⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,901–2,920 · Page 146 of 382
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 590 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 633
Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001 -Schedules 'F' and 'G' - Distribution undertakings as set out in H 633 634 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 9 S.C.R. A Schedule 'F' and Holding Company as set out in Schedule 'G' - If any conflict between the two as regards the ownership of land which stood transferre…
Supreme Court of India18 Jan 2016Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,901–2,920 · Page 146 of 382
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 590 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 633
Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001 -Schedules 'F' and 'G' - Distribution undertakings as set out in H 633 634 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 9 S.C.R. A Schedule 'F' and Holding Company as set out in Schedule 'G' - If any conflict between the two as regards the ownership of land which stood transferre…
Supreme Court of India18 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 59 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 520
Manoj Swarup, Lalita Kohli, Abhishek Swarup, Charu Singhal, Mis. Manoj Swarup & Co. for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. I. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2015 passed by the High Court ofUttarakhand atNainital in Writ…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 589 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 140
[2016] 5 S.C.R. 140 A STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. v. RAJIV BERRY & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6900 of2009) 8 AUGUST 10,2016 [RANJAN GOGOi AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Whether i11vocation of s. 17 (1) and (2) mandates invocation of s. 17 (4) - Applicability of s. 17(1) c and 17(2) 011 011e ha11d a…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 587 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 101
H 101 io2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal and passing certain directions, the Court HELD: 1. The agreement clearly contemplates the proportion of allocation of a capacity. The EPL has to fuel and operate the generating station to meet the requirement of electric output that can be generated …
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 586 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 806
[2016J 3 S.C.R. 806 A VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR. v. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 7358of2016) B AUGUST 09, 2016 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Conslilulirm of India - Ari. 233(2) · · Meaning and p11rpor1 of - Appoinlmenl <!( Dislricl .Judges Bar 011 appoint111en1 of certai…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 585 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 755
G WITH Crl. A. No. 752 of2016. C. U. Singh, Sr. Adv., P. V. Dinesh, Sanjiv K. Jha, T. P. Sindhu, Rajendra Beniwal, Binesh K., Aarushi Singh, Sibo Sankar Mishra, U. K. Mishra, Niranjan Sahu, Advs. for the Appellant. H MIS. HCL INFOSYSTEM LTD. v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF 757 INVESTIGATION Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., M. Rambabu, M…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 581 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 783
- Land laws. Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 783 784 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A HELD: The Tribunal having adjudicated upon the application, it could only correct clerical or arithmetical errors as permitted by Section 48-A of the Act. The amendment sought by the appellant was not in the nature of a cler…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 580 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 38
f Exemption Notification - Purpose of HSN Explanatory Notes - Held: In cases where exemption notification are to be construed, HSN Notes only serve as guide and not used to interpret the notification. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The present case relates to the admissibility of exemption notification. When…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 579 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 712
- Language of s.31 (2) also makes it clear that e1•ery appeal preferred against such orders and pending immediately before 10.10.1975G shall be deemed to have abated on the said date and thus the appeal in the present case having been filed prior to 10.10.1975, stood abated on the said date - U.P. Imposition of Ceiling…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 578 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 24
D.R. Gurushantappa v. Abdul Khuddus Anwar and Ors. 1969 (3) SCR 425 : 1969 (1) SCC 466 - followed. G Mysore State Road 7hmsport Corporation v. A. Krishna Rao and Anr. 1973(1) SLR 1080; PEPSU Road Tramport Corporation, Patiala v. Mangat Singh and Ors. 2011 (6) SCR 564 : 2011 (11) SCC 702 - referred to. H 24 PEPSU ROAD T…
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 575 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 849
2.1 On behalf of Union of India, it was submitted that a fair D mechanism for dealing with food safety and standards and for checking adulteration is in place. [Para 5) [853-G) 2.2 As per Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Business) Regulations, 2011, the Dairy establishment in which dairy ba…
Supreme Court of India1 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 567 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 92
Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv., Navin Prakash, Tarun Gulia, Anantha Narayana M. G., Ms. Disha Yaish, Akshat Shrivastava, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E MADAN B. LOKUR, J. I. The two questions for our consideration are whether the suit filed by the appellant Madina Begum was b…
Supreme Court of India1 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 566 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 1026
(2016] 4 S.C.R. I 026 A LOK PRAHARI v. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 657 of2004) 8 AUGUSTOl,2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, N.V. RAMANA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Government bungalows - Overstay by former CMs of Respondent-State in the allotted govt. bungalows after demitting c the office, in absence of any special s…
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 564 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 781
Manjit Singh Sr. Adv., Rahu1 Gupta, Adv. for the Appellants. B Vinod Sharma, Arun Singh, S. K. Visen, Prem Malhotra, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. The High Court of Punjab c and Haryana allowed, by its judgment dated 1 August 2005, a petition filed by …
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 563 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 927
2.2 The said directions of this Court would allay the apprehension of the appellants in regard to the fairness of the process involved in drawing the voice sample. This would ensure that the text which the appellants were called upon to read out for the purpose of drawing their voice samples would not have F sentences …
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 561 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 87
87 88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 4 S.C.R. A 2008 WITH C. A. NO. 5980-5981 OF 2010. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., U. A. Rana, Ms. Mrinal Elkar Mazumdar, Himanshu Mehta, For Mis. Gagrat & Co., Advs. for the Appellant. B C. K. Sasi, Jogy Scaria, R. Sathish, P. V. Dinesh, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was de…
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 560 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 69
M/S. GALADA POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. 71 v. UNITED !NOIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Petition Nos. 2774-2790 of2006. A Rana Mukhe1jee, Sr. Adv., D. Bharat Kumar, T. Bhaskar Gowtham, Abhij it Sengupta, Ad vs. for the Appellant. Rakesh Kumar, Arun Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Prabhat Kaushik, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal. M. K. Dua, Advs…
Supreme Court of India26 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 559 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 310
312 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A Department, it is not accepted that the figure of Rs.2,91,00,000/ - was tailor made to suit the bid offered by the Appellant. [Para 21] (322-F-G] Case Law Reference 1991 (2) SCR 696 relied on Para 15 B 2006 (8) Suppl. SCR 11 relied on Para 16 (1996) 3 SCR 500 relied on Para 1…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 555 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 484
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. PREMCO-DKSPL (JV) & ORS. 485 relevant terms of agreement which showed that there was no A stipulation of any time limit like that of 60 days in the present case. The terms of the Agreement bind the parties unless they have chosen to repudiate the same. Relevant terms, if provided, will be mater…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 554 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 323
Constitution of India : Art.136 - Scope of interference, discussed. F Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. PW.7 wife of the deceased, PW.8, PW.13, PW.18, PW.3 and PW.IO all had stated that there was a land dispute between the parties. Witness PW.to had also stated that with regard to the land dispute the leg of th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2016 INSC 59 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 520
Manoj Swarup, Lalita Kohli, Abhishek Swarup, Charu Singhal, Mis. Manoj Swarup & Co. for the Respondent. c The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. I. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2015 passed by the High Court ofUttarakhand atNainital in Writ…
Supreme Court of India10 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 589 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 140
[2016] 5 S.C.R. 140 A STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. v. RAJIV BERRY & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6900 of2009) 8 AUGUST 10,2016 [RANJAN GOGOi AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Whether i11vocation of s. 17 (1) and (2) mandates invocation of s. 17 (4) - Applicability of s. 17(1) c and 17(2) 011 011e ha11d a…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 587 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 101
H 101 io2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 5 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal and passing certain directions, the Court HELD: 1. The agreement clearly contemplates the proportion of allocation of a capacity. The EPL has to fuel and operate the generating station to meet the requirement of electric output that can be generated …
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 586 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 806
[2016J 3 S.C.R. 806 A VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR. v. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 7358of2016) B AUGUST 09, 2016 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] Conslilulirm of India - Ari. 233(2) · · Meaning and p11rpor1 of - Appoinlmenl <!( Dislricl .Judges Bar 011 appoint111en1 of certai…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 585 · [2016] 8 S.C.R. 755
G WITH Crl. A. No. 752 of2016. C. U. Singh, Sr. Adv., P. V. Dinesh, Sanjiv K. Jha, T. P. Sindhu, Rajendra Beniwal, Binesh K., Aarushi Singh, Sibo Sankar Mishra, U. K. Mishra, Niranjan Sahu, Advs. for the Appellant. H MIS. HCL INFOSYSTEM LTD. v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF 757 INVESTIGATION Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., M. Rambabu, M…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 581 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 783
- Land laws. Dismissing the appeal, the Court H 783 784 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A HELD: The Tribunal having adjudicated upon the application, it could only correct clerical or arithmetical errors as permitted by Section 48-A of the Act. The amendment sought by the appellant was not in the nature of a cler…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 580 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 38
f Exemption Notification - Purpose of HSN Explanatory Notes - Held: In cases where exemption notification are to be construed, HSN Notes only serve as guide and not used to interpret the notification. Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The present case relates to the admissibility of exemption notification. When…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 579 · [2016] 9 S.C.R. 712
- Language of s.31 (2) also makes it clear that e1•ery appeal preferred against such orders and pending immediately before 10.10.1975G shall be deemed to have abated on the said date and thus the appeal in the present case having been filed prior to 10.10.1975, stood abated on the said date - U.P. Imposition of Ceiling…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 578 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 24
D.R. Gurushantappa v. Abdul Khuddus Anwar and Ors. 1969 (3) SCR 425 : 1969 (1) SCC 466 - followed. G Mysore State Road 7hmsport Corporation v. A. Krishna Rao and Anr. 1973(1) SLR 1080; PEPSU Road Tramport Corporation, Patiala v. Mangat Singh and Ors. 2011 (6) SCR 564 : 2011 (11) SCC 702 - referred to. H 24 PEPSU ROAD T…
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 575 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 849
2.1 On behalf of Union of India, it was submitted that a fair D mechanism for dealing with food safety and standards and for checking adulteration is in place. [Para 5) [853-G) 2.2 As per Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Business) Regulations, 2011, the Dairy establishment in which dairy ba…
Supreme Court of India1 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 567 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 92
Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv., Navin Prakash, Tarun Gulia, Anantha Narayana M. G., Ms. Disha Yaish, Akshat Shrivastava, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E MADAN B. LOKUR, J. I. The two questions for our consideration are whether the suit filed by the appellant Madina Begum was b…
Supreme Court of India1 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 566 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 1026
(2016] 4 S.C.R. I 026 A LOK PRAHARI v. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 657 of2004) 8 AUGUSTOl,2016 [ANIL R. DAVE, N.V. RAMANA AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] Government bungalows - Overstay by former CMs of Respondent-State in the allotted govt. bungalows after demitting c the office, in absence of any special s…
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 564 · [2016] 6 S.C.R. 781
Manjit Singh Sr. Adv., Rahu1 Gupta, Adv. for the Appellants. B Vinod Sharma, Arun Singh, S. K. Visen, Prem Malhotra, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. The High Court of Punjab c and Haryana allowed, by its judgment dated 1 August 2005, a petition filed by …
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 563 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 927
2.2 The said directions of this Court would allay the apprehension of the appellants in regard to the fairness of the process involved in drawing the voice sample. This would ensure that the text which the appellants were called upon to read out for the purpose of drawing their voice samples would not have F sentences …
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 561 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 87
87 88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2016] 4 S.C.R. A 2008 WITH C. A. NO. 5980-5981 OF 2010. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., U. A. Rana, Ms. Mrinal Elkar Mazumdar, Himanshu Mehta, For Mis. Gagrat & Co., Advs. for the Appellant. B C. K. Sasi, Jogy Scaria, R. Sathish, P. V. Dinesh, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was de…
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 560 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 69
M/S. GALADA POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. 71 v. UNITED !NOIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Petition Nos. 2774-2790 of2006. A Rana Mukhe1jee, Sr. Adv., D. Bharat Kumar, T. Bhaskar Gowtham, Abhij it Sengupta, Ad vs. for the Appellant. Rakesh Kumar, Arun Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Prabhat Kaushik, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal. M. K. Dua, Advs…
Supreme Court of India26 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 559 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 310
312 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 3 S.C.R. A Department, it is not accepted that the figure of Rs.2,91,00,000/ - was tailor made to suit the bid offered by the Appellant. [Para 21] (322-F-G] Case Law Reference 1991 (2) SCR 696 relied on Para 15 B 2006 (8) Suppl. SCR 11 relied on Para 16 (1996) 3 SCR 500 relied on Para 1…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 555 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 484
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. PREMCO-DKSPL (JV) & ORS. 485 relevant terms of agreement which showed that there was no A stipulation of any time limit like that of 60 days in the present case. The terms of the Agreement bind the parties unless they have chosen to repudiate the same. Relevant terms, if provided, will be mater…
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2016Full text
2016 INSC 554 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 323
Constitution of India : Art.136 - Scope of interference, discussed. F Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. PW.7 wife of the deceased, PW.8, PW.13, PW.18, PW.3 and PW.IO all had stated that there was a land dispute between the parties. Witness PW.to had also stated that with regard to the land dispute the leg of th…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis