⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,401–1,420 · Page 71 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 74 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1151
High Court exercising suo motu contempt jurisdiction against the appellant for repeatedly disobeying the orders of the court, and for casting aspersions and threatening the Judges hearing the matters, and thereafter, holding him guilty of criminal contempt and sentencing him, if calls for interference
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 739 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 393
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,401–1,420 · Page 71 of 500
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 74 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1151
High Court exercising suo motu contempt jurisdiction against the appellant for repeatedly disobeying the orders of the court, and for casting aspersions and threatening the Judges hearing the matters, and thereafter, holding him guilty of criminal contempt and sentencing him, if calls for interference
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 739 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 393
Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 737 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 62
FIR was filed against the appellants under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition under Section 482, CrPC for quashing of the said FIR and the chargesheet against the appellants and holding that a prima facie case of cruelty was made out against them under Section 498A, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 736 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 98
Issue arose as to whether the criteria on the basis of which selection was made could be made the legal basis for selection and appointment of Laboratory Attendants.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 735 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 108
Issue arose as regards sustainablility of the findings of the High Court holding the appellants guilty of commission of offences u/ss. 302/34 and 364/34 IPC; as also the approach of the High Court, if in line with the settled law for reversing an acquittal into conviction.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 734 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 724
Appellants-convicts are members of the police force and the allegation against them is misuse and abuse of their powers, in resorting to custodial torture of victim-S and tampering with evidence.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 733 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 18
Issue arose whether all aspirants whose names find place in the revised select list, pursuant to the course correction process, would secure appointment against the notified 1423 posts of Primary Teachers, irrespective of whether they were litigating for appointment.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 732 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 45
Respondent sought refund of the entire maintenance amount which was paid to the appellant (wife of respondent).
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 730 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 881
Whether the appellants are liable to pay stamp duty and penalty on the agreements to sell executed prior to the sale deed executed in their favour.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 73 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1090
Scope and extent of the contempt jurisdiction exercised by a High Court under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 727 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 616
Issue arose for consideration that as to whether the accused can be convicted for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC or in the facts and circumstance of the case, the conviction needs to be altered to a lesser offence.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 725 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 677
When the case falls in the category where the respondent-tenant has failed to comply with the order passed by the Supreme Court directing payment of rent.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 723 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 609
Evidence provided by the prosecution, if sufficient to secure a conviction of the appellant for the murder of the victim.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 721 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 625
Issue arose, if the court can convict one accused and acquit the other when there is similar or identical evidence pitted against two accused persons.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 720 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 37
The appellant was convicted for offences punishable u/ss. 450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s.34 of IPC and s.5(g)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) awarding death penalty u/ss. 376A and 302 IPC and life imprisonment u/s. 376D of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years u/s. 450 of the IPC.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 72 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1134
In a case wherein the dispute was commercial in nature having no element of criminality, whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing summons for trial u/ss.406, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and the High Court in dismissing the application filed by the appellant for quashing said summons and the complaint case.
Supreme Court of India20 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 719 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 644
Whether the appellants-children of the original tenant had also became tenants upon the death of their father, by virtue of s.2(h) of the old Act-West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; and whether the 1997 Act would cover such tenants who were protected under the 1956 Act.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 718 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 315
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation of statutory timelines and the requirement of independent review which includes application of mind, are necessary aspects of procedure; whether the appellant’s involvement were actually independent of the ones in which A-6 and other members were arrayed as accused; and whether the statutory exemption u/s.22 A of the UAPA applies to the appellant who claims to be unaware of the
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 717 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 54
Issue arose, if the High Court was justified in convicting and sentencing the husband u/ss. 498A and 306 IPC for subjecting the victim-wife to cruelty and forcing her to commit suicide.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 716 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 154
What is the scope of Section 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO); what is the underlying distinction between sub-section(s) (1), (2) and (3) respectively of the POCSO; whether, mere viewing, possessing or storing of any child pornographic material is punishable under the POCSO; what is the true scope of Section 67B of the IT Act; what is the scope of Section 30 of the POCSO; what are the foundational facts necessary for invoking the statutory presumption of culpable mental state in respect of Section 15 of the POCSO; whether, the statutory presumption contai
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 737 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 62
FIR was filed against the appellants under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition under Section 482, CrPC for quashing of the said FIR and the chargesheet against the appellants and holding that a prima facie case of cruelty was made out against them under Section 498A, Penal Code, 1860.
Supreme Court of India11 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 736 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 98
Issue arose as to whether the criteria on the basis of which selection was made could be made the legal basis for selection and appointment of Laboratory Attendants.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 735 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 108
Issue arose as regards sustainablility of the findings of the High Court holding the appellants guilty of commission of offences u/ss. 302/34 and 364/34 IPC; as also the approach of the High Court, if in line with the settled law for reversing an acquittal into conviction.
Supreme Court of India25 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 734 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 724
Appellants-convicts are members of the police force and the allegation against them is misuse and abuse of their powers, in resorting to custodial torture of victim-S and tampering with evidence.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 733 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 18
Issue arose whether all aspirants whose names find place in the revised select list, pursuant to the course correction process, would secure appointment against the notified 1423 posts of Primary Teachers, irrespective of whether they were litigating for appointment.
Supreme Court of India10 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 732 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 45
Respondent sought refund of the entire maintenance amount which was paid to the appellant (wife of respondent).
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 730 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 881
Whether the appellants are liable to pay stamp duty and penalty on the agreements to sell executed prior to the sale deed executed in their favour.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 73 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1090
Scope and extent of the contempt jurisdiction exercised by a High Court under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 727 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 616
Issue arose for consideration that as to whether the accused can be convicted for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC or in the facts and circumstance of the case, the conviction needs to be altered to a lesser offence.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 725 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 677
When the case falls in the category where the respondent-tenant has failed to comply with the order passed by the Supreme Court directing payment of rent.
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 723 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 609
Evidence provided by the prosecution, if sufficient to secure a conviction of the appellant for the murder of the victim.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 721 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 625
Issue arose, if the court can convict one accused and acquit the other when there is similar or identical evidence pitted against two accused persons.
Supreme Court of India12 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 720 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 37
The appellant was convicted for offences punishable u/ss. 450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s.34 of IPC and s.5(g)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) awarding death penalty u/ss. 376A and 302 IPC and life imprisonment u/s. 376D of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years u/s. 450 of the IPC.
Supreme Court of India30 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 72 · [2024] 1 S.C.R. 1134
In a case wherein the dispute was commercial in nature having no element of criminality, whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing summons for trial u/ss.406, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and the High Court in dismissing the application filed by the appellant for quashing said summons and the complaint case.
Supreme Court of India20 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 719 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 644
Whether the appellants-children of the original tenant had also became tenants upon the death of their father, by virtue of s.2(h) of the old Act-West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; and whether the 1997 Act would cover such tenants who were protected under the 1956 Act.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 718 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 315
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation of statutory timelines and the requirement of independent review which includes application of mind, are necessary aspects of procedure; whether the appellant’s involvement were actually independent of the ones in which A-6 and other members were arrayed as accused; and whether the statutory exemption u/s.22 A of the UAPA applies to the appellant who claims to be unaware of the
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 717 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 54
Issue arose, if the High Court was justified in convicting and sentencing the husband u/ss. 498A and 306 IPC for subjecting the victim-wife to cruelty and forcing her to commit suicide.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 716 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 154
What is the scope of Section 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO); what is the underlying distinction between sub-section(s) (1), (2) and (3) respectively of the POCSO; whether, mere viewing, possessing or storing of any child pornographic material is punishable under the POCSO; what is the true scope of Section 67B of the IT Act; what is the scope of Section 30 of the POCSO; what are the foundational facts necessary for invoking the statutory presumption of culpable mental state in respect of Section 15 of the POCSO; whether, the statutory presumption contai
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis