⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,861–2,880 · Page 144 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 854 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 724
[2016] 4 S.C.R. 724 A COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P. v. MIS. A.R. THERMOSETS (PVT.) LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 2650 of2016) B SEPTEMBER 06, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.) VAT Act, 2008: Schedule II; Part A Serial no.22 - Bitumen emulsion - Whether c ··bitumen emulsion" is covered within Entry 22 of Sche…
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 853 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 212
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,861–2,880 · Page 144 of 382
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 854 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 724
[2016] 4 S.C.R. 724 A COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P. v. MIS. A.R. THERMOSETS (PVT.) LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 2650 of2016) B SEPTEMBER 06, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.) VAT Act, 2008: Schedule II; Part A Serial no.22 - Bitumen emulsion - Whether c ··bitumen emulsion" is covered within Entry 22 of Sche…
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 853 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 212
H 212 DHARIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. KISHORE WADHWANI & 213 ORS. K. T. S. Tulsi, P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advs., Lal it Chauhan, Raj Kamal, A Vishal Prasad, Ms. Ritika Sethi, K. Raj , Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh (for Mis Parekh & Co.), Advs. for the Appellant. Dr. A. M. Singhvi, Vikas Singh, Sr. Advs., Priya Puri, Amit Bhandari, Anil…
Supreme Court of India5 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 852 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 739
WITH F C. A. No. 2318 of2013 C. A. No. 7241 of2016. N. Venkatraman, K. N. Bhat, Sr. Advs., D. P. Mohanty, Ms. Sanjana Ramachandran, Abhinay, Mis. Parekh & Co., Sanand Ramakrishnan, G V. N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.K. SIKRI, J. I. Same…
Supreme Court of India5 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 851 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 281
(17) SCR 844 - relied on. Mohit alias Sonu and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2013) 7 SCC 789 : 2013 (7) SCR 86 -held not correct law. H 281 282 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A Sanjay Bhandari v. State of Rajasthan 2009 (1) CrLR (Raj.) 282; R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 : 1960 SC…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 850 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 992
WITH E C. A. No. 8748 of2016 Mukul Rohatgi, AG, Manoj K. Dass, Nikilesh Ramachandran, Piyush Bhardwaj, Neeraj Jha, Saurabh Mishra, Ms. Rekha Chaudhary, Ad vs. for the Appellants. Keshav Dayal, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advs., Alok Gupta, R. K. F Rathore, Vibhu Shankar Mishra, D. S. Mahra, Dr. Salone Kantroo, Advs. for the …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 848 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 266
Chalan Roadways Ltd. v. G. Thirugnanasambandam (2005) 3 sec 241: 2004 (6) Suppl. SCR 1123 -relied on. A. Mariasundararaj v. Cheran Tramport Corporation G Ltd.in W.A. No. 2238 of 2000; State of Haryana & Others v. Rattan Singh (1977) 2 SCC 491; Divisional Controller KSRTC (NWKRTC) v. A. T. Mane (2005) 3 SCC 254; Thakur …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 846 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 250
252 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A K?vin Gulati, Sr. Adv., R. N. Karanjawala, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Suman· Yadav, Harsh Trivedi, Ms. Eesha Mohapatra, Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Advs. for the Appellant. ' Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv., V. N. Raghupathy, Anirudh Sanganeria, Amjid Maqbool, Parikshit P. Angadi,…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 844 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 917
[2016] 7 S.C.R. 917 CARDAMOM MARKETING CORPORATION AND ANR. A v. STATE OF KERALA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4453 of2008) SEPTEMBEROl,2016 B [A.K. SIKRI, S.A. BOBDE AND ASIIOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Kera/a Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act. 1959 - s. 76 -Notification under, levying additional court fee in respect of each appeal o…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 841 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 513
Su nil Fernandes, Puneeth K. G., Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. F M. Yogesh Kamm, Ms. Nithya, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. I. The prosecution in the instant case was lodged against the appellant herein - Kadamanian @ G Manikandan, as well as, …
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 84 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 614
Mayawanti v. Kaushalya Devi, (1990) 3 SCC 1 : 1990 (2) SCR 350; and Parakunnan Veetill Josephs SonG Mathew v. Nedumbara Kuruivila s Son and others AIR 1987 SC 2328 - referred to. Case Law Reference 1990 (2) SCR 350 referred to Para9 H AIR 1987 SC 2328 referred to Para 10 614 SATISH KUMAR v. KARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER 615 …
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 8 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 607
Allowing the appeal, the Court E ' HELD: 1.1 Only the trial court came to the definite finding on structural alteration in a tenanted premises. That finding was endorsed by the first appellate court on re-appreciation of the evidence, and therefore, the High Court in second appeal was not justified in upsetting the fin…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 76 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 419
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is meant to operate as a tool for banks and ensures a smooth H 419 420 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A debt recovery process. The object behind the enactment of Maha…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 74 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 808
- Registrar directed to expeditiously decide the opposition proceedings - Appellant filed writ petition - High Court held that no injustice was done by Appellate Board in directing de novo hearing of the case - Held: s.124(1) refers only to the plaintiff H and defendant of a suit for infringement, and s. l 24(1)(ii) 80…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 73 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 576
H 576 UNION OF INDIA v. HBL NIFE POWER SYSTEMS LTD. 577 2. The subject-matter of the present case is submarine A batteries. The importance of submarine batteries to a submarine cannot be underestimated as it is strategically a vital equipment for submarines. DGQA therefore ensures that it is associated during the produ…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 71 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 216
Doctrine - Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil - applicability of- Held: The doctrine is applicable not only to unravel tax evasion, but also where protection of public interest is of paramount importance.G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case there are two transactions. The first transaction i…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 70 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 511
B P. Vishwanatha Shetty, E. C. Vidhya Sagar, Jennifer John, B. K. Gautam, Subhash Chandra Sagar, for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. I. Leave granted. c 2. These appeals assail the judgment dated 15.06.2010 in R.F.A. Nos. I 051 of 2003…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 7 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 851
Dismissing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Sub-section (2) to Section 4-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 requires ·that the notified goods should be "intended" to be sold by the dealer within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or in the course of H 851 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 5 S.C.…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 69 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 174
State by Inspector of Police, Narcotic Intelligence Bureau, Madhurai, Tamil Nadu v. Rajangam 2010 (15)E SCC 369; Megha Singh v. State of Haryana 1996 (11) sec 709 - held inapplicable. Case Law Reference 2010 (15) sec 369 held inapplicable. Paras 9, 10, 11 F 1996 (11) SCC 709 held inapplicable. Paras 10, 11 CRIMINAL APP…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 65 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 627
F Kapil Arora, Ms. Ekshita Choudhary, Ms. Kum Kum Sen, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Mukul Singh, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G R. BANUMATHI, J. I. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at …
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 640 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 604
G s.195 - Complaint by Deputy Director of IT, Bhopal against appellant-assessee for making false statements during search operations - Appellants husband and wife resident of Bhopal and Aurangabad - Search operation conducted by authorities under the IT Act at Bhopal and Aurangabad - Search at Aurangabad H 604 BABITA L…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
H 212 DHARIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. KISHORE WADHWANI & 213 ORS. K. T. S. Tulsi, P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advs., Lal it Chauhan, Raj Kamal, A Vishal Prasad, Ms. Ritika Sethi, K. Raj , Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh (for Mis Parekh & Co.), Advs. for the Appellant. Dr. A. M. Singhvi, Vikas Singh, Sr. Advs., Priya Puri, Amit Bhandari, Anil…
Supreme Court of India5 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 852 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 739
WITH F C. A. No. 2318 of2013 C. A. No. 7241 of2016. N. Venkatraman, K. N. Bhat, Sr. Advs., D. P. Mohanty, Ms. Sanjana Ramachandran, Abhinay, Mis. Parekh & Co., Sanand Ramakrishnan, G V. N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.K. SIKRI, J. I. Same…
Supreme Court of India5 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 851 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 281
(17) SCR 844 - relied on. Mohit alias Sonu and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2013) 7 SCC 789 : 2013 (7) SCR 86 -held not correct law. H 281 282 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A Sanjay Bhandari v. State of Rajasthan 2009 (1) CrLR (Raj.) 282; R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 : 1960 SC…
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 850 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 992
WITH E C. A. No. 8748 of2016 Mukul Rohatgi, AG, Manoj K. Dass, Nikilesh Ramachandran, Piyush Bhardwaj, Neeraj Jha, Saurabh Mishra, Ms. Rekha Chaudhary, Ad vs. for the Appellants. Keshav Dayal, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advs., Alok Gupta, R. K. F Rathore, Vibhu Shankar Mishra, D. S. Mahra, Dr. Salone Kantroo, Advs. for the …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 848 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 266
Chalan Roadways Ltd. v. G. Thirugnanasambandam (2005) 3 sec 241: 2004 (6) Suppl. SCR 1123 -relied on. A. Mariasundararaj v. Cheran Tramport Corporation G Ltd.in W.A. No. 2238 of 2000; State of Haryana & Others v. Rattan Singh (1977) 2 SCC 491; Divisional Controller KSRTC (NWKRTC) v. A. T. Mane (2005) 3 SCC 254; Thakur …
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 846 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 250
252 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 4 S.C.R. A K?vin Gulati, Sr. Adv., R. N. Karanjawala, Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Suman· Yadav, Harsh Trivedi, Ms. Eesha Mohapatra, Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Advs. for the Appellant. ' Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv., V. N. Raghupathy, Anirudh Sanganeria, Amjid Maqbool, Parikshit P. Angadi,…
Supreme Court of India1 Sep 2016Full text
2016 INSC 844 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 917
[2016] 7 S.C.R. 917 CARDAMOM MARKETING CORPORATION AND ANR. A v. STATE OF KERALA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4453 of2008) SEPTEMBEROl,2016 B [A.K. SIKRI, S.A. BOBDE AND ASIIOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Kera/a Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act. 1959 - s. 76 -Notification under, levying additional court fee in respect of each appeal o…
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 841 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 513
Su nil Fernandes, Puneeth K. G., Ms. Astha Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. F M. Yogesh Kamm, Ms. Nithya, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. I. The prosecution in the instant case was lodged against the appellant herein - Kadamanian @ G Manikandan, as well as, …
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 84 · [2016] 11 S.C.R. 614
Mayawanti v. Kaushalya Devi, (1990) 3 SCC 1 : 1990 (2) SCR 350; and Parakunnan Veetill Josephs SonG Mathew v. Nedumbara Kuruivila s Son and others AIR 1987 SC 2328 - referred to. Case Law Reference 1990 (2) SCR 350 referred to Para9 H AIR 1987 SC 2328 referred to Para 10 614 SATISH KUMAR v. KARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER 615 …
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 8 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 607
Allowing the appeal, the Court E ' HELD: 1.1 Only the trial court came to the definite finding on structural alteration in a tenanted premises. That finding was endorsed by the first appellate court on re-appreciation of the evidence, and therefore, the High Court in second appeal was not justified in upsetting the fin…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 76 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 419
Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is meant to operate as a tool for banks and ensures a smooth H 419 420 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. A debt recovery process. The object behind the enactment of Maha…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 74 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 808
- Registrar directed to expeditiously decide the opposition proceedings - Appellant filed writ petition - High Court held that no injustice was done by Appellate Board in directing de novo hearing of the case - Held: s.124(1) refers only to the plaintiff H and defendant of a suit for infringement, and s. l 24(1)(ii) 80…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 73 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 576
H 576 UNION OF INDIA v. HBL NIFE POWER SYSTEMS LTD. 577 2. The subject-matter of the present case is submarine A batteries. The importance of submarine batteries to a submarine cannot be underestimated as it is strategically a vital equipment for submarines. DGQA therefore ensures that it is associated during the produ…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 71 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 216
Doctrine - Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil - applicability of- Held: The doctrine is applicable not only to unravel tax evasion, but also where protection of public interest is of paramount importance.G Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. In the present case there are two transactions. The first transaction i…
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 70 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 511
B P. Vishwanatha Shetty, E. C. Vidhya Sagar, Jennifer John, B. K. Gautam, Subhash Chandra Sagar, for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. I. Leave granted. c 2. These appeals assail the judgment dated 15.06.2010 in R.F.A. Nos. I 051 of 2003…
Supreme Court of India28 Oct 2016Full text
2016 INSC 7 · [2016] 5 S.C.R. 851
Dismissing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1.1 Sub-section (2) to Section 4-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 requires ·that the notified goods should be "intended" to be sold by the dealer within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce or in the course of H 851 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016) 5 S.C.…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 69 · [2016] 1 S.C.R. 174
State by Inspector of Police, Narcotic Intelligence Bureau, Madhurai, Tamil Nadu v. Rajangam 2010 (15)E SCC 369; Megha Singh v. State of Haryana 1996 (11) sec 709 - held inapplicable. Case Law Reference 2010 (15) sec 369 held inapplicable. Paras 9, 10, 11 F 1996 (11) SCC 709 held inapplicable. Paras 10, 11 CRIMINAL APP…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2016Full text
2016 INSC 65 · [2016] 4 S.C.R. 627
F Kapil Arora, Ms. Ekshita Choudhary, Ms. Kum Kum Sen, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Mukul Singh, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G R. BANUMATHI, J. I. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at …
Supreme Court of India31 Aug 2016Full text
2016 INSC 640 · [2016] 7 S.C.R. 604
G s.195 - Complaint by Deputy Director of IT, Bhopal against appellant-assessee for making false statements during search operations - Appellants husband and wife resident of Bhopal and Aurangabad - Search operation conducted by authorities under the IT Act at Bhopal and Aurangabad - Search at Aurangabad H 604 BABITA L…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis