⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,441–1,460 · Page 73 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 682 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 374
National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi disposed of the OA preferred by the Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch, respondent No. 1 herein, by directing the Pune Municipal Corporation to close the Garbage Processing Plant (GPP) operated by Noble Exchange Environment Solution Pune LLP, at Baner, Pune and to shift the same to an alternate location in terms of the guidelines issued by the Central Pollution Control Board.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,441–1,460 · Page 73 of 500
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 682 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 374
National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi disposed of the OA preferred by the Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch, respondent No. 1 herein, by directing the Pune Municipal Corporation to close the Garbage Processing Plant (GPP) operated by Noble Exchange Environment Solution Pune LLP, at Baner, Pune and to shift the same to an alternate location in terms of the guidelines issued by the Central Pollution Control Board.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 681 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 361
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled for protection under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, 1872 as his statement was recorded earlier at the pre-summoning stage as a witness for the complainant/respondent bank.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 677 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 733
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, upholding the order passed by the Single Judge and the conclusions arrived at, without furnishing any reasons therefor.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 675 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 218
Matter pertains to the appointment of the appellant to the post of Teacher Grade-III for TSP Area.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 674 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 194
Whether the Court under Article 32 can issue a writ to the Union Government to cancel existing licences and halt the issuance of new licences for the export of arms and military equipments to Israel.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 673 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 135
Miscellaneous application is filed by the appellant seeking direction to reinstate him into service as civil judge with all the consequential benefits in view of the order dated 20.04.2022 passed by the Supreme Court in C.A.No. 3082 of 2022.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 672 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 186
Legality of the appointment of Judge Advocate who was admittedly junior to the respondent.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 671 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 235
NCLT and NCLAT, if justified in dismissing the company petition by the appellant seeking rectification of the Register of Members of respondent No.1-Company by entering their names therein u/ss. 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013, and to initiate action against respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, for oppression and mismanagement, and criminal proceedings u/ss. 447 and 448 of the 2013 Act, for committing fraud.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 670 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 199
Whether the application of the petitioner for the appointment of an arbitrator deserves to be allowed. Whether the requirement of prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, as stipulated u/s. 11 of the Act, 1996, is satisfied. Whether the respondent no. 2 is a party to the arbitration agreement or not.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 669 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 257
Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of an accused while he is already in judicial custody in connection with his involvement in a different case.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 668 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 110
Matter pertains to seeking quashing of the summons issued to the appellants by the Enforcement Directorate, seeking their personal appearance in New Delhi with the documents sought for, pertaining to the FIR registered in respect of alleged illegal excavation and theft of Coal, against the accused.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 667 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 97
Whether the possession as offered by Agra Development Authority on 04.12.2014 should be taken as a valid offer of possession even if there was no completion certificate and whether the firefighting clearance certificate was available with the ADA or not. Absence of these documents, if vitiated the offer of possession made by the ADA.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 666 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 86
Matter pertains to investigation as regards the suspicious death of the wife of senior judicial officer.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 665 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 796
The appellants have been convicted u/ss.498A, 304B and 306 r/w.s.34 of the IPC. The Trial Court had convicted sister-in-law (appellant no.1), husband (appellant no.2) and mother-in-law of the deceased and sentenced them to suffer life imprisonment, 3 years R.I and 10 years R.I for offences u/ss.304B, 498A and 306 of IPC respectively, along with fine and other default stipulations. Both the conviction and the sentence of the present appellants have been upheld in appeal and the High Court.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 664 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 64
High Court, if justified in disturbing the custody of the child, aged one year and five months at the time of passing the order, by handing over the custody of the child to her father and paternal side relatives from the custody of her maternal side relatives.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 663 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 75
The appellant issued a notification dated 08.06.2017 repatriating employees who were on deputation, including the present respondents, to their parent cadres in TSRTC, i.e., to the zones in which they were initially appointed. The respondents challenged the notification. In writ appeals, taking note of the guidelines for allocation formulated by both Corporations (APSRTC and TSRTC), the High Court passed an interim order dated 18.04.2018 suspending the order of the Single judge of the High Court and directing the respondents to report in their parent zones under the TSRTC, where they were init
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 662 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 54
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision Application against the rejection of the discharge application moved by the appellant-Company.
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 661 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 782
Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In the instant appeal, they are seeking permission of the Court for compounding the offence.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 660 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 150
Writ petition filed by two seniormost District and Sessions Judges in the State of Himachal Pradesh aggrieved with the non-consideration of their names by the High Court Collegium for elevation as Judges of the High Court and recommendation of names of two officers junior to them for elevation, in ignorance of the directions of reconsideration given by the Collegium of the Supreme Court. Whether the present writ petition is maintainable; whether elevation for judgeship in the High Court has to be considered collectively by the High Court Collegium or whether the Chief Justice acting individual
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 659 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 1263
(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in accepting the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; (ii) Whether the appellant was justified in alleging that the subject property was under-valued; (iii) Whether it was incumbent for the Liquidator to constitute a Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee; (iv) Whether Liquidator had violated Regulation 33 of the IBBI Regulations, 2016; (v) What is the import of the order of attachment issued by the Income Tax Authorities in respect of the auctioned pr
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 681 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 361
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled for protection under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, 1872 as his statement was recorded earlier at the pre-summoning stage as a witness for the complainant/respondent bank.
Supreme Court of India21 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 677 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 733
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, upholding the order passed by the Single Judge and the conclusions arrived at, without furnishing any reasons therefor.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 675 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 218
Matter pertains to the appointment of the appellant to the post of Teacher Grade-III for TSP Area.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 674 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 194
Whether the Court under Article 32 can issue a writ to the Union Government to cancel existing licences and halt the issuance of new licences for the export of arms and military equipments to Israel.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 673 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 135
Miscellaneous application is filed by the appellant seeking direction to reinstate him into service as civil judge with all the consequential benefits in view of the order dated 20.04.2022 passed by the Supreme Court in C.A.No. 3082 of 2022.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 672 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 186
Legality of the appointment of Judge Advocate who was admittedly junior to the respondent.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 671 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 235
NCLT and NCLAT, if justified in dismissing the company petition by the appellant seeking rectification of the Register of Members of respondent No.1-Company by entering their names therein u/ss. 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013, and to initiate action against respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, for oppression and mismanagement, and criminal proceedings u/ss. 447 and 448 of the 2013 Act, for committing fraud.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 670 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 199
Whether the application of the petitioner for the appointment of an arbitrator deserves to be allowed. Whether the requirement of prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, as stipulated u/s. 11 of the Act, 1996, is satisfied. Whether the respondent no. 2 is a party to the arbitration agreement or not.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 669 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 257
Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of an accused while he is already in judicial custody in connection with his involvement in a different case.
Supreme Court of India9 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 668 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 110
Matter pertains to seeking quashing of the summons issued to the appellants by the Enforcement Directorate, seeking their personal appearance in New Delhi with the documents sought for, pertaining to the FIR registered in respect of alleged illegal excavation and theft of Coal, against the accused.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 667 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 97
Whether the possession as offered by Agra Development Authority on 04.12.2014 should be taken as a valid offer of possession even if there was no completion certificate and whether the firefighting clearance certificate was available with the ADA or not. Absence of these documents, if vitiated the offer of possession made by the ADA.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 666 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 86
Matter pertains to investigation as regards the suspicious death of the wife of senior judicial officer.
Supreme Court of India29 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 665 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 796
The appellants have been convicted u/ss.498A, 304B and 306 r/w.s.34 of the IPC. The Trial Court had convicted sister-in-law (appellant no.1), husband (appellant no.2) and mother-in-law of the deceased and sentenced them to suffer life imprisonment, 3 years R.I and 10 years R.I for offences u/ss.304B, 498A and 306 of IPC respectively, along with fine and other default stipulations. Both the conviction and the sentence of the present appellants have been upheld in appeal and the High Court.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 664 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 64
High Court, if justified in disturbing the custody of the child, aged one year and five months at the time of passing the order, by handing over the custody of the child to her father and paternal side relatives from the custody of her maternal side relatives.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 663 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 75
The appellant issued a notification dated 08.06.2017 repatriating employees who were on deputation, including the present respondents, to their parent cadres in TSRTC, i.e., to the zones in which they were initially appointed. The respondents challenged the notification. In writ appeals, taking note of the guidelines for allocation formulated by both Corporations (APSRTC and TSRTC), the High Court passed an interim order dated 18.04.2018 suspending the order of the Single judge of the High Court and directing the respondents to report in their parent zones under the TSRTC, where they were init
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 662 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 54
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision Application against the rejection of the discharge application moved by the appellant-Company.
Supreme Court of India30 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 661 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 782
Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In the instant appeal, they are seeking permission of the Court for compounding the offence.
Supreme Court of India6 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 660 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 150
Writ petition filed by two seniormost District and Sessions Judges in the State of Himachal Pradesh aggrieved with the non-consideration of their names by the High Court Collegium for elevation as Judges of the High Court and recommendation of names of two officers junior to them for elevation, in ignorance of the directions of reconsideration given by the Collegium of the Supreme Court. Whether the present writ petition is maintainable; whether elevation for judgeship in the High Court has to be considered collectively by the High Court Collegium or whether the Chief Justice acting individual
Supreme Court of India28 Aug 2024Full text
2024 INSC 659 · [2024] 8 S.C.R. 1263
(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in accepting the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; (ii) Whether the appellant was justified in alleging that the subject property was under-valued; (iii) Whether it was incumbent for the Liquidator to constitute a Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee; (iv) Whether Liquidator had violated Regulation 33 of the IBBI Regulations, 2016; (v) What is the import of the order of attachment issued by the Income Tax Authorities in respect of the auctioned pr
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis