⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,621–1,640 · Page 82 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 469 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 69
Matter pertains to the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in the State-aided Universities in the State of West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 467 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 29
Whether the present suit (claiming title and possession over the suit land) as filed by the plaintiff-appellant was barred under Section 11 CPC on principle of res judicata inasmuch as there was no adjudication of the rights of the co-defendants (including appellant) in the previous suit with regard to the suit land and the issue therein was not directly or indirectly and substantially the same as in the present suit.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,621–1,640 · Page 82 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 469 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 69
Matter pertains to the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in the State-aided Universities in the State of West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 467 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 29
Whether the present suit (claiming title and possession over the suit land) as filed by the plaintiff-appellant was barred under Section 11 CPC on principle of res judicata inasmuch as there was no adjudication of the rights of the co-defendants (including appellant) in the previous suit with regard to the suit land and the issue therein was not directly or indirectly and substantially the same as in the present suit.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 466 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 196
Is Rule 13(v) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 , insofar as it provides age relaxation to the persons serving under educational projects discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India; Was the award of bonus marks to the project employed applicants discriminatory and ultra vires the Rules; Were the guidelines sanctioning the award of bonus marks on a differential basis for applicants with project experience and other applicants invalid for any other reason.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 465 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 246
The appellant is a person with arthrogryposis and is aggrieved by the manner in which persons with disabilities have been portrayed in the movie titled ‘Aankh Micholi’. The appellant seeks guidelines against filmmakers, regarding the provisions of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the composition of the Board and the Advisory panel under the Cinematograph Act and recommendations to beep certain parts of the present film as well.The issues arises for consideration include the impact of the provisions of RPwD Act 2016 on the certification of films and under the Cinematograph A
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 464 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 178
Non-questioning the appellant convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 on the twin incriminating circumstances during his examination u/s.313, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if caused material prejudice to him vitiating the trial qua him.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 463 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 22
Appellant-plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale and in the alternative prayed for refund of the advance sale consideration of Rs.18,00,000/- (initial advance sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- and additional sum of Rs. 15,00,000/), mesne profits etc. with interest. Trial Court denied specific performance however, directed the defendant no.1 to refund Rs.18,00,000/- to the plaintiff with interest. High Court modified the decree and allowed the plaintiff to recover only Rs.3,00,000/- with interest. Whether the plaintiff proved payment of Rs. 3,00,000/- initiall
Supreme Court of India3 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 462 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 163
Correctness of the order of the High Court upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offences under ss. 302 and 307 IPC .
Supreme Court of India14 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 461 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1038
Status reports filed by various States/UTs furnishing information on the action proposed to be taken within fixed timeline as regards various facilities lacking in jails and the recommendations made by the Committee(s) constituted by the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jun 2024Full text
2024 INSC 460 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 959
High Court, if justified in directing the trial court to accept the respondent’s memo and pass appropriate order.
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 46 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 604
Matter pertains to the prerequisites to be mandatorily mentioned in the application filed for grant of bail; and effect of non-mentioning of details of previous bail applications and order in all bail applications.
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 459 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 533
Re-scheduling of two papers of Chartered Accountant Examination sought in the wake of General Elections of 2024. In view of the obligation cast upon every citizen to exercise their franchise, whether the examination schedule will cause a dislocation for students eligible to exercise their franchise and enrolled for the examination.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 458 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 708
Whether the appellant is entitled to additional compensation for the left out portion of land at least @ 5% of the value of the award for a period spreading over 84 months.
Supreme Court of India27 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 457 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 896
Whether a person being an award holder, of monetary compensation without actual receipt thereof, would be disentitled from filing an appeal seeking enhanced compensation as an indigent.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 456 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1211
Whether the appellants made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the grounds of subsequent change of law brought in by Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [2018] 2 SCR 1 and Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal [2020] 3 SCR 1, public interest and justice, COVID-19 pandemic, suppression of material facts by the landowners, leeway to be granted to government entities etc.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 455 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1159
a) Whether the dismissal of a civil appeal preferred by one appellant in the first round operates as res judicata against the other appellant in the second round before this Court; b) Whether suppression of the first round of litigation by the appellants constitutes a material fact, thereby inviting an outright dismissal of the appeals at the threshold; c) Does the doctrine of merger operate as a bar to entertain the civil appeals in the present case; d) Whether the previous determination of the rights of subsequent purchasers in an inter se dispute precludes the same issue from being reconsid
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 454 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 949
Issue arose to resolve as to which of the two views on maintainability of the Review petitions-Hon’ble Judge presiding over the Bench ruling in favour of maintainability of the review petitions whereas the Hon’ble companion Judge on the Bench holding that the review petitions were not maintainable, is the correct view; can the review petitioners, on the basis of the pleadings in the review petitions, be considered persons aggrieved; whether the last sentence of paragraph 217 of Shailendra [3-Judge] case grants ‘liberty’ to any party to seek a review of Pune Municipal Corporation case; if affir
Supreme Court of India9 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 453 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 935
Whether the manner of shortlisting candidates for appointment to the posts of primary teacher as directed by the Division Bench was in departure from the procedure envisaged under Rule 8 of the West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2016; whether the remaining 3929 vacancies of primary school teachers were to be treated exclusively as part of 16,500 vacancies for which the recruitment process commenced via Notification dated 23.12.2020, or whether such vacancies can be carried forward to the next recruitment cycle that commenced via Notification dated 29.09.2022 instead.
Supreme Court of India22 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 452 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1011
The respondents-accused were arrested for the alleged offences under section 120(b), 153(A), 153(AA) of IPC and Section 13, 17, 18, 18(B), 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1957. The High Court released the respondents on bail subject to the conditions. Whether from the perusal of the chargesheet and other material/documents produced against the respondents, there are reasonable grounds for believing that accusations against the respondents are prima facie true, as contemplated in the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 43D of UAPA.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 451 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 777
Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, if competent to impose, by way of Guidelines, a numerical restriction on the maximum number of tax audits that could be accepted by a Chartered Accountant, u/s. 44AB of the 1961 Act, in a Financial Year by way of a Guideline; the restrictions imposed, if unreasonable, arbitrary and illegal and thus, violative of the right guaranteed to Chartered Accountants u/Art. 19(1)(g) and impermissible u/Art. 14 of the Constitution; and exceeding of the specified number of tax audits, if can be deemed to be ‘professional misconduct’.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 450 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 567
Parties arrived at an amicable settlement for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. However, the wife resiled from the settlement agreement. Exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to grant decree of divorce.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 466 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 196
Is Rule 13(v) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 , insofar as it provides age relaxation to the persons serving under educational projects discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India; Was the award of bonus marks to the project employed applicants discriminatory and ultra vires the Rules; Were the guidelines sanctioning the award of bonus marks on a differential basis for applicants with project experience and other applicants invalid for any other reason.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 465 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 246
The appellant is a person with arthrogryposis and is aggrieved by the manner in which persons with disabilities have been portrayed in the movie titled ‘Aankh Micholi’. The appellant seeks guidelines against filmmakers, regarding the provisions of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and the composition of the Board and the Advisory panel under the Cinematograph Act and recommendations to beep certain parts of the present film as well.The issues arises for consideration include the impact of the provisions of RPwD Act 2016 on the certification of films and under the Cinematograph A
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 464 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 178
Non-questioning the appellant convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 on the twin incriminating circumstances during his examination u/s.313, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if caused material prejudice to him vitiating the trial qua him.
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 463 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 22
Appellant-plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale and in the alternative prayed for refund of the advance sale consideration of Rs.18,00,000/- (initial advance sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- and additional sum of Rs. 15,00,000/), mesne profits etc. with interest. Trial Court denied specific performance however, directed the defendant no.1 to refund Rs.18,00,000/- to the plaintiff with interest. High Court modified the decree and allowed the plaintiff to recover only Rs.3,00,000/- with interest. Whether the plaintiff proved payment of Rs. 3,00,000/- initiall
Supreme Court of India3 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 462 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 163
Correctness of the order of the High Court upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offences under ss. 302 and 307 IPC .
Supreme Court of India14 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 461 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1038
Status reports filed by various States/UTs furnishing information on the action proposed to be taken within fixed timeline as regards various facilities lacking in jails and the recommendations made by the Committee(s) constituted by the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India14 Jun 2024Full text
2024 INSC 460 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 959
High Court, if justified in directing the trial court to accept the respondent’s memo and pass appropriate order.
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 46 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 604
Matter pertains to the prerequisites to be mandatorily mentioned in the application filed for grant of bail; and effect of non-mentioning of details of previous bail applications and order in all bail applications.
Supreme Court of India29 Apr 2024Full text
2024 INSC 459 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 533
Re-scheduling of two papers of Chartered Accountant Examination sought in the wake of General Elections of 2024. In view of the obligation cast upon every citizen to exercise their franchise, whether the examination schedule will cause a dislocation for students eligible to exercise their franchise and enrolled for the examination.
Supreme Court of India16 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 458 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 708
Whether the appellant is entitled to additional compensation for the left out portion of land at least @ 5% of the value of the award for a period spreading over 84 months.
Supreme Court of India27 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 457 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 896
Whether a person being an award holder, of monetary compensation without actual receipt thereof, would be disentitled from filing an appeal seeking enhanced compensation as an indigent.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 456 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1211
Whether the appellants made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the grounds of subsequent change of law brought in by Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [2018] 2 SCR 1 and Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal [2020] 3 SCR 1, public interest and justice, COVID-19 pandemic, suppression of material facts by the landowners, leeway to be granted to government entities etc.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 455 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1159
a) Whether the dismissal of a civil appeal preferred by one appellant in the first round operates as res judicata against the other appellant in the second round before this Court; b) Whether suppression of the first round of litigation by the appellants constitutes a material fact, thereby inviting an outright dismissal of the appeals at the threshold; c) Does the doctrine of merger operate as a bar to entertain the civil appeals in the present case; d) Whether the previous determination of the rights of subsequent purchasers in an inter se dispute precludes the same issue from being reconsid
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 454 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 949
Issue arose to resolve as to which of the two views on maintainability of the Review petitions-Hon’ble Judge presiding over the Bench ruling in favour of maintainability of the review petitions whereas the Hon’ble companion Judge on the Bench holding that the review petitions were not maintainable, is the correct view; can the review petitioners, on the basis of the pleadings in the review petitions, be considered persons aggrieved; whether the last sentence of paragraph 217 of Shailendra [3-Judge] case grants ‘liberty’ to any party to seek a review of Pune Municipal Corporation case; if affir
Supreme Court of India9 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 453 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 935
Whether the manner of shortlisting candidates for appointment to the posts of primary teacher as directed by the Division Bench was in departure from the procedure envisaged under Rule 8 of the West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2016; whether the remaining 3929 vacancies of primary school teachers were to be treated exclusively as part of 16,500 vacancies for which the recruitment process commenced via Notification dated 23.12.2020, or whether such vacancies can be carried forward to the next recruitment cycle that commenced via Notification dated 29.09.2022 instead.
Supreme Court of India22 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 452 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1011
The respondents-accused were arrested for the alleged offences under section 120(b), 153(A), 153(AA) of IPC and Section 13, 17, 18, 18(B), 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1957. The High Court released the respondents on bail subject to the conditions. Whether from the perusal of the chargesheet and other material/documents produced against the respondents, there are reasonable grounds for believing that accusations against the respondents are prima facie true, as contemplated in the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 43D of UAPA.
Supreme Court of India17 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 451 · [2024] 6 S.C.R. 777
Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, if competent to impose, by way of Guidelines, a numerical restriction on the maximum number of tax audits that could be accepted by a Chartered Accountant, u/s. 44AB of the 1961 Act, in a Financial Year by way of a Guideline; the restrictions imposed, if unreasonable, arbitrary and illegal and thus, violative of the right guaranteed to Chartered Accountants u/Art. 19(1)(g) and impermissible u/Art. 14 of the Constitution; and exceeding of the specified number of tax audits, if can be deemed to be ‘professional misconduct’.
Supreme Court of India15 May 2024Full text
2024 INSC 450 · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 567
Parties arrived at an amicable settlement for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. However, the wife resiled from the settlement agreement. Exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to grant decree of divorce.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis