⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,841–1,860 · Page 93 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 191 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 377
In a celebratory firing during a marriage ceremony, the Appellant shot the deceased resulting in his demise. Whether the Appellant could be held guilty of the offence under Section 304 Part I or Part II of the IPC as against Section 302 IPC.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 190 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 393
Whether the High Court was right in interfering with the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal which approved the decision of Accepting Authority altering the Personal Appraisal Report score under All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,841–1,860 · Page 93 of 500
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 191 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 377
In a celebratory firing during a marriage ceremony, the Appellant shot the deceased resulting in his demise. Whether the Appellant could be held guilty of the offence under Section 304 Part I or Part II of the IPC as against Section 302 IPC.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 190 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 393
Whether the High Court was right in interfering with the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal which approved the decision of Accepting Authority altering the Personal Appraisal Report score under All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007.
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 19 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 248
Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt, the entire chain of circumstances, not leaving any link missing for the appellant to escape from the clutches of law.
Supreme Court of India1 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 189 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 385
Whether High Court was justified in setting aside the entire proceedings of the case against the accused on the basis of a Settlement Agreement where the complainant in the FIR was not made a party.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 188 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1196
Matter pertains to permissibility of an employer to change the qualifications prescribed in the advertisement midstream, during the course of the ongoing selection process.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 187 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 317
High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing the FIR filed against him for the offence punishable u/s.153-A, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 186 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 356
The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was repealed by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 wherein s. 52 provides a maximum penalty of Rs.3,00,000/- for misbranded food. The issue arose whether the appellant can be granted the benefit of the new legislation-2006 Act and be awarded a lesser punishment as is presently prescribed under the new law, though it was not in force when the offence was committed.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 184 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1065
Whether the State Commission and the National Commission were justified in exonerating the respondents-doctors of all the charges of misconduct/medical negligence in performing the cataract surgery of complainant’s son leading to complete loss of vision in his right eye.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 183 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 363
Whether the writ petition at the behest of respondent no.1 should have been entertained by the High Court; and whether the appellant- Board qualifies as a “food business operator” as defined u/s.3(1) (j) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 181 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 309
High Court, if justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant u/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR registered against him u/ss. 376 (2)(n) and 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 18 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 267
Validity of the detention order passed by the respondents; Detenue’s right to make a representation, the communication regarding the same if to be made both orally and in writing.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 178 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 187
The issues were : (i) Whether Tiger Safaris and Zoos are on the same footing; (ii) Whether establishment of a ‘Tiger Safari’ at Pakhrau in Corbett Tiger reserve was legal; (iii) Illegal construction in Corbett Tiger reserve and illegal felling of trees for the said purpose; (iv) ‘Public Trust’ Doctrine and (v) Principle of Ecological Restitution.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 177 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1054
Prosecution, if succeeded in establishing that there was mens rea on the part of the appellant to commit the offence rather to push the victim to commit suicide and to attract the offence u/s. 306, IPC.
Supreme Court of India29 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 175 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1121
Impugned orders passed by the High Court directing closure of the copper smelter operated by the petitioner at the industrial complex in Tamil Nadu for violations of numerous environmental norms, if justified.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 174 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 174
Whether “ghee” is a “product of livestock” under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 and; whether the Government 1994 notification, which inter alia notified “ghee” as one of the products of livestock for the purpose of regulation of purchase and sale of “ghee” in all notified market areas was published after due compliance of the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Act.
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 173 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 60
The interpretation of power of Section 20(1) & (2) and Section 20(3) of the Pre-conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation & Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 for cancellation, suspension or suspension in public interest respectively by the appropriate authority specified in Section 17 of PC & PNDT Act.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 172 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 157
High Court, if justified in rejecting the application filed by the accused appellant u/s. 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceeding of the criminal case registered against him u/s. 306 IPC and s. 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 170 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 294
There were questionable transactions between the appellants and respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8, the alleged benami companies of respondent No. 2 (notified party). Whether the Special Court committed manifest error in facts as well as in law in holding that the appellants herein were the garnishees of respondent No. 2. Whether the conclusions and findings passed by the Special Court, that the appellant herein failed to prove the fact that amounts had been repaid to the benami companies of the notified person- respondent No.2, can be sustained.
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 17 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 281
The Civil Judge modified the award passed by the Arbitrator reducing the amount awarded as also interest thereupon, i.e., Rs.14,68,239/- @ 18% to only 25% of the tender amount which equals to Rs.3,71,564/- and the interest percentage thereon was reduced to 9%. Whether the modification of the arbitral award as carried out by the Civil Judge as confirmed by the High Court, was justified within law.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 169 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 36
Conviction of the appellants-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302 and 34, Penal Code, 1860 based solely on the dying declaration, if justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 19 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 248
Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt, the entire chain of circumstances, not leaving any link missing for the appellant to escape from the clutches of law.
Supreme Court of India1 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 189 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 385
Whether High Court was justified in setting aside the entire proceedings of the case against the accused on the basis of a Settlement Agreement where the complainant in the FIR was not made a party.
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 188 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1196
Matter pertains to permissibility of an employer to change the qualifications prescribed in the advertisement midstream, during the course of the ongoing selection process.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 187 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 317
High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing the FIR filed against him for the offence punishable u/s.153-A, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 186 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 356
The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was repealed by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 wherein s. 52 provides a maximum penalty of Rs.3,00,000/- for misbranded food. The issue arose whether the appellant can be granted the benefit of the new legislation-2006 Act and be awarded a lesser punishment as is presently prescribed under the new law, though it was not in force when the offence was committed.
Supreme Court of India22 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 184 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1065
Whether the State Commission and the National Commission were justified in exonerating the respondents-doctors of all the charges of misconduct/medical negligence in performing the cataract surgery of complainant’s son leading to complete loss of vision in his right eye.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 183 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 363
Whether the writ petition at the behest of respondent no.1 should have been entertained by the High Court; and whether the appellant- Board qualifies as a “food business operator” as defined u/s.3(1) (j) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 181 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 309
High Court, if justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant u/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR registered against him u/ss. 376 (2)(n) and 506 IPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 18 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 267
Validity of the detention order passed by the respondents; Detenue’s right to make a representation, the communication regarding the same if to be made both orally and in writing.
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 178 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 187
The issues were : (i) Whether Tiger Safaris and Zoos are on the same footing; (ii) Whether establishment of a ‘Tiger Safari’ at Pakhrau in Corbett Tiger reserve was legal; (iii) Illegal construction in Corbett Tiger reserve and illegal felling of trees for the said purpose; (iv) ‘Public Trust’ Doctrine and (v) Principle of Ecological Restitution.
Supreme Court of India21 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 177 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1054
Prosecution, if succeeded in establishing that there was mens rea on the part of the appellant to commit the offence rather to push the victim to commit suicide and to attract the offence u/s. 306, IPC.
Supreme Court of India29 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 175 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1121
Impugned orders passed by the High Court directing closure of the copper smelter operated by the petitioner at the industrial complex in Tamil Nadu for violations of numerous environmental norms, if justified.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 174 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 174
Whether “ghee” is a “product of livestock” under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 and; whether the Government 1994 notification, which inter alia notified “ghee” as one of the products of livestock for the purpose of regulation of purchase and sale of “ghee” in all notified market areas was published after due compliance of the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Act.
Supreme Court of India4 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 173 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 60
The interpretation of power of Section 20(1) & (2) and Section 20(3) of the Pre-conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation & Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 for cancellation, suspension or suspension in public interest respectively by the appropriate authority specified in Section 17 of PC & PNDT Act.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 172 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 157
High Court, if justified in rejecting the application filed by the accused appellant u/s. 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceeding of the criminal case registered against him u/s. 306 IPC and s. 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 170 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 294
There were questionable transactions between the appellants and respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8, the alleged benami companies of respondent No. 2 (notified party). Whether the Special Court committed manifest error in facts as well as in law in holding that the appellants herein were the garnishees of respondent No. 2. Whether the conclusions and findings passed by the Special Court, that the appellant herein failed to prove the fact that amounts had been repaid to the benami companies of the notified person- respondent No.2, can be sustained.
Supreme Court of India4 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 17 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 281
The Civil Judge modified the award passed by the Arbitrator reducing the amount awarded as also interest thereupon, i.e., Rs.14,68,239/- @ 18% to only 25% of the tender amount which equals to Rs.3,71,564/- and the interest percentage thereon was reduced to 9%. Whether the modification of the arbitral award as carried out by the Civil Judge as confirmed by the High Court, was justified within law.
Supreme Court of India5 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 169 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 36
Conviction of the appellants-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302 and 34, Penal Code, 1860 based solely on the dying declaration, if justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis