⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,881–1,900 · Page 95 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 138 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 743
Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. & Anr v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., holding that after coming into force of the FSSA w.e.f 29th July 2010, it would have an overriding effect on other food related laws, including the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and ss. 272, 273, IPC, challenged in Criminal Appeal No. 476-478 of 2012 is correct.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,881–1,900 · Page 95 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 138 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 743
Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. & Anr v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., holding that after coming into force of the FSSA w.e.f 29th July 2010, it would have an overriding effect on other food related laws, including the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and ss. 272, 273, IPC, challenged in Criminal Appeal No. 476-478 of 2012 is correct.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 137 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 713
Whether a notification for filling up 18 posts of lecturers of Home Science in First Grade College run by State of Karnataka is liable to be quashed for not providing the breakup of the ‘subjects’ within Home Science.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 136 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 812
In the instant writ petition, Petitioners claiming to be social activists sought directions against the States and Union Territories to formulate a scheme to implement the concept of Community Kitchens to combat hunger, malnutrition and starvation and the deaths resulting therefrom. The Petitioners also sought direction against National Legal Services Authority to formulate a scheme in order to further the provisions of Art.50(1)A of the Constitution, as also against the Central Government to create a National Food Grid beyond the scope of the Public Distribution Scheme.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 135 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 847
1) Whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 amounts to expropriation which leads to change of its status inasmuch as its ownership is transferred to the Union of India; 2) If there is a transfer of ownership by its statutory vesting in the Custodian for Enemy Property, whether the Union within the meaning of Article 285 of the Constitution would be entitled to exemption from payment of property or other local taxes to Municipal Corporation under provisions of the UP Municipal Corporation Adhiniyam, 1959 (Act of 1959); a
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 134 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1072
The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil**. On basis of the said report, various directions are issued for due compliance by the States/Union Territories/CBI and High Courts.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 131 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 722
There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling the selection of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 130 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 685
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the trial court whereunder, the trial court rejected the application filed by the complainant u/s. 216/319 CrPC seeking the summoning of, and the impleadment of the appellants as accused persons in connection with the case u/ss. 452, 294(b), 323 and 506(1) IPC.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 129 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 693
Result of the election to the post of Mayor at the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation declared by the Presiding Officer in favour of the eighth respondent, if was contrary to law in view of the alleged electoral malpractices by him during the counting of votes.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 128 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 668
As per PW-1-informant (son of the deceased), on the fateful evening when he and his brother were sitting in the open space in front of the entrance door of his house, his mother was sitting close by on a cot and some neighbours were also sitting on another cot, the appellant came along with co-accused on whose instigation he fired on PW-1 but he slipped below the cot and the bullet hit his mother who died immediately. While the co-accused was acquitted on the same set of evidence, whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.301 r/w 302, u/s.307 IPC and his sentence were justified when there wa
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 127 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 617
Whether in the facts of the case, withdrawal of resignation dated 25.03.2003 submitted by the appellant prior to the effective date, i.e., 24.09.2003 ought to have been permitted; whether the letter of the Management dated 08.04.2003 accepting the resignation was final, binding and irrevocable and the rejection of the request for withdrawal of such resignation was in accordance with law and; in the facts of the case, what relief could be granted to the Appellant.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 126 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 409
The appellant sought appointment as a primary school teacher. The issue arising for consideration in the present case relates the allocation of marks for additional qualifications, for which 10 marks had been prescribed.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 125 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 638
Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 124 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 391
Whether the extra judicial confession of the appellant-accused was admissible, credible and sufficient for his conviction thereon for the murder of his brother-PW-1’s son; whether the testimony of PW-1 could be termed as reliable and trustworthy and; whether the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and consistent for arriving at the conclusion of guilt.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 121 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 650
Civil Appeal No. 722 of 2012 The respondents-plaintiffs claimed that they had been granted patta (lease) of the land by Gram Panchayat in the year 1959 and on the basis thereof, they were continuing in possession. However, the land was still being shown in the ownership of the Government. A civil suit was filed by the respondents for permanent injunction and for ownership and possession of the suit land. The suit was filed as a notice was issued by the appellants u/s. 92A of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. Whether a suit simpliciter for injunction was maintainable as the title of th
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 12 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 81
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the Second Appeal filed by the respondents and setting aside the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the Sub-Judge dismissing the suit of the respondents and decreeing the suit.
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 119 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 371
Whether a notification issued by the appellant-Chandigarh Housing Board calling for applications from both Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes confer any benefit on the respondent (who belonged to the Schedule Tribes community as recognised in the State of Rajasthan and was living in Chandigarh for twenty years) when there is no Presidential Order u/Art. 342 of the Constitution of India issued with regard to Scheduled Tribes insofar as Union Territory of Chandigarh is concerned.
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 117 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 364
Parties levelled counter-allegations against each other of having extracted money for securing job for their relatives. High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition of the appellant for quashing the criminal proceedings against him.
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 115 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 348
Inquiry Officer found that the charges levelled against the appellant were duly established. Inquiry report was accepted and the appellant was dismissed from service. Whether the dismissal of the appellant was justified and was the High Court justified in upholding the same.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 114 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 357
In a case involving recovery of huge quantity of narcotic substance (232.5 kg of ganja), wherein the Respondent-accused was indicted as being the conspirator for procurement/supply of the ganja so recovered, High Court whether justified in granting anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR registered for the offences punishable u/ss.8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1100 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1100
Maintenance granted to the appellant by the Family Court, enhanced by High Court. If to be enhanced further.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 137 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 713
Whether a notification for filling up 18 posts of lecturers of Home Science in First Grade College run by State of Karnataka is liable to be quashed for not providing the breakup of the ‘subjects’ within Home Science.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 136 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 812
In the instant writ petition, Petitioners claiming to be social activists sought directions against the States and Union Territories to formulate a scheme to implement the concept of Community Kitchens to combat hunger, malnutrition and starvation and the deaths resulting therefrom. The Petitioners also sought direction against National Legal Services Authority to formulate a scheme in order to further the provisions of Art.50(1)A of the Constitution, as also against the Central Government to create a National Food Grid beyond the scope of the Public Distribution Scheme.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 135 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 847
1) Whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 amounts to expropriation which leads to change of its status inasmuch as its ownership is transferred to the Union of India; 2) If there is a transfer of ownership by its statutory vesting in the Custodian for Enemy Property, whether the Union within the meaning of Article 285 of the Constitution would be entitled to exemption from payment of property or other local taxes to Municipal Corporation under provisions of the UP Municipal Corporation Adhiniyam, 1959 (Act of 1959); a
Supreme Court of India13 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 134 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1072
The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil**. On basis of the said report, various directions are issued for due compliance by the States/Union Territories/CBI and High Courts.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 131 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 722
There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling the selection of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India16 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 130 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 685
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the trial court whereunder, the trial court rejected the application filed by the complainant u/s. 216/319 CrPC seeking the summoning of, and the impleadment of the appellants as accused persons in connection with the case u/ss. 452, 294(b), 323 and 506(1) IPC.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 129 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 693
Result of the election to the post of Mayor at the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation declared by the Presiding Officer in favour of the eighth respondent, if was contrary to law in view of the alleged electoral malpractices by him during the counting of votes.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 128 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 668
As per PW-1-informant (son of the deceased), on the fateful evening when he and his brother were sitting in the open space in front of the entrance door of his house, his mother was sitting close by on a cot and some neighbours were also sitting on another cot, the appellant came along with co-accused on whose instigation he fired on PW-1 but he slipped below the cot and the bullet hit his mother who died immediately. While the co-accused was acquitted on the same set of evidence, whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.301 r/w 302, u/s.307 IPC and his sentence were justified when there wa
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 127 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 617
Whether in the facts of the case, withdrawal of resignation dated 25.03.2003 submitted by the appellant prior to the effective date, i.e., 24.09.2003 ought to have been permitted; whether the letter of the Management dated 08.04.2003 accepting the resignation was final, binding and irrevocable and the rejection of the request for withdrawal of such resignation was in accordance with law and; in the facts of the case, what relief could be granted to the Appellant.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 126 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 409
The appellant sought appointment as a primary school teacher. The issue arising for consideration in the present case relates the allocation of marks for additional qualifications, for which 10 marks had been prescribed.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 125 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 638
Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 124 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 391
Whether the extra judicial confession of the appellant-accused was admissible, credible and sufficient for his conviction thereon for the murder of his brother-PW-1’s son; whether the testimony of PW-1 could be termed as reliable and trustworthy and; whether the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and consistent for arriving at the conclusion of guilt.
Supreme Court of India20 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 121 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 650
Civil Appeal No. 722 of 2012 The respondents-plaintiffs claimed that they had been granted patta (lease) of the land by Gram Panchayat in the year 1959 and on the basis thereof, they were continuing in possession. However, the land was still being shown in the ownership of the Government. A civil suit was filed by the respondents for permanent injunction and for ownership and possession of the suit land. The suit was filed as a notice was issued by the appellants u/s. 92A of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. Whether a suit simpliciter for injunction was maintainable as the title of th
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 12 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 81
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the Second Appeal filed by the respondents and setting aside the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the Sub-Judge dismissing the suit of the respondents and decreeing the suit.
Supreme Court of India7 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 119 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 371
Whether a notification issued by the appellant-Chandigarh Housing Board calling for applications from both Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes confer any benefit on the respondent (who belonged to the Schedule Tribes community as recognised in the State of Rajasthan and was living in Chandigarh for twenty years) when there is no Presidential Order u/Art. 342 of the Constitution of India issued with regard to Scheduled Tribes insofar as Union Territory of Chandigarh is concerned.
Supreme Court of India19 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 117 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 364
Parties levelled counter-allegations against each other of having extracted money for securing job for their relatives. High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition of the appellant for quashing the criminal proceedings against him.
Supreme Court of India15 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 115 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 348
Inquiry Officer found that the charges levelled against the appellant were duly established. Inquiry report was accepted and the appellant was dismissed from service. Whether the dismissal of the appellant was justified and was the High Court justified in upholding the same.
Supreme Court of India12 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 114 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 357
In a case involving recovery of huge quantity of narcotic substance (232.5 kg of ganja), wherein the Respondent-accused was indicted as being the conspirator for procurement/supply of the ganja so recovered, High Court whether justified in granting anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR registered for the offences punishable u/ss.8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India29 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 1100 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1100
Maintenance granted to the appellant by the Family Court, enhanced by High Court. If to be enhanced further.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis