⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,741–1,760 · Page 88 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 314 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 506
Writ court, if justified in entertaining the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1 challenging the approval granted in favour of the appellant for starting LPG distributorship.
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 313 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 640
Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or infirmity; whether the extension of remand by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate beyond the period of 90 days was illegal.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,741–1,760 · Page 88 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 314 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 506
Writ court, if justified in entertaining the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1 challenging the approval granted in favour of the appellant for starting LPG distributorship.
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 313 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 640
Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or infirmity; whether the extension of remand by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate beyond the period of 90 days was illegal.
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 312 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 707
The appellant was convicted u/s. 302, s.307 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years respectively. Both sentences were to run concurrently. An appeal preferred by the appellant before the High Court was dismissed.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 311 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 518
Matter pertains to clarification of the order passed by this Court as regards grant of pensionary benefits to the women Short Service Commissioned Officers in Armed Forces.
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 310 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 81
High Court whether justified in passing the impugned order in review petition in favour of the plaintiff-respondent despite him not proving his title over the suit property (forest land), setting aside the concurrent judgments rendered by courts below which inter alia found that the suit land was a part of the reserved forest and the plaintiff had failed to show his title to the suit property.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 301 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 591
The issue for consideration was a challenge to the Complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, mainly on the ground that apart from s. 120B of the Indian Penal Code, no other offences were scheduled offences, within the meaning of clause (y) of sub-section (1) of s. 2 of PMLA.`
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 30 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 973
What is the Legislative Scheme of the Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act, 1977 (TCP Act); What is the nature of functions/powers of the Authorities under Chapter-IV of the TCP Act; Whether the NGT could have issued directions to the legislative body to exercise its legislative functions in a particular manner; Whether observations in Para 47 of the Mantri Techzone Private Limited would operate as res judicata; Whether the NGT was justified in passing the order dated 14.10.2022 when the High Court was seized of the same issue during the pendency of Civil Writ Petition No.5960 of 2022;
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 3 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 171
Matter pertains to the Adani-Hindenburg report alleging that the Adani Group manipulated its share price wherein the petitioner is seeking investigation by the Special Investigation Team or by the CBI.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 299 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 558
In a case based on circumstantial evidence wherein the appellants- accused persons were convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, ss.120B and 201, s.302 r/w ss.34 and 120B, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life, whether the prosecution was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the recovery of the dead body of the deceased from the pond was on the basis of the information given by the appellants in the statement recorded u/s.27, Evidence Act, 1872.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 297 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 541
Matter pertains to the High Courts entertaining petitions arising out of the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act in spite of availability of an effective alternative remedy.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 296 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 724
The present civil appeal has been filed by the complainant, who is the daughter of the insured-deceased, who is also the nominee under the subject life insurance policies of her late father. The controversy in the present case pertains to the factum of repudiation of the insurance claim of the complainant on the ground of the material suppression of information regarding the previous policies allegedly held by the insured-deceased, while taking the life insurance policy from the respondent insurance company. Whether, the respondent insurance company herein was correct in repudiating the claim
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 295 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 322
High Court, if justified in overturning the order of acquittal.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 294 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 328
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting and sentencing accused no. 1 u/s. 302, and accused no. 2 and 4 u/ss. 324 and 326 IPC.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 293 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 357
Appellants if had easementary right of the way over the land owned by the respondents i.e. the disputed rasta. Appellants’ reliance upon the evidence of their Power of Attorney holder/Manager of the property (PW-1) to prove their easementary right of way over the disputed rasta, if proper.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 293 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 576
The two appeals arise out of a judgment delivered by a Single Judge of the High Court of Bombay on 25.07.2019 directing, inter alia, wage revisions pertaining to the workmen of employer-VVF Ltd. working in two units at Sewree and Sion. Whether the High Court had travelled beyond its jurisdiction in appreciating facts and in that process substituted the finding of the Tribunal with its own finding on facts.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 292 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 473
(i) Whether the curative petition is maintainable; and (ii) Whether this Court (two-judge Bench) was justified in restoring the arbitral award which had been set aside by the Division Bench of the High Court on the ground that it suffered from patently illegality.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 291 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 264
Matter pertains to entitlement of the claimant for enhanced compensation.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 290 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 442
As per the prosecution, secret information was received by PW-2 (Intelligence Officer/Inspector) as to Accused No. 4 (husband of Accused No.1) carrying contraband from a particular route in an auto rickshaw. Said secret information was recorded by her and reported to her superior-PW-3, (Zonal Officer, a Gazetted Officer). The raiding party chased the said auto rickshaw however, Accused No.4 allegedly abandoned it fleeing away from the scene. On conducting the search of the said auto rickshaw, the raiding party inter alia found 1.450 Kgs charas. It eventually searched the house of Accused No.4
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 289 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 394
In the year 2019, appellant-KK an independent candidate emerged victorious in Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly from 44 Tezu (ST) Assembly Constituency. The issue arising for consideration is as to the validity of the High Court’s findings that grounds u/ss. 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d)(i) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 were established, warranting invalidation of the election of KK.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 288 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 255
Issue arose as to whether the cheques were issued in discharge of a debt and if so, whether the respondent no.1 was able to rebut the presumption in terms of s. 118/139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 312 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 707
The appellant was convicted u/s. 302, s.307 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years respectively. Both sentences were to run concurrently. An appeal preferred by the appellant before the High Court was dismissed.
Supreme Court of India15 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 311 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 518
Matter pertains to clarification of the order passed by this Court as regards grant of pensionary benefits to the women Short Service Commissioned Officers in Armed Forces.
Supreme Court of India18 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 310 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 81
High Court whether justified in passing the impugned order in review petition in favour of the plaintiff-respondent despite him not proving his title over the suit property (forest land), setting aside the concurrent judgments rendered by courts below which inter alia found that the suit land was a part of the reserved forest and the plaintiff had failed to show his title to the suit property.
Supreme Court of India8 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 301 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 591
The issue for consideration was a challenge to the Complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, mainly on the ground that apart from s. 120B of the Indian Penal Code, no other offences were scheduled offences, within the meaning of clause (y) of sub-section (1) of s. 2 of PMLA.`
Supreme Court of India11 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 30 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 973
What is the Legislative Scheme of the Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act, 1977 (TCP Act); What is the nature of functions/powers of the Authorities under Chapter-IV of the TCP Act; Whether the NGT could have issued directions to the legislative body to exercise its legislative functions in a particular manner; Whether observations in Para 47 of the Mantri Techzone Private Limited would operate as res judicata; Whether the NGT was justified in passing the order dated 14.10.2022 when the High Court was seized of the same issue during the pendency of Civil Writ Petition No.5960 of 2022;
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 3 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 171
Matter pertains to the Adani-Hindenburg report alleging that the Adani Group manipulated its share price wherein the petitioner is seeking investigation by the Special Investigation Team or by the CBI.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 299 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 558
In a case based on circumstantial evidence wherein the appellants- accused persons were convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, ss.120B and 201, s.302 r/w ss.34 and 120B, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life, whether the prosecution was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the recovery of the dead body of the deceased from the pond was on the basis of the information given by the appellants in the statement recorded u/s.27, Evidence Act, 1872.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 297 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 541
Matter pertains to the High Courts entertaining petitions arising out of the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act in spite of availability of an effective alternative remedy.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 296 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 724
The present civil appeal has been filed by the complainant, who is the daughter of the insured-deceased, who is also the nominee under the subject life insurance policies of her late father. The controversy in the present case pertains to the factum of repudiation of the insurance claim of the complainant on the ground of the material suppression of information regarding the previous policies allegedly held by the insured-deceased, while taking the life insurance policy from the respondent insurance company. Whether, the respondent insurance company herein was correct in repudiating the claim
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 295 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 322
High Court, if justified in overturning the order of acquittal.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 294 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 328
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting and sentencing accused no. 1 u/s. 302, and accused no. 2 and 4 u/ss. 324 and 326 IPC.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 293 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 357
Appellants if had easementary right of the way over the land owned by the respondents i.e. the disputed rasta. Appellants’ reliance upon the evidence of their Power of Attorney holder/Manager of the property (PW-1) to prove their easementary right of way over the disputed rasta, if proper.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 293 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 576
The two appeals arise out of a judgment delivered by a Single Judge of the High Court of Bombay on 25.07.2019 directing, inter alia, wage revisions pertaining to the workmen of employer-VVF Ltd. working in two units at Sewree and Sion. Whether the High Court had travelled beyond its jurisdiction in appreciating facts and in that process substituted the finding of the Tribunal with its own finding on facts.
Supreme Court of India10 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 292 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 473
(i) Whether the curative petition is maintainable; and (ii) Whether this Court (two-judge Bench) was justified in restoring the arbitral award which had been set aside by the Division Bench of the High Court on the ground that it suffered from patently illegality.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 291 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 264
Matter pertains to entitlement of the claimant for enhanced compensation.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 290 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 442
As per the prosecution, secret information was received by PW-2 (Intelligence Officer/Inspector) as to Accused No. 4 (husband of Accused No.1) carrying contraband from a particular route in an auto rickshaw. Said secret information was recorded by her and reported to her superior-PW-3, (Zonal Officer, a Gazetted Officer). The raiding party chased the said auto rickshaw however, Accused No.4 allegedly abandoned it fleeing away from the scene. On conducting the search of the said auto rickshaw, the raiding party inter alia found 1.450 Kgs charas. It eventually searched the house of Accused No.4
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 289 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 394
In the year 2019, appellant-KK an independent candidate emerged victorious in Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly from 44 Tezu (ST) Assembly Constituency. The issue arising for consideration is as to the validity of the High Court’s findings that grounds u/ss. 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d)(i) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 were established, warranting invalidation of the election of KK.
Supreme Court of India9 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 288 · [2024] 4 S.C.R. 255
Issue arose as to whether the cheques were issued in discharge of a debt and if so, whether the respondent no.1 was able to rebut the presumption in terms of s. 118/139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis