⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,281–1,300 · Page 65 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 878 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1440
Whether it was the appellant-accused who assaulted the victim-deceased due to which the death of the deceased has occurred; whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC, deserves to be altered to one under Part I of Section 304 IPC.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 877 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 822
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
1,281–1,300 · Page 65 of 500
Supreme Court of India20 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 878 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1440
Whether it was the appellant-accused who assaulted the victim-deceased due to which the death of the deceased has occurred; whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC, deserves to be altered to one under Part I of Section 304 IPC.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 877 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 822
Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 876 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1312
Respondent (husband) filed a petition for divorce under Section 10(i) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 before Family Court. Appellant (wife) filed an application for maintenance in the same proceeding and the Family Court by an Order granted a monthly interim maintenance of Rs.1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy-Five Thousand only) to her. This order was challenged before the High Court by the Respondent. The High Court modified the order of the Family Court by reducing the monthly interim maintenance to Rs. 80,00,000/- (Eighty thousand only). Before the Supreme Court, the Appellant sought enha
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 875 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1257
Respondents/Plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession of the suit property against the Appellants/Defendants, i.e. State of Haryana and Public Works Department. The Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the Respondents and held that defendants had failed to prove that they had become owners by adverse possession. Aggrieved by the Trial Court's decision, the defendants filed an appeal before the District Judge, which allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove their ownership to the land. In second appeal, the Hon’ble High Court s
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 874 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 799
Issue arose as regards whether the Bank could have initiated disciplinary proceedings against the employee after his superannuation.
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 873 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1634
Whether recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory? Whether the inquiry proceedings conducted against the appellant were in gross violation of Rule 7(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, and is non-est in law.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 871 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1628
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the Award passed by Labour Court wherein Labour Court allowed the reinstatement of the employee with full back wages, continuity of service, and all other consequential benefits that the employee could have received in the absence of the order of removal from service.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 870 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2369
Whether the High Court erred in granting relief to the employee by setting aside his termination for abandonment of service despite the employee's failure to disclose his subsequent employment and the procedural compliance by the employer under Regulation 39(4)(iii) of the LIC Staff Regulations, 1960.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 87 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1
The courts below, if justified in convicting the four accused u/ss. 302/34 IPC and imposing sentence for life for committing murder of the victim.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 869 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 792
Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences can be quashed on the ground of settlement.
Supreme Court of India14 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 868 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2329
Whether the deed executed, which gave rise to the present property dispute, was a gift deed or a deed of settlement; Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of fact while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 867 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 713
Whether the appellant was entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 866 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 722
Whether the executive should be permitted to take away the shelter of a family or families as a measure for infliction of penalty on a person who is accused in a crime. In other words, whether properties of persons, who are accused of committing certain crimes or for that matter even convicted for commission of criminal offences, can be demolished without following the due process of law.
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 865 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2375
Whether the Appellants are entitled to specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990. Whether the Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990 executed by one Sushila Devi was valid and enforceable; whether such execution could be proved by a General Power of Attorney holder; whether the plea of pardanashin status, illiteracy and old age affected the validity of the sale; whether the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act; whether plaintiffs were in possession and whether consideration had been paid; whether plaintiffs were always ready and willing to perfor
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 864 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 786
Issue arose as to whether the conviction of the appellant u/ss.324 and 452 IPC is sustainable; and whether a restaurant can be said to be a place used for dwelling or for worship or for the custody of property for convicting a person u/s.452 IPC for committing offence of house tresspass.
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 863 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2348
Supreme Court laid down guidelines that State authorities must adhere to while removing illegal encroachments in relation to road widening projects.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 862 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1042
(1) Whether Judges of the High Court appointed from the District Judiciary can be denied subscription to the General Provident Fund (GPF) on the basis of their previous service under the New Pension Scheme (NPS); and (2) Whether all Judges of the High Court, irrespective of their source of recruitment, constitute a homogenous class for determining service conditions, including post-retirement benefits.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 861 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 667
Issue arose, whether the judgment of this Court suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record which warrants the exercise of the review jurisdiction; whether the suit instituted by the petitioner was barred by limitation; and whether the suit for specific performance must be decreed.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 86 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 123
Exemption of pre-emption as granted vide notification dated 08.10.1985, if available to the urban immovable property on which right of pre-emption was sought to be exercised by the tenants.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 858 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 970
Writ Petition sought directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities (PWDs). Directions were issued by this Court to the States and Union Territories however, in view of slow progress in compliance, the Centre for Disability Studies, NALSAR University of Law was appointed to assess the situation on the ground and recommend steps to ensure compliance with accessibility standards for PWDs. Submissions filed by the petitioner; report submitted by NALSAR-CDS.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail.
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 876 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1312
Respondent (husband) filed a petition for divorce under Section 10(i) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 before Family Court. Appellant (wife) filed an application for maintenance in the same proceeding and the Family Court by an Order granted a monthly interim maintenance of Rs.1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy-Five Thousand only) to her. This order was challenged before the High Court by the Respondent. The High Court modified the order of the Family Court by reducing the monthly interim maintenance to Rs. 80,00,000/- (Eighty thousand only). Before the Supreme Court, the Appellant sought enha
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 875 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1257
Respondents/Plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession of the suit property against the Appellants/Defendants, i.e. State of Haryana and Public Works Department. The Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the Respondents and held that defendants had failed to prove that they had become owners by adverse possession. Aggrieved by the Trial Court's decision, the defendants filed an appeal before the District Judge, which allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove their ownership to the land. In second appeal, the Hon’ble High Court s
Supreme Court of India19 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 874 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 799
Issue arose as regards whether the Bank could have initiated disciplinary proceedings against the employee after his superannuation.
Supreme Court of India18 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 873 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1634
Whether recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory? Whether the inquiry proceedings conducted against the appellant were in gross violation of Rule 7(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, and is non-est in law.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 871 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1628
Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the Award passed by Labour Court wherein Labour Court allowed the reinstatement of the employee with full back wages, continuity of service, and all other consequential benefits that the employee could have received in the absence of the order of removal from service.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 870 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2369
Whether the High Court erred in granting relief to the employee by setting aside his termination for abandonment of service despite the employee's failure to disclose his subsequent employment and the procedural compliance by the employer under Regulation 39(4)(iii) of the LIC Staff Regulations, 1960.
Supreme Court of India6 Jan 2024Full text
2024 INSC 87 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1
The courts below, if justified in convicting the four accused u/ss. 302/34 IPC and imposing sentence for life for committing murder of the victim.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 869 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 792
Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences can be quashed on the ground of settlement.
Supreme Court of India14 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 868 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2329
Whether the deed executed, which gave rise to the present property dispute, was a gift deed or a deed of settlement; Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of fact while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 867 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 713
Whether the appellant was entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds.
Supreme Court of India13 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 866 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 722
Whether the executive should be permitted to take away the shelter of a family or families as a measure for infliction of penalty on a person who is accused in a crime. In other words, whether properties of persons, who are accused of committing certain crimes or for that matter even convicted for commission of criminal offences, can be demolished without following the due process of law.
Supreme Court of India12 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 865 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2375
Whether the Appellants are entitled to specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990. Whether the Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990 executed by one Sushila Devi was valid and enforceable; whether such execution could be proved by a General Power of Attorney holder; whether the plea of pardanashin status, illiteracy and old age affected the validity of the sale; whether the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act; whether plaintiffs were in possession and whether consideration had been paid; whether plaintiffs were always ready and willing to perfor
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 864 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 786
Issue arose as to whether the conviction of the appellant u/ss.324 and 452 IPC is sustainable; and whether a restaurant can be said to be a place used for dwelling or for worship or for the custody of property for convicting a person u/s.452 IPC for committing offence of house tresspass.
Supreme Court of India6 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 863 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 2348
Supreme Court laid down guidelines that State authorities must adhere to while removing illegal encroachments in relation to road widening projects.
Supreme Court of India5 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 862 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1042
(1) Whether Judges of the High Court appointed from the District Judiciary can be denied subscription to the General Provident Fund (GPF) on the basis of their previous service under the New Pension Scheme (NPS); and (2) Whether all Judges of the High Court, irrespective of their source of recruitment, constitute a homogenous class for determining service conditions, including post-retirement benefits.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 861 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 667
Issue arose, whether the judgment of this Court suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record which warrants the exercise of the review jurisdiction; whether the suit instituted by the petitioner was barred by limitation; and whether the suit for specific performance must be decreed.
Supreme Court of India6 Feb 2024Full text
2024 INSC 86 · [2024] 2 S.C.R. 123
Exemption of pre-emption as granted vide notification dated 08.10.1985, if available to the urban immovable property on which right of pre-emption was sought to be exercised by the tenants.
Supreme Court of India8 Nov 2024Full text
2024 INSC 858 · [2024] 11 S.C.R. 970
Writ Petition sought directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities (PWDs). Directions were issued by this Court to the States and Union Territories however, in view of slow progress in compliance, the Centre for Disability Studies, NALSAR University of Law was appointed to assess the situation on the ground and recommend steps to ensure compliance with accessibility standards for PWDs. Submissions filed by the petitioner; report submitted by NALSAR-CDS.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis