⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 260 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 202
The principal issue which falls for consideration is with regard to the assessment of extent of disability for the purpose of computing loss of earning capacity, and more particularly, the soundness of the High Court’s determination of functional disability at 30% as against 63% assessed by the Medical Board and affirmed by the MACT. Whether the appellant-claimant is entitled to any further enhancement of compensation over and above the amount awarded by the MACT.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 500
Supreme Court of India18 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 260 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 202
The principal issue which falls for consideration is with regard to the assessment of extent of disability for the purpose of computing loss of earning capacity, and more particularly, the soundness of the High Court’s determination of functional disability at 30% as against 63% assessed by the Medical Board and affirmed by the MACT. Whether the appellant-claimant is entitled to any further enhancement of compensation over and above the amount awarded by the MACT.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 26 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 372
As regards admission to MBBS/BDS courses under sports quota, the issue arose as to whether the procedure of keeping the admission process elastic after issuance of the prospectus and submission of applications by the candidates with their sports achievements would be valid in the eye of law.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 257 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 191
Impugned order challenged by the appellant-convict contending that as he was not made aware of absence of the counsel engaged by him to prosecute the appeal before the Division Bench and as the Division Bench proceeded to appoint the amicus without his knowledge, he may be allowed to raise all such grounds which he had raised in the memorandum of appeal that was filed in the High Court to secure an order of setting aside the conviction u/s.304 Part II, IPC and the sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to allow the appeal by recording an acquittal.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 254 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 184
Matter pertained to acts of hooliganism by the Barabanki Bar Members by attacking advocate representing petitioners in toll plaza case.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 251 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 586
Issue arose as regards the propriety of the exercise of power by the Trial Court u/s.319 Cr.PC and the justifiability of the imprimatur granted thereto by the Court below.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 25 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 167
Issue arose as regards the consolidation of FIRs; and whether or not the offences allegedly committed against the 1,852 complainants were part of the ‘same transaction’.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 249 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 576
Whether the appellant is guilty of the offences u/ss.302 and 498A of IPC and whether the sentence (two years of simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default in payment of the same, with a further three months of simple imprisonment u/s.498A IPC and sentence of life imprisonment u/s.302 IPC) awarded to him is justified.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 247 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 151
(i) Whether there is a valid undertaking by way of a guarantee executed by Defendant No.1 and whether Defendant No.1 can absolve from its liability; (ii) Whether the reasons adopted by the Division Bench of the High Court warrant interference by this Court.
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 243 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 140
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the declaration that the election of the respondent to the post of Chairman Delang Panchayat Samiti was invalid, however, setting aside the declaration made in favour of the appellant directing her appointment as the Chairman, and directing fresh election for the said post.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 24 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 62
Whether the Bihar Engineering Service Class-II Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 2022 can be made applicable to the 2019 Advertisements after the written examination has been conducted and the provisional merit list has been published.
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 236 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 58
The present writ petition has been filed by the Mizo Chief Council, through its President, on behalf of the tribal chieftains. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents seized/acquired the lands of these chieftains without paying due compensation. The following questions fall for consideration: (i) Whether the writ petition is hit by delay and laches; (ii) Whether any fundamental rights of the Mizo Chiefs were violated.
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 234 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 358
Matter pertains to dismissal of police constable without conducting departmental inquiry, holding that it was not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry.
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 233 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 112
Whether the Air Force Group Insurance Society (AFGIS) could be treated as “State” or “other authority” within the meaning of Art.12 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 230 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 1
Whether the clarificatory letter dated 14.10.2004 can have any overriding or superseding effect over the Office Memorandum dated 08.09.1993, which expressly lays down the criteria for exclusion from the benefit of reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) by identifying the creamy layer namely, the socially advanced persons of sections among the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes; whether there can be hostile discrimination between employees of the Government and those working in Public or Private Sector Undertakings, when both occupy posts of the same grade or class.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 229 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 432
Dispute pertains to inter-se seniority of the Assistant Engineers (Electrical)-directly recruited and internally selected candidates, and what is to be taken as the date of the appointment of the direct recruits.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 228 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 525
Whether the arbitral award deserves to be set aside on the ground of lack of jurisdiction due to improper constitution of the arbitral tribunal or patent illegality.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 225 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 448
Challenge to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court setting aside the order of the Single Judge by way of which the Single Judge had dismissed the writ petition of respondent wherein he had challenged the rejection of his candidature by the screening committee for appointment to the post of constable (driver) in the police force on the ground that he had criminal antecedents.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 223 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 556
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in acquitting the accused despite the alleged dying declarations, motive and testimony of witnesses relied upon by the prosecution to establish the prosecution case.
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 221 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 415
Bereft of proof of the conspiracy theory and finding absence of the demand of bribe, the conviction of both the accused (A1 and A2) was overturned by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 220 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 335
Whether the respondent-State was justified in law in classifying the present appellants, who were engaged on an academic arrangement basis under the impugned SRO No. 384 titled “Jammu and Kashmir Medical and Dental Education (Appointment on Academic Arrangement Basis) Rules, 2009”, as a distinct class u/s.3 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, and thereby excluding them from the benefit of regularisation contemplated under the said enactment.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026 INSC 26 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 372
As regards admission to MBBS/BDS courses under sports quota, the issue arose as to whether the procedure of keeping the admission process elastic after issuance of the prospectus and submission of applications by the candidates with their sports achievements would be valid in the eye of law.
Supreme Court of India16 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 257 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 191
Impugned order challenged by the appellant-convict contending that as he was not made aware of absence of the counsel engaged by him to prosecute the appeal before the Division Bench and as the Division Bench proceeded to appoint the amicus without his knowledge, he may be allowed to raise all such grounds which he had raised in the memorandum of appeal that was filed in the High Court to secure an order of setting aside the conviction u/s.304 Part II, IPC and the sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to allow the appeal by recording an acquittal.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 254 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 184
Matter pertained to acts of hooliganism by the Barabanki Bar Members by attacking advocate representing petitioners in toll plaza case.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 251 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 586
Issue arose as regards the propriety of the exercise of power by the Trial Court u/s.319 Cr.PC and the justifiability of the imprimatur granted thereto by the Court below.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 25 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 167
Issue arose as regards the consolidation of FIRs; and whether or not the offences allegedly committed against the 1,852 complainants were part of the ‘same transaction’.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 249 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 576
Whether the appellant is guilty of the offences u/ss.302 and 498A of IPC and whether the sentence (two years of simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default in payment of the same, with a further three months of simple imprisonment u/s.498A IPC and sentence of life imprisonment u/s.302 IPC) awarded to him is justified.
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 247 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 151
(i) Whether there is a valid undertaking by way of a guarantee executed by Defendant No.1 and whether Defendant No.1 can absolve from its liability; (ii) Whether the reasons adopted by the Division Bench of the High Court warrant interference by this Court.
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 243 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 140
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the declaration that the election of the respondent to the post of Chairman Delang Panchayat Samiti was invalid, however, setting aside the declaration made in favour of the appellant directing her appointment as the Chairman, and directing fresh election for the said post.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 24 · [2026] 2 S.C.R. 62
Whether the Bihar Engineering Service Class-II Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 2022 can be made applicable to the 2019 Advertisements after the written examination has been conducted and the provisional merit list has been published.
Supreme Court of India13 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 236 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 58
The present writ petition has been filed by the Mizo Chief Council, through its President, on behalf of the tribal chieftains. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents seized/acquired the lands of these chieftains without paying due compensation. The following questions fall for consideration: (i) Whether the writ petition is hit by delay and laches; (ii) Whether any fundamental rights of the Mizo Chiefs were violated.
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 234 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 358
Matter pertains to dismissal of police constable without conducting departmental inquiry, holding that it was not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry.
Supreme Court of India12 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 233 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 112
Whether the Air Force Group Insurance Society (AFGIS) could be treated as “State” or “other authority” within the meaning of Art.12 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 230 · [2026] 4 S.C.R. 1
Whether the clarificatory letter dated 14.10.2004 can have any overriding or superseding effect over the Office Memorandum dated 08.09.1993, which expressly lays down the criteria for exclusion from the benefit of reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) by identifying the creamy layer namely, the socially advanced persons of sections among the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes; whether there can be hostile discrimination between employees of the Government and those working in Public or Private Sector Undertakings, when both occupy posts of the same grade or class.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 229 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 432
Dispute pertains to inter-se seniority of the Assistant Engineers (Electrical)-directly recruited and internally selected candidates, and what is to be taken as the date of the appointment of the direct recruits.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 228 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 525
Whether the arbitral award deserves to be set aside on the ground of lack of jurisdiction due to improper constitution of the arbitral tribunal or patent illegality.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 225 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 448
Challenge to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court setting aside the order of the Single Judge by way of which the Single Judge had dismissed the writ petition of respondent wherein he had challenged the rejection of his candidature by the screening committee for appointment to the post of constable (driver) in the police force on the ground that he had criminal antecedents.
Supreme Court of India11 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 223 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 556
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in acquitting the accused despite the alleged dying declarations, motive and testimony of witnesses relied upon by the prosecution to establish the prosecution case.
Supreme Court of India10 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 221 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 415
Bereft of proof of the conspiracy theory and finding absence of the demand of bribe, the conviction of both the accused (A1 and A2) was overturned by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India9 Mar 2026Full text
2026 INSC 220 · [2026] 3 S.C.R. 335
Whether the respondent-State was justified in law in classifying the present appellants, who were engaged on an academic arrangement basis under the impugned SRO No. 384 titled “Jammu and Kashmir Medical and Dental Education (Appointment on Academic Arrangement Basis) Rules, 2009”, as a distinct class u/s.3 of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, and thereby excluding them from the benefit of regularisation contemplated under the said enactment.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis