singh, Kanti Kumar, Ramesh war Prasad, Advs., for the Appellant. Ms. Prema Singh, Guntur Prabhakar, Advs., for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by: MADAN B. LO KUR, J. I. The petitioner was directly recruited E in the Group-I services as a Regional Transport Off…
Supreme Court of India28 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 277 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 347
Aliowing the appeals, the Cnurt HELD:. 1. It is not "disputed that in the earlier round of litigation, appellants filed Writ Petitions. It is also not disputed that in said writ petitions the factum relating to pledge made in H favour of appellants by rcsponilcnt No.5 was considered, and the 347 348 SIJPREME COIJRT REP…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 273 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 376
Public Interest Litigation - Suo motu initiation of PIL - When - Held: Court can initiate suo motu proceedings in respect pf certain issues which come within domain of public interest - But it depends upon the nature of the issue involved - There cannot be uncontrolled G or unguided exercise of epistolary jurisdiction.…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 271 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 902
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition (C) Nos. D 1879-1881 of2015 in W. P. (c) Nos. 13/2003, 197/2004 & 302/2012. WITH REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1876-1877 OF 2015 IN W. P. (C) NO. 197 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 1834 OF 2015 IN W. P. E (C) NO. 197 OF 2004 REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 2703-2705 OF 2015 IN W. P. (C)…
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 270 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 1008
1010 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 2 S.C.R. A Pradesh upholding the freezing of the bank accounts of APSC being unsustainable in law is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the State ·of Andhra Pradesh and APSC are allowed. Having allowed the appeal filed by APSC, the action of freezing of the bank …
Supreme Court of India7 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 27 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 616
s. 34 - Common intention - Connotation of - Held: Common intention implies pre-arranged plan - Under s.34 a pre-concert in F the sense of a distinct previous plan is not necessary to be proved -Essence of liability uls. 34 is conscious mind of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular res…
Supreme Court of India2 May 2016Full text
2016 INSC 267 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 579
[2016] 3 S.C.R. 579 MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE & ORS. A v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4060,of2009) B MAY02,2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, A.K. SIKRI, R.K. AGRAWAL, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavasayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh cKa Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nird…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 267 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 575
576 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat atJabalpur in Writ Petition No. 2732 of2009. K. K. Venugopal, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Advs. Puneet Jain, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Vikas Singh, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. B Advs.,…
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 265 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 810
(2016] 2 S.C.R. 810 A UNION OF INDIA v. MIS. AMBlCA CONSTRUCTION (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11114 of2009) B MARCH 16,2016 [RANJAN GOGOi, ARUN MISHRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.] Arbitration Act,19./0: ss.3, 31 - Puwer of arbitrator to award pendente lite interest in case contract bars the same - Held: Ifc contrac…
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 264 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 555
556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A in Form 25 in compliance with the requirement of statute under proviso to s.83(l)(c) - Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Form 25 - Constitution of India - Art. 225 - High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Or. VIL r. 11. Dismissing the appea…
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 263 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 905
Disposing of the appeals, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Having regard to the fact that 9 persons initially came forward but they all petered out and ultimately left only R Corpn. and R Constructions Pvt. Ltd. in the fray, the fact that R Constructions Pvt. Ltd. was the only other bidder which offered a sum.ofRs.7 crores about …
Supreme Court of India14 Mar 2016Full text
2016 INSC 260 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 412
WITH C. A. Nos. 14728 & 14729 0f2015 Purvish Jitendra Malkan, Jitendra M. Malkan, Ms. Dharita Malkan, Ms. Arunima Singh, Ms. Sangya Arora, Advs., for the Appellant. G Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Purushottam Kumar Jha, Ms. Niharika (For Mis. K. J. John & Co.), Advs., with him for t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis