⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 382
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 903 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 237
proceedings in question had arisen out of the PF Act and, therefore, the issue was required to be decided in the light of the relevant provisions of the PF Act and not in the light of the finding recorded in the proceedings arising under the Industrial Disputes Act – High Court did not notice the definition of “employe…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2019Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 382
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 903 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 237
proceedings in question had arisen out of the PF Act and, therefore, the issue was required to be decided in the light of the relevant provisions of the PF Act and not in the light of the finding recorded in the proceedings arising under the Industrial Disputes Act – High Court did not notice the definition of “employe…
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 900 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 243
– Aggrieved, State filed instant appeals – Held: High Court was swayed away with the consideration that since two courts have decreed the suit, resulting in passing of the decree against the State, there was no substantial question of law in the appeals – When any F concurrent finding of fact is assailed in second appe…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 9 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 208
H 208 MADHAV HARI JOSHI v. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE 209 INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA 2. The plan in question was not exclusively an insurance A based product. By being linked to the equity market, it had an investment element. LIC held on to the moneys of the appellant wrongfully for five years. Its omission to refun…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 899 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 24
Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv., S.A. Haseeb, Ms. Swati Gildyal, Vikas G Bansal, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs. for the Appellant. Ankit Vijaywargiya, Aditya Verma, Shrey Patnaik, Advs. for the Respondent. H 26 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 10 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Delay condoned.…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 897 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 581
their Degrees which became valid after clearing the examination – It was also alleged that their representations for adding their higher qualification, B.Tech (Civil) and due benefit for promotion at par with junior candidates who obtained their B.Tech Degrees through regular mode, were not considered– Held: Though the…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 896 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 125
which showed that his son-in-law was only a manager – Revisional Court cannot have jurisdiction to re-appreciate the evidence and substitute its own finding upsetting the finding arrived at by the appellate authority – The findings rendered by the courts below were well supported by evidence on record and could not eve…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 895 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 88
application of mind to the objections raised by the land-owners – On facts, file noting contained in an internal office file, or in the report submitted by the Competent Authority to the Central Government, would not constitute a valid order in the eyes of law – There was no order whatsoever passed rejecting the object…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 894 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 175
175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 10 S.C.R. A the present miscellaneous application – Held: Registrar was right in refusing to register the appellant’s application – On merits, consistent stand of the appellant has been that it is not covered under any of the Acts viz. the UGC Act, IGNOU Act and the AICTE Act – In t…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 892 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 31
[2019] 10 S.C.R. 31 31 MADHUKAR NIVRUTTI JAGTAP & ORS. A v. SMT. PRAMILABAI CHANDULAL PARANDEKAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5382 of 2007) AUGUST 13, 2019 B [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Specific Relief Act, 1963: Nature of transaction between the plaintiffs and defendant nos.1 to 3 – Suit for specific …
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 891 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 217
– Moreover, as suggested by the State Coordinator, the issue raised could be best decided by the Tribunal, if so required as and when appeals are filed. Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National C Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 – rr.4A, 6A – r.4A of the 2003 Rules carves out special provisions in the mat…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 889 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 381
[2019] 10 S.C.R. 381 381 PIONEER URBAN LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE A LIMITED & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 43 of 2019) B AUGUST 09, 2019 [R.F. NARIMAN, SANJIV KHANNA AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: ss. 5(8)(f), 21(6A)(b) and 25A – Amendments made to the Code C vide Am…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 888 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 708
to the post of Gardener is required to be made in terms of the Recruitment Rules or in terms of the instructions issued – Selection of the candidates for training was not by way of transparent procedure nor there was any commitment to appoint candidates who have completed training as Gardeners – Even if a candidate has…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 887 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 718
– Such temporary appointment pending filling up of a vacancy on regular basis does not confer any right at par with the candidate appointed on regular basis – Management had right to terminate the services during ad-hoc period on account of unsatisfactory work – Decision to arrive at the unsatisfactory work is motive a…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 886 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 143
Words & expressions – “Decree”, “Judgment” – Meaning of B – Discussed – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – ss.2(2), 2(9). Suits – Consolidation of – Plea of the respondents drawing distinction between an order of consolidation of suits and the order where common judgment is rendered in different suits – Held: Not tenable …
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 885 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 1
maintained the conviction and sentence of the appellant but found the accused no.2 not guilty and acquitted him – On appeal, held: The prosecution was not able to remove all the obvious doubts as to the place and manner of occurrence, particularly as to who was the aggressor and how it started – Prosecution was not abl…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 882 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 627
with the applications received in response to the initial notification – In the instant case, the private respondents were issued appointment letters on 17.09.2015 and 29.05.2015 respectively, the change was made subsequent thereto by the general corrigendum dated 16.01.2016 by including the qualification of B.Sc. (For…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 881 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 660
660 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS11 S.C.R. 660 [2019] 11 S.C.R. A MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. v. CANARA BANK & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6202-6205 of 2019) B AUGUST 08, 2019 [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Arbitration agreement – Existence of valid arbitration C agreem…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 880 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 609
[2019][2019] 1111 S.C.R.S.C.R. 609609 609 MALLIKARJUN AND OTHERS A v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Criminal Appeal No.1066 of 2009) AUGUST 08, 2019 B [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Evidence – Of eye-witness – Appreciation of – As per the prosecution on 14.06.02, PW-7-brother of ‘B’ went to the fields for ploughing in the…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 88 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 386
exploded in the course of the incident – Injuries suffered by accused nos.4 and 5 were simple – None of the persons in the family of the complainant were armed – It was the accused’s side which was armed with weapons and explosives – Judgment of the High Court convicting accused nos.1-4, 6-8 and 11 u/s.304 Part I affir…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 877 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 646
impugned order of the High Court, the petitioners made any grievance/objection with respect to inadequacy of the compensation determined by the High Court – On the contrary, they accepted the compensation awarded – Even if the petitioners are denied the interest and/or the other statutory benefits for the delayed perio…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2019 INSC 900 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 243
– Aggrieved, State filed instant appeals – Held: High Court was swayed away with the consideration that since two courts have decreed the suit, resulting in passing of the decree against the State, there was no substantial question of law in the appeals – When any F concurrent finding of fact is assailed in second appe…
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 9 · [2019] 1 S.C.R. 208
H 208 MADHAV HARI JOSHI v. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE 209 INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA 2. The plan in question was not exclusively an insurance A based product. By being linked to the equity market, it had an investment element. LIC held on to the moneys of the appellant wrongfully for five years. Its omission to refun…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 899 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 24
Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv., S.A. Haseeb, Ms. Swati Gildyal, Vikas G Bansal, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs. for the Appellant. Ankit Vijaywargiya, Aditya Verma, Shrey Patnaik, Advs. for the Respondent. H 26 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 10 S.C.R. A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UDAY UMESH LALIT, J. 1. Delay condoned.…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 897 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 581
their Degrees which became valid after clearing the examination – It was also alleged that their representations for adding their higher qualification, B.Tech (Civil) and due benefit for promotion at par with junior candidates who obtained their B.Tech Degrees through regular mode, were not considered– Held: Though the…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 896 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 125
which showed that his son-in-law was only a manager – Revisional Court cannot have jurisdiction to re-appreciate the evidence and substitute its own finding upsetting the finding arrived at by the appellate authority – The findings rendered by the courts below were well supported by evidence on record and could not eve…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 895 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 88
application of mind to the objections raised by the land-owners – On facts, file noting contained in an internal office file, or in the report submitted by the Competent Authority to the Central Government, would not constitute a valid order in the eyes of law – There was no order whatsoever passed rejecting the object…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 894 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 175
175 176 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 10 S.C.R. A the present miscellaneous application – Held: Registrar was right in refusing to register the appellant’s application – On merits, consistent stand of the appellant has been that it is not covered under any of the Acts viz. the UGC Act, IGNOU Act and the AICTE Act – In t…
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 892 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 31
[2019] 10 S.C.R. 31 31 MADHUKAR NIVRUTTI JAGTAP & ORS. A v. SMT. PRAMILABAI CHANDULAL PARANDEKAR & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5382 of 2007) AUGUST 13, 2019 B [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Specific Relief Act, 1963: Nature of transaction between the plaintiffs and defendant nos.1 to 3 – Suit for specific …
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 891 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 217
– Moreover, as suggested by the State Coordinator, the issue raised could be best decided by the Tribunal, if so required as and when appeals are filed. Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National C Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 – rr.4A, 6A – r.4A of the 2003 Rules carves out special provisions in the mat…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 889 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 381
[2019] 10 S.C.R. 381 381 PIONEER URBAN LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE A LIMITED & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 43 of 2019) B AUGUST 09, 2019 [R.F. NARIMAN, SANJIV KHANNA AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: ss. 5(8)(f), 21(6A)(b) and 25A – Amendments made to the Code C vide Am…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 888 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 708
to the post of Gardener is required to be made in terms of the Recruitment Rules or in terms of the instructions issued – Selection of the candidates for training was not by way of transparent procedure nor there was any commitment to appoint candidates who have completed training as Gardeners – Even if a candidate has…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 887 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 718
– Such temporary appointment pending filling up of a vacancy on regular basis does not confer any right at par with the candidate appointed on regular basis – Management had right to terminate the services during ad-hoc period on account of unsatisfactory work – Decision to arrive at the unsatisfactory work is motive a…
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 886 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 143
Words & expressions – “Decree”, “Judgment” – Meaning of B – Discussed – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – ss.2(2), 2(9). Suits – Consolidation of – Plea of the respondents drawing distinction between an order of consolidation of suits and the order where common judgment is rendered in different suits – Held: Not tenable …
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 885 · [2019] 10 S.C.R. 1
maintained the conviction and sentence of the appellant but found the accused no.2 not guilty and acquitted him – On appeal, held: The prosecution was not able to remove all the obvious doubts as to the place and manner of occurrence, particularly as to who was the aggressor and how it started – Prosecution was not abl…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 882 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 627
with the applications received in response to the initial notification – In the instant case, the private respondents were issued appointment letters on 17.09.2015 and 29.05.2015 respectively, the change was made subsequent thereto by the general corrigendum dated 16.01.2016 by including the qualification of B.Sc. (For…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 881 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 660
660 SUPREME COURT[2019]REPORTS11 S.C.R. 660 [2019] 11 S.C.R. A MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. v. CANARA BANK & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 6202-6205 of 2019) B AUGUST 08, 2019 [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE AND INDU MALHOTRA, JJ.] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Arbitration agreement – Existence of valid arbitration C agreem…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 880 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 609
[2019][2019] 1111 S.C.R.S.C.R. 609609 609 MALLIKARJUN AND OTHERS A v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Criminal Appeal No.1066 of 2009) AUGUST 08, 2019 B [R. BANUMATHI AND A. S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Evidence – Of eye-witness – Appreciation of – As per the prosecution on 14.06.02, PW-7-brother of ‘B’ went to the fields for ploughing in the…
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2019Full text
2019 INSC 88 · [2019] 2 S.C.R. 386
exploded in the course of the incident – Injuries suffered by accused nos.4 and 5 were simple – None of the persons in the family of the complainant were armed – It was the accused’s side which was armed with weapons and explosives – Judgment of the High Court convicting accused nos.1-4, 6-8 and 11 u/s.304 Part I affir…
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2019Full text
2019 INSC 877 · [2019] 11 S.C.R. 646
impugned order of the High Court, the petitioners made any grievance/objection with respect to inadequacy of the compensation determined by the High Court – On the contrary, they accepted the compensation awarded – Even if the petitioners are denied the interest and/or the other statutory benefits for the delayed perio…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis