⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,501–1,520 · Page 76 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 611 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 916
Appellants-meritorious reserved candidates, who had passed from the Government Schools and on their own merit were entitled to be selected against the Unreserved Government School (UR-GS) quota were denied the seats against the open seats in the GS quota, on account of erroneous application of the methodology in applying the horizontal and vertical reservation. They were deprived admission in the Academic Session 2023-24 for MBBS Course against the UR-GS category. High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,501–1,520 · Page 76 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 611 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 916
Appellants-meritorious reserved candidates, who had passed from the Government Schools and on their own merit were entitled to be selected against the Unreserved Government School (UR-GS) quota were denied the seats against the open seats in the GS quota, on account of erroneous application of the methodology in applying the horizontal and vertical reservation. They were deprived admission in the Academic Session 2023-24 for MBBS Course against the UR-GS category. High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants.
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 610 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 451
Matter pertains to the grant of custody of the minor child to the father, the only natural guardian.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 608 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 472
Applicability of the Rule of Stepping up of pay of a Government employee on the basis of the pay of his junior.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 607 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 540
Whether the 9-judge bench judgment in Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/s Steel Authority of India & Anr. Etc 2024 INSC 554 be given prospective effect?
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 605 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 401
In violation of the undertaking dtd. 21.11.2023 given to this Court, the proposed contemnors held a press conference on 22.11.2023 making casual public statements regarding the efficacy of particular medicines manufactured by them and making derogatory statements in respect of other systems of treatment; and also continued to issue misleading advertisements. Conduct of the proposed contemnors, if was in wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court and contumacious.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 604 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 633
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 603 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 391
Issue arose whether the victim was a bona fide passenger of the train in question on the date of incident, and was entitled to compensation.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 602 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 322
In order to partly discharge the loan amount, a cheque was issued by the respondent-accused for a sum of Rs.19,00,000/-. However, the cheque was returned with the endorsement ‘Account Closed’. Whether a discrepancy apropos the rate of interest, whether it be 1.8%, 2.4% or 3% per month was sufficient to disbelieve the claim of the appellant-chitfund company.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 601 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 332
The Single Judge of the High Court observed that the appellant had intentionally filed a false affidavit and therefore a direction was issued to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court to file a complaint against him. The question that falls for consideration is whether the contents of the affidavit filed before the High Court, constitutes an offence under Section 193 IPC, as defined in Section 191 IPC.
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 600 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 935
Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force.
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 6 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 40
Conviction and sentence of the appellants, inter alia, for offence u/s.364-A, Penal Code, 1860, if justified.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 599 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 501
Respondents had filed a suit for specific performance in September 1993 inter alia seeking execution of sale deed on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 17.12.1989. As per the said agreement, the sale deed was to be executed and registered within one month, i.e. up to 16.01.1990. The agreement to sell incorporated a clause that the said agreement was valid for five years. The said suit for specific performance was dismissed with costs by the Trial Court. The first appellate court set aside the order of Trial Court and decreed the suit in favour of the Respondents. In second appeal, the Hig
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 598 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 287
High Court, if justified in reducing the percentage of disability suffered by the pillion rider who met with an accident from 25% as fixed by the tribunal, to 20% while determining the compensation payable to him.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 594 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 949
Whether gratuitous observations passed by a Judge of a High Court regarding previous orders of the Supreme Court, undermine the authority of the Supreme Court and should therefore be expunged?
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 593 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 291
The issue arising in the present appeal relates to enforcement of an arbitral award expressed in foreign currency. In this context, two questions arise for consideration. First, what is the correct and appropriate date to determine the foreign exchange rate for converting the award amount expressed in foreign currency to Indian rupees. Second, what would be the date of such conversion, when the award debtor deposits some amount before the court during the pendency of proceedings challenging the award.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 592 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 154
Order passed by the Single Judge of the High Court quashing the removal order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and issuing directions to reconsider the employee’s case for promotion, which was upheld by the Division Bench, if justified.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 591 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 377
The Accountant General, State of Bihar, raised an objection dated 28.01.2003, regarding the promotion accorded to the appellant on 10.03.1991 with a further remark that the promotion given to the appellant on 10.03.1991 would become ineffective after 01.01.1996 in view of the Government Resolution dated 08.02.1999 and, thus, the pay scale of the appellant would have to be revised and reduced to match that of the lower post, i.e., the Marketing Officer from the post of Senior Selection Grade, Marketing Officer-cum-Assistant District Supply Officer (ADSO).
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 590 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 345
As per the FIR (Exhibit-79) there were two eyewitnesses to the incident, PW-12-Police Constable and PW-11-the first informant who was deceased’s cousin brother. PW-12 claiming to be an eyewitness to the incident had reported at the police station with the crime weapons however, he did not lodge any complaint of the incident. FIR was registered on the basis of the oral statement of PW-11. Testimony of the aforesaid witnesses, if was trustworthy and reliable. In view of inconsistencies and contradictions in the evidences, whether the conviction of the accused-appellants under Section 302 read wi
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 59 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 704
Matter pertains to criteria issued for the identification of private ‘forest’ land in the State of Goa.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 589 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 189
Where the case is of an ordinary breach of contract and the explanation offered by the person concerned raises a bona fide dispute, whether blacklisting/debarment can resorted to as a penalty.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 610 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 451
Matter pertains to the grant of custody of the minor child to the father, the only natural guardian.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 608 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 472
Applicability of the Rule of Stepping up of pay of a Government employee on the basis of the pay of his junior.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 607 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 540
Whether the 9-judge bench judgment in Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/s Steel Authority of India & Anr. Etc 2024 INSC 554 be given prospective effect?
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 605 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 401
In violation of the undertaking dtd. 21.11.2023 given to this Court, the proposed contemnors held a press conference on 22.11.2023 making casual public statements regarding the efficacy of particular medicines manufactured by them and making derogatory statements in respect of other systems of treatment; and also continued to issue misleading advertisements. Conduct of the proposed contemnors, if was in wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court and contumacious.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 604 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 633
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 603 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 391
Issue arose whether the victim was a bona fide passenger of the train in question on the date of incident, and was entitled to compensation.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 602 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 322
In order to partly discharge the loan amount, a cheque was issued by the respondent-accused for a sum of Rs.19,00,000/-. However, the cheque was returned with the endorsement ‘Account Closed’. Whether a discrepancy apropos the rate of interest, whether it be 1.8%, 2.4% or 3% per month was sufficient to disbelieve the claim of the appellant-chitfund company.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 601 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 332
The Single Judge of the High Court observed that the appellant had intentionally filed a false affidavit and therefore a direction was issued to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court to file a complaint against him. The question that falls for consideration is whether the contents of the affidavit filed before the High Court, constitutes an offence under Section 193 IPC, as defined in Section 191 IPC.
Supreme Court of India12 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 600 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 935
Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force.
Supreme Court of India3 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 6 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 40
Conviction and sentence of the appellants, inter alia, for offence u/s.364-A, Penal Code, 1860, if justified.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 599 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 501
Respondents had filed a suit for specific performance in September 1993 inter alia seeking execution of sale deed on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 17.12.1989. As per the said agreement, the sale deed was to be executed and registered within one month, i.e. up to 16.01.1990. The agreement to sell incorporated a clause that the said agreement was valid for five years. The said suit for specific performance was dismissed with costs by the Trial Court. The first appellate court set aside the order of Trial Court and decreed the suit in favour of the Respondents. In second appeal, the Hig
Supreme Court of India9 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 598 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 287
High Court, if justified in reducing the percentage of disability suffered by the pillion rider who met with an accident from 25% as fixed by the tribunal, to 20% while determining the compensation payable to him.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 594 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 949
Whether gratuitous observations passed by a Judge of a High Court regarding previous orders of the Supreme Court, undermine the authority of the Supreme Court and should therefore be expunged?
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 593 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 291
The issue arising in the present appeal relates to enforcement of an arbitral award expressed in foreign currency. In this context, two questions arise for consideration. First, what is the correct and appropriate date to determine the foreign exchange rate for converting the award amount expressed in foreign currency to Indian rupees. Second, what would be the date of such conversion, when the award debtor deposits some amount before the court during the pendency of proceedings challenging the award.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 592 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 154
Order passed by the Single Judge of the High Court quashing the removal order passed by the Disciplinary Authority and issuing directions to reconsider the employee’s case for promotion, which was upheld by the Division Bench, if justified.
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 591 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 377
The Accountant General, State of Bihar, raised an objection dated 28.01.2003, regarding the promotion accorded to the appellant on 10.03.1991 with a further remark that the promotion given to the appellant on 10.03.1991 would become ineffective after 01.01.1996 in view of the Government Resolution dated 08.02.1999 and, thus, the pay scale of the appellant would have to be revised and reduced to match that of the lower post, i.e., the Marketing Officer from the post of Senior Selection Grade, Marketing Officer-cum-Assistant District Supply Officer (ADSO).
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 590 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 345
As per the FIR (Exhibit-79) there were two eyewitnesses to the incident, PW-12-Police Constable and PW-11-the first informant who was deceased’s cousin brother. PW-12 claiming to be an eyewitness to the incident had reported at the police station with the crime weapons however, he did not lodge any complaint of the incident. FIR was registered on the basis of the oral statement of PW-11. Testimony of the aforesaid witnesses, if was trustworthy and reliable. In view of inconsistencies and contradictions in the evidences, whether the conviction of the accused-appellants under Section 302 read wi
Supreme Court of India24 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 59 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 704
Matter pertains to criteria issued for the identification of private ‘forest’ land in the State of Goa.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 589 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 189
Where the case is of an ordinary breach of contract and the explanation offered by the person concerned raises a bona fide dispute, whether blacklisting/debarment can resorted to as a penalty.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis