⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,461–1,480 · Page 74 of 500
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 657 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 847
Appellants-landowners executed a Joint Venture Agreement and an irrevocable power of attorney in favour of the Respondent No.2-builder for the development of the land and construction of flats. Respondent No.2 entered into sale agreements with the complainants-respondents for the units in question. Complaints filed by the respondents against the appellants and Respondent No.2 inter alia for declaration that they were guilty of deficiency in service and were jointly and severally liable to complete the construction as per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties and put the complaina
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,461–1,480 · Page 74 of 500
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 657 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 847
Appellants-landowners executed a Joint Venture Agreement and an irrevocable power of attorney in favour of the Respondent No.2-builder for the development of the land and construction of flats. Respondent No.2 entered into sale agreements with the complainants-respondents for the units in question. Complaints filed by the respondents against the appellants and Respondent No.2 inter alia for declaration that they were guilty of deficiency in service and were jointly and severally liable to complete the construction as per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties and put the complaina
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 656 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 810
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court which quashed the appointment of the primary school teachers with B.Ed qualification.
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 655 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 37
Whether the prosecution could prove the charges against the appellant under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the appellant was a part of the unlawful assembly and if he actually took part in the crime or not.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 654 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1409
Issue arose as to whether the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in allowing extension of time for filing written statement after a considerable delay of 17 years.
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 653 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 805
The appellant’s father had applied for allotment of a plot under the Respondent No.1/New Okhla Industrial and Development Authority (NOIDA) in the year 2006. The father of the appellant had passed away on 08.11.2007. After an open lottery held on 01.10.2009, the father of the appellant was allotted a plot on 26.10.2009. However, NOIDA on 21.09.2011 cancelled the allotment on the ground that it was made in favour of a dead person on the day such draw of lots was held.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 652 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 16
Whether as a mere dealer of M/s Hindustan Motors, the appellant could be considered owner of the vehicle and as such liable, jointly and severally with M/s Hindustan Motors, to pay the compensation as directed by the Tribunal/High Court; whether clauses 3 (b) and 4 of the Dealership Agreement absolved M/s Hindustan Motors of its liability to pay compensation as an owner; whether M/s Hindustan Motors, even without preferring an appeal against the award of the Tribunal, could question its liability under the award by relying on the provisions of Order 41, Rule 33 of the CPC.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 651 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 1
Issue arose as to whether the execution court had jurisdiction to deal with the application for rescission of contract and extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; and if execution court had the jurisdiction, whether those applications ought to have been decided as one in the suit on original side, if yes, then, whether, in the facts of the case, on that ground alone, the impugned order warrants interference in exercise of jurisdiction Art 136 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 650 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 166
Scope of Sections 33, 34, 37, 39 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957; whether the agreement of sale dated 29.06.1999, with a recital on delivery of possession to the appellant, conforms to the definition of conveyance under Section 2(d) read with Article 20(1) of the Schedule of the Act or not; whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case, the penalty determined by the trial Court on the instrument instead of sending the instrument to the District Registrar for determination and collection of penalty as may be applicable is legal; whether, the said order of trial court as confirmed by t
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 648 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 788
Matter pertains to the issue that if the amendment to s.80DD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be given retrospective effect.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 647 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 885
Can the executive instructions in form of a resolution of the Full Court (High Court) by prescribing minimum marks for interview, override statutory rules made under Article 234/309; whether the High Court’s decision frustrates the legitimate expectation of the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 646 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 820
Issue arose as regards to the presence of the estranged husband, if mandatory to process an application by the wife-foreign spouse of a citizen of India for overseas Citizen of India Card, u/s.7-A of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
Supreme Court of India3 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 645 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 992
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 644 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 727
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in second appeal wherein it created a new case for the party, framed the issues and decided them without following the procedure contemplated u/Ord. XLI.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 642 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 700
Matter pertains to the right of the accused to file a fresh application u/s.216 Cr.P.C. seeking his discharge after the charge is framed by the court, more particularly when his application seeking discharge u/s.227 Cr.P.C. has already been dismissed; and as regards the maintainability of the revision application u/s.397 Cr.P.C. against the order dismissing application seeking modification of charge framed which would be an interlocutory order.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 641 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 709
Issue arose as regards inter-se seniority of the incumbents appointed to the post of Junior Engineer on direct recruitment basis and those whose posts of Sectional Officer, Grade-I, were upgraded to Junior Engineer.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 640 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 1002
Whether the respondent-defendant by way of the agreement agreed to create equitable mortgage by depositing the title deeds for the loan obtained by him from the appellant-plaintiff; whether there was redemption of the mortgage; whether the Single Judge rightly
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 639 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 739
The complaint, which set in motion the Criminal Law, was at the instance of Respondent No.2-complainant, who filed the same against the former in-laws of his elder daughter, for not returning the ornaments (gold) which he had given at the time of her marriage with their son. The sum and substance of the present dispute lie in the father’s right over the gifts, i.e.,‘stridhan’ given by him to his daughter at the time of marriage.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 955
When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023) for a new case in which his arrest is not yet shown, and which are claimed to contain incriminating material against the maker, would be admissible under Section 50, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 636 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 753
Respondent no.1 was released on bail by the High Court for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 635 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 650
Matter as regards, the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee-DSGMC, challenging the order passed by the High Court, whereby the NDMC was directed to reimburse the pay and perquisites including the pension and other benefits accruing to the staff of the school and then to recover the same from DSGMC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 656 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 810
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court which quashed the appointment of the primary school teachers with B.Ed qualification.
Supreme Court of India4 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 655 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 37
Whether the prosecution could prove the charges against the appellant under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the appellant was a part of the unlawful assembly and if he actually took part in the crime or not.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 654 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1409
Issue arose as to whether the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in allowing extension of time for filing written statement after a considerable delay of 17 years.
Supreme Court of India27 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 653 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 805
The appellant’s father had applied for allotment of a plot under the Respondent No.1/New Okhla Industrial and Development Authority (NOIDA) in the year 2006. The father of the appellant had passed away on 08.11.2007. After an open lottery held on 01.10.2009, the father of the appellant was allotted a plot on 26.10.2009. However, NOIDA on 21.09.2011 cancelled the allotment on the ground that it was made in favour of a dead person on the day such draw of lots was held.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 652 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 16
Whether as a mere dealer of M/s Hindustan Motors, the appellant could be considered owner of the vehicle and as such liable, jointly and severally with M/s Hindustan Motors, to pay the compensation as directed by the Tribunal/High Court; whether clauses 3 (b) and 4 of the Dealership Agreement absolved M/s Hindustan Motors of its liability to pay compensation as an owner; whether M/s Hindustan Motors, even without preferring an appeal against the award of the Tribunal, could question its liability under the award by relying on the provisions of Order 41, Rule 33 of the CPC.
Supreme Court of India3 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 651 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 1
Issue arose as to whether the execution court had jurisdiction to deal with the application for rescission of contract and extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; and if execution court had the jurisdiction, whether those applications ought to have been decided as one in the suit on original side, if yes, then, whether, in the facts of the case, on that ground alone, the impugned order warrants interference in exercise of jurisdiction Art 136 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India2 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 650 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 166
Scope of Sections 33, 34, 37, 39 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957; whether the agreement of sale dated 29.06.1999, with a recital on delivery of possession to the appellant, conforms to the definition of conveyance under Section 2(d) read with Article 20(1) of the Schedule of the Act or not; whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case, the penalty determined by the trial Court on the instrument instead of sending the instrument to the District Registrar for determination and collection of penalty as may be applicable is legal; whether, the said order of trial court as confirmed by t
Supreme Court of India20 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 648 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 788
Matter pertains to the issue that if the amendment to s.80DD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be given retrospective effect.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 647 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 885
Can the executive instructions in form of a resolution of the Full Court (High Court) by prescribing minimum marks for interview, override statutory rules made under Article 234/309; whether the High Court’s decision frustrates the legitimate expectation of the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India22 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 646 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 820
Issue arose as regards to the presence of the estranged husband, if mandatory to process an application by the wife-foreign spouse of a citizen of India for overseas Citizen of India Card, u/s.7-A of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
Supreme Court of India3 Jul 2024Full text
2024 INSC 645 · [2024] 7 S.C.R. 992
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 644 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 727
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court in second appeal wherein it created a new case for the party, framed the issues and decided them without following the procedure contemplated u/Ord. XLI.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 642 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 700
Matter pertains to the right of the accused to file a fresh application u/s.216 Cr.P.C. seeking his discharge after the charge is framed by the court, more particularly when his application seeking discharge u/s.227 Cr.P.C. has already been dismissed; and as regards the maintainability of the revision application u/s.397 Cr.P.C. against the order dismissing application seeking modification of charge framed which would be an interlocutory order.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 641 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 709
Issue arose as regards inter-se seniority of the incumbents appointed to the post of Junior Engineer on direct recruitment basis and those whose posts of Sectional Officer, Grade-I, were upgraded to Junior Engineer.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 640 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 1002
Whether the respondent-defendant by way of the agreement agreed to create equitable mortgage by depositing the title deeds for the loan obtained by him from the appellant-plaintiff; whether there was redemption of the mortgage; whether the Single Judge rightly
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 639 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 739
The complaint, which set in motion the Criminal Law, was at the instance of Respondent No.2-complainant, who filed the same against the former in-laws of his elder daughter, for not returning the ornaments (gold) which he had given at the time of her marriage with their son. The sum and substance of the present dispute lie in the father’s right over the gifts, i.e.,‘stridhan’ given by him to his daughter at the time of marriage.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 637 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 955
When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023) for a new case in which his arrest is not yet shown, and which are claimed to contain incriminating material against the maker, would be admissible under Section 50, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 636 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 753
Respondent no.1 was released on bail by the High Court for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 635 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 650
Matter as regards, the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee-DSGMC, challenging the order passed by the High Court, whereby the NDMC was directed to reimburse the pay and perquisites including the pension and other benefits accruing to the staff of the school and then to recover the same from DSGMC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis