⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,801–1,820 · Page 91 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 239 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1181
High Court, if erred in affirming the order of preventive detention passed by the Detaining Authority against the detenu and his associates for committing offence of gold chain snatching creating lot of fear and panic in the minds of the women folk.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 237 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 959
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,801–1,820 · Page 91 of 500
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 239 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1181
High Court, if erred in affirming the order of preventive detention passed by the Detaining Authority against the detenu and his associates for committing offence of gold chain snatching creating lot of fear and panic in the minds of the women folk.
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 237 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 959
Whether the Standing Orders read in conjunction with the terms of the appointment order restrain the transferability of employees.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 236 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 865
The issue for consideration before this Hon’ble Court was a challenge to a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, which rejected the Appellant’s prayer for a reference of his diagnosis of AIDS, to a fresh Medical Board. The matter arose out of the Appellant’s discharge from service from the Indian Army under Rule 13(3), Item III (iii) of the Army Rules, 1954 on the ground that he was suffering from AIDS. The Appellant approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging the Order of discharge from service. A Single Judge of the High Court allowed the Appellant’s writ petition, which was revers
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 235 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 705
Matter pertains to MBBS admission to a Maharashtra State domicile in Maharashtra despite his father’s deployment outside Maharashtra as a paramilitary personnel.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 233 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 722
FIR registered against accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 (appellant) for offences punishable u/s.420 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in rejecting the petition filed by the appellant u/s.482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 420, IPC, if attracted qua the appellant.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 232 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1014
Whether criminal proceedings should be initiated against a police officer who has committed excesses on individual in police custody?
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 231 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 890
The appellant had imported second hand steel mill machinery and parts covered by three transit bonds totalling 595 cases. The officials of the Preventive Branch of the Commissionerate searched the industrial premises of the appellant, including the notified public bonded warehouse and found that only 304 cases were stocked inside the warehouse, whereas 264 cases were found outside the warehouse but within the industrial/factory premises of the appellant. Remaining 27 cases were neither found inside the warehouse nor outside the warehouse. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, inter-a
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 230 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1235
The appellant, a Cooperative Society, had issued a notification dated 29.01.2011 inviting applications for regular recruitment to, inter alia, the post of Plant Attender, Grade-III. The Respondents challenged the notification before the High Court of Kerala and prayed, inter alia, for their regularization on the post of Plant Attenders. The Respondents, admittedly, did not avail the remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) but directly invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India and filed a writ petition before the High Court. The appellant-Society had pleaded, before the H
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 23 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 909
State Commission held that the tariffs offered by the L-4 and L-5 bidders were not aligned to the prevailing market prices. In appeal by L-5, APTEL held that the State Commission had to necessarily adopt the tariff and had no power to consider whether the tariff was aligned to market prices. Impugned judgment of the High Court relying on the said judgment of the APTEL and the earlier orders of this Court concluded that applying the test of “filling the bucket”, the procurers were bound to take supply from the respondent No.1 at the rates quoted by it and it had a right to supply power since th
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 228 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1273
Whether the High Court, in a habeas corpus petition, was correct in directing the ‘corpus’ to undergo a counselling session with a psychologist; what guidelines should be followed by courts while dealing with habeas corpus petitions or petitions for police protection.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 227 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 673
The issue for consideration was a challenge to a decision of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, refusing to quash the F.I.R. registered u/s. 506, 420, 34, 120-B and 467 of the Penal Code, 1860, against the Appellants/Accused, on the ground that the dispute between the parties was essentially civil in nature.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 225 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 824
Whether Division Bench of High Court was justified in reversing the judgment and order of the Single Judge vide which the writ petition of the Appellant was allowed and the Respondent was directed to proceed with his candidature for LPG Distributorship.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 224 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 838
Whether the High Court erred in finding without any evidence that the amount alleged to have been paid as the value of share in Joint Hindu Family property is not so but for some other purpose.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 223 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1147
Whether the use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of the episodes of the web-series ‘College Romance’ constitutes an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit content u/ss.67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 221 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 679
The charges were framed against the appellants. While the charge against the appellant-P was u/s. 109 IPC r/w. s.13(1) (e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the charge against appellant-R was u/s. 13(1)(e) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In substance, the charge was that appellant-R owned assets disproportionate to known sources of income and the appellant-P son of R has abetted him in the commission of the said offence. The High Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the petitions for quashing criminal proceedings. The question that arises for consi
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 22 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 319
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the Police Department.
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 219 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 848
Whether gap between the retirement of a District Judge and her subsequent appointment as the Judge of the High Court would constitute ‘break in service’ adversely affecting her pensionary and other retirement benefits.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 218 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 812
When there is a general reference in the second contract to the terms and conditions of the first contract, whether the arbitration clause in the first contract would ipso facto be applicable to the second contract.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 217 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 778
Whether the appellants have been able to satisfy the twin conditions laid down in s. 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the persons accused of the offence under the PMLA is not guilty of such offence; and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 216 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 947
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the criminal proceedings by exercising the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 354D, 376(2)(n), 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether the Standing Orders read in conjunction with the terms of the appointment order restrain the transferability of employees.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 236 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 865
The issue for consideration before this Hon’ble Court was a challenge to a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, which rejected the Appellant’s prayer for a reference of his diagnosis of AIDS, to a fresh Medical Board. The matter arose out of the Appellant’s discharge from service from the Indian Army under Rule 13(3), Item III (iii) of the Army Rules, 1954 on the ground that he was suffering from AIDS. The Appellant approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging the Order of discharge from service. A Single Judge of the High Court allowed the Appellant’s writ petition, which was revers
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 235 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 705
Matter pertains to MBBS admission to a Maharashtra State domicile in Maharashtra despite his father’s deployment outside Maharashtra as a paramilitary personnel.
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 233 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 722
FIR registered against accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 (appellant) for offences punishable u/s.420 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in rejecting the petition filed by the appellant u/s.482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 420, IPC, if attracted qua the appellant.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 232 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1014
Whether criminal proceedings should be initiated against a police officer who has committed excesses on individual in police custody?
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 231 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 890
The appellant had imported second hand steel mill machinery and parts covered by three transit bonds totalling 595 cases. The officials of the Preventive Branch of the Commissionerate searched the industrial premises of the appellant, including the notified public bonded warehouse and found that only 304 cases were stocked inside the warehouse, whereas 264 cases were found outside the warehouse but within the industrial/factory premises of the appellant. Remaining 27 cases were neither found inside the warehouse nor outside the warehouse. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, inter-a
Supreme Court of India31 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 230 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1235
The appellant, a Cooperative Society, had issued a notification dated 29.01.2011 inviting applications for regular recruitment to, inter alia, the post of Plant Attender, Grade-III. The Respondents challenged the notification before the High Court of Kerala and prayed, inter alia, for their regularization on the post of Plant Attenders. The Respondents, admittedly, did not avail the remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) but directly invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India and filed a writ petition before the High Court. The appellant-Society had pleaded, before the H
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 23 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 909
State Commission held that the tariffs offered by the L-4 and L-5 bidders were not aligned to the prevailing market prices. In appeal by L-5, APTEL held that the State Commission had to necessarily adopt the tariff and had no power to consider whether the tariff was aligned to market prices. Impugned judgment of the High Court relying on the said judgment of the APTEL and the earlier orders of this Court concluded that applying the test of “filling the bucket”, the procurers were bound to take supply from the respondent No.1 at the rates quoted by it and it had a right to supply power since th
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 228 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1273
Whether the High Court, in a habeas corpus petition, was correct in directing the ‘corpus’ to undergo a counselling session with a psychologist; what guidelines should be followed by courts while dealing with habeas corpus petitions or petitions for police protection.
Supreme Court of India7 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 227 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 673
The issue for consideration was a challenge to a decision of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, refusing to quash the F.I.R. registered u/s. 506, 420, 34, 120-B and 467 of the Penal Code, 1860, against the Appellants/Accused, on the ground that the dispute between the parties was essentially civil in nature.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 225 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 824
Whether Division Bench of High Court was justified in reversing the judgment and order of the Single Judge vide which the writ petition of the Appellant was allowed and the Respondent was directed to proceed with his candidature for LPG Distributorship.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 224 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 838
Whether the High Court erred in finding without any evidence that the amount alleged to have been paid as the value of share in Joint Hindu Family property is not so but for some other purpose.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 223 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1147
Whether the use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of the episodes of the web-series ‘College Romance’ constitutes an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit content u/ss.67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 221 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 679
The charges were framed against the appellants. While the charge against the appellant-P was u/s. 109 IPC r/w. s.13(1) (e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the charge against appellant-R was u/s. 13(1)(e) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In substance, the charge was that appellant-R owned assets disproportionate to known sources of income and the appellant-P son of R has abetted him in the commission of the said offence. The High Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the petitions for quashing criminal proceedings. The question that arises for consi
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 22 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 319
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the Police Department.
Supreme Court of India15 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 219 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 848
Whether gap between the retirement of a District Judge and her subsequent appointment as the Judge of the High Court would constitute ‘break in service’ adversely affecting her pensionary and other retirement benefits.
Supreme Court of India19 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 218 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 812
When there is a general reference in the second contract to the terms and conditions of the first contract, whether the arbitration clause in the first contract would ipso facto be applicable to the second contract.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 217 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 778
Whether the appellants have been able to satisfy the twin conditions laid down in s. 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the persons accused of the offence under the PMLA is not guilty of such offence; and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2024Full text
2024 INSC 216 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 947
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the criminal proceedings by exercising the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 354D, 376(2)(n), 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis