⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
121–140 · Page 7 of 9
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
[2014] 11 S.C.R. 268
law which has been read into our Constitution by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 sec 248." H STATE OF M.P. v. RAM MANOHAR PANDEY 277 [SUDHANSU JYOTI
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
121–140 · Page 7 of 9
Supreme Court of India9 Dec 2014Full text
[2014] 11 S.C.R. 268
law which has been read into our Constitution by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 sec 248." H STATE OF M.P. v. RAM MANOHAR PANDEY 277 [SUDHANSU JYOTI
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India
2014 INSC 874 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 744
sufficient to shut the doors of the court on any petitioner. [Para 32][182-F-H] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248 ; Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B. Munshi (1969) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 690 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 704
the activist magnitude of Article 14 as evolved in E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Maneka Gandhi case, (1978) 1 sec 248 and observed that it must follow as a necessary corollary from the principle ofB
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 676 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1151
SCR 353; E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) 4 SCC 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India B (1978) 1SGC248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 ; Col. A.S. Iyer& Ors. v. Bala Subramanyan & Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 526 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 569
law which has been read into our Constitution by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 May 2014Full text
2014 INSC 367 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 573
the State not to incarcerate except under law which is fair, just and reasonable in its procedural essence. Maneka Gandhi's D case (1978) 1 SCC 248, as 'developed further in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India25 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 338 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 835
State of Orissa vs. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei and Ors (1967) 2 SCR 625; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Sahara India (Firm), Lucknow vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 218 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 486
procedures so established must be fair, not fanciful, nor formal nor flimsy, as laid down in Maneka Gandhi case. So, it is axiomatic that our Constitutional jurisprudence mandates the State not to deprive a person of his personal
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 172 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 327
SCC 1; V. Rajeshwari (Smt) vs. T. C. Saravanabava (2004) 1 SCC 551: 2003 (6) Suppl. SCR 927; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union H 342 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 146 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 406
Judged in the light shed by Maneka Gandhi and Bachan Singh, it is impossible to uphold Section 303 as valid. Section 303 excludes judicial discretion. The scales of justice are removed from the hands of the Judge
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2014) 2 SCC 1
act. Parallelly, he underscored the impact of Article 21 on Section 154 of the Code by referring to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248, wherein this Court has applied Article 21 to several provisions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 791 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 489
Dead) through LRs and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 5 SCC 553 in which Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India has been quoted where it has been laid down that the "audi alteram partem
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 748 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 713
Kutty Haji vs. State of Kera/a 2002 (2) Crimes 143; Re: Subbaratnam and Ors. AIR 1949 Madras 663; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Chairman Board of Mining Examination 0and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2013Full text
2013 INSC 673 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 430
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. (1974) 4 sec 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) D 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2013Full text
2013 INSC 615 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 125
contained in Section 438 must be saved, not jettisoned. No doubt can linger B after the decision in Maneka Gandhi [1978]2SCR621 that in order to meet the challenge of Article 21 of the . Constitution, the procedure established
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 448 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 469
SCC 489; E.P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1974 (2) SCR 348 = (1974) 4 SCC 3; and Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 =(1978) 1 SCC 248 - held inapplicable
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 275 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 1004
Suppl. SCR 385; A.K. Praipak vs. Union of India A (1969) 2 sec 262: 1970 (1) SCR 457; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of /ndia.(1978) 1 sec 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union of India vs. Tutsi Ram
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 249 · [2013] 6 S.C.R. 676
without unreasonable delay. [Para 47] [754-C-F] Jagmohan Singh VS. State of U.P. (1973) 1 sec 20; Maneka Gandhi VS. Union of India (1978) 1 sec
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 246 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 831
SCALE 709; Mohd. Khalid vs. State of West Bengal (2002) 7 SCC 334: 2002 (2) Suppl. SCR 31; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Abdul Rehman Antulay and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2013Full text
2013 INSC 179 · [2013] 15 S.C.R. 1
decades, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in A.K. Gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India that the procedure contemplated by Article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness. The
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2014 INSC 874 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 744
sufficient to shut the doors of the court on any petitioner. [Para 32][182-F-H] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 : (1978) 1 SCC 248 ; Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B. Munshi (1969) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India26 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 690 · [2014] 10 S.C.R. 704
the activist magnitude of Article 14 as evolved in E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Maneka Gandhi case, (1978) 1 sec 248 and observed that it must follow as a necessary corollary from the principle ofB
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India24 Sep 2014Full text
2014 INSC 676 · [2014] 14 S.C.R. 1151
SCR 353; E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) 4 SCC 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348 ; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India B (1978) 1SGC248: 1978 (2) SCR 621 ; Col. A.S. Iyer& Ors. v. Bala Subramanyan & Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2014Full text
2014 INSC 526 · [2014] 7 S.C.R. 569
law which has been read into our Constitution by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 May 2014Full text
2014 INSC 367 · [2014] 12 S.C.R. 573
the State not to incarcerate except under law which is fair, just and reasonable in its procedural essence. Maneka Gandhi's D case (1978) 1 SCC 248, as 'developed further in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India25 Apr 2014Full text
2014 INSC 338 · [2014] 5 S.C.R. 835
State of Orissa vs. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei and Ors (1967) 2 SCR 625; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Sahara India (Firm), Lucknow vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 218 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 486
procedures so established must be fair, not fanciful, nor formal nor flimsy, as laid down in Maneka Gandhi case. So, it is axiomatic that our Constitutional jurisprudence mandates the State not to deprive a person of his personal
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India6 Mar 2014Full text
2014 INSC 172 · [2014] 4 S.C.R. 327
SCC 1; V. Rajeshwari (Smt) vs. T. C. Saravanabava (2004) 1 SCC 551: 2003 (6) Suppl. SCR 927; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India & Anr. (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union H 342 SUPREME COURT
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2014Full text
2014 INSC 146 · [2014] 3 S.C.R. 406
Judged in the light shed by Maneka Gandhi and Bachan Singh, it is impossible to uphold Section 303 as valid. Section 303 excludes judicial discretion. The scales of justice are removed from the hands of the Judge
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull text
(2014) 2 SCC 1
act. Parallelly, he underscored the impact of Article 21 on Section 154 of the Code by referring to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248, wherein this Court has applied Article 21 to several provisions
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India28 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 791 · [2013] 12 S.C.R. 489
Dead) through LRs and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 5 SCC 553 in which Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India has been quoted where it has been laid down that the "audi alteram partem
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2013Full text
2013 INSC 748 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 713
Kutty Haji vs. State of Kera/a 2002 (2) Crimes 143; Re: Subbaratnam and Ors. AIR 1949 Madras 663; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Chairman Board of Mining Examination 0and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India4 Oct 2013Full text
2013 INSC 673 · [2013] 14 S.C.R. 430
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. (1974) 4 sec 3: 1974 (2) SCR 348; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. (1978) D 1 SCC 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Ajay Hasia and Ors
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India13 Sep 2013Full text
2013 INSC 615 · [2013] 10 S.C.R. 125
contained in Section 438 must be saved, not jettisoned. No doubt can linger B after the decision in Maneka Gandhi [1978]2SCR621 that in order to meet the challenge of Article 21 of the . Constitution, the procedure established
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India8 Jul 2013Full text
2013 INSC 448 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 469
SCC 489; E.P. Royappa Vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1974 (2) SCR 348 = (1974) 4 SCC 3; and Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India 1978 (2) SCR 621 =(1978) 1 SCC 248 - held inapplicable
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India23 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 275 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 1004
Suppl. SCR 385; A.K. Praipak vs. Union of India A (1969) 2 sec 262: 1970 (1) SCR 457; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of /ndia.(1978) 1 sec 248: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Union of India vs. Tutsi Ram
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India12 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 249 · [2013] 6 S.C.R. 676
without unreasonable delay. [Para 47] [754-C-F] Jagmohan Singh VS. State of U.P. (1973) 1 sec 20; Maneka Gandhi VS. Union of India (1978) 1 sec
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India11 Apr 2013Full text
2013 INSC 246 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 831
SCALE 709; Mohd. Khalid vs. State of West Bengal (2002) 7 SCC 334: 2002 (2) Suppl. SCR 31; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr. AIR 1978 SC 597: 1978 (2) SCR 621; Abdul Rehman Antulay and
Matched in judgment text
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2013Full text
2013 INSC 179 · [2013] 15 S.C.R. 1
decades, the Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in A.K. Gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India that the procedure contemplated by Article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness. The
Matched in judgment text
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis