⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,321–1,340 · Page 67 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 833 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 445
Issue arose as to whether the press release of 01.10.2009 announcing the decision of the Union Cabinet about approval of certain modifications envisaged in the then existing mega power policy, is covered within the meaning of the expression “law as defined in Clause 1.1 of the Request For Proposal-RFP/Power Purchase Agreement-PPA and if so did the extant legal regime as on 01.10.2009 undergo a change from the said date.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,321–1,340 · Page 67 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 833 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 445
Issue arose as to whether the press release of 01.10.2009 announcing the decision of the Union Cabinet about approval of certain modifications envisaged in the then existing mega power policy, is covered within the meaning of the expression “law as defined in Clause 1.1 of the Request For Proposal-RFP/Power Purchase Agreement-PPA and if so did the extant legal regime as on 01.10.2009 undergo a change from the said date.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 832 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 428
Issue arose as to whether the services of such of the candidates who were selected in the select list and had produced the Course on computer concepts-CCC certificate at the time of the interview could have been terminated.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 831 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 365
Issue arose as to correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 to be unconstitutional on the ground that it violates the principle of secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 830 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 2240
Whether there is any arbitrary variation in marks obtained by candidates in the language examination for the Rajasthan Civil Judge Cadre 2024 which may affect the integrity of the overall results of the examination.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 83 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 91
Entitlement of the respondent to refund of duty drawback and interest for delayed payment thereof.
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 829 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 340
Issue arose as to whether s.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 has application to a demand raised by appellants-distributor on the first respondent for recovery of sums payable under the Electricity Act, 1910 and, whether demand, if it be treated as one under the 1910 Act, is sustainable having regard to long delay.
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 828 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 325
Candidates with Diploma in Computer Applications-DCA/higher qualifications, if could be considered for selection to the post of Lower Division Clerk in the Kerala Water Authority, when the qualification prescribed was Certificate in Data Entry and Office Automation from the named Institute or from a similar/equivalent government approved institution.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 827 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1503
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting stay on the execution of the award conditional on the respondent furnishing a bank guarantee.
Supreme Court of India25 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 825 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1475
The NCDRC held appellant-doctor liable for negligence in medical treatment and liable for payment of compensation. Whether the NCDRC was justified in holding doctor negligent and awarding compensation.
Supreme Court of India25 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 823 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1876
Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the conviction of the respondents-accused under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 821 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 981
Respondent No.1 filed a statement of claim before the Tribunal impugning his termination vide order dated 25.07.2017 – Tribunal passed ex-parte award dated 05.02.2019, the termination of the Respondent No.1 was held to be bad – Respondent No.1 was directed to be reinstated with back-wages and other service benefits – The aforesaid ex-parte Award was challenged by all the parties impleaded by the Respondent No.1 before the Tribunal, namely, the officers in person, without joining the company-employer as a party – The writ petition filed by the writ petitioners/appellants before the High Court,
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 820 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1855
Issue as regards the shares of the parties in the disputed land. High Court whether justified in upholding the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in revision and holding that the appellants had 1/12 share jointly in the plots comprised in Khata Nos. 98 and 99 excluding plot Nos. 35, 37, 111 and 112 which exclusively belonged to the respondents. Consolidation authorities whether erred in alloting 1/2 share to the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 82 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 111
The capital punishment awarded to the petitioner-convict for the conviction u/s. 376 AB, IPC was not confirmed and it was commuted to imprisonment for life, which, going by the provisions thereunder, means imprisonment for the remainder of the convict’s natural life. The only question is whether the commutation of capital punishment to sentence of life imprisonment requires further interference.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 819 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 930
Matter pertains to the challenge to the order passed by the High Court suspending the sentence of imprisonment and the fine imposed on the accused who was convicted for embezzlement of Rs. 46 lakhs.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 817 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 952
Issue arose whether the registered gift deed was duly acted upon and accepted and is a valid document which continue to exist despite its revocation as the donor had not reserved the right to revoke the same.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 816 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 939
Issue arose that in case of conflict of the dates of birth between the two documents, School Leaving Certificate and the Aadhar Card, which of the two is to be taken as authoritative; and whether the High Court’s reduction of the compensation awarded by the MACT was justified and in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 813 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1769
Access to free and timely legal aid for prison inmates.
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 812 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1931
The issues which arise for adjudication in this reference pertain to the scope of the power of the State Legislatures under Entry 8 and the meaning of the phrase “intoxicating liquor”. The question is whether “intoxicating liquor” in Entry 8 only includes potable alcohol, such as alcoholic beverages or also includes alcohol which is used in the production of other products; whether Entry 52 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution overrides Entry 8 of List II; whether the expression ‘intoxicating liquors’ in Entry 8 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution includes a
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 811 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1802
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in invoking its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 in the presence of a prescribed procedure for withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and settlement of claims between parties; and without prejudice to the above, whether the NCLAT adequately addressed the objections raised by the appellant, while exercising its discretionary power under Ru
Supreme Court of India22 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 810 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1462
Whether specific and clear acknowledgement of debt by the Corporate Debtor in its balance sheet is necessary while considering limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2024 INSC 832 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 428
Issue arose as to whether the services of such of the candidates who were selected in the select list and had produced the Course on computer concepts-CCC certificate at the time of the interview could have been terminated.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 831 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 365
Issue arose as to correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 to be unconstitutional on the ground that it violates the principle of secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 830 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 2240
Whether there is any arbitrary variation in marks obtained by candidates in the language examination for the Rajasthan Civil Judge Cadre 2024 which may affect the integrity of the overall results of the examination.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 83 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 91
Entitlement of the respondent to refund of duty drawback and interest for delayed payment thereof.
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 829 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 340
Issue arose as to whether s.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 has application to a demand raised by appellants-distributor on the first respondent for recovery of sums payable under the Electricity Act, 1910 and, whether demand, if it be treated as one under the 1910 Act, is sustainable having regard to long delay.
Supreme Court of India4 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 828 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 325
Candidates with Diploma in Computer Applications-DCA/higher qualifications, if could be considered for selection to the post of Lower Division Clerk in the Kerala Water Authority, when the qualification prescribed was Certificate in Data Entry and Office Automation from the named Institute or from a similar/equivalent government approved institution.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 827 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1503
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting stay on the execution of the award conditional on the respondent furnishing a bank guarantee.
Supreme Court of India25 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 825 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1475
The NCDRC held appellant-doctor liable for negligence in medical treatment and liable for payment of compensation. Whether the NCDRC was justified in holding doctor negligent and awarding compensation.
Supreme Court of India25 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 823 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1876
Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the conviction of the respondents-accused under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC.
Supreme Court of India23 Sep 2024Full text
2024 INSC 821 · [2024] 9 S.C.R. 981
Respondent No.1 filed a statement of claim before the Tribunal impugning his termination vide order dated 25.07.2017 – Tribunal passed ex-parte award dated 05.02.2019, the termination of the Respondent No.1 was held to be bad – Respondent No.1 was directed to be reinstated with back-wages and other service benefits – The aforesaid ex-parte Award was challenged by all the parties impleaded by the Respondent No.1 before the Tribunal, namely, the officers in person, without joining the company-employer as a party – The writ petition filed by the writ petitioners/appellants before the High Court,
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 820 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1855
Issue as regards the shares of the parties in the disputed land. High Court whether justified in upholding the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in revision and holding that the appellants had 1/12 share jointly in the plots comprised in Khata Nos. 98 and 99 excluding plot Nos. 35, 37, 111 and 112 which exclusively belonged to the respondents. Consolidation authorities whether erred in alloting 1/2 share to the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants.
Supreme Court of India5 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 82 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 111
The capital punishment awarded to the petitioner-convict for the conviction u/s. 376 AB, IPC was not confirmed and it was commuted to imprisonment for life, which, going by the provisions thereunder, means imprisonment for the remainder of the convict’s natural life. The only question is whether the commutation of capital punishment to sentence of life imprisonment requires further interference.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 819 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 930
Matter pertains to the challenge to the order passed by the High Court suspending the sentence of imprisonment and the fine imposed on the accused who was convicted for embezzlement of Rs. 46 lakhs.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 817 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 952
Issue arose whether the registered gift deed was duly acted upon and accepted and is a valid document which continue to exist despite its revocation as the donor had not reserved the right to revoke the same.
Supreme Court of India24 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 816 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 939
Issue arose that in case of conflict of the dates of birth between the two documents, School Leaving Certificate and the Aadhar Card, which of the two is to be taken as authoritative; and whether the High Court’s reduction of the compensation awarded by the MACT was justified and in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 813 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1769
Access to free and timely legal aid for prison inmates.
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 812 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1931
The issues which arise for adjudication in this reference pertain to the scope of the power of the State Legislatures under Entry 8 and the meaning of the phrase “intoxicating liquor”. The question is whether “intoxicating liquor” in Entry 8 only includes potable alcohol, such as alcoholic beverages or also includes alcohol which is used in the production of other products; whether Entry 52 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution overrides Entry 8 of List II; whether the expression ‘intoxicating liquors’ in Entry 8 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution includes a
Supreme Court of India23 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 811 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1802
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in invoking its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 in the presence of a prescribed procedure for withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and settlement of claims between parties; and without prejudice to the above, whether the NCLAT adequately addressed the objections raised by the appellant, while exercising its discretionary power under Ru
Supreme Court of India22 Oct 2024Full text
2024 INSC 810 · [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1462
Whether specific and clear acknowledgement of debt by the Corporate Debtor in its balance sheet is necessary while considering limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis