⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1–20 · Page 1 of 3
Supreme Court of India2009Cited by 1
(2009) 9 SCC 1
Reproductive choice of a mentally-challenged woman protected; no forced termination.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1–20 · Page 1 of 3
Supreme Court of India2009Cited by 1
(2009) 9 SCC 1
Reproductive choice of a mentally-challenged woman protected; no forced termination.
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2009Full text
2009 INSC 191 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 785
[2010) 2 S.C.R. 785 AJMER SINGH A v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 436 of 2009) FEBRUARY 15, 2009 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: s.20 - Prosecution under - Conviction by courts below c - On appeal, conviction upheld. s. 50 - Applicability of - In case…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1303 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 162
H 162 ALLAHABAD BANK v. ALL INDIA ALLAHABAD BANK 163 RETIRED EMPS. ASSN. statutes - Interpretation of - Held: Such statutes should A receive liberal construction having due regard to the directive principles of the State Policy, so as to secure the relief contemplated by the statute - Constitution of India, 1950 -Direc…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1294 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 594
PANNEY @ PRATAP NARAIN SHUKLA & ANR. v. 595 STATE OF U.P. Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Crl. Appeal No. 6628 of A 2004. Ajay Veers Singh, B.S. Jain, S.N. Shukla, Nitin Jain, Mohd, lrshad Hanif for the Appellants. Prashant Chaudhary, S.K. Dwivedi, Garvesh Kabra, Shrish B Kumar Misra for the Respondent. The followi…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1291 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 593
593 H 594 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A hearing before the Supreme Court, it was pointed out that some of the conditions challenged before the High Court were later waived, and the matter before the Supreme Court remained largely academic. Allowing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1.1. No person has a right to …
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1245 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 572
WITH G Criminal Appeal No. 740 of 2007. R.S. Cheema, K.B. Sinha, Kanwaljit Kochhar, Kusum • Judgment Received on 6.2.2010. H 572 AMARJIT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA 573 Chaudhary, D.P. Singh, Tanu, Roopansh Purohit, Rajeev Gaur, A 'Naseem', Kamal Mohan Gupta for the Appearing parties. The following Order of the Court was…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1061 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 555
H 555 556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 1 S.C.R. A the High Court challenging the orders granting the second extension and rejecting his bail application. The High Court dismissed both the petitions. Aggrieved, the accused filed the appeals. Allowing the appeals, the CourtB HELD: 1.1. The proviso to s. 36-A (4) of the N…
Supreme Court of India2008
(2008) 13 SCC 767
Fixed-term life imprisonment without remission as alternative in grave murder cases.
Supreme Court of India2008
(2009) 1 SCC 267
In bailable offences under Section 436, granting bail is mandatory; neither police nor magistrate has discretion to refuse bail once surety is furnished. | Mandatory right to bail in bailable offences applied to Section 478 BNSS.
Supreme Court of India2008Cited by 1
(2008) 6 SCC 1
Upheld 27% OBC reservation in higher education with creamy-layer exclusion.
Supreme Court of India2007Cited by 1
(2007) 2 SCC 1
Laws included in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 do not enjoy blanket immunity; subject to judicial review against the basic structure test and Part III golden triangle.
Supreme Court of India2006
(2006) 4 SCC 227
Section 27 applies to all post-employment restrictive covenants; right of first refusal restraining cricketer from contracting with others post-contract expiry is void.
Supreme Court of India2006Cited by 2
(2006) 8 SCC 212
Reservation in promotion for SC/ST valid only with quantifiable data on backwardness and adequacy.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 4 SCC 649
BCCI is not 'State' under Article 12 as it lacks government monopoly, financial dominance, or pervasive administrative control; however, it discharges public functions amenable to Article 226 writ jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 11 SCC 600
Agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act is the sine qua non of criminal conspiracy under 120B; mere association or knowledge without agreement is insufficient. | Essential ingredients and evidentiary threshold of criminal conspiracy applied to Section 61 BNS (corresponding to Section 120B IPC).
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 8 SCC 89
Vicarious liability under Section 141; specific averment in complaint that director was in charge of and responsible for conduct of company's business is mandatory.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 8 SCC 618
Power of Chief Justice/Court under Section 11 is a judicial power, not an administrative one (streamlined by 2015 amendment inserting Section 11(6A)).
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 6 SCC 537
No state quotas or fee caps in unaided private professional colleges; clarified T.M.A. Pai.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 2 SCC 344
Object of Section 10 is to prevent concurrent courts from simultaneously adjudicating parallel proceedings involving the same matter directly and substantially in issue.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 5 SCC 400
Intention under Section 307 is gathered from the weapon used, force applied, vital part of body targeted, and surrounding circumstances, not mere seriousness of injury.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2009Full text
2009 INSC 191 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 785
[2010) 2 S.C.R. 785 AJMER SINGH A v. STATE OF HARYANA (Criminal Appeal No. 436 of 2009) FEBRUARY 15, 2009 B [P. SATHASIVAM AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: s.20 - Prosecution under - Conviction by courts below c - On appeal, conviction upheld. s. 50 - Applicability of - In case…
Supreme Court of India15 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1303 · [2010] 2 S.C.R. 162
H 162 ALLAHABAD BANK v. ALL INDIA ALLAHABAD BANK 163 RETIRED EMPS. ASSN. statutes - Interpretation of - Held: Such statutes should A receive liberal construction having due regard to the directive principles of the State Policy, so as to secure the relief contemplated by the statute - Constitution of India, 1950 -Direc…
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1294 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 594
PANNEY @ PRATAP NARAIN SHUKLA & ANR. v. 595 STATE OF U.P. Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Crl. Appeal No. 6628 of A 2004. Ajay Veers Singh, B.S. Jain, S.N. Shukla, Nitin Jain, Mohd, lrshad Hanif for the Appellants. Prashant Chaudhary, S.K. Dwivedi, Garvesh Kabra, Shrish B Kumar Misra for the Respondent. The followi…
Supreme Court of India8 Dec 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1291 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 593
593 H 594 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 4 S.C.R. A hearing before the Supreme Court, it was pointed out that some of the conditions challenged before the High Court were later waived, and the matter before the Supreme Court remained largely academic. Allowing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1.1. No person has a right to …
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1245 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 572
WITH G Criminal Appeal No. 740 of 2007. R.S. Cheema, K.B. Sinha, Kanwaljit Kochhar, Kusum • Judgment Received on 6.2.2010. H 572 AMARJIT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA 573 Chaudhary, D.P. Singh, Tanu, Roopansh Purohit, Rajeev Gaur, A 'Naseem', Kamal Mohan Gupta for the Appearing parties. The following Order of the Court was…
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2009Full text
2009 INSC 1061 · [2010] 1 S.C.R. 555
H 555 556 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 1 S.C.R. A the High Court challenging the orders granting the second extension and rejecting his bail application. The High Court dismissed both the petitions. Aggrieved, the accused filed the appeals. Allowing the appeals, the CourtB HELD: 1.1. The proviso to s. 36-A (4) of the N…
Supreme Court of India2008
(2008) 13 SCC 767
Fixed-term life imprisonment without remission as alternative in grave murder cases.
Supreme Court of India2008
(2009) 1 SCC 267
In bailable offences under Section 436, granting bail is mandatory; neither police nor magistrate has discretion to refuse bail once surety is furnished. | Mandatory right to bail in bailable offences applied to Section 478 BNSS.
Supreme Court of India2008Cited by 1
(2008) 6 SCC 1
Upheld 27% OBC reservation in higher education with creamy-layer exclusion.
Supreme Court of India2007Cited by 1
(2007) 2 SCC 1
Laws included in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 do not enjoy blanket immunity; subject to judicial review against the basic structure test and Part III golden triangle.
Supreme Court of India2006
(2006) 4 SCC 227
Section 27 applies to all post-employment restrictive covenants; right of first refusal restraining cricketer from contracting with others post-contract expiry is void.
Supreme Court of India2006Cited by 2
(2006) 8 SCC 212
Reservation in promotion for SC/ST valid only with quantifiable data on backwardness and adequacy.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 4 SCC 649
BCCI is not 'State' under Article 12 as it lacks government monopoly, financial dominance, or pervasive administrative control; however, it discharges public functions amenable to Article 226 writ jurisdiction.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 11 SCC 600
Agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act is the sine qua non of criminal conspiracy under 120B; mere association or knowledge without agreement is insufficient. | Essential ingredients and evidentiary threshold of criminal conspiracy applied to Section 61 BNS (corresponding to Section 120B IPC).
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 8 SCC 89
Vicarious liability under Section 141; specific averment in complaint that director was in charge of and responsible for conduct of company's business is mandatory.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 8 SCC 618
Power of Chief Justice/Court under Section 11 is a judicial power, not an administrative one (streamlined by 2015 amendment inserting Section 11(6A)).
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 6 SCC 537
No state quotas or fee caps in unaided private professional colleges; clarified T.M.A. Pai.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 2 SCC 344
Object of Section 10 is to prevent concurrent courts from simultaneously adjudicating parallel proceedings involving the same matter directly and substantially in issue.
Supreme Court of India2005
(2005) 5 SCC 400
Intention under Section 307 is gathered from the weapon used, force applied, vital part of body targeted, and surrounding circumstances, not mere seriousness of injury.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis