⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,561–1,580 · Page 79 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 537 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1314
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without taking in view the quantity of the contraband substance.
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 536 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1230
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,561–1,580 · Page 79 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 537 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1314
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without taking in view the quantity of the contraband substance.
Supreme Court of India9 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 536 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1230
Whether claims of the petitioner in the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were barred by limitation.
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 535 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1225
Whether in the instant case, conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be quashed by the Supreme Court as the parties had settled the dispute among themselves by entering into a settlement agreement.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 534 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1054
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in custody for more than nine years.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 533 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1347
Parties entered into an agreement to sell for sale of a property. Defendant no.1 sent various notices to plaintiffs to execute the sale deed. However, plaintiffs did not execute the sale deed. Thereafter, defendants executed sale deeds in favour of another persons (defendant nos. 6, 7 and CN). The plaintiffs instituted suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. Whether plaintiffs were always ready and willing to get the sale deed executed and registered.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 532 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 840
Issue arose whether the execution of a discharge voucher towards the full and final settlement between the parties would operate as a bar to invoke arbitration; as regards the scope and standard of judicial scrutiny that an application u/s. 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 can be subjected to when a plea of “accord and satisfaction” is taken by the defendant; and as regards the effect of the decision of this Court in In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and the Stamp Act 1899 on the scope of powers of the referral cou
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 531 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 970
The issue pertains to the selection and appointment to the post of City Manager under the Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar. The said post is governed by the Bihar City Manager Cadre (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2014, which were framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 530 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 942
Long-standing separation between the parties, multiple prolonged litigations pending adjudication, several failed attempts at reconciliation. Issue was as regards interim maintenance however, in view of irretrievable break down of marriage, marriage between the appellant-wife and respondent-husband was dissolved in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Amount of permanent alimony to be paid by the respondent to the appellant.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 53 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 642
Reopening of a concluded assessment-reassessment u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 following issuance of notice u/s. 148 of the Act, legally sustainable or bad in law.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 529 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 813
Ten persons were arrayed as accused and after investigation, a charge sheet was filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 IPC alleging indiscriminate shooting and/or conspiracy leading to death of two persons and injury of one person. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions against nine accused persons numbered as Sessions Trial No. 17/1995. Subsequently, the case against the proclaimed offender was committed and numbered as Sessions Trial No. 66/2004. During the pendency of trial in 2007, one of the Accused, the 2nd Respondent herein was elected as Member of Legislative Assembly. T
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 528 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 796
Matter pertains to the correctness of the Resolution passed by the State Government based upon the recommendations by the State Backward Commission that in the list of Extremely Backward Classes, the “Tanti-Tantwa” caste be merged in the Scheduled Castes list with the caste ‘Pan/Sawasi’ mentioned at Serial No. Entry 20 so that they could get benefits of the Scheduled Castes.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 527 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1398
Respondents had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against Appellants, claiming to be owners in possession of suit land on the basis of an alleged compromise entered into by them in an earlier litigation with the original owners of the property. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. The order of dismissal was set aside in first appeal filed by the Respondents and the order of first appellate court was confirmed by the High Court in regular second appeal vide the impugned order. Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the judgment of the first Appellate court v
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 526 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 745
Whether the exemption from payment of Market Fee, granted under the Industrial Policy, 2003, of the Punjab Government, can be said to include exemption from Rural Development Fee.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 525 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 730
Whether the facts of the case necessitated constitution of a High Powered Sale Committee, under Article 142 of the Constitution, to auction the immovable assets of the companies to satisfy the investors’ claims and liquidate all other statutory liabilities of the Companies.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 524 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1321
If there was any discrepancy in the pay scales of Sub-Deputy Inspectors of Schools/Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (SDI/ ABSA) and Deputy Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (DBSA) of the Basic Education Department, State of Uttar Pradesh vis-à-vis the Headmasters of Junior High Schools, as alleged. Whether the SDI/ ABSA and DBSA were entitled to the higher pay scale of 7500- 12000 with effect from 01.07.2001 or whether it was appropriately granted to them from 01.12.2008 onwards.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 523 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 781
Whether the High Court had shown undeserving leniency and sympathy to accused Nos.1 and 2 by sentencing them to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, even after finding that they committed the serious offence of bigamy punishable u/s. 494 IPC; and whether an enhancement of sentence is called for.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 522 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1155
In the chargesheet, appellant was accused for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 343, 217, 218, 330, 120B and 34, IPC. An application for discharge u/s. 227 of Cr.PC was rejected by the Trial Court. Whether the findings of the trial Court on the ground to proceed against the appellant is based on suppositions and suspicions, having no foundational support from the materials produced by the prosecution.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 52 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1062
i) Whether the Working President could have convened the election meeting for 08.09.2002 as according to the Objectors, it was only the Secretary or in the alternative the President who could have convened the meeting under the bye laws; ii) Whether the 7 Objectors were entitled to a notice for the meeting of 08.09.2002 in view of their disqualification u/s. 15 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860; iii) Whether lack of notice to the said 7 Objectors would vitiate the entire election meeting of 08.09.2002; iv) Whether invalid members had signed the requisition dated 20.08.2002 and had been e
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 519 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1031
Whether the alleged conduct of the appellant-accused in the nature of marital disputes attracts s.306 IPC read with s.107 IPC.
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 518 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 2434
Whether the suit for possession filed by the respondents was barred by limitation; whether the burden of proof of ownership would lie on the person challenging the ownership of the person in possession; whether the continued name of the Plaintiff/Respondent in the revenue records would confer title upon him; whether the plaint lacked/deliberately omitted necessary and material particulars to surpass the bar of limitation.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether claims of the petitioner in the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were barred by limitation.
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 535 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1225
Whether in the instant case, conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be quashed by the Supreme Court as the parties had settled the dispute among themselves by entering into a settlement agreement.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 534 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1054
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in custody for more than nine years.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 533 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1347
Parties entered into an agreement to sell for sale of a property. Defendant no.1 sent various notices to plaintiffs to execute the sale deed. However, plaintiffs did not execute the sale deed. Thereafter, defendants executed sale deeds in favour of another persons (defendant nos. 6, 7 and CN). The plaintiffs instituted suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. Whether plaintiffs were always ready and willing to get the sale deed executed and registered.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 532 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 840
Issue arose whether the execution of a discharge voucher towards the full and final settlement between the parties would operate as a bar to invoke arbitration; as regards the scope and standard of judicial scrutiny that an application u/s. 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 can be subjected to when a plea of “accord and satisfaction” is taken by the defendant; and as regards the effect of the decision of this Court in In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and the Stamp Act 1899 on the scope of powers of the referral cou
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 531 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 970
The issue pertains to the selection and appointment to the post of City Manager under the Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar. The said post is governed by the Bihar City Manager Cadre (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2014, which were framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 530 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 942
Long-standing separation between the parties, multiple prolonged litigations pending adjudication, several failed attempts at reconciliation. Issue was as regards interim maintenance however, in view of irretrievable break down of marriage, marriage between the appellant-wife and respondent-husband was dissolved in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Amount of permanent alimony to be paid by the respondent to the appellant.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 53 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 642
Reopening of a concluded assessment-reassessment u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 following issuance of notice u/s. 148 of the Act, legally sustainable or bad in law.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 529 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 813
Ten persons were arrayed as accused and after investigation, a charge sheet was filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 IPC alleging indiscriminate shooting and/or conspiracy leading to death of two persons and injury of one person. The case was committed to the Court of Sessions against nine accused persons numbered as Sessions Trial No. 17/1995. Subsequently, the case against the proclaimed offender was committed and numbered as Sessions Trial No. 66/2004. During the pendency of trial in 2007, one of the Accused, the 2nd Respondent herein was elected as Member of Legislative Assembly. T
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 528 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 796
Matter pertains to the correctness of the Resolution passed by the State Government based upon the recommendations by the State Backward Commission that in the list of Extremely Backward Classes, the “Tanti-Tantwa” caste be merged in the Scheduled Castes list with the caste ‘Pan/Sawasi’ mentioned at Serial No. Entry 20 so that they could get benefits of the Scheduled Castes.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 527 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1398
Respondents had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against Appellants, claiming to be owners in possession of suit land on the basis of an alleged compromise entered into by them in an earlier litigation with the original owners of the property. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. The order of dismissal was set aside in first appeal filed by the Respondents and the order of first appellate court was confirmed by the High Court in regular second appeal vide the impugned order. Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the judgment of the first Appellate court v
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 526 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 745
Whether the exemption from payment of Market Fee, granted under the Industrial Policy, 2003, of the Punjab Government, can be said to include exemption from Rural Development Fee.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 525 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 730
Whether the facts of the case necessitated constitution of a High Powered Sale Committee, under Article 142 of the Constitution, to auction the immovable assets of the companies to satisfy the investors’ claims and liquidate all other statutory liabilities of the Companies.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 524 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1321
If there was any discrepancy in the pay scales of Sub-Deputy Inspectors of Schools/Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (SDI/ ABSA) and Deputy Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (DBSA) of the Basic Education Department, State of Uttar Pradesh vis-à-vis the Headmasters of Junior High Schools, as alleged. Whether the SDI/ ABSA and DBSA were entitled to the higher pay scale of 7500- 12000 with effect from 01.07.2001 or whether it was appropriately granted to them from 01.12.2008 onwards.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 523 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 781
Whether the High Court had shown undeserving leniency and sympathy to accused Nos.1 and 2 by sentencing them to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, even after finding that they committed the serious offence of bigamy punishable u/s. 494 IPC; and whether an enhancement of sentence is called for.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 522 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1155
In the chargesheet, appellant was accused for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 343, 217, 218, 330, 120B and 34, IPC. An application for discharge u/s. 227 of Cr.PC was rejected by the Trial Court. Whether the findings of the trial Court on the ground to proceed against the appellant is based on suppositions and suspicions, having no foundational support from the materials produced by the prosecution.
Supreme Court of India23 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 52 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1062
i) Whether the Working President could have convened the election meeting for 08.09.2002 as according to the Objectors, it was only the Secretary or in the alternative the President who could have convened the meeting under the bye laws; ii) Whether the 7 Objectors were entitled to a notice for the meeting of 08.09.2002 in view of their disqualification u/s. 15 of the Societies Registration Act, 1860; iii) Whether lack of notice to the said 7 Objectors would vitiate the entire election meeting of 08.09.2002; iv) Whether invalid members had signed the requisition dated 20.08.2002 and had been e
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 519 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1031
Whether the alleged conduct of the appellant-accused in the nature of marital disputes attracts s.306 IPC read with s.107 IPC.
Supreme Court of India10 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 518 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 2434
Whether the suit for possession filed by the respondents was barred by limitation; whether the burden of proof of ownership would lie on the person challenging the ownership of the person in possession; whether the continued name of the Plaintiff/Respondent in the revenue records would confer title upon him; whether the plaint lacked/deliberately omitted necessary and material particulars to surpass the bar of limitation.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis